1. Easy (1.28 stars, 108 notes)
2. Hard (3.24 stars, 279 notes)
3. Insane (4.06 stars, 371 notes)
4. Normal (2.08 stars, 171 notes)
5. Pazuru~ (4.88 stars, 450 notes)

[ClickMyCircle] wrote:

I've expected not really good map here but finally I was surprised how good this is as a mapped by novice mapper

PAZURU~
00:09:218 (5,6,7) - make the shape of this triple a bit rounded
00:11:843 (3,2) - these two are too close, place 00:11:843 (3,2) somewhere else
00:24:593 (1) - sliders like this one look ugly, change this shape
01:11:843 (3,4,5,6) - patterns like this are more playable when they're symmetric
01:32:843 (1,2,3) - this triple is overmapped, place a slider there https://gyazo.com/0558547ce27e1e4e80384bf934d31d6d

INSANE
00:04:343 (3,4,5,6,1) - this pattern doesn't look good
00:24:405 (6,1) - these objects are too close, increase spacing
00:55:343 (1,2,3,4) - kinda strange pattern
01:24:593 (1,2,3,4) - make it symmetric

sers zgk wrote:

Easy
I think it is necessary to lower the slider sensitivity. DS should be around 1.0.
This map is very hard to play. Now that you pointed that out, it is quite fast for a 1* map

Normal
00:06:218 (4,1) I do not like overlapping. fixed
Your slider is too long. Please consider shortening.Fixed

You are still a beginner in Mapping, so I will not attack any more.
Good Luck.Thanks!

1. hitsound ny ga beres kali dan ga benar sesuai dgn instrumental ny

1. 2.25 ...? 1.75 is enough for me in mapping
2. 00:09:593 (1,2) - 00:11:093 (1,2) - ini ga beres bah. mendingan kek gini biar ada feeling sesuai dgn diff ini biar ada clickable ny http://puu.sh/xfKIS/b993b310fc.jpg
3. overlap seperti 00:17:843 (5,1) - 00:19:343 (3,1) - dll perlu dihindarikan sesuai dgn readability dan juga perlu ada suatu alasan mengapa di overlapkan
4. 00:24:218 (4) - ctrl+g biar ada flow + emphasize dri snare beat ny
5. 00:36:686 (2) - 00:37:437 (2) - 00:38:186 (2,6,2) - delete these notes, karena overmap dan ga ada sesuai dgn laguny
6. 01:09:218 (5,6) - note seperti ini ga diwajibkan kali karena ga ada hubungan dgn 2 1/2 note disini
7. 01:15:593 (1,2) - 01:17:093 (1,2) - ya ini lagi
8. 01:32:843 (3) - gampang amat mainnya ini. kasih 3 note aja dah biar enak mainnya dgn diff sperti ini

1. sv 2.15, rly? mendingan ku buatkan jadi 1.6 dah
2. 00:14:843 (3,4,5) - tau bahwa lu bisa buat 5 note stream disini kan?
3. 00:27:218 (4) - ctrl+g biar flow ny lebih enak dan emphasize ny ada hubungan ny
4. 00:54:593 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - ini mah kek pp diff sih. coba gini aja biar ada build up di bagian ini http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8901164

1. pls deh, ini kan ga gitu susah mainnya dengan diff sperti ini, tapi malah buat SVnya tinggi amat. 1.3 dah cukup lah
2. sejak lu masih baru dlm mapping, mendingan ku rekomendasikan ngemap pake DS saja biar aman
3. 00:00:593 - oi, slider speed ny hancur

1. sebenarnya ini dah bisa aja sampe 2* biar pas dgn spread balanced ny
2. 00:07:343 (1) - remove NC
3. 00:14:843 (3,1) - coba gini biar arah slidernya berubah sesuai dgn emphasize ny https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8901206
4. 00:15:593 - coba gini ritme ny http://puu.sh/xfLSW/28071a42de.jpg
5. 01:07:343 (1) - remove NC
6. 01:23:093 (3,1) - sperti ane bilang, overlap ini harus dihindarkan

1. really? 0.5x DS? pls deh. pake yg 1x DS dah. coba liat contoh map dari user lain yg sudah buat di Easy diff

lit120 wrote:

no kds. i don't wanna mention a lot of them, but this is for your improvement next time

[general]

1. hitsound ny ga beres kali dan ga benar sesuai dgn instrumental ny Fixed

[puzzle]

1. 2.25 ...? 1.75 is enough for me in mapping Fixed
2. 00:09:593 (1,2) - 00:11:093 (1,2) - ini ga beres bah. mendingan kek gini biar ada feeling sesuai dgn diff ini biar ada clickable ny http://puu.sh/xfKIS/b993b310fc.jpg Fixed
3. overlap seperti 00:17:843 (5,1) - 00:19:343 (3,1) - dll perlu dihindarikan sesuai dgn readability dan juga perlu ada suatu alasan mengapa di overlapkan Fixed
4. 00:24:218 (4) - ctrl+g biar ada flow + emphasize dri snare beat ny Fixed
5. 00:36:686 (2) - 00:37:437 (2) - 00:38:186 (2,6,2) - delete these notes, karena overmap dan ga ada sesuai dgn laguny Fixed
6. 01:09:218 (5,6) - note seperti ini ga diwajibkan kali karena ga ada hubungan dgn 2 1/2 note disini Fixed
7. 01:15:593 (1,2) - 01:17:093 (1,2) - ya ini lagi Fixed
8. 01:32:843 (3) - gampang amat mainnya ini. kasih 3 note aja dah biar enak mainnya dgn diff sperti ini Fixed

[insane]

1. sv 2.15, rly? mendingan ku buatkan jadi 1.6 dah Fixed
2. 00:14:843 (3,4,5) - tau bahwa lu bisa buat 5 note stream disini kan? jujur, nope
3. 00:27:218 (4) - ctrl+g biar flow ny lebih enak dan emphasize ny ada hubungan ny Fixed
4. 00:54:593 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - ini mah kek pp diff sih. coba gini aja biar ada build up di bagian ini http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8901164 Fixed(?)

[hard]

1. pls deh, ini kan ga gitu susah mainnya dengan diff sperti ini, tapi malah buat SVnya tinggi amat. 1.3 dah cukup lah Fixed
2. sejak lu masih baru dlm mapping, mendingan ku rekomendasikan ngemap pake DS saja biar aman Fixed
3. 00:00:593 - oi, slider speed ny hancur Efek ngantuk

[normal]

1. sebenarnya ini dah bisa aja sampe 2* biar pas dgn spread balanced ny fixed
2. 00:07:343 (1) - remove NC Fixed
3. 00:14:843 (3,1) - coba gini biar arah slidernya berubah sesuai dgn emphasize ny https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8901206 Remap dikit
4. 00:15:593 - coba gini ritme ny http://puu.sh/xfLSW/28071a42de.jpg Fixed
5. 01:07:343 (1) - remove NC Fixed
6. 01:23:093 (3,1) - sperti ane bilang, overlap ini harus dihindarkan Fixed

[easy]

1. really? 0.5x DS? pls deh. pake yg 1x DS dah. coba liat contoh map dari user lain yg sudah buat di Easy diff Fixed

coba lu liat di map lain dan pelajari teknik mereka. atau ga, nonton pishifat di youtube aja

Amryu wrote:

Coming from my modding queue

Easy Remapped and added proper blankets

- Don't reinvent slider shapes all the time. Create 1 or 2 slider shapes and copy paste them. It will look much better. Fixed
- You did a nice job on keeping distance snapping but it looks like you didn't use the distance snap tool. I recommend never turning it off in an easy diff unless you wanna break for 8 beats or more Fixed
- You can also make use of blankets for a nicer look like this:


Use the approach circles to see if the slider border lines up perfectly (or close to perfect)

00:03:593 (1,2,3,4,1) - This doesn't really look nice. Try to use more circles and more different slider shapes and don't go around in circles like that.
00:18:593 (4,5) - Try to not overlap sliders in Easy diffs unless you have a good reason to do so which is VERY rare
00:21:593 (1) - distance snapping is messed up
00:25:343 (2,1) - overlap, you could solve this by placing the 1 exactly below the 2 to stack them (make sure it's not a perfect stack!)
00:36:593 (5,6) - Make those sliders work together more, make them parallel or something

Overall you should work on making the map look less like randomly placed objects that were distance snapped and made to go around in circles. Be a bit more creative about this.

Normal Remapped and added proper blankets

00:03:218 (4,1) - blanket
00:04:343 (2,3) - ^
00:06:218 (4,1) - ^
00:09:218 (3,1) - ^
00:16:718 (2,3) - ^
00:16:718 (4,5) - ^
00:27:218 (5,1) - ^
00:28:718 (2,3) - ^
00:40:718 (3,4) - ^
00:57:218 (2,1) - ^ ?
00:04:343 (2,4) - stack the note on the slider head to make it look less like a random overlap
00:09:593 (1,2,3) - overlap. You can also blanket those sliders like so:


Those are simple 3 point sliders which i carefully aligned and rotated. You should practice doing that.

00:11:093 (1) - Don't use bezier sliders for round curves. If you use 3 points sliders will always be perfectly round and its super easy to create blankets.


00:12:593 (1,2,3,1) - You can arrange this nicer
00:17:093 (3,5) - overlap
00:23:093 (3,1) - overlap, stack the sliderends or something
00:24:218 (4,1) - blanket?
00:43:718 (8,1,2) - stack note on sliderend and blanket those sliders properly
00:44:093 (1,4) - place note on sliderend
00:50:093 (3,1) - overlap, this could look nice:


00:59:093 (3,1) - ugly overlap
01:00:593 (1,3) - ^
01:14:093 (4,1) - ^
01:23:093 (3,1) - ^
01:27:593 (1,1) - ^
01:13:718 (3,4,5) - nice but please try to make proper blankets

To be continued since I'm lazy rn

- Frontier - wrote:

q

[General]

1. Color 1 and Color 3 have the same color tone! (hue and sat are the same w) Fixed
2. Having all characters in the image background but there are only colors for Chino might seems a bit weird. I know you are using blue colors to represent Chino's colors. But why don't you try the others colors (from the others characters) for variety? why didn't i think of that
3. Tick out "Enable Countdown" in every diff because it doesn't shown in gameplay. Fixed
4. Tick out "Widescreen Support" in every diff but Pazuru~ diff because your map has no storyboard. Fixed

[Hitsound]

1. Try to use custom hitsounds, because each skins has different hitsounds on their own. So having custom hitsounds in your map will have actual hitsounds in your map. Fixed
2. Try to reduce your volume. (around 60-70% is fairly good) It's really pain in ass to play the map with 100% volume. Fixed

[Metadata]

1. Title: 未来パズル (Mirai Puzzle) Fixed
2. Artist: チノ (CV:水瀬いのり) (Chino (CV:Minase Inori)) [It should have a whitespace between "Chino" and "(CV:Minase Inori)"] Fixed
3. Kindly add "キャラクターソングアルバム チノ" and "Cup of Chino"in tags since they're an album name for this song. Fixed
4. If you don't mind, you could add "short version" or "cut version" (choose one) in tags, as the other mappers mostly did add in their maps. Fixed
5. There is no need for comma after every tags, or then it'll be something like this and could make the searching in error. The webpage will automatically separate the tags for you, so adding comma after every tag is no needed. Fixed
6. There is no need to add "Mirai Puzzle, chino, minase inori" in tags since there are already mentioned in artist and title Fixed
7. Metadata:
   1. http://www.gochiusa.com/contents/cd/index02630000.html
   2. https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/t/483564

[Easy] Fixed (?)

1. Having 2/1-beat gaps in every hitobjects makes the map boring. I know you try to make it easy my making like this, but variations in mapping is very important and are acceptable in Easy. Try to look at Easy diffs in the ranked maps (I suggested anime songs.) and try to apply with your diff.
2. 00:05:093 (2) - This note makes the flow quite unnaturally. (This is how the pattern goes.) I suggested you to flip this horizontally to make a better flow.

I'm lazy Hi lazy, I'm dad
GL~ nice song

lit120 wrote:

did u forget to provide 2 kudos there above?

1. hitsound delay > 5ms:
   normal-hitfinish.wav
   Ranking Criteria:
   Hitsounds must have an acceptable range of delay under 5ms. Every hitsound file should start in time, preferrably at 0ms. This is to ensure that every map doesn't sound mistimed, and therefore could provide acceptably synchronized rhythm feedback to players.
2. current ratio of the background image is strange. "try to fix this to 16:9" (1366x768 or 1920x1080)
   Ranking Criteria:
   Background images must not exceed a width of 1920 pixels and a height of 1200 pixels. Images with lower vertical or horizontal resolutions than that of the player's will be upscaled to fit the entire screen.
   < You can refer to this rule.
3. about difficulty settings:
   1. CS, AR, OD of Easy difficulty is so low. set these higher. (maybe CS3 AR3 OD3)
   2. OD setting of Insane diff and Pazuru diff is same now. I recommend lowering the od of Insane difficulty to 7.
4. current metadata is a bit wrong
   
   metadata1

   http://www.gochiusa.com/contents/cd/index02630000.html official website
   metadata2

   http://db2.nbcuni.co.jp/contents/hp0004/list.php?CNo=4&AgentProCon=26349 NBCUniversal Entertainment Japan
   metadata3

   https://inoriminase.com/ 水瀬いのり official website

   Artist: チノ（CV.水瀬いのり）
   Romanised Artist: Chino(CV.Minase Inori) or (CV.Inori Minase)
   Title: 未来パズル
   Romanised Title: Mirai Puzzle
   Source: ご注文はうさぎですか？？

   She calls herself in romanian as inori minase. (https://inoriminase.com/)
   However, other ranked beatmaps labeled her name minase inori.
   I do not know what those metadatas are based on.

1. 00:00:593 (1,2,3,4,5) - these notes are RANDOMLY PLACED. (it feels random.) 00:00:593 (1,3,5) - these 3 notes are a relatively strong sounds but 00:00:593 (1,2) - weak sounds have wider spacing than 00:00:780 (2,3) - stronger sounds. 00:00:968 (3,4,5) - again. try to arrange the distances between the notes differently depending on the strength of the sound. this is a really basic skill.
2. 00:02:093 (1) - similar to the above. try to make increase distance between 00:01:905 (9,1) - so You can express this powerful drum better.
3. 00:03:499 (16,1) - sudden huge distance after the stream like this is not good. You can use pattern like this, but think carefully about what problems we are having by using this pattern. (like slidermiss)
4. 00:05:468 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - this jumps are really uncreative like 00:00:593 (1,2,3,4,5) -
5. 00:08:093 (1) - you can make increase distance here cuz the sound of this place is pretty strong. 00:08:093 (1,2) - and there's NO STRUCTURE between these two notes so try to make structure.
   
   wtf is this horrible image

   
6. 00:12:593 (7) - put NC cuz this place is start of new part.
7. 00:13:343 (7) - ^similar with above
8. 00:14:093 (13) - nc and 00:14:843 (1) - remove nc. new combo is usually put in one downbeat. Listen to where the turning point of music is.
9. 00:27:593 (1,3) - no way! It's no wonder that if you put notes on the slider, it's hard to see. and this is so messy tbh, try to avoid overlap so you are one step closer to a good mapper.
   
   overlap

   <before
   <after (example)
10. 00:28:718 (5) - that CRAZY DISTANCE and it's not cool flow i guess. but solving this problem is straightforward!
    
    solution

    < ctrl+h and turn 30 degrees and blanket on 00:27:968 (2) - this slider
11. 00:29:280 (8,1,2) - I have a pretty good suggestion about flow of this place.
    
    JUST DO IT

    <don't do it if you don't like this
12. 00:30:593 (5) - make increase distance. this is a very important point and I will continue to mention it.
13. 00:31:343 (8,2) - probably overlapping causes more problems than you think, I guarantee it!
14. 00:29:280 (8) - remove nc and 00:29:468 (1) - nc 00:30:593 (6) - nc. Keep this pattern in mind.
15. 00:35:093 (9) - nc
16. 00:37:343 (5) - maybe nc, this place is pretty special. in many ways...
17. 00:38:843 (6) - nc 00:39:405 (1) - remove nc 00:39:592 (7) - nc
18. 00:40:343 (4) - nc 00:40:718 (1) - remove nc 00:41:093 (9) - nc 00:41:843 (5) - nc 00:42:218 (1) - remove nc 00:42:593 (7) - nc 00:43:343 (7) - nc 00:43:718 (1) - remove nc 00:44:093 (7) - nc 00:45:405 (1) - remove nc 00:45:593 (8) - nc 00:46:343 (5) - nc 00:46:718 (1) - remove nc 00:47:093 (10) - nc 00:47:843 (5) - nc yea
19. 00:58:718 (5) - eh... just copy 00:57:968 (2) - paste 00:58:718 - here, ctrl+hjg and make blanket so this will be nicer.
    
    example

    
20. 00:59:093 (6) - 01:02:093 (7) - nc
21. 01:06:218 (1) - remove nc 01:06:593 (6) - nc etc etc.
    
    My point is not limited to a single place.
    Reconsider this map as a whole. (I don't mean remap but if you can or want to do, just try! that will develop you a lot)

• 
  Compose

1. 00:00:593 (1,2) - 00:00:968 (3,4) - 00:01:155 (4,5) - similar as Pazuru diff! you can do better than before.
2. 00:01:343 (5,6,7,8) - There is a problem such as overlap, blanket and newcombo. follow the example below if you like that.
   
   ex

   
3. 00:05:093 (1) - This is the starting point for the new part and the intensity of the sound is relatively strong. You need to emphasize the expression of this place!
4. 00:09:593 (1,2,3) - / 00:11:093 (2,3,4,5) - You are expressing the same sounds in quite different ways like 00:09:968 (2) - / 00:11:468 (3,4) - and ds of 00:09:593 (1,2) - / 00:10:718 (1,2) - . This destroys the consistency of the beatmap. These two parts do not have to be exactly the same, but they should be at least similar.
5. 00:10:343 (3,1) - The distance between these two notes is too close. People may not recognize this as a "1/1" beat!
6. 00:12:218 (1,2,3) - Different distance of train pattern(?) cause confusion. you must modify the flow of this place. or at least make sure that all notes have the same distance. there are two recommendations :
   
   ex1, not even good tho

   
   ex2, much better way imo

   
7. 00:17:468 (2) - This will be better if you avoid overlap.
8. 00:35:655 (3) - / 00:36:405 (6,7,1) - you know now, this is actually an ambiguous placement.
9. 00:36:968 (4,5) - again, people may not recognize this as a "1/1" beat. require further increasing distance.
10. 00:40:811 - 00:40:905 - You are ignoring the sounds of this place. this is a very sad situation. . Remember the other triples you used. This is fatal to consistency.
11. 00:42:311 - 00:42:405 - You can fill something up here. don't be afraid!
12. 00:45:218 (5,3) - blanket
13. 00:53:843 (3,4) - Maybe you know what's wrong now. this is quite messy.
14. Places where you can develop : 00:56:843 (8) - 01:02:468 (2) - 01:04:718 (5) - 01:05:843 (3,4) - 01:11:093 (1,2) - 01:12:593 (1) - 01:16:343 (3,4) - 01:17:468 (2,3) - / Similar problems are being repeated on this map. Look for problems yourself!
    
    New combo
    
15. 00:01:343 (5) -
16. 00:10:718 (1) - remove
17. 00:11:093 (5) -
18. 00:12:218 (1) - remove maybe
19. 00:12:593 (3) -
20. 00:16:905 (6) - 00:17:280 (1) - remove
21. 00:25:905 (6) - 00:26:468 (1) - ^
22. 00:37:343 (5) -
23. 00:55:343 (5) - 00:55:530 (1) - remove
24. 00:56:093 (6) -
25. 00:56:843 (4) - nc maybe
26. 01:06:218 (4) - ^
27. 01:30:593 (6) -
28. 01:31:343 (7) - 01:31:718 (1) - remove
29. 01:32:093 (7) -

1. 00:08:843 (3,4,5,6) - that overlaps, looks really messy.
2. 00:03:968 (2,5) - There needs to be a increase distance between these two notes.
   
   1

   
3. 00:06:968 (2) - yeah
4. 00:10:155 (2) - 00:11:655 (2) - The present condition is also umm.... cool. but I want to suggest another way. 00:10:343 - this is where I'm paying attention. the sound is quite strong but is expressed weakly using sliderend. I recommend changing this slider into two notes or delete that slider and 00:09:593 (1) - give a reverse so this will emphasize this place in difficult or easy way. what is important here is the correct expression, not the intensity.
5. 00:13:155 (2,4) - e
6. 00:16:905 (1) - 00:18:593 (1) - 00:20:093 (1) - 00:24:593 (1) - 01:20:093 (1,2) - etcetcetc
   WHAT??? white dots in these sliders are quite strange. 2010 style confirmed

   wtf
   
   this is really not.... what happened seriously
7. 00:20:093 (1,2,3,4) - How about using this pattern? The current pattern is too messy, you know.
   
   image

   
8. 00:24:593 (1) - 00:25:905 (4) - yup
9. 00:48:405 (4,5) - move these notes to 00:48:311 - ... just triples are here, not that place.
10. 01:15:593 (1,2) - 01:17:093 (1,2) -
11. 01:32:093 (7) - nc
    
    overall rhythm selections of this map is pretty fine!
    the structures and placements are...
    but I saw the potential on this map.

1. 00:08:843 (5,6) - overlap should be avoided at easier difficulties. the overlap at the lower AR causes serious confusion for the "new players". really, You should avoid all overlaps.
2. 00:24:218 (4) - stack it up perfectly.
   
   you made this diff very well.
   just avoid overlap. it's important.

1. 00:09:593 (1) - 00:11:093 (3,4) - In easy difficulty(and maybe normal, hard, insane, extra or tragic love yeah), consistency is a very important element. These two places are similar or same. so you have to make two places similar. it's really simple
2. 00:57:593 - ~ in the kiai, didn't you think that this place lacked something compared to the rhythm of previous part? 00:03:593 - ~ 00:14:843 - JUST compare these two places. usually we need more notes or distance in the highlight(kiai) section.
   
   avoid overlap
   lol

1. 00:16:905 (6) - finish
2. 00:18:030 - whistle
3. 00:21:593 (1,1) - remove finishes (so noisy)
4. 00:25:905 - normal finish
5. 00:33:593 (1) - 00:34:343 (5) - 00:35:093 (9) - remove finishes (my ears hurt D:)
6. 00:39:592 (3) - normal finish
7. 00:39:592 (3) - normal finish (or just make consistency with 00:45:593 (3) - )
8. There are too many finishes in kiai. damn