1. 00:13:275 (5,6,7) - Some of the spacing are really confusing me like
   they are having different interval but same distance between. Intervals are very contradictory
   00:13:275 (5,6) - I recommend to keep distance away
2. 00:32:413 (1,2,3,4) - This is a very strange placement
   This is because all objects are at different distances.
   00:32:413 (1,2) - How about copying this and placing it in the location 00:32:586 (3,4) -
3. 00:43:448 (4) - Patternally I think this is a circle
   00:21:379 (4,5) - 00:26:896 (4,5) - 00:48:965 (4,5) - just like here
4. 00:55:862 (1) - I encourage you to turn the end of the slider down　Image
   00:56:206 (2) - I think that the player will be able to grasp the flow of the next slider
5. 01:01:034 (3) - Since the speed of the slider has changed, it is better to add NC
6. 01:03:793 (2,3) - 00:58:275 (2,3) - Why are the distances different?
7. 01:08:793 (3,4,1) - I think the image is more beautiful Image
   01:08:275 (1,3) - 01:08:879 (4,1) - The distance is different but it looks beautiful by making similar distances
8. 01:38:620 (1,2,3,4) - 00:32:413 (1,2,3,4) - Same
9. 02:15:000 (6,1) - Since the slider's direction of travel is the same, aim is likely to get confused
   02:15:000 (6) - Ctrl+G is better
10. 02:33:448 (2,3,4) - I will Add NC
11. 03:29:656 (1,2) - Given your mapping I thought it was blanket here
12. 03:35:519 (3) - 01:01:034 (3) - Same
13. 03:40:519 (9,10,1) - Why is the distance only 0.4 here?
    01:06:034 (9,10,1) - 01:50:172 (9,10,1) - 04:24:656 (9,10,1) - This is distance 0.6
14. 05:07:933 (2,3,4) - 02:33:448 (2,3,4) - Same
15. 05:28:277 - 05:28:363 - Please delete green line

Yasaija 714 wrote:

m5m!!

Daybreak

1. 00:13:275 (5,6,7) - Some of the spacing are really confusing me like
   they are having different interval but same distance between. Intervals are very contradictory - the 1/4 slider plays like a circle so it should be fine
   00:13:275 (5,6) - I recommend to keep distance away
2. 00:32:413 (1,2,3,4) - This is a very strange placement
   This is because all objects are at different distances.
   00:32:413 (1,2) - How about copying this and placing it in the location 00:32:586 (3,4) -
3. 00:43:448 (4) - Patternally I think this is a circle
   00:21:379 (4,5) - 00:26:896 (4,5) - 00:48:965 (4,5) - just like here
4. 00:55:862 (1) - I encourage you to turn the end of the slider down　Image
   00:56:206 (2) - I think that the player will be able to grasp the flow of the next slider
5. 01:01:034 (3) - Since the speed of the slider has changed, it is better to add NC - the change is so minor it doesn't really matter
6. 01:03:793 (2,3) - 00:58:275 (2,3) - Why are the distances different?
7. 01:08:793 (3,4,1) - I think the image is more beautiful Image
   01:08:275 (1,3) - 01:08:879 (4,1) - The distance is different but it looks beautiful by making similar distances
8. 01:38:620 (1,2,3,4) - 00:32:413 (1,2,3,4) - Same
9. 02:15:000 (6,1) - Since the slider's direction of travel is the same, aim is likely to get confused
   02:15:000 (6) - Ctrl+G is better
10. 02:33:448 (2,3,4) - I will Add NC
11. 03:29:656 (1,2) - Given your mapping I thought it was blanket here
12. 03:35:519 (3) - 01:01:034 (3) - Same
13. 03:40:519 (9,10,1) - Why is the distance only 0.4 here?
    01:06:034 (9,10,1) - 01:50:172 (9,10,1) - 04:24:656 (9,10,1) - This is distance 0.6
14. 05:07:933 (2,3,4) - 02:33:448 (2,3,4) - Same
15. 05:28:277 - 05:28:363 - Please delete green line - don't really need to, used for reference o/

Maybe Sendan Life will post tomorrow

Good luck!

Opsi wrote:

Here's the mod you asked for, as promised won't say much about aesthetics (I can see why based on how many blanket mods are here LOL), which seem p gud anyway

[Sliderbreak]

1. 00:22:586 (2,3) - Spacing is significantly higher than the rest of this section; using almost equal spacing to 00:21:551 (5,1) - emphasizes it too much and detracts from the strong snare imo
   
2. 00:41:120 (6,7,8,1) - Not a fan of how this flows; seems inconsistent with the smooth flow you continuously used before 00:33:103 (1) -; I'd suggest using flow similar to 00:29:827 (5,6,7,8,1) - even if it's a new section due to how the song basically repeats - it's not the uncomfortable, i'd say it flows fine
   
3. 00:48:793 (3,4,5,1) - I think this could be done better emphasis wise; 00:48:793 (3) - isn't nearly as emphasized as 00:48:448 (2,5) - despite still being the iconic violin, and 00:49:310 (1) - isn't emphasized nearly as drastically as previous instance such as 00:43:448 (4,5,1) - ; the wide angle may make up for the similar spacing but I also think it doesn't flow as harshly as you mapped it before as it actually somewhat promotes clockwise circular flow; personally I'd just lower the spacing before the snare for the latter problem - 3 is actually quite weak compared to 4,5 so i won't change those, but i do agree 1 could use more emphasis so i adjusted that
   
4. 00:52:413 (1,2,3,4) - The jagged flow from 1 seems a bit odd here and seems inconsistent with the motion to the next slider at 00:53:103 (4) - ; I also think that adding another circle 1/4 before 00:53:103 (4) - would give the measure more rhythmic consistency; personally I would also make 00:52:758 (3) - similar to 00:52:413 (1,4) - considering they're the same bass sound - adjusted this
   
5. 00:55:172 (1) - Aww yee let's go
   
6. 01:00:689 (1,2,3,4) - This (and other instances of this pattern) doesn't seem to exactly fit with the music as the strong wubs are on 1 and 3 only; I would suggest giving less priority to 2 and 4 by making them simply circles or using lower SV; personally I would do the latter as you did at 01:12:068 (2,1) - 01:56:206 (2,1) - etc since using circles at a lower spacing seems inconsistent in this section - they are on all notes i seperated them according to the emphasis you mention but the wub i follow is present on all of them
   
7. 01:02:413 (2,1) - Not that much of a fan of how this plays since flow is interrupted due to the sliders going in the same circular direction at different speeds, which is quite different from the motion that you used in 00:56:896 (2,1) - and before and feels more natural and fun to play, personally; I would suggest perhaps rotating 01:02:758 (1,2) - so that 01:02:758 (1) - blankets the sliderend of 01:02:068 (1) - or another equivalent that preserves flow - i tried to adjust this
   
8. 01:06:896 (1,2) - Don't really know why these are suddenly equal with the sv overlap pattern you established so far; I can understand why you did so for wubs such as 01:10:344 (1,2) - , but this seems unnecessarily inconsistent; same for the other instances of this (I'm assuming you have a good reason which I'd like to know, personally all I can think of is for variation from 01:08:620 (2) - but valuing consistency would be wiser imo) - the pitch of the wubs actually stays the same here this time, so i didn't vary the sv, it happens in all sections so i applied it consistently in that respect
   
9. 01:11:724 (1) - Really lacking in emphasis, I would rotate this as well so that the flow is harsher like most of this section; perhaps so that the red node is blanketed by 01:11:379 (1) - (which you could also move to blanket 01:11:034 (3) - kds pls hUE) - the sv increase does this for me since it changes quite drastically imo
   
10. 01:18:448 (6) - Maybe make this into a 1/4 slider for the offbeat violin; this measure feels a bit empty of 1/4 compared to the next ones
    
11. 01:21:379 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - nut
    
12. 01:25:517 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Emphasis and flow are spot on this measure wow
    
13. 01:40:344 (2,1,2) - This on the other hand is quite nasty honestly, too much jagged clockwise flow that feels quite awkward to play as a result along with not that much emphasis - adjusted
    
14. 01:42:068 (1) - You may hate me for this but this overlaps the sliderbody of 01:42:413 (2) - too much compared to the many other times this pattern occurs
    
15. 01:48:965 (1) - The spacing here seems to imply that it'll be a 1/4 gap rather than 1/2, along with the lack of 1/2 gaps between sliders this section, as well as 01:04:827 (1) - having a 1/4 gap, so yeah extend the slider (make it fancier or smth if size is an issue hurr durr) so it has a 1/4 gap - yep adjusted this
    
16. 02:00:172 (2,3) - Plays kind of weirdly due to the angle and the reduction in spacing; personally ctrl+g feels much better
    
17. 02:05:517 (2) - Someone forgot to press Q x D
    
18. 02:10:172 (3) - I'd consider making this into a triple considering there's a very strong 1/4 sound on the sliderend that you can't really represent well with just a normal 1/4 slider; if you want to keep this rhythm you should emphasize it properly like you did at 02:04:655 (3) - since it's really weak rn - i disagree on the grounds that i can barely hear what you're talking about lol but adjusted the emphasis
    
19. 02:12:758 (2,3,4,5) - Personally disagree with these and other instances rhythmically considering violin is on 02:12:758 (2,3,5) - but 4 is a slider instead of 5 for some reason; I'd probably make 4 a circle for the bass on 5 to still be a circle as well; this would also give some rhythmic variance to strong wubs such as 02:15:862 (4) - that you use the same rhythm and just slightly higher sv for - i think i did like this in the last part but didn't change it in the first part, fixed
    
20. 02:21:206 (3,4) - This low spacing coupled with the SL abuse doesn't really suit the intensity of the song here IMO, the wub feels very underemphasized compared to the previous iteration on 02:15:689 (3,4) - adjusted
    
21. 02:31:551 (7) - Consider moving this to 02:30:344 (1) - 's head as I think the wider angle for circular flow and lower spacing compared to the snare on 02:31:379 (6) - fits the violin nicely
    
22. 02:32:413 (4) - There's a unique bell sound here, maybe show it as a circle or 1/8 slider instead - don't hear it
    
23. 02:36:724 (6) - I'd suggest using higher sv here and other similar instances for the wub instead of just making it an ordinary slider, the resulting sv drop for the snare on the next slider would also emphasize it further too - i think just spacing it more works
    
24. 02:38:620 (1) - Maybe make the sliderend clickable as a 1/4 slider for the distinctive sound since it honestly feels unnatural after so many 1/4 slider gaps you used, and it feels much too similar to when you ignored the sound at 02:35:862 (1) - idk why it's not 1/4 but made it 1/4
    
25. 02:45:517 (1,1,1,1,2,3,4,5,1,1,2,3,4,5,1,1,2,3,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,3,4,5,1,2) - fix blanket kds pls ty
    
26. 03:06:788 (1,2) - Consider ctrl+g or an equivalent since the sudden violin breaking the silence is really underspaced rn imo - you mean overspaced? it's pretty easy to hit so i think it's fine
    
27. 03:23:450 (3,1) - Honestly these seem way too visually similar along with similar flow as 03:23:277 (2,3) - for there to not really be much emphasis, but this is pretty nitpicky
    
28. 03:28:277 (1,2,3,4) - I'd reposition this so that 03:28:794 (4) - is directly facing 03:28:450 (2) - so it's symmetrical like all the other times you used this pattern
    
29. 03:34:484 (3,4,1) - The equal distance with snapping flow doesn't really suit the snare IMO, maybe reposition 03:34:656 (4) - so that it's better emphasized such as at 03:33:450 (5) - 's head
    
30. 03:40:519 (9,10,1) - Not really necessary but I'd personally try to continue the symmetry of the last two triples like this for more structure and harsher circular flow that plays pretty well - ehhhhhhh i think it's fine since the first 2 are the only really symmetrical ones i need
    
31. 03:43:450 (1,2) - Remember what I said about the circle overlapping slider too much compared to before
    
    
    
    Ye XD
    
32. 03:43:794 (2,3) - I'd space this out just because you did so in the first rendition of this drop back at 01:03:793 (2,3) - xd
    
33. 03:46:208 (1) - I think ctrl+g would give more emphasis through circular flow as well as to better show the similarity to 03:45:863 (1) - , but you use this motion often so up to you
    
34. 04:19:656 (2,3) - wtf how'd you get 3 to be smaller without using a green line wHAt WWHHHUUUUU UHHMM I DONT KNOW LOL
    
35. 04:24:656 (9,10,1) - Same as what I suggested before perhaps about symmetry, considering that it is really similar to 04:24:312 (6,7,8) - as roughly a 45 degree rotation - nah only first 2 are symmetrical!
    
36. 04:38:277 (6,7) - I believe you had the same thing at 02:14:827 (5,6) - before you applied yasaijia's mod; do the same here and ctrl+g 7
    
37. Not as much stuff for the second half since a lot of the song repeats, hope some of this helped

Good luck Mir

Good map Mir

Good song Mir

Good bye Mir

Plaudible wrote:

hihi

Rusty K - All That We Lost
General

1. normal-hitnormal feels quiet tbh, could use more feedback for triples like 03:40:174 (6,7,8) - or other 1/4 rhythms where this occurs - raised volume

map

1. 00:12:413 (1) - What I really liked about your later instances of this slow part is how you use the slider at the end to sort of sustain the synth rhythm there like at 03:15:863 (1) - . This rhythm instead here makes the held out synth feel more tense since you're focusing on strings, though maybe using more of those sliders at the end instead of circles would make it feel nicer. - imo there is a difference, the violin is no longer present, so i focused more on the synths in the second part. I don't really want to take away focus from the violin in the early parts since it's quite unique there and the piano in the second part continues from the slow part before so it's not that unique anymore after having been exclusively mapped to for 30 seconds
2. 00:32:413 (1,2,3,4) - , 00:54:482 (1,2,3,4) - Personally feels overemphasized to me, it's just the drums with nothing else. It'd be really cool to build some contrast in emphasis by keeping the spacing at 00:54:827 (1) - the same but maybe doing something like this to give those drums a little less intensity: http://puu.sh/xruGk/c6a0581039.jpg. This'd make the wub part a lot cooler as opposed to making things more difficult from the start here since this stream is pretty hard to play. same for other reps - nerfed all
3. 01:00:862 (2,4) - This sorta oversimplifies this imo. Strong synths fall on 01:00:689 (1,3) - with the deeper wubs on the other 2 sliders. It'd be cool to contrast them in some way, maybe by SV or something to make them each more individually emphasized. - replaced with circles instead
4. 02:12:068 (2) - Feels aesthetically out of place a bit, overlap more like 00:55:862 (1,2) - and such - would rather not, the sounds are much more obviously copy-pasted so the overlap distance is noticeably shorter, unlike the rest of the noises that are variable in some way
5. 02:27:586 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - What happened to mapping strings here like 02:16:551 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - there's a cool different sounding wub sequence here that i feel deserves more attention than the strings i mapped all those other times so i ignored them here. they're also ignored in the latter section for the same reasons 05:02:070 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1) -
6. 03:07:412 - no circle here/ it does the weird synth pulse thing, would be cool
7. 03:33:450 (5,4) -
8. 03:35:174 (1,2,3,4), 04:19:656 (2,3) - Same thing on these wubs
9. 04:56:208 (6) - More symmetrical? Rotated it and it was bit off, would be kyoot

all i got, gr8 map call me b

Mir wrote:

Speed rank smh

Mir wrote:

Speed rank smh