1. Easy (1.44 stars, 88 notes)
2. Insane (4.18 stars, 300 notes)
3. J a c k's Normal (2.04 stars, 130 notes)
4. kiry's Insane (4.82 stars, 342 notes)
5. Mcen314's Hard (3.32 stars, 223 notes)
6. Story of the End (5.28 stars, 342 notes)

Easy: 100% by Me
J a c k's Normal: 100% by J a c k
Mcen314's Hard: 100% by Mcen314
Insane: 100% by Me
kiry's Insane: 100% by Kirylln
Story of the End: 100% by Me
Hitsounds: by Kirylln and Hitsound Copier Tool

Play Heppy's Insane here

Heppy's Insane

hypercyte wrote:

It was fun, I liked the sliders
https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8878240

sullywally wrote:

Modding, cuz was bored

General

1. Disable Widescreen support, There's no SB here Not yet

Story of the End

• 
  Check AIMod Oops

1. 00:01:628 (1) - change this to 2 circle (preferably stacked) Why tho? I want to make it less intense
2. 00:05:719 (1,3) - Overlap... ;w; It's just the slider's body, it won't affect during gameplay. Fix tho
3. 00:06:401 (3,1) - Stack the sliderhead with silderend Fixed
4. 00:12:878 (2) - Move the red anchor, so that it completely stack with 00:12:196 (6) - https://puu.sh/xdTp0/31d5a5bdcb.png
5. 00:15:605 (2,3) - Swap this, the movement in 00:13:901 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - is really consistent, and then you break it without any warning Yes, without warning Fixed
6. 00:16:628 (1,3) - overlap Just the slidertail man
7. 00:22:083 (1,3) - ^ o ^
8. 00:33:503 (2,4) - stack this 'stack these', but who am I? The vocal at 00:33:503 (2) - is pretty prominent, it's different from the previous beat-long slider
9. 00:36:742 (3,4,1,2,3,4) - this jump is really hard to read, imo yeah, i get annoyed looking at them too, will fix if have free time
10. 00:42:196 (4,1) - overlap, stack 00:42:196 (4) - sliderend with 00:43:219 (2) - fixed by rotating 00:41:174 (1,2,3,4) - , like 7 degrees
11. 00:56:174 (4) - ctrl + g ok
12. 01:00:265 (1,2) - 01:00:776 (4,1) - ? What's with this huge 1/4 spacing? have you ever heard of the concept 'kicksliders?' there're also piano sounds on 00:41:515 (2,3,4) - , so i make them stand out by adding 1/4 sliders
13. 01:13:560 (4) - The 1/4 drum continue until 01:13:901 - right, kicksliders added
14. 01:22:594 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4) - I have no clue what this even mapped to, there's no 1/4 beat in it... #OvermapToExpressIntensity
15. 01:25:662 - 1/4 drum damn, you're right. Fixed

It's quite a solid diff, some overlap issue, but it's great. I dont know if I really like how you blanket.Some of the blanket is so tight, it almost look like overlapping Yes

SPOILER

SPOILER

Atomosphere wrote:

was pretty fun ima just shoot kudosu for this cuz i wanna see this get ranked!

rockstarrzz wrote:

Hi, from modreqs

Easy

00:00:265 (1,1) - nice slider art, could remove the 2nd NC maybe? sure, why not?
00:41:174 (4) - reusing the same shape alot, theres one thing for keeping structure and consistency but it might get a little boring imo, new players are very bad at the game, so I reuse the same shape so that they can easily relate that to the song. something familiar is obviously easier than something new and strange, right?
00:31:287 (5) - NC? NC every 4 measures (generally), so no
01:08:446 (1) - maybe move this around so it overlaps on 3's head yes, definitely, absolutely
01:20:719 (3,5) - slight overlap triggers me triggers me too

Map is fine from a playability standpoint, but the patterns are slider shapes are very repetitive, you're gonna wanna change them up a bit

(dunno if u wanted this one modding aswell but here ya go regardless)

Story of the End

Could boost OD to 8.5 hmm, higher OD = more pp, hell yeah
00:33:503 (2,4) - Not a fan of this overlap yeah, i did think about that earlier, i'll see what i can do
00:38:958 (2) - maybe stack on 1? ooh, damn, stacking is much better. have to fix that jump tho
00:41:515 (2) - ^ uhh, it's already stacked
00:42:537 (1,2,3) - silence/quieten the slidertails now I have to do it for all the other extended sliders to keep consistency
00:54:128 (2) - stack on 1 i separated them on purpose to lead into 00:54:810 (3) -
00:54:810 (3) - ^o^
01:11:174 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - this is quite unpleasant to play, the odd numbered notes decrease in spacing a bit too much for my liking the vocal of the song gets softer and softer, so i mapped the jumps shorter and shorter
nice map, very neat placements and blanketing, good job such flattering, here, have a kudosu

x Arow wrote:

>.>
<.<
#modreqs

Easy

00:05:719 (1) - I think shape or placement could be better better how? (i dislike the shape too) fixed tho
00:31:287 (5) - without NC it feels bad, what if you would make 4th circle overlap slider and then space it a little bit. can you be a bit clearer? i don't understand what you're trying to say (like with a screenshot or something)https://a.uguu.se/5ICKB5k8LxQr_xArow-20170820-105752.txt
00:52:082 (4) - snap this slider to the timeline oops, forgot about AImod
01:04:696 (4,5) - should be placed same as 01:07:424 (4,5) yes, yes it should, fixed the later tho, parallel is better


ugh, change this slider shape in all sliders exept those with reverse arrows. but doing that would ruin patterns like these

massive changes in slider shapes

Nikakis wrote:

Very beautiful map, wish you the best~!

Mcen314 wrote:

I'd like GD a Hard diff
But <Source> is Garbage characters,So you need fix <Source> manually

Walshy wrote:

Saw this posted in modreqs the other day
First mod sorry if its super subjective

Easy:
00:09:128 (3) - Why stack this? idk
01:24:810 (5) - Would look pretty if it was blanketed around the three sliders yes, yes it would

Story of the End:
00:08:446 (1) - Slider here to match 00:05:719 (1) and 00:07:083 (1) ? no, because the vocal at 00:08:446 (1) - is much shorter than those at 00:09:128 (2,3) - . another reason why i chose hitcircle is because the vocals at 00:08:446 (1) - and 00:09:128 (2) - are the same.
00:11:515 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - The music here is getting consistently more intense, but you only made it seem like the intensity changed between 00:11:855 (4,5) the increasing intensity can also be represented by that, spacing doesn't necessary have to be higher after each hitobject
00:43:219 (2) - NC why? NCing it here would cause inconsistency with 00:09:128 (2,3) -
00:43:901 (3) - NC ^

Really pretty mapset! Sorry again if my mods were too opinionated
Thanks

Walshy wrote:

Saw this posted in modreqs the other day
First mod sorry if its super subjective

Kyri's Insane:
00:09:810 (1) - The beat is too strong to be a sliderend ye
00:31:628 (1) - Differentiate this slider from 00:31:969 (2,3) to emphasize the different sound they all represent the vocal, there's no need
01:07:083 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - Increase spacing here its enough for me
Kiai - Increase the spacing a bit more? nah
01:12:452 (5) - NC no since i want to emphasize the cymbal afterward

Aro wrote:

Hey! #modrequest; Excuse any language mistakes I do, because my English isn't fluent.

Story of the End

General: Space Usage
->press cntrl+a in the editor, you recognize a limited field of object placement -> many overlaps, cluttered -> lacks aesthetics

Detailed Mod:
00:09:128 (2,3) - I don't know why you over mapped them on the 1/4 because there is a really strong sound on 1/2
00:42:537 (1,2,3) - ^ same case
00:10:492 (4) - I think to go with sliders here is off because the slider tail has a much stronger sound than the slider head
00:23:105 (4) - ^
00:35:719 (1) - ^
00:36:230 (2) - ^ in this case the return arrow has the strongest sound
00:45:605 (2,3) - ^
00:46:969 (2) - ^
00:48:333 (6) - ^
-> strong sounds often need to be clicked, so putting a slider tail/reverse arrow on them screws with the emphasis of a sound
00:11:344 (x) - I don't know why you under mapped
00:16:202 (x) - ^ but in this case i would replace 00:16:117 (2) - by a kickslider, so 00:16:287 (3) - doesn't loose it's emphasis
00:38:787 (1) - ^
00:24:725 (6) - unnecessary over map in my opinion
00:32:907 (6) - ^
00:59:327 (6) - ^
01:04:270 (6) - ^
01:06:997 (9) - ^
01:12:537 (1,2) - second and last slider tick is over mapped
01:19:355 (1,2) - ^^
01:20:719 (1,2) - ^^
01:05:634 (6) - ^ it's over mapped and you put emphasis by spacing on a sound that's not given
01:08:361 (6) - ^^
00:27:367 (4,5) - I would space them more cause of their strong sounds
01:16:969 (3,4) - unreasonable double, because the sounds aren't the same also the emphasis is off because the second circle is clearly a strong instrument sound
01:21:912 (6,1) - ^

Good Luck with your set! o/

00:09:128 (2,3) - I don't know why you over mapped them on the 1/4 because there is a really strong sound on 1/2
00:42:537 (1,2,3) - ^ same case
00:10:492 (4) - I think to go with sliders here is off because the slider tail has a much stronger sound than the slider head
00:23:105 (4) - ^
00:35:719 (1) - ^
00:45:605 (2,3) - ^
00:46:969 (2) - ^
00:48:333 (6) - ^
-> strong sounds often need to be clicked, so putting a slider tail/reverse arrow on them screws with the emphasis of a sound

00:11:344 (x) - I don't know why you under mapped

00:16:202 (x) - ^ but in this case i would replace 00:16:117 (2) - by a kickslider, so 00:16:287 (3) - doesn't loose it's emphasis

00:38:787 (1) - ^

00:24:725 (6) - unnecessary over map in my opinion
00:32:907 (6) - ^
00:59:327 (6) - ^
01:04:270 (6) - ^
01:06:997 (9) - ^
01:05:634 (6) - ^ it's over mapped and you put emphasis by spacing on a sound that's not given
01:08:361 (6) - ^^

00:36:230 (2) - ^ in this case the return arrow has the strongest sound

01:12:537 (1,2) - second and last slider tick is over mapped
01:19:355 (1,2) - ^^
01:20:719 (1,2) - ^^

00:27:367 (4,5) - I would space them more cause of their strong sounds

01:16:969 (3,4) - unreasonable double, because the sounds aren't the same also the emphasis is off because the second circle is clearly a strong instrument sound

01:21:912 (6,1) - ^

Space Usage

limited field of object placement

Stormiverse wrote:

I'm gonna go easy on you, man

And if that lacks aesthetics, your pattern is just not good enough.