m4m from my queue
This map is really interesting and clean. I couldn't find anything worth mentioning, so instead I'll point out some minor details you may or may-not care about to trying and help as much as I can, is that fine? :3
Extra00:44:567 (1,2,3,1,1,1,2,3) - omg so clean. Love the parallelism and the aesthetic of the notes aiming at each other. One thing I'm not too sure of is the overlap at 00:45:256 (1,2) - while I understand the aeshetic it makes with 00:46:118 (1) - It looks a little off when you highlight both of the notes. You can see the clickable end of 00:45:256 (1) - isn't perfectly aligned with the center of 00:45:774 (2) - which I personally think would make it look better like how you're having the rest of this pattern 'correlate' by having perfect alignment between notes like 00:45:084 (1,1) - & 00:44:739 (3,1) -
https://puu.sh/yf761/0e83346cb8.png I slightly moved the slider to center with the overlapping slider, and thought it looked nicer. It's up to you though, as it's not a huge change, just something I thought looked nice.
01:12:325 (1,2) - Love how you contrast the distance on the timeline by having these notes partially overlap, but not perfectly like the streams at 01:11:636 (1,2,3) -
01:19:222 (1,2) - Such attention to detail with the curve.
01:21:981 (1,1) - The way this slider curves in and overlaps the next note is beautiful. I think to add onto the aesthetic, maybe ctrl+g on 01:22:498 (2) - so it aims towards 01:22:670 (1) - for a visual gimmick?
01:33:015 (1,2) - Absolutely beautiful.
01:34:912 (1,3,4,5,6) - Pretty shape, and I think the overlap is a good idea. Some mappers might think the overlap was a result of the automatic stacking mechanic, so if you want to make the aesthetic more obvious, I'd distance the overlap to around the distance of your overlaps at
https://puu.sh/yf74b/fde4866734.png02:35:084 (1,2) - so clean omg
03:06:808 (1,2) - Think the tension you're building up with this section is well done. Because these 2 notes share a near identical distance to 03:06:463 (3,4) - and both have NC on the first note, the player might confuse both of these as 1/2 jumps, which for the tension you're building up might stick out. I suggest 1 to
https://puu.sh/yf7j3/f05d925beb.png like shown so the player has that extra distance to contrast the differences in the timeline.
03:37:498 (2,3) - orgasmic hitsounds. Never thought these would fit in this song so well, but you proved me wrong.
04:17:498 (2,1,2) - Love the aesthetic with 2,1 and the square created by 2,2
04:29:049 (2,1) - I think because 2 correlates to the note back at 04:28:532 (2) - is quite a detailed way to connect everything visually. Amazing.
I'm worried the player might miss 04:29:567 (1) - because the overlap created by 04:29:049 (2) - gives the player less time to prepare for a 1/4 jump. How about overlapping the tail instead to create
https://puu.sh/yf7ym/ec8d81584b.png ? If you like this pattern, you'll have to adjust 2, which I can give you the coords for: x:155 y:76
04:59:998 (1) - Wow, what an interesting map. Could you finish it off with slider art? I know it's not a new idea and it could be tedious, but I think it'd be a nice finisher that you can contrast from the spinner used at 02:14:481 (1) - which will make the player feel refreshing. The spinner works regardless, so it's up to you.
Great job on the map. One last thing I'll point out is a more general suggestion. I think the slider tick rate is better at 1 because slider shapes like 01:42:670 (1) - and 03:02:670 (1) - don't have the tick line up with the beat.
Nice map. gl with ranking