Loreley wrote:

• 
  [Hard]

1. 00:15:365 (1) - make it more intensive, beacuse i want to click! I think that you don't want to complicate this part did
2. 00:26:904 (1,2) - increase sv better to feel music? yes
3. 00:58:442 (1) - it seems to me that this moment is hard for such diff imo, suggestions http://puu.sh/x7c0q/6c397ba846.png keep for now cuz it best fits vocal, i'll gather more opinions
   [Normal]
   00:15:365 (1) - same as hard diff it's hard to do so in normal diff
   [Easy]
4. 01:25:365 (3) - 1/2 slider is better imo changed

Loreley wrote:

• 
  [GlazeE's Insane]

1. 00:16:519 (5) - I suggest to reduce sv on this slider, better to reflect a pause in music. keep
2. 00:21:519 (9) - nc for for the aesthetic reason(u did it here 00:32:288 (1) - ) all keep
3. 00:15:365 (1,2) - This moment the most intensive at intro, you could add more clickable objects 00:15:557 (2) - 00:15:654 (3) - ok added
4. 01:12:096 (4,1,2,1) - nice ty

- Sunflower - wrote:

先来个水mod

[easy]
01:12:865 (4) - 红点再往右边移动一格（正好注意到，把红点移到了那个中间有音的地方

[Challenger]
00:46:904 (1,2,3,4,5) - 感觉弧度有点大了。。就是看上去不美观 你书的对
01:27:481 (1,2) - 感觉这两个换成一个短滑条跳比较有意思 那样节奏会变模糊，和 01:27:288 (3) - 没有区分度
01:18:955 (2,1) - 这两个没对准 微调

-
萌新摸不出点什么=-=
加油

- Sunflower - wrote:

[GlazeE's Insane]
00:09:211 (1,1) - 个人主观。。我喜欢把这两个拆开 00:09:981 (1) - x292y72 可以 但是你这个太开了 我就弄得比原来远点吧_(:з」∠)_
00:21:519 (9) - NC ok
00:27:673 (1,2,7) - 这三个没怎么包好 emm我并没有要包
00:40:365 (2,3,4) - 对称的间距弄个一样的吧 00:40:942 (3) - x252y64 这个不是对称;w; 这是个几何
如果上面那个改了的话
00:41:134 (4,5) - 我推荐这个ctrl+g ok
00:52:288 (1) - 因为我比较喜欢跟歌词吧 这里的节奏我比较倾向于这个。。。↓http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8816951 no
01:01:423 (1) - 我咋感觉这里没音 delete ok

00:56:904 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,1,1) - 还有感觉这一段有点那啥。。。。Re? keep
01:03:057 (1) - 这里最起码应该加个finish 加了normal
01:15:365 (1) - ↑ 加了normal
01:12:096 (4,1,2,1,2) - 读版困难 可能是我太辣鸡了 keep

还有其他难度都是结尾1:28:634这个是1:27:673 我不知道要不要改哈qwq ok

Yamicchi wrote:

[GlazeE's]
• 00:00:750 (3) - It's weird how you used spacing to emphasize this but not 00:00:365 (2) - this, eventhough they're literally at the same pitch. Can they be consistent? ok
• 00:36:327 - why did you ignore the vocal here? fixed
• 00:38:250 - also I think this should be clickable instead of continuing the pattern you're having ok
• 00:52:673 (2,3,4) - Might wanna move these further from (1) a bit, visual spacing fixed
• 01:06:327 (2,3,4) - Idk spacing is kinda going to the opposite of what vocal should have. Pitch going down on 01:06:519 (3) - and up on 01:06:711 (4) -, imo swapping spacing between them is a better option fixed

Yamicchi wrote:

Hi immediate M4M in case I forgot to do it xd
[General]
• I heard you need higher res BG so here you go (2685x1920). Feel free to crop/resize it your way i mean more high-res bg' not higher res bg but thanks anyway!
• Glaze's diff is the only one with Widescreen support turned on. Consider turning it off. done
• I would prefer having at least 1 spinner for Hard and Challenger diff, in order not to turn the leaderboard into a race with 1 players in top 1 years by years till i found a proper place to add
[Easy]
• 00:49:211 (1) - About this sliderend, I understand that you wanna make consistent pattern with 00:46:134 (1) - but this one deserves a circle on it though. That way it would represent the vocal better i prefer mine, it works fine in my view
• 00:55:365 (1,2) - Meanwhile, also to represent the vocal better, I think these should be a reverse slider. Having 00:56:134 (2,3) - these both circles while there's a huge difference in pitch and intensity of vocal is pretty weird. changed
• 01:00:750 (5) - Minor stuff. It would look better if you adjust the red anchor a bit? http://puu.sh/x8GAE/80b29907e1.jpg k
• 01:27:673 (2) - Well I noticed the vocal ends on red tick but I think it's better to end the slider on 01:28:827 - though would reconsider, keep for now

[Normal]
• 01:00:750 (2,1) - Just asking but having a burst to 1.34x spacing acceptable? :d yes, you can apply different spacing to different time gaps for readability/visual sake
• 01:01:519 (1,2) - 01:13:827 (1,2) - Why do you have to make these inconsistent? Imo having consistent pattern twice wouldn't be a problem though cuz 01:11:519 (2,3,4,5,6,1) - is a long chain of 1/2 rhythms i want a little break
• 01:12:096 (3,4,5) - Minor stuff. Usually you don't make the flow turn so harsh like this, for example 01:02:865 (4,5) - 01:15:173 (4,5) - so if you don't mind, lowering 01:12:673 (4,5) - would do adjusted

[Hard]
• 00:14:788 (4,5) - Why was the spacing raised so high here? for visual, it comes with a stack so i guess the jump isnt too overkill
• 00:19:788 (3,1) - well imo it would be nice to have a bit of spacing emphasis here, I guess it won't be as much as 00:16:519 (5) - but ye 1.6x spacing
• 00:37:096 (2) - The 2 beats here is similar to 00:37:481 (3) - and 00:37:673 (4) - sliderstart instead of just 4, so I think ctrl+g 00:37:481 (3,4) - maybe? following vocal in my rhythm sense
• 01:03:442 (2,3) - Umm I still think even with 156bpm this spacing is a bit too big tbh, also compare with 01:15:750 (2,3) - . Can you decrease it somehow? decreased
• 01:11:711 (2,3,1) - It'd be great if you could breat the flow of 3-1 somehow, like what you did for 01:12:673 (2,1) - to emphasize the strong beat better? yea i agree but i found it pain to adjust everything for this

[Challenger]
• 00:20:750 (1,2,3,4) - Just curious why you choose to have alternative spacing decreasing for these but not for 00:21:134 (1,2,3,4) - these too? spacing is so small that decreasing won't look so impactful
• 00:37:288 - but this beat includes both vocal and drum, why is it unclickable ;w; still, following vocal in my rhythm sense,
if more ppl found it weird i'll make a change
• 00:52:769 (3) - Minor but how about less overlap, to be easier when reading it? i try
• 00:58:442 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Woah impressive <3

Ok that's all I guess. Not much since this is a good set already :3

SaBaKi_aZa wrote:

GlazeE's Insane
00:05:365 (4) -前一拍蓝线和红线的节奏 emmmm那里没有声音呀
第二个方法偏拥挤
(1）单点+短滑

(2）滑条+蓝线+短滑

00:13:827 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 这一段很憋屈 怎么调整滑条位置都会不顺 我建议改跳 ok
00:16:134 (4,5,6) - 圆型滑条好像摆的不是时候 建议改成 keep
00:37:096 (1,4) - 把1对其4或者把4对其1 感觉没啥必要。。
00:52:769 (3,4) - 这里我建议3-4叠加在一起 然后在扩大一下周围的间距 ok
01:06:327 (2,3,4) - 思考。。。2.3.4的衔接有点不顺手 keep
改成这样如何?
01:09:211 (1) - 这里可以改包住 前面的01:08:250 (5) - no
效果图:

Adol Christin wrote:

突然想来补摸上花园的部分了，no kd

General

1. 搞个Audio Lead in吧。红线的位置，开始的位置那么靠前，不搞的话可能会开始的有点仓促 好像已经改了相当久了，audioleadin会自动加，你打开一下主难度试试就知道了

Challenger

1. 00:16:519 (1) - 建议缩短1/4拍，打起来效果跟现在几乎相同的，但改了之后滑条尾能snap到一个有镲声的地方。 用各种姿势听了好几遍真没听出来欸
2. 00:22:577 (3) - 建议以删掉3的前提来下节奏，做成两个连续的二连。既然跟着乐器玩，那就玩到底吧。00:25:654 (3) - 同理 这个音我觉得这也是乐器的一部分，而且这样打起来比较顺手，空出来感觉有点奇怪，所以就不改了
3. 00:56:904 (1) - 让这个也加入跳跳跳大家族？ 基本功不够摆圈困难.. 现在这样排版起来比较有余裕我还是挺喜欢的，有灵感再说

Hard

1. 00:15:750 (2,3) - 有点小卡手，建议合并成滑条 好的

写完发现几乎啥都没写- - gl

Shad0w1and wrote:

Challenger
00:08:442 (1,2,3) - 要不正三角？差不多就行了没人在意
00:33:827 (1,2,3) - 这两个应该是一个东西吧。。。保持节奏一致？ref 00:39:981 (1,2,3,4) - 注意到vocal在蓝线上所以我改了下节奏，第一个用1/1是因为衔接前面紧凑的节奏过渡一下
01:15:557 (2,4) - 还能包好点 我尽力
01:26:711 (1,2,3) - 包 asdf

Gla I
00:31:519 (5) - nc
00:51:519 - fill? 这貌似是我他妈手滑删了（

normal
01:18:827 (5,6) - restack done

Shad0w1and wrote:

Gla I
00:31:519 (5) - nc ok
00:51:519 - fill? 花园手贱把它删了;w;

0109- wrote:

just something i noticed

[Regnellahc]

1. 00:19:500 (1,2) – how about making them into triplet since this section already use some like 00:15:173 (6,7,1) – and 00:13:634 (5,6,1) -, with that pace I believe some players also expect these are triplet as well makes sense but the overmapping 3/4 was intended to be similar to how 00:17:961 (2,3) - plays, previous triplets are just following the song exactly, I wanna keep this rhythm pattern for now.
2. 00:25:942 (1) – can just remove nc here as 00:24:211 (4) – didn’t nc k
3. 00:32:865 (1) – touching hp bar oh true
4. 00:59:211 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) – spaced streams seem fine but kinda unexpected since it haven’t introduced before, maybe decrease the spacing a bit at the final spaced one? spacing is locked cuz I stack all 00:59:307 (2,3) - in this pattern for neat visual, plus this is intended to be a hard pattern and it's much easier than the original one so I don't plan to change much.

[Drah]

1. 01:03:827 (3) – spacing here looks huge compared to others imo, how about moving 01:03:442 (2) – like http://puu.sh/xd1jr/bc657c7319.jpg should be easy enough cuz it's only 156bpm and there's a 1/1 break after the note lol, there are many similar spacings tbh

gl

kunka wrote:

Hi. short mod
Glad to be of help!
General

1. Exact size BG
   BG

   
   ↑ I like original size better
   
   BG2

   
   ↑ would be nice if theres a background for this image lol, applied to hard diff

Hard

1. 00:57:673 (3,4) - I think that I switch to a good vocal follow by ctrl+G. Reference 00:56:134 (3,4) - I still prefer mine here, 00:56:134 (3,4) - is because there are 4 syllables, but theres nothing at 00:57:865 - so cases are actually different.

Normal

1. 01:18:827 (5,6) - snap miss I'm trying to follow vocal here with 1/2 snapping, that's more intuitive rhythm for beginners to follow. I add some whistles so it should sound better now.

Easy

1. 01:22:288 (4) - Since 01:23:057 - is a strong sound, a click is preferable. Remove 01:23:442 (1) - , I recommend changing 01:22:288 (4) - to 1/1slider*2. done

GL

0109- wrote:

[Eezalg]

1. 00:05:557 (5,6) – transition from vocal to instruments need nc fixed
2. 00:51:519 – don’t really understand the pause, feels really awkward tbh just try to place something there fixed
3. 00:30:942 (2,3,4) – linear flow doesn’t fit to emphasize stuffs even though the high spacing, try to organize those like up and down a bit as you did at 00:14:981 (7) – ok
4. 00:38:057 – did pretty strong sound please let it clickable ok

the diff need some more polished imo idk how to do it ;w;

kunka wrote:

GlazeE's Insane

1. 00:03:057 (1,2) - Because the vocal is extended, 1/1slider is better. no
2. 01:06:327 (2,3) - Flow stops by the stack. Would you move to stack 01:06:519 (3) - to 01:05:942 (1) - head? fixed
3. 01:15:173 (5,1,2) - fmm,,I felt a little strange to snap. Since 01:15:750 (2) - is a two-word lyric, would you change it to 2circles? no
4. 01:19:981 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - By the arrangement and blanks of the circle only, has become too monotonous. It's recommended to change to 1/2slider because the 01:19:981 (1) - and 01:21:519 (1) - sound is stretched. Also, the 01:21:134 - and 01:22:673 - bass drum sounds are so important to make a rhythm, so adding circles is better. ok

Garden wrote:

@GlazeE 你是不是直接贴了上次的code啊.. nc那地方貌似没改啊，还有上次更新除了手贱删了那个以外我给你换了个bg，有些节奏不同的地方加了几个音效都美丽了... ;w; 总之现在给你加上了那个nc，微调了下音效，你再重下一次吧，bg你想用哪个就换哪个

ts8zs wrote:

from friend list dunno that u add me kek
I make first sound longer to fix the cutting of first sound and add some slience at start,this mp3's offset is 545
https://puu.sh/xfzfc/8f8959f071.mp3 thanks very much for the mp3 edit, but since I didn't map into the very first sound plus osu will add audio lead in automatically nowadays,
I deem it unnecessary to change the mp3 file.. (also I had pain changing related stuffs due to some old experiences xd)

SliderBorder : 100,150,200
SliderTrackOverride : 30,50,50
Use less they are useless but i simply like how they look xD

00:33:634 - I perfer preview time starts here hmm isn't it more natural to start at the chorus?
[Challenger]
01:05:942 (1) - blanket i tried
01:11:519 (1,2) - https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8898616 this one may better? will need to rearrange lots of upcoming patterns so nope, sorry
01:25:365 (1) - 117,38 to make 01:25:365 (1,2) - like a downbeat vocal pitch is going up tho
[GlazeE]
fine
[Hard]
fine
[Normal]
01:25:365 (4) - NC fair enough
01:12:673 (4) - remove to cut 01:11:519 (2,3,4,5,6) - to two parts,I think now one is too long for normal nope cuz that would sound weird to me, also i think it's not that long ..
[Easy]
fine

sahuang wrote:

Normal
01:00:750 (2,1) - ds? 钻空子，理论上是可以的，现在这样会比较好看
最后一个滑条突然减速真的不会坑人吗 那就少减速一点

Hard
00:14:788 (4,5) - ctrl+J makes more sense: http://puu.sh/xfJeP/b68dd057cd.jpg adjust spacing
00:33:634 (1,2) - unsnap, sound is 00:33:682 - and there's no music on 1.. 00:33:634 - 貌似有那么一点点就是相对后面很轻，我会再找人问问。。主难度直接扔1/8打起来也会比较奇怪，这里会考虑适当overmap（我第二张ranked图里记得也有这样做过..）
01:09:211 (1,2,3,4) - same music but rhythm is inconsistent? kinda subtle but 01:09:211 (1) - vocal is holding while 01:09:981 (3) - is switching to another syllable halfway

challenger
00:13:346 (4) - 00:34:884 (3) - 额，滑条尾重音打起来有点奇怪 vocal>metronome
00:33:634 (1) - 并不是1/6 changed to 1/8

ok

sahuang wrote:

Insane
00:26:134 (1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - 其实完全可以separate开，开了stacking的话这样超级难看的 ok
00:36:134 (3) - 旋转一下让00:35:365 (1,2,3) - 对称，现在ds都不对了 ???ds没事啊
00:36:519 (1,2) - 音乐明显很激烈，ds却那么小，然后00:36:904 (3,1) - calm的地方大跳 fixed
01:23:827 (5,6) - 和前面怎么不同了 这里是连打的节奏呀
00:31:327 (4,1) - 间距太小 fixed
01:00:365 (1) - 不需要NC ok
01:05:365 (3,4,5,6,1) - flow非常不舒服，尤其是滑条方向。。 keep
01:06:327 (2,3,4) - ds问题，http://puu.sh/xfJyV/1b85a7eea4.jpg fixed
01:16:519 (5,6,1) - 也不好看 fixed

sahuang wrote:

Hard
01:10:365 (4) - still think 1/2 slider is more suitable because the sound here is very similar to 01:09:981 (3) - . Also a circle seems too empty imo? yes fixed, considering 01:10:750 (1,1) - is another 1/1 gap

Insane
00:36:134 (3,1) - ds still too small for a downbeat here, it shouldnt be the same as 00:36:904 (3,1,2) -
00:38:442 (6) - 1/2 slider because there's vocal 00:38:634 - .It is meaningless to extend the slider fixed both with permission from the mappr

metadata? http://you-zitsu.com/product/music.html no proof of tv size or anything so yea