1. osu! forums
  2. Beatmaps
  3. Pending Beatmaps
show more
posted
Did the map just got bubbled after added a new diff which is jakads' diff without a single mod for it?

And why you even nominated it even thought you know it's not comfortable for you? It's like you just make the bases and let other to solves it for you

About metadata:
Artist: MAZARE (kradness,ななひら,Yukacco)
Romanised Artist: MAZARE (kradness,Nanahira,Yukacco)
Title: Mazare Party
Romanised Title: Mazare Party

Official website: http://kradness.jp/
Album information: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OwOz3IvQmWQ
More references: http://exittunes.com/detail/qwce-90005.html
Album hosted by kradness
The song is composed by: かめりあ (Camellia)




Yes, it's included whole metadata, it's not an explaintion, but it's included
Because if it's an explaintion will be like explaintion Camellia's the composer (作詞・作曲:かめりあ)
But this is whole artist name, example like other song: "Crusaders In Virtuality / Quarks(kradness×Camellia)". And making it with only Quarks made no senses due to his new album http://tandeki.extsm.com/ also have the same metadata with it. That's reference example.
And yes, I already saw the post about metadata check, but I don't really follow it tho, I wish I could ask kradness for confirmation ...
posted

Kuo Kyoka wrote:

Did the map just got bubbled after added a new diff which is jakads' diff without a single mod for it?

And why you even nominated it even thought you know it's not comfortable for you? It's like you just make the bases and let other to solves it for you

About metadata:
Artist: MAZARE (kradness,ななひら,Yukacco)
Romanised Artist: MAZARE (kradness,Nanahira,Yukacco)
Title: Mazare Party
Romanised Title: Mazare Party

Official website: http://kradness.jp/
Album information: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OwOz3IvQmWQ
More references: http://exittunes.com/detail/qwce-90005.html
Album hosted by kradness
The song is composed by: かめりあ (Camellia)




Yes, it's included whole metadata, it's not an explaintion, but it's included
Because if it's an explaintion will be like explaintion Camellia's the composer (作詞・作曲:かめりあ)
But this is whole artist name, example like other song: "Crusaders In Virtuality / Quarks(kradness×Camellia)". And making it with only Quarks made no senses due to his new album http://tandeki.extsm.com/ also have the same metadata with it. That's reference example.
And yes, I already saw the post about metadata check, but I don't really follow it tho, I wish I could ask kradness for confirmation ...
Alright, updated the metadata that matches the one in the album listed here: http://exittunes.com/detail/qwce-90005.html

Not updating this again lmao
posted
hi

eyes wrote:





JAKARE's 6K Extra

Pitch Relevance stuff:

00:34:026 (34026|4,34026|3,34176|5,34176|4) - I think it's better to make double jack out of it so you follow PR as properly as at 00:32:676 (32676|5,32676|2,32826|2,32826|5,32976|2,32976|5,33126|5,33126|2,33276|2,33276|5)
hmm i don't think that's too necessary
i just wanted to emphasize 00:32:676 (32676|5,32676|2,32826|2,32826|5,32976|2,32976|5,33126|5,33126|2,33276|2,33276|5) -, not the other ones


00:31:326 (31326|4,31326|1,31626|1,31626|4) - and 00:36:126 (36126|5,36126|1,36426|5,36426|1) - these have diffrent pitch and should be arranged defferently. Similar point as example: 00:34:626 (34626|4,34626|1,34926|2,34926|4) -
again, i'm not really trying to follow pitch relevance here, i feel like these are fun to play as is

----
01:31:176 (91176|3) - and 01:32:376 (92376|2) - have different sounds, why not to represent them differently?
same concern at 01:35:976 (95976|1) - 01:37:176 (97176|4) -
maintaining a shield pattern overall. putting them on different column other than where the LN ends would ruin how it plays. that was completely intentional

01:45:876 - I can tell you are gradually complicating it, and it's good. But here it's a little bit wrong, because these brackets 01:47:076 - are harder than 01:47:676 - so you might want to swap it, otherwise it looks weird to have hard bracket in the middle of burst and everything aftewards are easier than that
fair point

Last part is too hard problem:
I understand your style of making it harder to the end of the song but some patterns go too far .
Examples:
03:25:701 (205701|2,205701|1,205776|1,205776|2) - double jack between triple and penta, also surrounded by LN patterns might be too sudden and unplayable for player. decreased penta to triple to remove jacks
03:29:226 (209226|5,209226|4,209301|4,209301|5,209376|5,209376|4) - triple jack of 1/8 double LNs impossible to hit properly for player who plays 95-96% on first half of the map. yeah i agree
03:30:276 - same as before. Full LN of 1/4 double stair patterns. yea nerfed
Everything else except doublejacks are just fine.

If you say "ur just bad", I would understand, but the gup is kinda too big and first half of the song might be too easy (next> boring) for players who have no problems with last part. And for players of around my level, who can S first half but almost dies at the end it might be too harsh.
I know that this is a thing, please send some more feedback if the fixed version still seems too hard
not saying to brag my skills or whatever, but keeping some sane difficulty throughout the whole difficulty is kinda tough for me, so feedbacks are very welcome

Kuo Kyoka wrote:

Did the map just got bubbled after added a new diff which is jakads' diff without a single mod for it?
ikr

mod applied
posted

Kuo Kyoka wrote:

Did the map just got bubbled after added a new diff which is jakads' diff without a single mod for it?

And why you even nominated it even thought you know it's not comfortable for you? It's like you just make the bases and let other to solves it for you
i did check the difficulty before nominating it of course, it was just more so the fact my skills most likely dont extend that far to judge a chart of that difficulty level. its not like i just shrugged off the idea of even checking the map, i just did what i could.

regardless, it was a mistake and i apologise for it. to be extra sure, we are letting another nominator ensure its quality before letting any more nominations happen.

yeah again, sorry for the inconvenience and this should be rolling again soon
posted

error_exe777 wrote:

Kuo Kyoka wrote:

Did the map just got bubbled after added a new diff which is jakads' diff without a single mod for it?

And why you even nominated it even thought you know it's not comfortable for you? It's like you just make the bases and let other to solves it for you
i did check the difficulty before nominating it of course, it was just more so the fact my skills most likely dont extend that far to judge a chart of that difficulty level. its not like i just shrugged off the idea of even checking the map, i just did what i could.

regardless, it was a mistake and i apologise for it. to be extra sure, we are letting another nominator ensure its quality before letting any more nominations happen.

yeah again, sorry for the inconvenience and this should be rolling again soon
If anything, this was my fault as error was relying on accurate information and communication from me. I pushed this onto him and I am the one to blame for the mistake.
posted
tails you suck
posted

me irl

ok so i'm gonna check jakads diff as per request, rest was already pretty extensively checked

[JAKARE... wait why the fuck is it jakare i don't get it]
could've just called it JAKADS' 6K PARTY! or something mate, jakare looks bad, mashing nickname with the artist ha, tho there are worse examples of diffnames I guess


god i hate this song

00:15:876 - you could really do something cool with LN releases like for example this

especially since you do use the releases kind of like that at 00:29:076 (29076|0,29226|1,29376|2,29526|3,29676|4,29976|5) - and it would be more suitable to have full hold chord to accent the power of those chords at the start y'know
image just for idea, choose something that'll play well

general meat of the first kiai - I feel like too much emphasis is given towards the stronger hits when tom triples are decently impactful too, for example instead of going 2-1-5 at 00:30:426 (30426|3,30426|0,30501|2,30576|0,30576|4,30576|3,30576|1,30576|5) - you could do 2-2-4 or 3-2-4 even and it would be more musically relevant
the 6-chords for finishes feel overboard but idk man, it feels like forced density on harder hits/finishes and not enough emphasis on the main rhythm in general

00:38:863 (38863|4) - this note is out of place, I hear what it goes for I think but this measure is pretty much tom (the clunky thing I guess) only and would be epic if it stayed like that, clear and simple

01:20:151 (80151|3,80226|4,80301|5,80376|3,80451|4,80526|5,80601|4,80676|3) - oh god this is so mean why the small trill there even exists this looks awful lmao

01:30:276 - same as intro

01:59:226 (119226|3,119226|1,119301|1,119301|3,119376|3,119376|1,119526|3,119526|1,119676|4,119676|2,119826|2,119826|4,119976|3,119976|5) - why does this to to the right when the pitch goes down

02:08:863 (128863|1) - same as 38 seconds in

actually what are the 1/8 LNs going to exactly, 37 ms LNs are going to be a pain in the ass to acc by far and large, I would really reconsider the usage of them, even 50 ms LNs are hard to acc, 1/4 LNs would be kinda ok but it's still gonna be ass so you better have good explanation for them

second kiai in general feels okay

02:09:876 - it feels like you're missing a lot of guitar that you could map in that section, there's a lot of empty space as a result and this part feels "empty" in general I guess?

02:29:976 (149976|5,149976|1,149976|0,149976|4) - hey look here you're doing 1/4 LNs

03:09:201 - hey nice uneven release


03:29:226 (209226|4,209226|5,209301|2,209301|3,209376|4,209376|5,209526|3,209526|4,209676|3,209676|2,209826|1,209826|2,209976|1,209976|0,210126|0,210126|1) - yeah while i get the aesthetic i think it plays like ass and does not work in o!m. It's a thing stepmania charters did to emphasize sounds but it works there because of no release timings, same in o2jam (kinda). This does not work well here tbh

03:41:076 - ssssame as before

03:43:176 (223176|4,223176|2) - actually what are those notes for there's like nothing here

03:50:901 (230901|1,230901|4,230976|1,230976|4) - this is so sad can we conquer the persian empire
why, you could easily just removed the LNs so you don't have a shield out of nowhere

my general gripe with the structure is as mentioned earlier, too much emphasis on the backbone of the song (1/1 hits) and not enough emphasis on the melody and rhythm making it feel like a chordfest and possibly causing the issues aforementioned in this thread about first half being too easy








deez nutz
posted

Kamikaze wrote:

deez nutz
have you guys ever heard of bofa?
posted

Unpredictable wrote:

Kamikaze wrote:

deez nutz
have you guys ever heard of bofa?
whats bofa
posted

booty wrote:

whats bofa
bofa deez nuts hahahahahaaaa

top 10 pranks that went too far
posted

Unpredictable wrote:

booty wrote:

whats bofa
bofa deez nuts hahahahahaaaa

top 10 pranks that went too far
cool but did you try ligma

----------
imo "jakare" is fine
posted

Kamikaze wrote:


me irl

ok so i'm gonna check jakads diff as per request, rest was already pretty extensively checked
sure

[JAKARE... wait why the fuck is it jakare i don't get it]
could've just called it JAKADS' 6K PARTY! or something mate, jakare looks bad, mashing nickname with the artist ha, tho there are worse examples of diffnames I guess

u look bad

god i hate this song
why

00:15:876 - you could really do something cool with LN releases like for example this

especially since you do use the releases kind of like that at 00:29:076 (29076|0,29226|1,29376|2,29526|3,29676|4,29976|5) - and it would be more suitable to have full hold chord to accent the power of those chords at the start y'know
image just for idea, choose something that'll play well
i agree, but not really sure on what pattern to go with

general meat of the first kiai - I feel like too much emphasis is given towards the stronger hits when tom triples are decently impactful too, for example instead of going 2-1-5 at 00:30:426 (30426|3,30426|0,30501|2,30576|0,30576|4,30576|3,30576|1,30576|5) - you could do 2-2-4 or 3-2-4 even and it would be more musically relevant
the 6-chords for finishes feel overboard but idk man, it feels like forced density on harder hits/finishes and not enough emphasis on the main rhythm in general
changed melody to 2, kick to 3, snare to 4, crash to 5

00:38:863 (38863|4) - this note is out of place, I hear what it goes for I think but this measure is pretty much tom (the clunky thing I guess) only and would be epic if it stayed like that, clear and simple
i love trap beats tho ree

01:20:151 (80151|3,80226|4,80301|5,80376|3,80451|4,80526|5,80601|4,80676|3) - oh god this is so mean why the small trill there even exists this looks awful lmao
then what else can i put there
if this was 7k it would've been clean, but meh


01:30:276 - same as intro
meh

01:59:226 (119226|3,119226|1,119301|1,119301|3,119376|3,119376|1,119526|3,119526|1,119676|4,119676|2,119826|2,119826|4,119976|3,119976|5) - why does this to to the right when the pitch goes down
I Ctrl+H'd the entire part
are you happy now


02:08:863 (128863|1) - same as 38 seconds in
meh

actually what are the 1/8 LNs going to exactly, 37 ms LNs are going to be a pain in the ass to acc by far and large, I would really reconsider the usage of them, even 50 ms LNs are hard to acc, 1/4 LNs would be kinda ok but it's still gonna be ass so you better have good explanation for them
emphasis on "HAH" and other stuff
pretty sure it's gonna be fine


second kiai in general feels okay
thx u too

02:09:876 - it feels like you're missing a lot of guitar that you could map in that section, there's a lot of empty space as a result and this part feels "empty" in general I guess?
i've thought about that, but not only it is hard to follow because it's so faint, but also i thought it'd be better to calm down after the hard part soo yea no guitar 4 u

02:29:976 (149976|5,149976|1,149976|0,149976|4) - hey look here you're doing 1/4 LNs
the parts i was using 1/8 LNs already had some 1/4 LNs following something, so i shortened them to make them distinct
this part however is relatively calm and has no reason to put any other 1/4 LNs, so i didn't shorten it cuz it felt unnecessary to do so


03:09:201 - hey nice uneven release

how tf did u spot that
i swear to god i played that part multiple times and thought it was perfect wtf jadlksfgnmaldfgnjkader
thx


03:29:226 (209226|4,209226|5,209301|2,209301|3,209376|4,209376|5,209526|3,209526|4,209676|3,209676|2,209826|1,209826|2,209976|1,209976|0,210126|0,210126|1) - yeah while i get the aesthetic i think it plays like ass and does not work in o!m. It's a thing stepmania charters did to emphasize sounds but it works there because of no release timings, same in o2jam (kinda). This does not work well here tbh
ok this one's fair
didn't need to be 1/8 lel
made them 1/4


03:41:076 - ssssame as before
iiiiiiidddddddkkkkkkkk

03:43:176 (223176|4,223176|2) - actually what are those notes for there's like nothing here
exact same sound effect on 00:17:976 (17976|4) - and 01:32:376 (92376|2) -

03:50:901 (230901|1,230901|4,230976|1,230976|4) - this is so sad can we conquer the persian empire
why, you could easily just removed the LNs so you don't have a shield out of nowhere
yes i'm on it rn
shh i just didn't want to follow the weirdly snapped stuff
fixed but i still used LN fucc u haha yes


my general gripe with the structure is as mentioned earlier, too much emphasis on the backbone of the song (1/1 hits) and not enough emphasis on the melody and rhythm making it feel like a chordfest and possibly causing the issues aforementioned in this thread about first half being too easy
i agree, i'll try to find a solution







deez nutz no u
mm yes
gonna fix some stuff and then send ya the file
posted

eyes wrote:

cool but did you try ligma
whats ligma
posted
This modding thread has been migrated to the new "modding discussions" system. Please make sure to re-post any existing (and unresolved) efforts to the new system as required.
Please sign in to reply.