Trying to move about while forcing the old forums is annoying
Update + minor selfmod to 4k sent via discord
Cheers!error_exe777 wrote:
6k diffs[Ash's 6K Extra]
why didnt you chart the 1/8th : (
tbh, i cant really argue against it, but if you have a reason for it that would be helpful
Anyone sane enough would probably mash through the thing anyway so I didn't really bother unless it was extreme buildup stuff.
also are you going for this whole 0 sliders thing Yeah I guess lol
00:05:976 (5976|1,5976|5,5976|4,6126|2,6126|4,6126|5) - could you change these to doubles to indicate the drum roll is different to the one beforehand? If anything, I would have used triples here, though that seemed a little too awkward to implement. The drum roll is still extremely similar to the one beforehand, so I think the current pattern is still fine.
00:20:376 (20376|4) - a normal note here seems a bit odd since theres the whole bass sound until the downbeat so you could probably chart that with one or two LNs A fair point, though in what is a fairly empty section, I don't think there's a large amount of urgency in trying to keep what little pressure there is here up.
01:10:776 - similar suggestion to the other instance Same response here then.
01:27:651 (87651|5,87801|2) - these could probably be doubles to keep consistency with how you charted things like at 00:48:276 - and to kind of give a bit of differentiation between this and the rolls within the kiai beforehand The extra double in the earlier burst was to pick up the oddly loud bass buzz, which isn't present in the second burst. Else this is generally just a dense handstream burst.
01:39:576 (99576|4,99576|3,99651|2,99651|1,99726|3,99726|4) - these should be triples to keep consistent with 00:25:176 (25176|1,25176|2,25176|0,25251|3,25251|5,25251|4,25326|2,25326|0,25326|1) - i guess The triples were to pick up the extra sound in the first section (I forgot the name of the instrument). The second time it's at 01:40:776 though, hence no triples here.
00:25:176 (25176|1,25176|2,25176|0,25251|3,25251|5,25251|4,25326|2,25326|0,25326|1,143826|5,143826|3,143826|1,143976|3,143976|4,143976|5) - would be cool to have these both stack in whatever columns to emphasise the sounds a bit more, since they're pretty prominent here I'm not entirely sure what you're wanting me to do here. (I'm generally trying to avoid minijacks of the 1/4 variety here.)
02:40:776 - same suggestion ok wont mention anymore Same response lul
02:58:476 - because consistency doesnt exist 01:27:876 - s m h Don't blame me that they're not identical lol. I heard slightly different things each time, hence why slightly different.
03:00:276 - is the break completely necessary? only diff that has one, and despite the use of no LNs, it would probably suit better to have no break at all tbh The break was put in deliberately though...
03:17:076 (197076|0) - could probably move this to col 2 to kinda make it look more aesthetically pleasing and flow i guess Sure lol
03:40:776 (220776|4,220776|3,220851|2,220851|1,220926|3,220926|4,221001|1,221001|2) - doubles? the sound itself isnt particularly that more prominent over the ones shown at the earlier sections, so just seems a bit overkill, especially in such a calm section in comparison with whats around it General concept of backloading a chart where the layering is much denser. I doubt it's going to cause massive problems like this. Though if you really think this needs changing I'll take another look.
Update + minor selfmod to 4k sent via discord