beeboy123 wrote:
Not Voting (1) - abraker, Zexion
Pretty sure I still have my vote on Ace Timing from
hereLincolm wrote:
Too assumptive?
Sure it's a big stretch, but I wouldn't call it unreasonable. I typically latch onto a scenario and run with it unless someone can tell me why not otherwise in means other then claiming over analysis. Other possible red players might be Foxtrot, John, and Lincolm, etc, etc, but I don't have enough info to come up with a hypothetical case scenario detailing what they might be up to. That's why my I reserve my votes so long into the game and why most of the time I have null reads.
One may say it's pointless to go in this deep, but it does me no good scraping the surface. This guy voted for this guy; this guy did that!; you did because this, ok then... But ever stop to think how any of those actions are related? This guy voted this guy because if this and that, then perhaps that guy can get the advantage. That guy did that because if this other guy has a PR, then that guy has more reason to believe this. By constructing bits and pieces of how the game pieces might be laid out, you can start guessing each player's motives and via those motives, their roles. Responses to questions from each player only scrapes the surface. I see them as a mask that may have a crack or two if you are lucky.