Vote: Zekks
Maybe this gives you the incentive to "look things over". You're setting off my scumdar now.
Maybe this gives you the incentive to "look things over". You're setting off my scumdar now.
nice taunt[ - Zekks - ] wrote:
I'm just confused, I'm too lazy to look over things asdf. If I die the mafia will have a higher chance of living, so if you decide to kill me off, good luck!
Unofficial Vote Count
[ - Zekks - ] (L-2) : rEdo, Foxtrot, Dawnsday
Hika (L-3) : Zexion, Lincolm
rEdo (L-4) : [ - Zekks - ]
Lincolm (L-4) : johnmedina999
Not Voting : abraker, Hika
So any reason why "fuck RVS"?abraker wrote:
I am considering to vote for myself if I cannot come up with any conclusions in the next couple days because fuck RVS.
I read both Foxtrot and John as town, for now. So yes, I was stuck.Dawnsday wrote:
Lincolm has stuck to explaining his play.
Because somehow he doesn't care about you? When I asked about you, he said "idc" and it's weird?johnmedina999 wrote:
It doesn't help that both times he asked someone about me he asked Zekks.
Have play mafia like 4-5 years ago, stopped playing 2 years ago, aaaaaand back.Dawnsday wrote:
I have no idea as to Lincolm's experience but I'm just giving my opinion on the matter.
I like my vote sticks in you >:)Hika wrote:
p.s. RVS is over imo
What is the abbreviation BS in here? Is it bullshit? I thought you like to over-analyzed everything. Can you explain more about your read on Foxtrot?abraker wrote:
Foxtrot - My personal BS detector from now on
Dawnsday wrote:
furthering the narrative that Zekks & Lincolm seems to have some connection
You and Zekks seemed to speak to eachother a lot, you were asking Zekks for his thoughts about John (you've explained this to be solely down to online users but I'm still iffy.)Lincolm wrote:
Somehow this question doesn't posted in my previous post.Dawnsday wrote:
furthering the narrative that Zekks & Lincolm seems to have some connection
What do you mean by "connection" between me and Zekks? Do you mean scum-scum interaction or something? What if one or both of us town?
BS means bullshit, yesLincolm wrote:
What is the abbreviation BS in here? Is it bullshit? I thought you like to over-analyzed everything. Can you explain more about your read on Foxtrot?
it's not like we can't unvote, so why would you say that? is zekks getting too many votes for your liking?Lincolm wrote:
So you guys should back off and chill out a little bit and see other players as we have 120 hours before deadline.
I think there are more interaction between me and Foxtrot now. What do you think about that?Dawnsday wrote:
You and Zekks seemed to speak to eachother a lot, you were asking Zekks for his thoughts about John (you've explained this to be solely down to online users but I'm still iffy.)
As abraker and Hika scum-read Zekks also, I would like you guys to see other players as I don't think Zekks is scum for now. Also, you can go unvote and vote him back. It's not about the votes, but everyone seems too focused on Zekks.Foxtrot wrote:
it's not like we can't unvote, so why would you say that? is zekks getting too many votes for your liking?
Incomparable. This is currently an open discussion, not a simple "hey X what do you think about Y" out of the blue (where X is currently most people's top scumread). You x Foxtrot interaction is limited to discussion, not the half-buddying I witnessed, again. I'm not claiming it to be scum-scum buddying. Was just an observation I made when rereading the thread.Lincolm wrote:
I think there are more interaction between me and Foxtrot now. What do you think about that?Dawnsday wrote:
You and Zekks seemed to speak to eachother a lot, you were asking Zekks for his thoughts about John (you've explained this to be solely down to online users but I'm still iffy.)
Explain? When asked to open up on certain things he simply says "I'm too lazy" and literally applies a logical fallacy (Appeals to emotion in his statement that if we lynch him we'll give mafia a higher probability.)Lincolm wrote:
As abraker and Hika scum-read Zekks also, I would like you guys to see other players as I don't think Zekks is scum for now. Also, you can go unvote and vote him back. It's not about the votes, but everyone seems too focused on Zekks.Foxtrot wrote:
it's not like we can't unvote, so why would you say that? is zekks getting too many votes for your liking?
Somehow, I'm pretty sure there is no point in pressuring or waiting Zekks. But if you want to stick your vote, I don't mind also.
Unofficial Vote Count
[ - Zekks - ] (L-2) : rEdo, Foxtrot, Dawnsday
Hika (L-3) : Zexion, Lincolm
rEdo (L-4) : [ - Zekks - ]
Lincolm (L-4) : johnmedina999
Not Voting : abraker, Hika
As I said before, his post when he stated "idc" is already weird for me. It turned on my scum-radar, but I considered many scenarios as it was RVS also.Dawnsday wrote:
Explain? When asked to open up on certain things he simply says "I'm too lazy" and literally applies a logical fallacy (Appeals to emotion in his statement that if we lynch him we'll give mafia a higher probability.)
I'm not saying he's guaranteed scum but he should 100% be setting off some alarms in your head right about now.
Not fully disagree about this, but I rather push him to give a content or something.Hika wrote:
I'm willing to stand my ground on voting an anti town but anti town > scum so we need to get off zekks a bit.
... I will pretend this question was not askedLincolm wrote:
So any reason why "fuck RVS"?
He just latched on to you since you started being radioactive. Pointing out the bullshit stuff such as asking needless question like "So any reason why 'fuck RVS'?" is what he did. Other than that, if you can't figure out whether I think town on scum from what I wrote, then I can't figure either.Lincolm wrote:
What is the abbreviation BS in here? Is it bullshit? I thought you like to over-analyzed everything. Can you explain more about your read on Foxtrot?
You don't think he's scum, and yet you call him scummy. You're contradicting yourself there.Lincolm wrote:
As abraker and Hika scum-read Zekks also, I would like you guys to see other players as I don't think Zekks is scum for now. Also, you can go unvote and vote him back. It's not about the votes, but everyone seems too focused on Zekks.
I think he is scummy because of fence-sitting, but it is just the way he plays this mafia game right now, either he is trolling or he has no idea what's going on. I don't see how this is coming from confidence, yet careless scum.And why should we stop focusing on Zekks if they might be possible scum? Waiting for other players is not a valid reason for it, because even if the other players come by that doesn't mean Zekks is not scum anymore. Everybody has actually posted here, but Zexion and rEdo haven't posted enough for me to get a read on them. Still, doesn't mean I shouldn't focus on Zekks; I got my read.
Last time Zekks got pushed all they said was "go ahead kill me that gives mafia higher chance to win" instead of trying to reason with us. Isn't that kind of a rookie mistake to do when you have a red role? You've been playing this for quite a while, so you should probably know.Lincolm wrote:
Not fully disagree about this, but I rather push him to give a content or something.
It's not bullshit when you did RVS in your previous game. Somehow you changed to "Nah, fuck RVS". It is implying you're trying to changing your play style or you have changed in 6 months.abraker wrote:
He just latched on to you since you started being radioactive. Pointing out the bullshit stuff such as asking needless question like "So any reason why 'fuck RVS'?" is what he did. Other than that, if you can't figure out whether I think town on scum from what I wrote, then I can't figure either.
I'm not contradicting myself. What am I trying to say is, he might be scum because he is ignoring all questions and doesn't do anything, but in his posts there are a lot of confidence yet carelessness that implying he is not scum. Town can trolling, can fence-sitting, can lurking, can looked scummy by anyone with any reason, but I have concluded that he is most likely (anti)town.Foxtrot wrote:
You don't think he's scum, and yet you call him scummy. You're contradicting yourself there.
I'm not saying you should stop focusing Zekks. I'm trying to tell that you should consider what if Zekks is town, go back and reread the thread again or maybe bring out new content as we still have 120 hours.Foxtrot wrote:
And why should we stop focusing on Zekks if they might be possible scum? Waiting for other players is not a valid reason for it, because even if the other players come by that doesn't mean Zekks is not scum anymore. Everybody has actually posted here, but Zexion and rEdo haven't posted enough for me to get a read on them. Still, doesn't mean I shouldn't focus on Zekks; I got my read.
Yes, because everyone is (going) too focused on Zekks because of his play, or maybe I'm the one who too focused right now.Foxtrot wrote:
Again, it seems like Zekks getting votes is bothering you too much.
Well, in my experience, every mafias were trying to win although it was his first game, like myself. But I can see some people don't like mafia role and said "kill me please" instead "replace me" because I thought about that when got mafia role 2 years ago, yet not confidence and careless.Foxtrot wrote:
Last time Zekks got pushed all they said was "go ahead kill me that gives mafia higher chance to win" instead of trying to reason with us. Isn't that kind of a rookie mistake to do when you have a red role? You've been playing this for quite a while, so you should probably know.
oooh what? Pretty sure we win if we go the other way. A player may be anti-town, but still town after all.Hika wrote:
I'm willing to stand my ground on voting an anti town but anti town > scum so we need to get off zekks a bit.
Maybe it's just me, but if Zekks really meant what he wrote (and it was not some funny rvs stuff) then there's not much more to explain. I totally agree with the second phrase tho.Hika wrote:
There's no point in letting Zekks go off easy so pressure him harder to see what he's all about.
@Zekks: what da fuck u think you doing playing the way you're playing
Looks like a critical reading question, "Why do you think this character you don't care about in some dumb book is doing this thing?"Hika wrote:
@abraker: why do u think rvs is over? I agree with ya but I'd like to see what you're saying
That's the only thing I remember reading regards to thinking rvs is over. Please quote whatever I said that might imply I think rvs is over. Do note it doesn't mean I never implied it, but I do want explicit text to make my life easier.Hika wrote:
p.s. RVS is over imo
What if I told you that I vote knowing I will likely regret the decision later? I vote when I am able to justify my vote since at least last game. Last time I voted Dawnsday as soon as soon as I had justification to vote, which was his mason crap. This time I am hesitant to vote zekks due to me being wrong about Dawnsday last game. This is why rvs sucks even if you can justify your reasons.Lincolm wrote:
It's not bullshit when you did RVS in your previous game. Somehow you changed to "Nah, fuck RVS". It is implying you're trying to changing your play style or you have changed in 6 months.abraker wrote:
He just latched on to you since you started being radioactive. Pointing out the bullshit stuff such as asking needless question like "So any reason why 'fuck RVS'?" is what he did. Other than that, if you can't figure out whether I think town on scum from what I wrote, then I can't figure either.
zekks didn't respond properly to Lincolm here. Instead he responded with a unrelated thought here, which I wrote my opinion about hereZexion wrote:
Sorry, a bit disconnected right now.
So what's the case on Zekks? Besides their bold claim about mafia to fear them which is pretty null right now. In any case, after a statement like that I definitely wouldn't lynch them today.
I try not to be angry, and sorry if it looked like so. Same with the content in this and future messages, pretend thet any "angry" text is emphasis. My tone might get like this due to irl events.Hika wrote:
Calm down Jesus fuck I thought when you said fuck RVS you were stating it in a way you thought it was over
is okay just calm your nerves
What worries me, is the fact that he ignored my question. That was a try to fish out why is he just parrotting the two most active guys. He is either a newb townie that does not really know what is going on, or scum pretending to be one.rEdo wrote:
What do you mean by decent?[ - Zekks - ] wrote:
I would reconsider my vote, but I don't know to vote for
I might vote for Foxtrot, since she is trying to pin everyone on Lincolm, but that seems kinda weak, but I'll still hold onto that
Or I can change my vote to Lincolm, because Foxtrot has decent amount of evidence to support the fact that Lincolm could be the mafia
What the hell is this?[ - Zekks - ] wrote:
As long as I'm still alive, no mafia can't stop me
Until this post I thought Zekks was scum, but now I'm somewhat convinced he's just a townie that doesn't give a darn.[ - Zekks - ] wrote:
I'm just confused, I'm too lazy to look over things asdf. If I die the mafia will have a higher chance of living, so if you decide to kill me off, good luck!
someone understands! no fucks were given todayrEdo wrote:
Until this post I thought Zekks was scum, but now I'm somewhat convinced he's just a townie that doesn't give a darn.
then leave and stop being a troll. or actually start playing the game seriously. i suggest you to look back in the previous threads and try to get a general idea of how it works. hell, this is my first time playing mafia in YEARS and look, i am trying to be a decent player here because i know that mafia can be time consuming, and i certainly don't want to be a waste of time like you're being right now. you're being extremely rude right now to play who actually want to play this game. and even if this is your way to play scum or whatever, it's a dumb one. i can't believe i voted you trying to get a reaction out of you. now i know this is all too pointless. yeah, i sound angry, because you're wasting our time when there could be ACTUAL content going on.[ - Zekks - ] wrote:
someone understands! no fucks were given todayrEdo wrote:
Until this post I thought Zekks was scum, but now I'm somewhat convinced he's just a townie that doesn't give a darn.
yeah, we do have PRs, but what makes you think Zekks is one and not just vanilla? Just chance?Hika wrote:
oh shit I'm so slow I forgot we have possible PRs
Slow your role bros, zekks could be a PR and doing it wrong
Dully noted.abraker wrote:
What if I told you that I vote knowing I will likely regret the decision later? I vote when I am able to justify my vote since at least last game. Last time I voted Dawnsday as soon as soon as I had justification to vote, which was his mason crap. This time I am hesitant to vote zekks due to me being wrong about Dawnsday last game. This is why rvs sucks even if you can justify your reasons.
Because I didn't assume he would have the same reason or same respond. As I said before, the first respond I specially consider it because maybe Zekks thought it was RVS stage, so he went " idc e e e e e". Then there was like more 10-15 posts and more contents to discuss so I would really like his opinions about everyone when he was active, but he still go "i go sha la la la la". I asked about John again because Zekks already gave his opinion about me and Foxtrot, the other one who involved was John but he didn't say anything about him, so I asked about John to Zekks again.abraker wrote:
@Lincolm
Also now that I look at it, why did you ask zekks about John twice here and here? You got your "joke" response from from zekks here, WHICH YOU JOKED BACK, ACKNOWLEDGING THE ANSWER. Like what the fuck, man? Maybe that's why zekks didn't bother answering that one properly in particular?
I don't want to discuss this because it achieves nothing except who or what is PR or not. We should do and act as our alignment regardless our power.Foxtrot wrote:
yeah, we do have PRs, but what makes you think Zekks is one and not just vanilla? Just chance?
Because if you discuss anything about him, you are going to achieve nothing about him (he won't respond seriously), especially if he is going to flip as town, you're going to hurt town.Foxtrot wrote:
I still don't get why we should back off from Zekks if he's scum, like Hika and Lincolm are suggesting. Sure, there's not enough content, but does it really matter if there's enough evidence that shows Zekks having higher chances of scum instead of town?
Why? If he's not commited to reading he's going to hurt town in the long run. It's not FUN to policy lynch rest assured I'd rather the idea was never even conceived but honestly.Lincolm wrote:
, but I hate policy lynch also.
... that's it? Really? Why start the PoE with abraker?Lincolm wrote:
Vote :abraker because PoE
Who would you start start with?Foxtrot wrote:
... that's it? Really? Why start the PoE with abraker?Lincolm wrote:
Vote :abraker because PoE