Please don't try to pick off the fresh meat just because it's juicy.
FTFY[ - Zekks - ] wrote:
idc, as long as I'm alive, there's no way town win from me 'w'
do you wanna fightLincolm wrote:
FTFY[ - Zekks - ] wrote:
idc, as long as I'm alive, there's no way town win from me 'w'
Lincolm wrote:
Yep, let's fight.
why would he answer red? are you trying to distract us from actual scum and shift the attention to the new players?Lincolm wrote:
That's logical answer. And no, I just ask if you get red or green colour, hoping you to answer red somehow.
Well-written flavour, though.
Hey Zekks, what do you think about John?this further proves my suspicion; stop trying to initiate a bandwagon, it's not working
He wrote really nice flavour for mafia but doesn't know RVS.doesn't take an experienced player to write good flavour
Do you agree that he is newbie?yeah
Most people, even newbies, will know green and red are the expected answer, and some experienced people might be jokingly answer it by any means as it was in RVSand because it's still RSV, I don't think he has any idea whether you're town or not, hence why he gave you a vague answer. to me, that makes perfect sense, he really has no reason to trust you.
You don't want to vote me Zekks? A nice green fast wagon to jump inwhat are you trying to accomplish
Maybe just me then.Foxtrot wrote:
doesn't take an experienced player to write good flavour
Not vague, imo.Foxtrot wrote:
and because it's still RSV, I don't think he has any idea whether you're town or not, hence why he gave you a vague answer. to me, that makes perfect sense, he really has no reason to trust you.
Because he was around. I like to engage someone who was around. If I want to ask who not online, I would put it later.Foxtrot wrote:
i still don't understand why you asked about john to zekks. you could have asked anybody but you went straight for zekks
What do you think about Zekks, then? Am I wrong to engage to him? What should I ask to him?Foxtrot wrote:
what are you trying to accomplish
I think tunnelling is good in this condition, I like what he do.[ - Zekks - ] wrote:
I might vote for Foxtrot, since she is trying to pin everyone on Lincolm, but that seems kinda weak, but I'll still hold onto that
What do you think about my clarification?[ - Zekks - ] wrote:
Or I can change my vote to Lincolm, because Foxtrot has decent amount of evidence to support the fact that Lincolm could be the mafia
Dawnsday haven't confirmed
Unofficial Vote Count
Lincolm (L-3) : johnmedina999, Foxtrot
rEdo (L-3) : Hika, [ - Zekks - ]
Hika (L-3) : Zexion, Lincolm
[ - Zekks - ] (L-4) : rEdo
Not Voting : abraker, Dawnsday
What do you mean by decent?[ - Zekks - ] wrote:
Or I can change my vote to Lincolm, because Foxtrot has decent amount of evidence to support the fact that Lincolm could be the mafia
fair enoughLincolm wrote:
Because he was around. I like to engage someone who was around. If I want to ask who not online, I would put it later.
i like your confidenceLincolm wrote:
It doesn't hurt me or Foxtrot if you vote me or Foxtrot.
well, you were expecting a red or green answer. he said mostly black. that can be seen as vague...Lincolm wrote:
Not vague, imo.
let me take that back.Foxtrot wrote:
to me, that makes perfect sense, he really has no reason to trust you.
i missed thisZekks wrote:
idc, as long as I'm walking, there's no stopping for me 'w'
but you didn't say that you were town, either, so we're back to square one. we don't know who you are, so that's a good enough reason to not trust you.John wrote:
I purposely did not give out any information because there was no real reason to. If someone asks for your credit card info, would you give it to them on the spot? I thought so
this is ONE of the possibilites i mentioned so i dont think i have to add anything to thatJohn wrote:
Also, I voted for him because RVS: there was no one to really vote for, no evidence to analyze yet, but the second he started fishing for an easy noob kill, it seems suspicious to me, and I voted.
are you trying to say that i mindlessly agreed with you? because that's not the case. i gave my reasons, and they just happened to concise with yours. until i read the thread over.John wrote:
Foxtrot, you confuse me. Hopping onto the first bandwagon that seemed plausible would be a scum thing to do
but i haven't even refrained my vote from Lincolm so you're contradicting yourself there.John wrote:
but I see you are starting to hop off it with your post, and going more neutral. My instincts tell me this is not a scum move, but there is also the possibility of you being Mafia and Lincolm being your partner: as soon as you saw Zekks thinking about hopping on the bandwagon, you saw that your partner being killed might be a certain possibility, and you hopped off the wagon to avoid that. That seems suspicious to me.
i just think that the possibility of you being scum is as high as Lincolm's because you both acted fairly suspicious.
Mafia game is full of doubt and naturally heated game. I'm trying to not mentally unbalanced like in the past. Confidence is just to hide my tantrums. Hope I do well in holding it.Foxtrot wrote:
i like your confidence
Maybe I'm not clear enough in my explanation before. If he answered either red or green jokingly, it means he is experienced and vice versa.Foxtrot wrote:
well, you were expecting a red or green answer. he said mostly black. that can be seen as vague...
Mmmm... even though if you said red colour, did it makes everyone believe you're mafia and vice versa? Tbh, I'm not trying to create a bandwagon, but I'm trying to push everyone to get out from RVS and post actual content. Unfortunately, I don't have any reads to change my vote to serious vote.johnmedina999 wrote:
I still hold my vote against Lincolm, though, because even if going after fresh meat is a plausible thing to do, trying to create a bandwagon is scummy to me.
Basically, that was rEdo's RVS vote.Foxtrot wrote:
but hey, you didn't go after rEdo when he voted for Zekks for simply being new. are you being hypocritical or are you partners with him?
I am considering to vote for myself if I cannot come up with any conclusions in the next couple days because fuck RVSLincolm wrote:
@abraker :
Why did you not join RVS? What do you think about me?
Lincolm plz, even the role PM's are up.Lincolm wrote:
That's logical answer. And no, I just ask if you get red or green colour, hoping you to answer red somehow.
Well-written flavour, though.
It's way too soon to be assuming bandwagons mean something. I've seen games when players get to L-1 and it doesn't mean anything in particular. Also why do you assume rEdo and Hika wagons are "based on nothing"? Have you ever asked the reasons why is that?johnmedina999 wrote:
I purposely did not give out any information because there was no real reason to. If someone asks for your credit card info, would you give it to them on the spot? I thought so. Also, I voted for him because RVS: there was no one to really vote for, no evidence to analyze yet, but the second he started fishing for an easy noob kill, it seems suspicious to me, and I voted.
Foxtrot, you confuse me. Hopping onto the first bandwagon that seemed plausible would be a scum thing to do (redo and Hika bandwagons are based on nothing), but I see you are starting to hop off it with your post, and going more neutral. My instincts tell me this is not a scum move, but there is also the possibility of you being Mafia and Lincolm being your partner: as soon as you saw Zekks thinking about hopping on the bandwagon, you saw that your partner being killed might be a certain possibility, and you hopped off the wagon to avoid that. That seems suspicious to me.
I still hold my vote against Lincolm, though, because even if going after fresh meat is a plausible thing to do, trying to create a bandwagon is scummy to me.
My vote may have been RVS, but that doesn't mean I keep it for the same reason.johnmedina999 wrote:
Well, I guess I meant nothing in this game. The first vote was for redo by Hika with no reasoning or previous posts, and you voted for Hika because she "didn't like my bastard game", which (to me) is not based on anything. Sure, cross-game interactions are valuable, but the reasoning isn't there. Now that you're here, may I ask if you have a different reason for voting for Hika?
I think you're just overanalyzing a bad newb-test Lincolm did.Dawnsday wrote:
My entire opinion on the entire "PM color" thing is that no matter what John responded (even red?), it couldn't be taken at face value ever. He responds green? Duh he's scum, or town. Leaving you with nothing. He responds with nor green nor red? Great, he's given you nothing. He responds red? He can simply claim he was trying to see how far you'd push him as a newb and how devoted you'd be to taking such info at face value. (Though I'm not sure I'd even consider this a possbility in hindsight, just pointing out that even in the most extreme of responses it could be played off.) therefore I think the entire concept of asking for his PM color was flawed in response.
and I asked her to clarify on this, but she hasn't told me anything yet. I know, I might be looking too hard for clues, but that is such an odd thing to sayZekks wrote:
idc, as long as I'm walking, there's no stopping for me 'w'
I'm looking at it critically but maybe you're right. I stand by that the concept was flawed, I have no idea as to Lincolm's experience but I'm just giving my opinion on the matter. I stand by that it COULD potentially have been a scum play but I agree that it's just a shortsighted newb test.Zexion wrote:
I think you're just overanalyzing a bad newb-test Lincolm did.Dawnsday wrote:
My entire opinion on the entire "PM color" thing is that no matter what John responded (even red?), it couldn't be taken at face value ever. He responds green? Duh he's scum, or town. Leaving you with nothing. He responds with nor green nor red? Great, he's given you nothing. He responds red? He can simply claim he was trying to see how far you'd push him as a newb and how devoted you'd be to taking such info at face value. (Though I'm not sure I'd even consider this a possbility in hindsight, just pointing out that even in the most extreme of responses it could be played off.) therefore I think the entire concept of asking for his PM color was flawed in response.