1. osu! forums
  2. Beatmaps
  3. Ranked/Approved Beatmaps
show more
posted

Pachiru wrote:

d o n ' t
j u d g e a m a p o n i t s S R

+

i don't see the problem with the map, since the 0.96 diffs is the topdiff. if it was a 3* Hard, that would be a problem indeed, but in this case, it's not.
Judgements can't be entirely formed from SR, but it can't be simply ignored. Also, I was arguing that there's not enough variation between the only two diffs in the set for it to be considered a complete set with varying difficulties.

How would a 3* Hard be bad for this song? The BPM may be low, but the mapping in the Easy and Normal diffs clearly skips over so much in the song. Mapping a 2 minute Hard difficulty isn't such a crazy effort, and 3* for a Hard isn't anything out of the ordinary, either.
posted

ignorance wrote:

Pachiru wrote:

d o n ' t
j u d g e a m a p o n i t s S R

+

i don't see the problem with the map, since the 0.96 diffs is the topdiff. if it was a 3* Hard, that would be a problem indeed, but in this case, it's not.
Judgements can't be entirely formed from SR, but it can't be simply ignored. Also, I was arguing that there's not enough variation between the only two diffs in the set for it to be considered a complete set with varying difficulties.

How would a 3* Hard be bad for this song? The BPM may be low, but the mapping in the Easy and Normal diffs clearly skips over so much in the song. 3* for a Hard isn't anything out of the ordinary, either.
yeah that's your opinion, Regraz have a different opinion, that's all :oops:
posted
I actually do not think they are details. They are pretty much like minor stuffs regarding intensity and pitch. Putting this aside, one thing I want to ask, even if they are details, is there any ranking criteria saying that one must not skip details of a song?
How would a 3* Hard be bad for this song? The BPM may be low, but the mapping in the Easy and Normal diffs clearly skips over so much in the song. 3* for a Hard isn't anything out of the ordinary, either.
About this, I think, though this quote is camouflaged with initially flawed statement of "details cannot be skipped", there are almost no differences between this quote and the posts in Beatmap Project forums that are requiring mappers to make map for them out of their own preference, which sounds pretty taking-for-granted. So yeah, if you think you want to add more things onto this song, you could certainly upload a new mapset!
posted

Natsu wrote:

yeah that's your opinion, Regraz have a different opinion, that's all :oops:
This "different opinion" of Regrez is just actually an excuse for the map to be pushed to ranked.

It's a serious insult to the artist of the song if this is considered a complete representation of the song. Regraz' "opinion" really can't be justified. This mapset simply screams laziness and lackluster representation of the song.
posted
life filled up with notes seems a little pathetic
posted

Regraz wrote:

I actually do not think they are details. They are pretty much like minor stuffs regarding intensity and pitch. Putting this aside, one thing I want to ask, even if they are details, is there any ranking criteria saying that one must not skip details of a song?
How would a 3* Hard be bad for this song? The BPM may be low, but the mapping in the Easy and Normal diffs clearly skips over so much in the song. 3* for a Hard isn't anything out of the ordinary, either.
About this, I think though camouflaged with initially flawed statement that "details cannot be skipped" there are almost no differences between this post and the posts in Beatmap Project forums that are requiring mappers to make map for them out of their own preference, which sounds pretty taking-for-granted. So yeah, if you think you want to add more things onto this song, you could certainly upload a new mapset!
MINOR? It's melodies that are completely skipped over! You literally have only mapped less than 25% of the actual song.

"add more things into this song" - you say this as if they're not in the song? As if what you haven't mapped apparently isn't there?
posted
man really, if the mapper wants to make a E - N spread is free to do it, some people enjoy playing easy maps, some people hard maps etc, mappers are same, some people enjoy making hard stuff and other doesn't, deal with it.
posted
Seems like BNs are going to completely ignore the criticism that I have made and claim that Regraz has an "opinion" and therefore critism can be ignored.

It's a battle lost by default if BNs disagree with you (without justification, oddly enough) so my efforts to help improve this mapset before it goes into its "completely finished" "ranked state" are done.

This map will stay lackluster and an insult to the artist of the song, I guess that's not my problem.
posted

ignorance wrote:

Seems like BNs are going to completely ignore the criticism that I have made and claim that Regraz has an "opinion" and therefore critism can be ignored.

It's a battle lost by default if BNs disagree with you (without justification, oddly enough) so my efforts to help improve this mapset before it goes into its "completely finished" "ranked state" are done.

This map will stay lackluster and an insult to the artist of the song, I guess that's not my problem.
Please stop with that BN excuse that is wrong. Don't force your opinion on the set, and understand Regraz's point of view, he has his own reason to keep it like this with low SR diffs. As long as there is no unrankable issue, it's not worth having a DQ here.
If you feel like there is more potential on this song, then map it with harder diffs, and try to rank it by yourself, it's not impossible.

Have a good day, I hope you'll understand this!
posted
congratz

ignorance wrote:

so my efforts to help
you're doing this wrong
posted
graz~~~
posted
Thanks! Hope more Chinese maps could be ranked! :D
posted
恭喜噜!!!
Please sign in to reply.