1. Easy (1.4 stars, 59 notes)
2. Hard (2.86 stars, 102 notes)
3. Here I am (3.52 stars, 109 notes)
4. Yamicchi's Normal (2.06 stars, 94 notes)

Mashed wrote:

[Yamicchi's Normal]
00:32:639 (3,4,1) - Perhaps you can change the stack so the circles go closer to the right and follow the path of sliders? tried but I guess it won't work well. Yes I turned off stacking view while mapping

Mashed wrote:

NM for you

[All Difficulties]
I automatically see you have a negative offset. This is a big problem please change the offset to 78. No, negative offset is rankable. The BIG WHITE TICKS are like Sol keys in a musical notation, they mark the start of measures. If you want positive offset, it must be at least 810, but there will be a problem with the timing point at 00:00:078

[Easy]
00:03:737 (1) - Shorten this slider 2 lines to make it fit better with the song and make it a bit easier for new players. Nice
00:04:834 (2) - Optional circle here, sounds nice in my opinion I like mine
00:15:444 (1) - Shorten this slider 2 lines as well Done
00:16:541 (2) - Put a circle here Already?

[Hard]
Looks good so far other than the offset. Thanks, no problem

[Valentine]
00:05:932 (1) - New combo here to make it easier to read stack? No, it's already easy

Looking pretty good.

DefendeRDjulus wrote:

from my queue

Easy

00:12:517 (1,2,3) - similar spacings is neccesary (i think) They are already
00:37:395 (2,3,1) - ^ ^
00:47:547 (1) - nc Done

Hard

00:08:676 (2) - don't rotate
00:11:786 (3,4,5) - spacing What's the problem?
00:40:688 (2,1) - not same sliders Fixed
00:44:768 (1,1,1,1) - nc? Done

Valentine

00:01:542 (2,3,1) - spacing as well so farWhat should I do? I don't know what you want
00:10:505 (2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - play this is so hard i think. Me too. Let it be
00:15:078 (2,3,1) - why not a same spacing? I mostly always make increasing space for that kind of sound
00:31:542 (1) - don't rotate pls
00:35:200 (3,1) - fix blanket Not that visual, no need to
00:41:786 (1) - don't rotate
00:43:249 (1) - ^
00:44:388 (2,3,1) - same spacing? No, I like mine
00:44:767 (1) - nc? Already
00:47:548 (1) - nc Okay

DefendeRDjulus wrote:

Oh lol i mean "reverse". my bad,sorry for that but im bad in english..

- raspy wrote:

Here's the mod:

Easy is fine.

Hard

SPOILER

00:24:225 (1,2,3) - This will obviously take some tweaking (or ignoring), but 3 isn't properly blanketing 2 but is blanketed by 1. Your choice which matters more. No more curve 3
00:41:786 (1,2,3) - This looks similar to a triangle, but isn't one, try to make it one Good idea

Here are the wide angles I found, which might not matter on such low bpm: Aren't they popular in Hard diffs?
00:05:932 (2,3,4) -
00:07:212 (2,3,4,5) -
00:10:505 (2,3,4,1) -
00:17:639 (2,3,4) -
00:18:920 (2,3,4,5) -
00:20:383 (2,3,4,5) -
00:32:639 (2,3,1) -

Valentine

SPOILER

00:10:505 (2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - That's a lot of wide angles in a row, but it might not matter on such low bpm. I aim on that to make this diff hard, btw I don't think they are strange, I see it on a lot of maps
00:44:388 (2,3,1) - Make this a triangle if you want No, I want to make it's space increasing

It's all I could find, great mapping man! Hope to see it ranked, calm songs like this are a thing I like! Thanks!

here

1. 00:00:078 (1,2) - fix blanket
   
   
2. 00:11:784 (5) - should nc this imo
3. 00:04:284 (3,4) - another blanket to be fixed
   
   look at the sliderend

   
   better view

   
4. 00:22:760 (1,2,3) - 90° flow? hmm..
5. 00:31:540 (1) - A red anchor doesn't feel right for this type of song, it's too calm

1. 00:08:676 (2) doesn't quite fit rhythm. maybe change this.

1. 00:45:594 (1,1) just a suggestion maybe lower sv of 2nd slider so the two sliders are the same length.

- raspy wrote:

Yamicchi's Normal

SPOILER

00:30:078 (1,2) - The end of slider 1 isn't properly blanketed by the curvature of slider 2. it's not a blanket
00:33:737 (2,3,4) - Another wide angle, but it's really your choice if these wide angles matter. wide angle is not a problem though
00:37:395 (2,3) - The blanketing of 3 is actually just a few pixels off of the curvature of slider 2. no one would actually see that tbh

Here are the wide angles I found, which might not matter on such low bpm:
00:26:786 (3,1,2) -
00:38:859 (1,2,3,4) -
00:39:956 (4,1,2,3,1) -

josh1024 wrote:

Normal

1. 00:08:676 (2) doesn't quite fit rhythm. maybe change this. I would like to know why

Manu028 wrote:

Hi, M4M from my queue

[General]
Negative offset is most of the times a bad thing, if you want to fix it but keep the big white ticks in the same notes, put 2 timing points like these (don't forget to resnap every note) AGAIN, NAGATIVE OFFSET IS NOT A PROBLEM. Check this: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/580994

here

[Valentine]

1. 00:00:078 (1,2) - fix blanket Done
   
   
2. 00:11:784 (5) - should nc this imo Not necessary, it's not a jump
3. 00:04:284 (3,4) - another blanket to be fixed Wow, nice
   
   look at the sliderend

   
   better view

   
4. 00:22:760 (1,2,3) - 90° flow? hmm.. ? The song is now slow, whatever flow, they are all okay
5. 00:31:540 (1) - A red anchor doesn't feel right for this type of song, it's too calm Done

Okay that's all, hope to see this ranked ^^
also sorry but i suck at modding less than 4 stars maps, so i decided to mod only the last diff Oh, okay, however your mod is good

josh1024 wrote:

From the queue:

Looks pretty good.

Easy
Neatest of all.
Hard

1. 00:45:594 (1,1) just a suggestion maybe lower sv of 2nd slider so the two sliders are the same length. Fixed in another way

Insane
I don't mind wide angles at this spacing but maybe make the notes look neater (by keeping angles constant etc.) I will fix if they are pointed specifically in further mod

- titan wrote:

heyy, from my queue.

easy

SPOILER

00:00:078 (1,1) - blanket is slightly off Fixed
00:04:834 - would be good if you put a circle here (for flow and rhythm stuff) No, I used to, and feel this better
00:05:200 (2,3) - think the blanket might be slightly off No need to do it so hard, I feel this okay
00:09:590 (1,2) - same here ^
00:15:078 (4,1) - this is like 1 pixel off or something Wow, nice
00:16:542 - if you take my suggestion to add a circle earlier, you'd also have to add one here of course
00:19:468 (2,3) - blanket Done
00:28:981 (4,1) - ^ Done
00:34:834 (4,1) - ^ Done

nice map. gl Thanks mate

- titan wrote:

yamicchi's normal

SPOILER

00:41:786 (1,1) - this feels really uncomfortable to play I don't feel like uncomfortable though, but I'll keep that in mind

nice map. gl

Manu028 wrote:

ok really want this ranked so i shooted a star \O3O/, don't disappoint me uwu

UniqueBlock11 wrote:

Hello, from my queue.

easy
00:00:810 (1) - Blanket is a bit too tall, move middle gray anchor to x:164 y:76 and slider end to x:252 y:96 (i'm picky ) Fixed a bit different
00:21:298 (1) - Are you sure new players can follow this slider rhythm? You can follow a simple arc or a complex but easier slider such as 00:24:225 (1) I am sure, I always ask newbies for testplay on my difficulties. A 13pp player can play this diff without miss at his first try.
00:35:932 (1) - ^

hard
What happened to your unique slider shapes? While modding easy difficulty I noticed a good amount of varying slider shapes but here you just use arcs and the occasional red anchor. Try to add some variety to your sliders, you can use the slider shapes in the easy difficulty for reference. Because the sliders in this diff is not long enough to make art, or it just me don't know how to make art with them...
00:47:554 (1) - The slider end is missing a clap hitsound. Done

valentine
00:47:554 (1) - The slider end is also missing a clap hitsound. Already has...

Sorry for this short mod, your mapset looks really well designed so I couldn't find a lot of issues.

UniqueBlock11 wrote:

yamicchi's normal
00:23:127 (1,2,3) - You use a rhythm like this throughout the rest of the song here, since the song gradually slows down, it would probably make sense to change every similar rhythm from 00:34:834 (3,4,5) on to a single repeat slider to emphasize this. basically you can't judge the intensity in most of the R3 music box songs, it's just the density. I believe having circles would be better to avoid slider-heavy section
00:34:834 (3,4,5) - There's also a NC inconsistency, sometimes this rhythm is NCed, other times not. For example, this rhythm is the same but has no NC: 00:28:981 (1,2,3) fixed

.

Underforest wrote:

[yamicchi's normal]
00:35:200 (2,3) - move to x:290 y:63 for better shape I prefer mine

Underforest wrote:

quick m4m return

[general]
why is bpm doubled? Because I believe my BPM analyzer

[easy]
really good Thanks!

[hard]
there's some jumps you need to polish but i think it's still good Er, okay, fixed some

[valentine]
00:11:054 (1,2,3,4) - give some variety and jump to this pattern for emphasis No, I want to keep them the same with 00:10:505 (2,3,4) -

sorry for short mod, it's a nice map, gl~

CookieBite wrote:

hi from my q

[Easy]

1. 00:46:457 (1) - just a suggestion: change the slider like this for better visual (at least for me) Okay
   
   click

   
   p well made tbh, not much to say

[Hard]

1. the beginning of the spacing seems too big i highly recommend lower it (eg. 00:03:005 (2,3,1,2) - ) I use that DS throughly. And 00:03:737 (1,2) - is 1 beat spacing, so it should be stack or clearly farther.
2. look ok enough

[Valentine]

1. 00:01:542 (2) - copy 00:00:810 (1) - and rotate it clockwise 270 degree, replace the slider and blanket with 00:02:090 (3) - so it doesn't feel like a random curve slider there Their DS seem fine to me, so I fixed in another way
2. 00:10:505 (2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - too much circle imo, recommend change some of it to be sliders No, I want to impress their sound
3. 00:11:786 (5) - NC? Not necessary, I prefer consistance
4. 00:12:517 (1,2,3) - the spacing here seems too similar compare to each other, stacking 00:13:615 (2) - onto the slider 1 should solve the problem I don't think it as a problem, because it use the same rhythm with the previous section
5. 00:13:981 (1,2,3) - ^ ^
6. 00:22:029 (2,1) - the sound at the circle seems very weak while the spacing is almost the same as 00:23:127 (2,3) - , lower the spacing may help Done
7. 00:32:639 (2,3) - the spacing here seems similar to the 1/1 part before, this may lead to some player's confusion I will notice this, and will decided to fix or not after a testplay
8. 00:40:322 (1,2) - the spacing is just unreasonable here, while the spacing of the previous part is huge, the spacing here is reduced so suddenly, consider larger the spacing here or lower the spacing at the 1/1 part before this Fixed

good luck with your map!
mod my map back