1. Advanced (2.33 stars, 158 notes)
2. Euphoria (4.62 stars, 313 notes)
3. Hard (3.34 stars, 195 notes)
4. Normal (1.84 stars, 109 notes)

Kyu96 wrote:

[Euphoria]

01:00:658 (1,2,1) - I don't understand what was your intention to stack the first two notes of the stream? imo the 2 notes feels like the odd one out, so I stack them to make sure players know that they're starting on the right beat, which is the 3rd circle
01:19:258 (6) - NC here maybe because of the drum sound on this note? hmm idk it doesn't seem like necessary to me
01:27:258 (1,2,1,2) - You might want to increase the spacing of the jumps a bit since it is the most intense part of the song. ok
01:28:758 (8) - Why did you NC here? I can't hear a dominant sound here. hm? When did I NC?
01:29:258 (5) - This note is supported with the vocals 'hey'. You might want to NC here instead. nah I don't usually NC on stuff like that because my stream is usually based on the drum, not others

I really didn't find many issues, the map is already well done and the points above are mainly
things you could change but you don't necessarily have to !
Good luck with this map !

Fursum wrote:

hi

No need for widescreen support if you aren't going to use a sb

01:28:058 - overlapping green lines

Hitsound files:

Wave hitsounds with possible delay > 5ms:
normal-hitfinish.wav got the file from ranked set, but I might check on it again

Hitsound file is not 100 ms length:
soft-hitclap2.wav 76.67ms will ask others about this too xd I collected it lately

[Normal]

Unused green lines:
00:49:758 - This part
01:03:458 - and 01:03:658 -
01:06:858 - and 01:07:258 -
01:19:658 - and 01:20:058 - clean

01:29:558 - The other diffs end here so it makes sense to end the spinner here as well. oops, fixed
Also end the kiai here 01:29:558 - if you are going to do that. ok

00:38:858 (2,3,4) - Don't think this linear pattern plays well with the reverse sliders placement. it's fine imo, but I'll keep that in mind in case someone mention it again
00:43:058 (3,4) - ^
00:46:258 (3,4) - This is a better way to do it

01:05:658 - This patterns entry is kinda weird. Makes more sense to make (2,3,4) into a different pattern because of the different sound, and put (1) to slider ends curve. actually it's 2,3 the same, 1, 4 has their own sound, and I feel like it's a bit complicated to seperate them, so I made this pattern.
It also support the drum well

[Hard]

Unused green lines:
00:49:758 - This part
01:03:458 - and 01:03:658 -
01:06:858 - and 01:07:258 -
01:19:658 - and 01:20:058 -

01:29:558 - End kiai here all done

00:31:258 (5) - Too close to (3), makes more sense to space it from that because of the new vocal sentence. what does it relate to 3 I dont understand? It's not even overlap so I think there's no problem putting it there

00:49:658 (1,2,3,4) - This manual stack is very similar to 1/4 stacks like here 00:57:458 - increased spacing a bit

01:28:058 - Makes more sense to put reverse sliders at the start because of the buildup, not sure if it would be harder though. I rarely see they put 5-note after reverse in hard diff tho xd I think it's fine this way

[Euphoria]

01:29:558 - End kiai here fixed

00:54:458 (1,2) - I don't like this stack because the nc is on (1) instead of (2) but nc doesn't fit (2) so not stacking is probably better. wew I'll keep it here because I don't like it too, I just made it for consistent.

01:00:258 (1,2) - Jump needs to be bigger than the last one, this is a later part of the build up. Currently the last jump is a bit bigger than this. fixed a bit, can't make it bigger as it might ruin the pattern up.

01:00:658 (1,2,1,2,3,4) - This part needs more curve into (5), also there's nothing to emphasize on (5) this much. I noticed this, lemme ask for more opinion, see if it's really bad

01:24:058 - This could be a double with 1/2 slider as well, missing a note here 01:24:158 - it'd be too much of 1/4 tho.

01:27:658 (1,2) - This jump could be bigger than the previous one as well. fixed a bit

01:28:958 (2,3,4,5,6,7,1) - Again, this part needs more curve, not much to emphasize on (5) but should be more curved than the other parts because of the buildup.

noz1995 wrote:

2!

SPOILER

1. 00:25:658 (1,2,3,4) - Nếu là tôi map, tôi sẽ làm thế này vì thấy nó hay hơn và không ảnh hướng đến độ khó: http://puu.sh/wRLiT.PNG. Tương tự với 00:32:058 (1,2,3,4) - hmm tui thay vay khong hop ly bang kieu tui dang lam :v
2. 00:29:658 (3) - Ctrl + G thấy đẹp mắt hơn ma flow khong dep bang :v
3. 00:46:258 (3) - Thế này tôi thấy đẹp hơn: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8670794 uhm co the dep hon ma flow hoi bi gat, khong hop voi vocal
4. 01:21:658 (1) - Vì lý do gì mà phải gấp khúc, trong khi chỉ việc copy 01:20:858 (3) - rồi xoay 180 độ nó cũng đẹp hơn?http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8670818 de tao net rieng biet cho 2 patterns gan nhau ong :v

1. 00:25:658 - Giống Normal giong normal

1. 00:41:658 - 00:44:858 - 00:48:058 - Nhạc nhẹ, không cần jump emphasis thoi ma :<
2. 00:54:258 (6,7,1,2) - Pattern 2010, xấu và đáng ghét -_- tui cung ghet lam, ma tai vi phai de cho consistent nen tui dang kh biet lam the nao )

Nói chung là tôi thấy Hard và Insane cách nhau xa quá, nhận xét cá nhân thôi. tui hoi BN roi, thi ong noi la khong sao, tui cung cha biet nua

Good luck on reading

1. 
2. 00:35:258 –circle here? idk
3. 00:50:458 (1,2,3) –why not just make a perfect triangle here, ds doesn’t change much anw
4. 00:54:258 (6,7,1) –gay, miss every time, not like anything wrong with it
5. 00:57:858 (1) –is there any reason to nc this, when the ½ drum go by white/red pair?
6. 01:06:058 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) – make it cul stream like 01:18:858 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) -,since there technically the same sound
7. 01:24:058 (1) –this has same sound as 01:11:258 (5,6) –why are they different?
   i

1. 00:59:858 (4) –something should change here, cause vocal and stuff
   
2. 01:25:258 (2,3) –maybe not stack here? In the kial stack like this is only used for 1 sound lik 01:22:458 (4,5) – so may as well keep it that way eh
   i

Kirylln wrote:

Đầu tao đau quá man
Still think you need an Easy diff but whateve,
fking hate you

SPOILER

not jk

[4.62]

1. wtf how
2. 00:35:258 –circle here? idk ye
3. 00:50:458 (1,2,3) –why not just make a perfect triangle here, ds doesn’t change much anw 1,3 is the copy of 2,4 :d
4. 00:54:258 (6,7,1) –gay, miss every time, not like anything wrong with it it's said 3 times, fixed
5. 00:57:858 (1) –is there any reason to nc this, when the ½ drum go by white/red pair? removed
6. 01:06:058 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) – make it cul stream like 01:18:858 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) -,since there technically the same sound hmm might think about it
7. 01:24:058 (1) –this has same sound as 01:11:258 (5,6) –why are they different? fixed
   i

[3.36]

1. 00:59:858 (4) –something should change here, cause vocal and stuff i don't feel like there's anything major changed.
   
2. 01:25:258 (2,3) –maybe not stack here? In the kial stack like this is only used for 1 sound lik 01:22:458 (4,5) – so may as well keep it that way eh k
   i

k

_DT3 wrote:

I delay mods
This is damn clean

[General]

1. Tbh, the soft-hitfinish +drum-hitnormal makes it that the hitsounding on the sliders in this part 00:25:658 - sounds a bit awkward with the default and possible other skins' soft-hitnormal imo. I can tell that it might have been used for the guitar strums, but the alternating between the really soft sound (soft-hitfinish + drum-hitnormal) and the soft-hitnormals sounds kinda weird imo, idk. Sth that felt weird to me when I played it (with my skin at least) um yea I didn't notice that. Made drum-hitnormal -> soft-hitwhistle. It sounds better now
2. 00:49:658 - Just an idea, but what about increasing volume gradually here since the "Take me" gets louder with every half-beat?oo good idea

[Normal]

1. 00:22:458 (1) - I get that you wanted a wave slider that's edgy but this is the only edgy slider in this whole part which makes the note unnecessarily stand out imo. Could stick to the curvy wave slider imo good one :3
2. 00:35:258 (1) - Could extend this to two more white ticks as this is allowed, sounds cooler imo but up to you hmm idk, let's see if anyone complain about it. Fixed
3. 01:26:458 (1) - Obvious ending because the last sound is on there, but could profit from ending 01:29:658 - since that's when the fade out stops and it feels more natural previous mod told me not to xd

[Hard]

1. 00:12:858 (1,2,3,4) - Well, it is with x1 DS but there are so many 1/2 hitcircles later that look similar (if not bigger) that players could be confused, even with the NCs since this is the first pattern they encounter well I think it's ok, as they all know it's not an exciting part to have such spacing for 1/2. Besides it's the intro, so they can retry it, more play counts owo
2. 00:14:058 (4,5) - Idk, but spacing emphasis because it's on a downbeat? Even if it's 1/1 it looks kinda inconsistent ok, didn't notice
3. 00:49:658 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Hmm, this contrast in spacing is so extreme that players are bound to break in some way imo, if you want contrast, you could replace these 00:49:658 (1,2,3,4) - with 1/2 sliders hmm I might get more opinions on this
4. 01:20:858 (3,4) - Might be for variety or contrast, but there is nothing really different here 01:17:658 (3) - 01:24:058 (3) - so I don't see why this is the only time in both kiais that you use 1/2 hitcircles

[Euphoria]

1. 00:40:858 (1,2,3) - 00:44:058 (1,2,3) - What bothers me is while there is a different pitch at (2), it gets mapped in a linear pattern, which imo doesn't emphasize the (2) while playing appropriately. 00:47:258 (1,2,3) - This pattern was honestly good for me, but since it is supposed to be different, it's up to you it's not bad to try something new, fixed
2. 01:02:458 (1,2,1) - Stupid stacking mechanics lol actually, lol
3. 01:06:058 (3,4,5,6) - Up to you but could be separated from 01:06:458 (7,8,9,10) - imo since the rhythm of the drums is different for both timestamps as someone mentioned this before, fixed

That's it lol
Nice set, GL!!

Pachiru wrote:

[Last diff]

* 00:32:058 (1) - why there is same spacing as those: 00:31:458 (4,5) - but there is not a big spacing as you did before here: 00:28:458 (4,1,4,1) - those spacing are placed on a strong sound, and there: 00:32:058 (1) - you didn't made such a big spacing (you made a big spacing here: 00:33:258 (4,1) - too, thats how you should make this spacing: 00:32:058 (1) -) ooo my bad, fixed

*00:44:258 (2,3) - the small spacing here can be quite disturbing. try to make something a bit more spaced, because it looks strange, and even if the song, the voice is less intense, it doesn't deserve a small spacing like this, in my opinion. make at least sth like this: 00:47:258 (1,2) - ok as I was complained about this earlier, fixed

*00:49:658 (1) - same thing about spacing here, try to make it a little more spaced, to show that there is a strong sound here, as you previously made. hmm I think it's fine here as that's not a strong beat, enough to have higher spacing

*01:09:358 (4,1,2) - the flow here looks bad to me, the fact that it's a reverse slider, and also the sharp angle of those two circles: 01:09:358 (4,1) - tried sth else

*01:15:458 (2,3,4) - in my opinion, you should try to arrange it differently here, cause you use only stacks on circles+slider, so the fact that's a triplet here, can be quite bothering, and maybe surprising for the player as he could be disoriented, cause it pop suddenly. if you can arrange it in a way to not stack those triplets that would be good i think DONE~

THE MAP IS AWESOME
YAMICCHI PLS GD

dipperbee wrote:

[Normal]
Dùng Tiếng Anh thì nó rề rà nên mình viết luôn Tiếng Việt :3
00:30:258 (4,5) - Tui nghĩ là ông nên chêm circle vào đây rồi thay slider ở nốt 4 và 5 để nó tương tự như mấy slider trước ông làm , thật ra làm thế thì tui thấy giai điệu nó hay hơn 1 chút thử rồi, cũng kh khá hơn mấy ông ơi tui giữ kiểu này vậy
00:54:258 - tương tư như trên , ở đây âm triple , nhưng chỉ là normal nên ông thêm 1 nốt vào đây thôi chắc không cần cũng đc hihi chỗ này tui tập trung ở cái snare mạnh nhất thôi
00:57:458 - circle here
01:24:858 (1,2,3,4) - Khúc này thì nên tăng space của jump vì nhạc nó hơi dãn ra , hoặc là đổi jump 1 đường thành jump khác cũng đc , tạo cảm giác khó 1 xíu chứ để như vậy thì cũng như phần đầu cá nhân tui nghĩ pattern 1 đường thẳng là cái khó nhất có thể làm trong Normal diff rồi, nên ông kh cần phải lo là nó kh đủ intensity đâu :v


Dù sao thì tui nghĩ ông cũng nên cần thêm guest diff và 1 cái beginner nữa , ya know , tăng khả năng ranked thôi :> hỏi mấy ông pro thì mấy ổng bảo như vậy là được rồi, nên tui cũng không thêm vào :3 lườiiii
Tất cả nhiêu đó tui mod được thôi , 2 diff kia sạch bong rồi , sound cũng tốt nữa nên chả thấy gì :v

• 
  Euphoria
  00:20:458 (4,1) - me being nazi but I feel this spacing too short :thinking: also different than 00:14:058 (4,1) -
  00:31:258 (3,4,5,6) - and 00:24:658 (2,3,4,5,6) - uses same spacing but song at this point is still building up it's intensity so I think you should reduce spacing on 00:24:658 (2,3,4,5,6) -
  00:36:858 - split spinner ? owo
  00:38:458 (1,2,3) - feel like spacing here its too short considering inteisty of the song And the prev section
  00:44:458 (3,4,1) - don't really like flow here even if the song is so slow so maybe rotate that pattern 00:44:058 (1,2,3,4) -
  00:49:658 (1) - I feel like this slider is unnecesary, don't really like how it plays & that vocal sound effec starts on 00:49:858 (2) -
  00:58:058 (3,1,2) - this feels kinda uncomfortable too but idk
  01:02:058 (1,2,3,4) - should this part of the stream has more spacing than the rest?
  01:06:058 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - maybe add more spacing to this stream? rn it looks like the same as 01:13:058 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - even tho they have quite different sound, the first one with that wub (?) could be more emphasized
  01:18:858 (1,2,3,4) - this stream should have a curved shape or at least something different than (more spacing eg) 01:19:258 (1,2,3,4) - for that synth sound it has, only the change of direction doesn't really reflect the song at the best
  01:29:658 - tbh at this point I was like... WAIT, THATS ALL???Because I liked the song smh damn tv size maps :<<<

Itasha_S13 wrote:

• 
  Euphoria
  00:20:458 (4,1) - me being nazi but I feel this spacing too short :thinking: also different than 00:14:058 (4,1) - well like 0.1x spacing wont be a problem, I think it's fine
  00:31:258 (3,4,5,6) - and 00:24:658 (2,3,4,5,6) - uses same spacing but song at this point is still building up it's intensity so I think you should reduce spacing on 00:24:658 (2,3,4,5,6) - I don't feel like a bit of spacing increase or decrease would visually be noticed that easy, so no change? :d
  00:36:858 - split spinner ? owo nah it feels good
  00:38:458 (1,2,3) - feel like spacing here its too short considering inteisty of the song And the prev section well imo the intensity didn't go up, it's just a change of section, which goes from soft drums in the previous section, to long guitar and clap. So higher spacing would be a no no to me,
  as I might create a big gap between Euphoria and Hard too uwu
  00:44:458 (3,4,1) - don't really like flow here even if the song is so slow so maybe rotate that pattern 00:44:058 (1,2,3,4) - ehhh adjusted a bit, can't do much
  00:49:658 (1) - I feel like this slider is unnecesary, don't really like how it plays & that vocal sound effec starts on 00:49:858 (2) - wha?
  The effect starts on 1 tho?
  00:58:058 (3,1,2) - this feels kinda uncomfortable too but idk
  01:02:058 (1,2,3,4) - should this part of the stream has more spacing than the rest? idk pitch didn't go up that much
  01:06:058 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - maybe add more spacing to this stream? rn it looks like the same as 01:13:058 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - even tho they have quite different sound, the first one with that wub (?) could be more emphasized decreased second one instead
  01:18:858 (1,2,3,4) - this stream should have a curved shape or at least something different than (more spacing eg) 01:19:258 (1,2,3,4) - for that synth sound it has, only the change of direction doesn't really reflect the song at the best nah it represent the same sound as the wub stream you mentioned above, so spacing does the trick. Shape is to create more diversity, I think it's fine
  01:29:658 - tbh at this point I was like... WAIT, THATS ALL???Because I liked the song smh damn tv size maps :<<< glad you like the song owo but because the song itself is kinda repeatative, it might be boring to fully map it, so I cut it out

konachan.net

1. 00:28:858 - Why aren't you following a rhythm similar to 00:22:458 - here? It is exactly the same thing in the music. There is no need to use 1/2 rhythms only here since the vocals stopped.
2. 00:44:658 (4,1) - What is this jump based on? I perfectly understand the need to increasing the spacing with 00:44:258 (2,3) - as the vocals are gaining in intensity, but for 00:44:658 (4,1) - I do not understand as the spacing is larger than for the previous jump but the music gets back to normal, removing the emphasis you put on 00:44:658 (4) - . In short, you should remove the jump between (4) and (1).

Kurai wrote:

[Euphoria]

1. 00:28:858 - Why aren't you following a rhythm similar to 00:22:458 - here? It is exactly the same thing in the music. There is no need to use 1/2 rhythms only here since the vocals stopped. to express the soft drum tho. The previous section has no more than just vocal and guitar,
   but there're drums here so why not
2. 00:44:658 (4,1) - What is this jump based on? I perfectly understand the need to increasing the spacing with 00:44:258 (2,3) - as the vocals are gaining in intensity, but for 00:44:658 (4,1) - I do not understand as the spacing is larger than for the previous jump but the music gets back to normal, removing the emphasis you put on 00:44:658 (4) - . In short, you should remove the jump between (4) and (1). I used the emphasis before in 00:41:658 (1) - though, I believe it's not bad to emphasize such beats

[Hard]
I have some concerns about the difficulty gap between Normal and Hard. Normal is rather simple (as it should be) but Hard has some streams and jumps, and several of them making it significantly more difficult to play than Normal. Yea I've heard some concerns too uwu might add a diff in later
For example, 00:50:058 (2,1) - is a pretty large jump for a Hard, 01:06:058 (2,3,4,5,6) - is a pretty hard stream.
Just compare the note density between those two difficulties, there is a huge spike in Hard around 1 minute:



I would suggest you to add another difficulty between Normal and Hard, it'd be sad if you had to break down some patterns in the Hard.
Yes I asked Mir for opinion before, he said the gap between Hard and Euphoria would be too much, so he suggested me to add a 5note stream in. I guess adding an Advanced would fix the problem right?

Besides that, the map looks pretty clean in general, good job!

-NanoRIPE- wrote:

as requested

normal
00:25:658 until 00:34:458 - hmm the rhythms here seems more easier than the previous one (it just fill with 1/1 rhythms).the music's tempo at here same as before so i think you should make the rhythms more consistent I wanna emphasize the soft hit every white tick instead, so I simplified the rhythm here
00:48:058 (1) - considering too add slidertick's sound here for the clap nah I asked for opinion before and someone said it gives terrible feedback to have hitsound on tick
01:06:058 (2,3,4) - i think the hitsound should be consistent (i mean the placement of whistle must be same) they're different sound so I guess not

advanced
00:47:858 (1,2) - same as normal

hard
00:49:258 - it would be better if you make clickable here for the vocal (it seems awkward imo) 00:48:458 - I didn't make this clickable either,
since I don't wanna make the pattern too dense
00:49:658 (1,2) - why you make it overlapping? i mean add small jump here its a good idea too so maybe try to avoid the overlap i guess I think it's a nice pattern, as I tried small jumps before but modders were pretty disagree with it
00:51:258 until 00:57:258 - hmm its kinda pointless if you just added 1/2 reverse sliders here instead for emphatized the drum here.try to add more circles for the drum imo (make the rhythm more dense here) but I emphasized the snare here D:

euphoria
00:25:658 until 00:35:258 - hmm i think the rhythm could be more attractive and more creative instead just added 1/2 jumps slider i think it's good enough, as it's not too hard nor too similar to other diffs.

ok thats it
sorry for bad mod xd
and gl ~

Stjpa wrote:

inconsistent metadata?

title of the youtube video says "MIN - TAKE ME AWAY" with all caps, while the description says "Min - Take Me Away" with only the first letters being capital, and you have a mix of both which is weird

maybe i missed something tho


edit: video description says "MIN" as the executive producer, but im still not sure if its the best idea to write the title like that

Stjpa wrote:

going with the full capsed version should be completely safe, unless theres an official soundcloud with other metadata

1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VafCaKa7J6U : uses "TAKE ME AWAY - MIN" and "Take Me Away - Min". (we could believe the title of the video is in full caps to bring morevisibility to the song as even "Official MV" is capped).
2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_N8DRWIw3xM : only "Take Me Away - Min".
3. http://www.nhaccuatui.com/bai-hat/take-me-away-min.e2dbF6PYWBjb.html only "Take Me Away - MIN" (not sure if it is official but it has a big official logo so... I don't think it's really reliable though.

1. The official facebook page of the artist is "MIN", therefore "Min" is incorrect.
2. Here is the cover of the single. As you can see, both TAKE ME AWAY and MIN are full capped.
3. In the MV: http://up.kuraip.net/0802D5B279r2423.png → Full caps.
4. In the description of another MIN's song on YT: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gC8GhWIB-yI
   → "Support Track trong Single "TAKE ME AWAY" Một ca khúc dành tặng những người Min thương nhất: Gia đình, Bạn bè và đặc biệt là các em Học sinh/Sinh viên, những người đã luôn sát cánh bên Min và giúp Min đi đến được ngày hôm nay. "

• - 00:14:458 (1) - Removed NC for consistency with other diffs.
  - 00:24:058 (1) - Removed NC for consistency with 00:17:658 (3) -

• - 00:35:258 (1) - Shortened spinner to 00:36:858 - for safer recovery time

Oyatsu wrote:

Mà nói thật VN mình dễ tính, cũng chẳng quan tâm mấy. Làm căng thế vụ metadata thế chớ ai thèm bắt bản quyền một game mà còn chả nhiều ng VN biết chi, VN làm như nước ngoài, mấy ổng kĩ quá. Thấy ông Kurai kia tra vụ data mà tự nhiên Oya thấy hài hài vl :v mò đủ kiểu mà cũng hay thiệt :v thế quái nào chả đc, căng đét :v

Yamicchi wrote:

Để cho chắc ăn thôi ) nhạc Nga hay gì cũng check metadata kĩ vậy đó, đừng bận tâmm

Oyatsu wrote:

Mà nói thật VN mình dễ tính, cũng chẳng quan tâm mấy. Làm căng thế vụ metadata thế chớ ai thèm bắt bản quyền một game mà còn chả nhiều ng VN biết chi, VN làm như nước ngoài, mấy ổng kĩ quá. Thấy ông Kurai kia tra vụ data mà tự nhiên Oya thấy hài hài vl :v mò đủ kiểu mà cũng hay thiệt :v thế quái nào chả đc, căng đét :v

Shortthu wrote:

yamiecchi teach me how to speedrank

Kuo Kyoka wrote:

Oyatsu wrote:

Mà nói thật VN mình dễ tính, cũng chẳng quan tâm mấy. Làm căng thế vụ metadata thế chớ ai thèm bắt bản quyền một game mà còn chả nhiều ng VN biết chi, VN làm như nước ngoài, mấy ổng kĩ quá. Thấy ông Kurai kia tra vụ data mà tự nhiên Oya thấy hài hài vl :v mò đủ kiểu mà cũng hay thiệt :v thế quái nào chả đc, căng đét :v

Hình như cũng chỉ mỗi mình Kuo quan tâm vụ metadata thôi hay sao ấy. Chủ yếu là cũng để đúng với ý tác giả mà nhỉ?

Plus congrats, không thích speedrank lắm mà thôi, grats.

Oyatsu wrote:

thấy tự nhiên ng nước ngoài mò từng đường tơ kẽ tóc nhạc nước mình nên Oya thấy thế :v