Yura Hatsuki & Paspal - Fairlady:Reincarnation / Ideal

posted
Total Posts
59
Topic Starter
Xenok
This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on dimanche, 24 décembre 2017 at 17:26:41

Artist: Yura Hatsuki & Paspal
Title: Fairlady:Reincarnation / Ideal
Tags: violin snare gothic girl rock metal guitar japanese Queen A'rcadia 世の漆黒 Toki no Shikkoku Symholic 海兎 六歌
BPM: 75
Filesize: 12682kb
Play Time: 05:49
Difficulties Available:
  1. Cursed Reincarnation (5.55 stars, 1346 notes)


Download: Yura Hatsuki & Paspal - Fairlady:Reincarnation / Ideal
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------

Banner by Ael !
Fairlady~

New background and hitsounds, Redownload if you downloaded before 24th october.

3rd song and last song of the album "Queen A'rcadia".

Lyrics of the song here.

You can hear the 3rd movement of the song "Moonlight Sonata" from Ludwig van Beethoven in the snareroll part
(Thx Deramok for finding that)

Timing by GoldenWolf and 6th!
Omgforz
good stuff
Topic Starter
Xenok

Omgforz wrote:

good stuff
Thank you, good return is always nice to hear :)
Suissie
hello my baby 55

so delete fairy from tags.

I would suggest you to lower overall hitsound volume. I played it on 50% 50% and it still was too loud. Parts like 00:48:517 - were hard to acc due to loud hitsounds.

I still find those sliders 00:41:850 (1,1) - look better like this http://puu.sh/xnoY3/c257f0a6a1.jpg http://puu.sh/xnoYn/c6c3ef6677.jpg

00:52:517 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - I dont get why this is the only weird movement in the stream section.

01:01:850 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - This flows kinda weird and the movement always feels always so awkward to me. Just copy and ctrl+H would make a better flow imo because it feels similar like the voice is also pretty similar there.

01:05:406 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - same here

01:08:961 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - you even do it there like I said.

01:16:961 (3) - slider there feel kinda weird to me. Replacing it with two 1/2 circles stacked would feel better to me. To me it gives me a better drum feeling and more contrast to the next downbeat since it would make a stop motion and circle to slider also gives more emphasize.

01:24:517 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - To make this pattern more consistent would I Copy and ctrl+h 01:24:850 (1,2) - and replace 01:25:517 (1,2) - with it. The angles would fit more together.

01:28:961 (1) - would look like this http://puu.sh/xnpFd/988f7629c5.jpg better imo

01:32:073 (1,2) - this always confuses me while playing. like you hear the drums there 01:31:628 (1) - and then this idk just weird. It seems like you want to build up pressure but for me that kinda doesn't work well there. Everything sounds similar in this part. It doesn't even support this circle 01:32:739 (3) - . http://puu.sh/xnq3D/4fac092245.jpg this would make more sense to me. Its more predictable and mapped better to the song imo.

01:38:443 (2,3) - Dont understand that little spacing. It still sounds same important as 01:37:406 (1,2,3,4) -

01:41:739 (2,3) - Thats not consistent to the rest I think. Map it like 01:40:850 (2,3,4) -. Well you do it more then once actually but I dont get why. Variation ?

02:08:184 (2,3,4,1) - I think you could do more with this. Kinda sad not to emphasize those drums.

02:09:628 (1) - I think placing circle on the sliderend would make more sense since its the same as here 02:10:184 (2,1) -. It gives less emphasize without reason imo. Also this replacing with a 1/2 circle would be more consistent since you emphasize drums with sliders. Tbh I find that whole rhythm here 02:08:517 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4,1) - kinda weird tbh. But yeah nothing to be too bothered because its mapped well I guess.

02:14:517 (2,1) - that spacing leads confusion there 02:14:961 (1,1) - because its the same distance but other rhythm.

not sure if that spacing there 02:16:517 (3) - makes sense even if it would be mapped to the violin which I doubt makes sense because the rest is mapped to vocal I think.

02:23:628 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - yep you know what I mean. 02:24:739 (2,3) - ctrl+g

02:27:184 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - ... dont have to mention it anymore I think

02:38:684 (3,1) - I think this is a bit hard to read.

02:41:628 (2,3) - Kinda weird since rhythm is same as here 02:40:961 (1,1,2) -

Meh always so confused because Im so used to prioritize vocals.

02:42:739 (1,2) - I just rly find vocals stands out way more but whatever

02:55:184 (1,1,2,1,2,3,4) - same weird thing

Idk but ideal sounds like this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-F3_Cj-fMWw to me xd

Im prepared for redwall
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply