Vert wrote:

旧版好啊，我喜欢

[General]
add some tags to all diffs

[ex]
00:00:763 - add a spinner should be better spinner is the worst thing in mapping
00:01:624 - the slider is too long to players i think even holding the head only can get 300
00:28:322 (1,2,3,4,1) - too hard to play or read
00:37:509 (1,2) - change the rhythm here same as 00:37:796 (1,2,3,4) - ,they are the same rhythm following different sound

[insane]
00:06:217 (3,4,1) - blanket stack view

[hard]
it's too hard to normal diff
the spread is so bad from these 2 diffs

Eir wrote:

ay

General

1. Unused hitsound: "soft-hitclap2.wav"
2. add guest name into tags at least ty
3. i really feel the diff spread has been concerned between Easy, Normal and Hard at the moment. there is bigger gap between E and N compared with N and H. for actual exmaple, u can buffer the problem by building up the part(01:53:298 - ~ 01:55:451 - ) like making Advanced difficulty on this Normal cuz the rhythm doesnt have enough difference with Easy despite there are really intense in hard compared with normal. can u build up the part by the way to use 1/2 sliders and put circles each 1/2 intervals for buffing last spurt at the end or smh in Normal? moreover u can build up other parts i guess.

Easy

1. 00:54:734 (5) - u likely forget to add nc? consistency as putting these each 2 measures on this section

Normal

1. 01:41:815 (1,2,3,4,5) - as mentioned general above, if u agreed with my suggestion about solving the diff spread, u can also build up this part by usage of 1/2 sliders or smh around here. there are sounds on blue ticks so it would be hard to do so

Hard

1. 00:39:375 (3,4,5) - i would prefer the triplet stacked nearly toward flow's direction like this in lower diffs considering playable for newbies. 00:48:562 (3,4,5) - same i think it's more interesting
2. 00:56:026 - ooffff u forget to insert break time here 01:01:050 - ya and 01:05:069 (3) - nc

Insane

1. 00:21:863 (4) - add nc or 00:20:715 (1) - remove nc for c o n s i s t e n c y
2. 00:24:303 (6) - i feel like weird rhythm pick here cuz u ignore the strong ring sound on 00:24:447 - despite 00:23:729 (1,2,3,4,5) - are following the ring sound as usual. can u catch up it by 1/2 reverse slider or smh? i'd like to keep the rhythm here simple as it's just an insane difficulty
3. 00:38:083 (6) - i'd prefer to add nc for 00:38:083 (6,7,8,9) - is consist a kind of bunch of stream leaving from 00:37:796 (5) - obviously

sex

1. oof
2. 00:19:136 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 00:19:136 - から実際1/8で音が鳴ってますし1/8kicksliderで音を取るのはどうでしょうか？

Ex

1. i feel like OD setting kinda low considering balanced of momoko's diff. can u increase it to 8.5 ~ 9? high od makes no sense for this map, there is no notelock issue
2. 00:19:997 (5,6,7,8) - this opinion is just my preference. why did u place the 1/8 kick sliders simply from 00:19:997 (5) - ? i'd like to suggest u can try to place the kick sliders like the previous pattern(00:19:710 (1,2,3,4) - ) cuz of keeping feeling of stir for them and 00:19:710 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - has been consisted sense of unity i guess. i don't really get what you mean but the flow here is smooth and comfortable to play
3. 01:00:906 (6) - add nc for smh cuz u added nc on ur other diffs
4. 01:05:356 (3,1) - swap NC? in your nc'd pattern u add them each stronger main melodies in this part i guess
5. 01:56:169 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - i actually prefer to place the circled stream like this cuz it would make more sense to place the edge which is strong piano beat and i assume recent mapping streams are very often so that. piece of sh*t i will post the pic of example later cuz my puush really is fu*ked off... rip your puush

ay

Ryuusei Aika wrote:

ぽい
As request.

Annotation

Words in red means that is an unrankable issue (= violates the "Rules" in Ranking Critiria General / Ranking Critiria in osu!) that you MUST fix.

Words in bold black means that is an issue that I highly recommand you (= either violate the "Guidelines" in Ranking Criteria General / Ranking Criteria in osu!, or I believe this issue will influence a lot of the experience of playing) to fix.

Words in black means that is an personal issue and have no big influence on your map in my eyes.

The mark "^" means "here is the same question with whose at above".

General

1. WARNING: This map needs over 12 Star Priority BEFORE it should be considered for ranking/bubbling
   Please focus your modding on maps which have higher star priorities first!
2. Combo color 3 seems not fit the BG quite well, as BG does not contain color like that. Delete it would be better.
3. Maybe add MUSECA to tags? Because the current Ú is a little bit hard to input.
   [/color]

Easy

1. 00:34:064 - 00:38:657 - NC is a little bit mess up in this part. By following your logic (NC on every 2 long white lines), I suggest you to put NC on 00:34:064 (4) - / 00:36:361 (4) - and remove NC on 00:32:916 (1) - / 00:35:212 (1) - / 00:37:509 (1) - .
2. 01:19:423 (2,3) - Move these two notes a little bit out, like this? Current flow is kinda weird as the previous note doesn't follow the slider 01:18:849 (1) - quite well.

Normal

1. 00:38:657 - 00:45:260 - This part's NC is still a little bit messy. My suggestion (following the same rule, NC on every 2 long white lines), I suggest you to put NC on 00:40:954 (3) - / 00:43:251 (3) - and remove NC on 00:39:806 (1) - / 00:42:102 (1) - / 00:44:399 (1) - .
2. 01:37:222 (1,2) - Make those two sliders parallel would make them look better owo
3. Bold but quite proper choices on general spacing, really love that :3

Hard

1. Aimod said that two objects are unsnapped. Please check that and fix them.
2. 01:05:069 (3) - NC this so that the following two slider-based patterns can have the same NC setting. ?_? where
3. 01:26:887 (1,2) - Change these two sliders' order to make the pattern 01:26:887 (1,2,3) - has similar spacing arrangement with 01:25:739 (1,2,3) - , which are represent the similar parts of the song?
4. 01:44:686 (2) - Subjective, but instead of represent the relatively weak drum beats, how about put it on 01:44:614 - to show the strong instrumental sound out? (If you accept that then you may need to move all similar notes in part 01:44:112 - 01:53:298 - 1/4 earlier) i always ignore sounds on clue ticks and keep simple rhythms in lower diffs

Insane

1. Aimod said that one object is unsnapped. Please check that and fix it.
2. 00:27:748 (5) - Subjective, but you can NC this note to make that spacing-changed stream looks a little bit more regular (just like what you have done for 01:30:906 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - )
   - 00:38:083 (6) - / 00:47:270 (3) - ^ (similar patterns so same reason + solution for those two notes)
3. 00:38:370 (1) - Can move that to 27|219 because currently 00:38:370 (1,2,3,4) - looks a liiiiiiiiiiiittle bit not linear.
4. 01:38:801 (4) - Maybe change that into a 1/4 slider so that the instrumental sound on 01:38:879 - can be represented? (As in hard diff you has represented that)
5. 01:54:806 (7) - Forgot NC here? Because 01:54:806 (7,8,9,10,11) - has the similar rhythm with previous two patterns.

Ex

1. 00:38:370 (1,2,3,4) - Make this rotate in clockwise so that they can flow with the trend of previous slider pattern 00:37:796 (1,2,3,4) - better?
2. 01:11:241 (3) - Change this into a 1/4 slider too? As the rhythm (preciously instrumental tunes arrangement) of this section actually changes at 01:11:385 - so I think maybe it's better to keep the previous rhythm consistency here. 前一半一种节奏后一半用另一种，同一种音乐用不同的节奏表达也是mapping的一环
3. I really love the sv settings at part 01:44:112 - 01:52:150 - :>

òwó works as usual, let me know once you get all mods replied and think it's ready!