Marianna wrote:

Obg pelo mod @Pulse, arrumei muitas coisas, mas na mesma medida não, há muitas coisas que são questão de gosto e há algo que eu não entendi:

Pulse wrote:

01:52:504 (3) - O apropriado seria seguir o movimento atual do cursor, então move um pixel pra direita

Obg pela star também <3

Pulse wrote:

É extra minor suggestion, mas esse arrombadinho 1 pixel pro lado faz uma mudança sutil (mas agradável pra mim) em como você movimenta o cursor. Como você tende a continuar o movimento mas o ds é baixo, você pode acabar ficando próximo de errar o click no sliderstart, e se você movesse o slider, você teria 0 preocupação com esse possível acaso.

Movimento com o slider atual, note onde está o cursor:

Considerando que muitos tem o click atrasado, seu cursor estaria geralmente ali. É BEM difícil passar demais e errar a nota, mas a nossa tendência de prosseguir com o movimento já nos inclina a uma aim propícia a erros. Se você jogar ele um pixel pra direita, você tem uma margem de erro bem mais confortável, note:

Irreversible wrote:

Could you provide me a full reply? Most of the things don't seem to be remained!

Irreversible wrote:

[Insane]

00:00:361 - This sounds rly fun to map tbh XD
00:06:313 (4,1) - blanket fixed (sorry, i'm really bad with blankets)
00:14:408 (1,2) - Lower the spacing a bit here to make 00:14:408 (1,2) - and 00:15:123 (3,4) - more consistent? fixed
00:16:313 (1) - I suggest that you enhance the wave a bit more, itll look better. fixed
00:19:527 (5) - visible spacing error fixed
00:22:027 (1,2) - If you compare this to 00:22:980 (3,4) - you can see 3 and 4 have a bigger visual spacing. Consistency should be better here, unless you had something in mind but I doubt it fixed (i copy pasted they and make some ajusts
00:25:837 (1,2) - blanket fixed
00:27:146 (4) - Looks slightly off, you should bring them into a curvy line fixed
00:37:265 (1,2,3,4) - I like this spacing, it seems interesting but 00:39:170 (1,2) - seem veeery underspaced and might be misread. Please go over that again fixed the way i understanded
00:40:123 (3,4,5,6,7) - I feel like that is very overmapped... try to place the rhythm again, i can assist if needed
00:42:980 (1,2) - Same as above
00:43:932 (3,4,5,6,7) - same
01:05:361 - I suggest a circle here and a longer slider 01:05:599 - here. It will suit the vocals perfeclty! fixed
01:14:408 (3) - Don't you wanna follow the vocals a bit more here and move this back by 1/4? Adjust the spacing if you do. I like that part
01:17:265 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - This also doesn't reaaally follow the song that well.. something is just missing 01:18:099 - , and then the overmap is a bit heavy imo! like i've sayied before, i get some testplays and, y'know xD
01:22:027 (3) - same as above
02:35:837 (3) - double clap intended? fixed
02:39:170 (1,2) - I knowww you don't have to follow the vocals but somehow i feel like there's so much lost potential XD I'd really like to keep this soft part
02:57:265 (1,2,3) - cooool thanks <3

The map itself is okay, buuuut you have to do some polishing homework, and please check out the rhythm issues! Sometimes it repeats and i didn't list it, so pelase go over the map yourself.

Hard and normal were good :p call me

Bakari wrote:

o, Irre ninja'd me. I'll koalify, then

Irreversible wrote:

short irc, let's go!

1. 00:19:170 (4,5,6) - a single 3/4 slider with a reverse would actually fit better with the context of slow part and low-density rhythm.
2. 02:27:742 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5) - ♥

1. I still can't see how the difficulty name relates to the song. Probably would expect some explanation on that.
2. 00:43:932 (3,4,5) - the 1/4 jump is a little confusing and can be hard to read? I was thinking of something a little easier to read, maybe like this?
   note: I'd also lower spacing for 00:49:646 (3,4) - to ease players into more intense jumps later in the kiais
3. 02:57:265 (1,2,3) - yesss ♥

M a r v o l l o wrote:

Grats