00:01:314 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2) - these are quite jarring to play, if you want to keep the rhythm maybe change these into repeat sliders for playability
00:05:539 (1) - this piano sound has two distinct sections that calls for two repeat sliders if your mapping this piano rhythm, try this:
00:07:546 (2,1) - there are two strong beats, not just one here, so timing this like this would sound a lot better:
00:09:593 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5) - a few things about this section, i played around with the timing and position and this is what i came up with:
Before:
this pattern has a lot of odd angles and weirdly timed circles so to make this a lot clearer heres an idea:
After:
the drawn out saxophone sound is the only thing i've changed rhythm wise
imo this flows 100000 times better than the previous pattern, which is basically unreadable
00:10:649 (7,1,2,3,4,5,1) - distance snap this
00:12:216 (6,7) - the slider on 6 is a good choice due to the help piano sound, but on 7 there are two clear distinct piano notes, so changing 7 to two sliders would be better (e.g you did it correctly here 00:11:688 (3,4,5) - )
00:12:956 (1,2,3) - you've been mapping the piano up to this point but the only piano sound i can hear is on 1, the triple isn't needed imo
00:14:223 (3,4,1) - love this <3
00:15:596 (6,7) - same problem as 00:12:216 (6,7) -
00:16:758 (3) - NC here
00:17:286 (7) - NC here
00:31:547 (1,2) - change this to a 1/4 slider, sounds bad as two circles imo
00:34:082 (5,6,7,8) - to go from mapping the piano to ignoring it completely for the small saxophone here just doesn't work well with the small breaks, i think making the sliders repeat sliders would improve flow a lot if you want to keep emphasis on the saxophone like this:
00:36:829 (2,3,4) - just stack this triple
00:37:040 (4) - blanket this to the slider previously like this:
00:39:998 (1,2,3) - triple doesn't fit because it starts on a white tick when the previous triples start on a red tick (00:38:942 (3,4,5) - )
00:39:998 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - again the small gaps/breaks in the play is really detrimental to the flow of the map
00:43:378 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2) - i would like to see an increase in difficulty here to match 00:16:336 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2) - because its the same music piece (kinda)
00:46:864 (3) - get rid of this
00:57:744 (1,2) - uncomfortable
01:00:279 (1,2,1,2) - just make these 1/4 jumps like i did in my insane for this map, this just feels wrong to play
01:01:970 (1) - the singing starts on the red tick, which is where the sliderend is placed,try emphasising this beat instead by putting a slider head instead here
01:01:970 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - this rhythm doesnt follow the music well, try this:
01:03:871 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - this is uncomfortable, make it look something like you did here 01:05:561 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9) -
01:05:244 (1) - Dont NC here
01:05:561 (3) - NC here
01:08:942 (1) - again a strong beat on this white tick but you've put a sliderend here which doesnt create emphasis at all
01:14:857 (1) - really ugly slider
a lot of the issues i had with the first haf of the chorus chorus repeat in the second half
01:20:561 (1,2,3,4,5,1,1) - why is this in kiai when this isnt 01:06:935 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,1) - they are the same piece
01:25:632 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - dont make it harder for no reason, there is no intensity change throughout the kiai so keep spacing loosely consistent
01:31:653 (6,7,8) - time this like this:
01:34:082 (1,1,1,1,1,1) - this should be one of the most intense sections, but its not really, make the spacing like you did here to be consistent 01:27:322 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1) -
01:34:822 (1) - spinner doesn't belong here