Winter Story wrote:
subjectively speaking, the map still needs polishing on a few perspective, and yes. Mainly on aesthetic (but we all know it's not a must to add aesthetic). But I guess I can't do much if the nominators itself are set on ranking this when there are much more better set that can be exhibited (can't really show a few but surely there are a few that deserves a spot in the ranked section).If you think a change is needed, come and make that change happen. Be specific and point out exact timestamps as well as reasonable explanations on why you think certain aspects should be changed. Please, refer to this map and this map only and explain your concerns. Remember, that none of us have to go ahead and explain anything, unless you specifically address issues and stop overgeneralizing.
In addition to that, quality of the map is still lacking from my point of view so I do hope a veto could be set up from a deeming nominator as someone told me not to complain too much and let the nominator do their job (by quality, i do not mean from my point of view. I am comparing 2016-2017 maps that have much higher quality and comparing them to this map, this needs a lot of work before it can be deem as 'ready for rank').
I do hope I can reach an understanding here, instead of just following the ranking criteria alone. Should I solely following the ranking criteria, then I could have file a complaint as to why my set is popped even when there is nothing in hindrance to make it unrankable (link : t/518872/start=90 )
Otherwise, there is no point and we might just as well assume that your goal in this case is to personally attack the mapper or nominating BN by purposely and with no reason holding up the set.
Oh, and I'm sure we all could appreciate if -Kazuto could practice their sense of humor somewhere else, unless they have some relevant input concerning the map itself.