If you fail to provide me a proper reasoning as to why the quality of this map should be a hindrance to its nomination, then I am not going to take your opinion into account (i.e. I don't care about your feelings, I want facts). This map is probably one of the best I have modded since I joined the BNG 3 weeks ago as it is extremely well structured: patterns all follow a certain logic that is consistent throughout the music while still providing pattern variety, jumps illustrate intensity variations in the music perfectly, SV changes make sense, etc.subjectively speaking, the map still needs polishing on a few perspective, and yes. Mainly on aesthetic (but we all know it's not a must to add aesthetic). But I guess I can't do much if the nominators itself are set on ranking this when there are much more better set that can be exhibited (can't really show a few but surely there are a few that deserves a spot in the ranked section).
I believe you only have a problem with the aesthetics of this map as it does look pretty old school (somehow this map reminds me of this one which is definitely a good one), and I don't see why this would be an issue.
I'm bubbling this set, if you have anything to add, feel free to do so, h4d0uk3n1 will decide whether or not he wants to listen to your suggestions or not.
In addition to that, quality of the map is still lacking from my point of view so I do hope a veto could be set up from a deeming nominator as someone told me not to complain too much and let the nominator do their job (by quality, i do not mean from my point of view. I am comparing 2016-2017 maps that have much higher quality and comparing them to this map, this needs a lot of work before it can be deem as 'ready for rank').
I do hope I can reach an understanding here, instead of just following the ranking criteria alone. Should I solely following the ranking criteria, then I could have file a complaint as to why my set is popped even when there is nothing in hindrance to make it unrankable (link : t/518872/start=90 )