1. Advanced (2.09 stars, 211 notes)
2. Hard (3.26 stars, 310 notes)
3. Normal (1.58 stars, 149 notes)

1. According to M2U's website, this track is actually called "Black Rose Remix by TAK". So, uh, it's either using that as a title, or using "TAK - Black Rose Remix" as artist - title, putting M2U on tags.
2. Seems like the song is on EZ2DJ, so it'd be interesting if that was on tags.
3. I think it'd make more sense if the spinner in all diffs ended at 02:07:381

1. 00:10:546 (1,2,3) - Would look/play nicer if you arranged these like this
2. 00:17:109 (5) - A NC here would be good to indicate the change in rhythm
3. 00:21:796 (1,2) - IMO, something like this would flow better
4. 00:27:421 (1) - According to your NCing logic, the new combo here should be at 00:29:296 (4) - instead
5. 00:32:109 (2) - Sliderend should be snapped to the red tick, if you listen at 50% it should make sense
6. 00:40:546 (1) - In my opinion it'd make more sense if the wiggle was at the slidertick, to emphasize the skipped beat
7. 00:44:296 (1) - nazi: move 1px right to stack perfectly with 00:42:421 (4)'s sliderend
8. 00:46:171 (3) - NC here to indicate change in rhythm? Also, this slider isn't snapped properly. The repeat should be at the blue tick at 00:46:522, and since it's a repeat slider, there's no way to make it end at its correctly snapped location (00:46:756), but for rhythm simplification purposes, letting it end at the red tick isn't too bad.
9. 00:58:359 (4) - Seems like an unusual shape to use in a normal diff, I think it'd be better if it was just a straight slider (or the red sliderpoint being closer to the middle of the slider, like 01:35:859 (6) - )
10. 01:02:109 (4) - Same issue with the wiggle as before, also the sliderend should be snapped to 01:02:811
11. 01:07:265 (2,3) - Maybe do something like this for better flow?
12. 01:09:140 (5,6) - Maybe move (6) to x268 y216 for better flow? Don't forget to adjust spacing with next note if you do this
13. 01:14:296 (1,2) - IMO would be cooler if you curved the slider the other way, to make it blanket like this
14. 01:31:875 (2) - This slider looks pretty ugly for me, I'd just rather use the new slider algorithm on it
15. 01:46:171 (3) - Same issue as 00:46:171 (3)
16. 01:49:921 (4) - If you move the red sliderpoint to x312 y168, the sharp edge will snap to the red tick, making more sense with the song (don't forget to adjust spacing with next note if you apply this)
17. 01:52:499 - This break feels really awkward, especially considering this section was mapped in the other diffs. Even some simple rhythm here will work just fine.
18. 01:59:296 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - I think the claps you used in the previous combo would work here just fine.

1. 00:17:109 (3) - NC here to indicate change in rhythm?
2. 00:24:609 (3) - Would flow better if this was curved upwards
3. 00:26:250 (2,3) - This small overlap is hurting me >:
4. 00:31:171 (1) - Reverse here should actually be snapped to 1/4
5. 00:32:109 (2) - Should be snapped to red tick instead
6. 00:33:984 (3) - Maybe move it a bit left to avoid the small overlap?
   
7. 00:46:171 (5) - Should be snapped to 1/4 instead
8. 00:59:296 (1) - This should really be stacked with 00:58:125 (2), would look much nicer
9. 01:01:171 (5) - Maybe move the reverse sliderpoint to x276 y201 to make it fit with 01:00:234 (3)?
10. 01:10:546 (1) - Add a finish hitsound?
11. 01:30:000 (3,1) - Might want to fix the spacing here
12. 01:34:921 (1,2) - Overlapping a bit too much IMO, maybe move (2) to x69 y250?
13. 01:59:296 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - Adding some claps here would be nice
14. 02:00:233 - seems weird to me that you skipped this beat, doesn't seem to fit with the rhythm you used through the rest of the map

1. 00:07:734 (5,1) - (1) isn't properly stacked with (5)'s sliderend
2. 00:31:796 (2) - Should be snapped to the red tick instead
3. 00:33:750 (2,3,4,1) - Spacing is kinda weird here, is it intentional?
4. 00:46:171 (1,2,3) - Should be snapped to the blue tick

paydayzcool wrote:

Hi there,

Just going around randomly modding ppls maps

Normal

00:46:171 (3), 01:46:171 (3) - Change the snap divisor to 1/4 and make the slider look like this: https://puu.sh/wEmoA/d9714d5f1f.png
01:07:031 (1,2,3,4,5) - I reckon you should make the downbeats clickable (the big white ticks) as leaving it like this feels a bit weird.
01:31:875 (2) - Just use a 3-point shape, or you can use a slider like this: https://puu.sh/wEmz2/f7add02d3e.png
01:47:109 (4) - Extend this slider so that it touches the red tick in front of it.
01:49:921 (4) - Why leave a break when you can put in some filler notes? The melody stops, but it's a bit subtle so it is safe to put notes in.
01:59:375 (1) - Avoid snapping notes to irregular points like this slider. It's not as readable.
02:02:109 (4) - You're gonna startle the player with this slider and they're gonna slider break or miss. Try to avoid this as you're in a Normal diff.

Hard

00:05:859 (3) - Add in a bit of repetition by starting this slider here: 00:04:921 (1)
00:17:109 (2,3,4) - 1/3 streams are dangerous in hard diffs, try to avoid them as 1. they are spaced, 2. Players are more used to streaming 1/4 streams.
01:16:171 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - This kind of spacing doesn't tell players that they are close together on the timeline, especially with the HD mod. Put them closer together.
01:25:546 (1) - Avoid bezier sliders like these. They are unnecessary and the curves aren't as clean as the usual 3-point sliders.
01:48:867 (4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - I believe you went overboard with the idea of 1/4 notes in Hard diffs. This configuration should be for insane diffs.
01:59:375 (1,2,3) - These notes are too far forward by 1 tick.
02:01:328 (1) - Avoid starting notes on non-white ticks. It damages the readability of this map.

Mismagius wrote:

boop

from modding q

[General]

1. According to M2U's website, this track is actually called "Black Rose Remix by TAK". So, uh, it's either using that as a title, or using "TAK - Black Rose Remix" as artist - title, putting M2U on tags.
2. Seems like the song is on EZ2DJ, so it'd be interesting if that was on tags.
3. I think it'd make more sense if the spinner in all diffs ended at 02:07:381

[Normal]

1. 00:10:546 (1,2,3) - Would look/play nicer if you arranged these like this
2. 00:17:109 (5) - A NC here would be good to indicate the change in rhythm
3. 00:21:796 (1,2) - IMO, something like this would flow better
4. 00:27:421 (1) - According to your NCing logic, the new combo here should be at 00:29:296 (4) - instead
5. 00:32:109 (2) - Sliderend should be snapped to the red tick, if you listen at 50% it should make sense
6. 00:40:546 (1) - In my opinion it'd make more sense if the wiggle was at the slidertick, to emphasize the skipped beat
7. 00:44:296 (1) - nazi: move 1px right to stack perfectly with 00:42:421 (4)'s sliderend
8. 00:46:171 (3) - NC here to indicate change in rhythm? Also, this slider isn't snapped properly. The repeat should be at the blue tick at 00:46:522, and since it's a repeat slider, there's no way to make it end at its correctly snapped location (00:46:756), but for rhythm simplification purposes, letting it end at the red tick isn't too bad.
9. 00:58:359 (4) - Seems like an unusual shape to use in a normal diff, I think it'd be better if it was just a straight slider (or the red sliderpoint being closer to the middle of the slider, like 01:35:859 (6) - )
10. 01:02:109 (4) - Same issue with the wiggle as before, also the sliderend should be snapped to 01:02:811
11. 01:07:265 (2,3) - Maybe do something like this for better flow?
12. 01:09:140 (5,6) - Maybe move (6) to x268 y216 for better flow? Don't forget to adjust spacing with next note if you do this
13. 01:14:296 (1,2) - IMO would be cooler if you curved the slider the other way, to make it blanket like this
14. 01:31:875 (2) - This slider looks pretty ugly for me, I'd just rather use the new slider algorithm on it
15. 01:46:171 (3) - Same issue as 00:46:171 (3)
16. 01:49:921 (4) - If you move the red sliderpoint to x312 y168, the sharp edge will snap to the red tick, making more sense with the song (don't forget to adjust spacing with next note if you apply this)
17. 01:52:499 - This break feels really awkward, especially considering this section was mapped in the other diffs. Even some simple rhythm here will work just fine.
18. 01:59:296 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - I think the claps you used in the previous combo would work here just fine.

[Advanced]

1. 00:17:109 (3) - NC here to indicate change in rhythm?
2. 00:24:609 (3) - Would flow better if this was curved upwards
3. 00:26:250 (2,3) - This small overlap is hurting me >:
4. 00:31:171 (1) - Reverse here should actually be snapped to 1/4
5. 00:32:109 (2) - Should be snapped to red tick instead
6. 00:33:984 (3) - Maybe move it a bit left to avoid the small overlap?
   
7. 00:46:171 (5) - Should be snapped to 1/4 instead
8. 00:59:296 (1) - This should really be stacked with 00:58:125 (2), would look much nicer
9. 01:01:171 (5) - Maybe move the reverse sliderpoint to x276 y201 to make it fit with 01:00:234 (3)?
10. 01:10:546 (1) - Add a finish hitsound?
11. 01:30:000 (3,1) - Might want to fix the spacing here
12. 01:34:921 (1,2) - Overlapping a bit too much IMO, maybe move (2) to x69 y250?
13. 01:59:296 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - Adding some claps here would be nice
14. 02:00:233 - seems weird to me that you skipped this beat, doesn't seem to fit with the rhythm you used through the rest of the map

[Hard]

1. 00:07:734 (5,1) - (1) isn't properly stacked with (5)'s sliderend
2. 00:31:796 (2) - Should be snapped to the red tick instead
3. 00:33:750 (2,3,4,1) - Spacing is kinda weird here, is it intentional?
4. 00:46:171 (1,2,3) - Should be snapped to the blue tick

cool map and nice song

Neoskylove wrote:

Q

[Hard]
00:10:429 - has a beat too/. It doesn't seem important enough to map,
00:14:296 (1) - end slider at 00:14:531 - . flows better imo
00:17:109 (2,3,4) - make this as 1/3slider for better reading. I'll wait for more opinion, but for now it seems readable to me
00:46:953 (3,4,5,6,7) - ^ ^
01:00:468 (4) - slider is too curved, looks weird since you didn't try it well. ur right
01:29:296 (1) - make it more circular. make it = to the other sliders like this

GL

Juiceys wrote:

paydayzcool wrote:

Hi there,

Just going around randomly modding ppls maps

Normal

00:46:171 (3), 01:46:171 (3) - Change the snap divisor to 1/4 and make the slider look like this: https://puu.sh/wEmoA/d9714d5f1f.png
01:07:031 (1,2,3,4,5) - I reckon you should make the downbeats clickable (the big white ticks) as leaving it like this feels a bit weird.
01:31:875 (2) - Just use a 3-point shape, or you can use a slider like this: https://puu.sh/wEmz2/f7add02d3e.png
01:47:109 (4) - Extend this slider so that it touches the red tick in front of it.
01:49:921 (4) - Why leave a break when you can put in some filler notes? The melody stops, but it's a bit subtle so it is safe to put notes in.
01:59:375 (1) - Avoid snapping notes to irregular points like this slider. It's not as readable.
02:02:109 (4) - You're gonna startle the player with this slider and they're gonna slider break or miss. Try to avoid this as you're in a Normal diff.

Hard

00:05:859 (3) - Add in a bit of repetition by starting this slider here: 00:04:921 (1)
00:17:109 (2,3,4) - 1/3 streams are dangerous in hard diffs, try to avoid them as 1. they are spaced, 2. Players are more used to streaming 1/4 streams.
01:16:171 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - This kind of spacing doesn't tell players that they are close together on the timeline, especially with the HD mod. Put them closer together.
01:25:546 (1) - Avoid bezier sliders like these. They are unnecessary and the curves aren't as clean as the usual 3-point sliders.
01:48:867 (4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - I believe you went overboard with the idea of 1/4 notes in Hard diffs. This configuration should be for insane diffs.
01:59:375 (1,2,3) - These notes are too far forward by 1 tick.
02:01:328 (1) - Avoid starting notes on non-white ticks. It damages the readability of this map.

Mismagius wrote:

boop

from modding q

[General]

1. According to M2U's website, this track is actually called "Black Rose Remix by TAK". So, uh, it's either using that as a title, or using "TAK - Black Rose Remix" as artist - title, putting M2U on tags.
2. Seems like the song is on EZ2DJ, so it'd be interesting if that was on tags.
3. I think it'd make more sense if the spinner in all diffs ended at 02:07:381

[Normal]

1. 00:10:546 (1,2,3) - Would look/play nicer if you arranged these like this
2. 00:17:109 (5) - A NC here would be good to indicate the change in rhythm
3. 00:21:796 (1,2) - IMO, something like this would flow better
4. 00:27:421 (1) - According to your NCing logic, the new combo here should be at 00:29:296 (4) - instead
5. 00:32:109 (2) - Sliderend should be snapped to the red tick, if you listen at 50% it should make sense
6. 00:40:546 (1) - In my opinion it'd make more sense if the wiggle was at the slidertick, to emphasize the skipped beat
7. 00:44:296 (1) - nazi: move 1px right to stack perfectly with 00:42:421 (4)'s sliderend
8. 00:46:171 (3) - NC here to indicate change in rhythm? Also, this slider isn't snapped properly. The repeat should be at the blue tick at 00:46:522, and since it's a repeat slider, there's no way to make it end at its correctly snapped location (00:46:756), but for rhythm simplification purposes, letting it end at the red tick isn't too bad.
9. 00:58:359 (4) - Seems like an unusual shape to use in a normal diff, I think it'd be better if it was just a straight slider (or the red sliderpoint being closer to the middle of the slider, like 01:35:859 (6) - )
10. 01:02:109 (4) - Same issue with the wiggle as before, also the sliderend should be snapped to 01:02:811
11. 01:07:265 (2,3) - Maybe do something like this for better flow?
12. 01:09:140 (5,6) - Maybe move (6) to x268 y216 for better flow? Don't forget to adjust spacing with next note if you do this
13. 01:14:296 (1,2) - IMO would be cooler if you curved the slider the other way, to make it blanket like this
14. 01:31:875 (2) - This slider looks pretty ugly for me, I'd just rather use the new slider algorithm on it
15. 01:46:171 (3) - Same issue as 00:46:171 (3)
16. 01:49:921 (4) - If you move the red sliderpoint to x312 y168, the sharp edge will snap to the red tick, making more sense with the song (don't forget to adjust spacing with next note if you apply this)
17. 01:52:499 - This break feels really awkward, especially considering this section was mapped in the other diffs. Even some simple rhythm here will work just fine.
18. 01:59:296 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - I think the claps you used in the previous combo would work here just fine.

[Advanced]

1. 00:17:109 (3) - NC here to indicate change in rhythm?
2. 00:24:609 (3) - Would flow better if this was curved upwards
3. 00:26:250 (2,3) - This small overlap is hurting me >:
4. 00:31:171 (1) - Reverse here should actually be snapped to 1/4
5. 00:32:109 (2) - Should be snapped to red tick instead
6. 00:33:984 (3) - Maybe move it a bit left to avoid the small overlap?
   
7. 00:46:171 (5) - Should be snapped to 1/4 instead
8. 00:59:296 (1) - This should really be stacked with 00:58:125 (2), would look much nicer
9. 01:01:171 (5) - Maybe move the reverse sliderpoint to x276 y201 to make it fit with 01:00:234 (3)?
10. 01:10:546 (1) - Add a finish hitsound?
11. 01:30:000 (3,1) - Might want to fix the spacing here
12. 01:34:921 (1,2) - Overlapping a bit too much IMO, maybe move (2) to x69 y250?
13. 01:59:296 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - Adding some claps here would be nice
14. 02:00:233 - seems weird to me that you skipped this beat, doesn't seem to fit with the rhythm you used through the rest of the map

[Hard]

1. 00:07:734 (5,1) - (1) isn't properly stacked with (5)'s sliderend
2. 00:31:796 (2) - Should be snapped to the red tick instead
3. 00:33:750 (2,3,4,1) - Spacing is kinda weird here, is it intentional?
4. 00:46:171 (1,2,3) - Should be snapped to the blue tick

cool map and nice song

Thank you both so much!, After looking through both, I changed everything you both said, after covering everything, except for the 1/3 rythmn changes from paydayz, Thanks! I appreciate it : D

Kurai wrote:

Metadata check from my queue!

M2U's official website: http://www.m2ustudio.com/index_en.html (check song number 72).



Artist: M2U
Title: Black Rose Remix by TAK

Source should be empty since M2U's website says this music is from EZ2DJ but does not specify which game. I tried looking for that but I couldn't find anything, it actually just looks like this music is non-existent, it's not listed anywhere else other than on M2U's website lol. You should simply leave ez2dj in the tags.
Other than that, your tags look fine, remove M2U once you fixed the artist name.

Hello! NM from my modding queue

1. 00:29:296 (1) -overlap,maybe you can put it upside-down?
   
2. 00:43:359 (5,1) -overlap.
   
3. 01:33:046 (1,2) -overlap.
   
4. 02:02:812 (1,1) - Give more breathing time between spinnerstart and the last note.Delete the last lote.

1. 00:15:234 (5) -The slider end should turn to the next note,or this would confuse the beginners.
   
2. 00:33:515 (2,3) - Much better if you can put it upside-down?
   
3. 00:44:765 (2,3) -overlap
   
4. 01:35:859 (3) - The slider end should turn to the next note,or this would confuse the beginners.
   
5. 01:42:421 (1,2) -overlap

1. 00:40:078 (4) -Put another note on 00:40:312 to make it more comfortable.
   
2. 01:43:359 (3) -Stack this on 4 instead of 2,as the present way may confuse the players.
   
3. 02:02:578 (6) -Don’t stack this on 5,put it at somewhere farther.

My Angel Yuki wrote:

Hello! NM from my modding queue
[Normal]

1. 00:29:296 (1) -overlap,maybe you can put it upside-down? Intentional Overlap
   
2. 00:43:359 (5,1) -overlap. Intentional
   
3. 01:33:046 (1,2) -overlap. Intentional
   
4. 02:02:812 (1,1) - Give more breathing time between spinnerstart and the last note.Delete the last lote. Spinner lasts long enough to where a break isn't necessary

[Advanced]

1. 00:15:234 (5) -The slider end should turn to the next note,or this would confuse the beginners. Its an advanced, A little flow break on a NC for emphasis won't ruin a play
   
2. 00:33:515 (2,3) - Much better if you can put it upside-down? it would look ugly, and its not confusing now
   
3. 00:44:765 (2,3) -overlap Intentional
   
4. 01:35:859 (3) - The slider end should turn to the next note,or this would confuse the beginners. Same as above
   
5. 01:42:421 (1,2) -overlapOfc its an overlap, its a 1/4 spacing.

[Hard]

1. 00:40:078 (4) -Put another note on 00:40:312 to make it more comfortable. There's no notable noise to map
   
2. 01:43:359 (3) -Stack this on 4 instead of 2,as the present way may confuse the players. doesn't make sense, would be confusing
   
3. 02:02:578 (6) -Don’t stack this on 5,put it at somewhere farther.I like it as it is now, Not confusing and its fine to play

Really nice song.Good luck to you~!

Arphimigon wrote:

Lab Mod!

Results given in [x, y] formats

[Advanced]
Object at 00:19:453 - should be placed at: [231, 191] currently at: [232, 192] to move in line with slider
Object at 00:22:734 - should be placed at: [107, 239] currently at: [108, 240] to move in line with slider
Object at 00:26:250 - should be placed at: [165, 59] currently at: [164, 60] to move in line with slider
Object at 00:29:531 - should be placed at: [451, 279] currently at: [452, 276] to blanket slider body
Object at 00:33:046 - should be placed at: [483, 23] currently at: [484, 24] to move in line with slider
Object at 00:47:812 - should be placed at: [357, 123] currently at: [356, 124] to move in line with slider
Object at 00:48:046 - should be placed at: [357, 123] currently at: [356, 124] to move in line with slider
Object at 01:01:171 - should be placed at: [201, 169] currently at: [202, 170] to move in line with slider
Object at 01:16:171 - should be placed at: [62, 108] currently at: [63, 106] to move in line with slider

[Hard]
Object at 00:08:671 - should be placed at: [429, 250] currently at: [430, 251] to move in line with slider
Object at 00:13:828 - should be placed at: [360, 173] currently at: [361, 174] to move in line with slider
Object at 00:20:390 - should be placed at: [195, 195] currently at: [196, 196] to move in line with slider
Object at 00:34:218 - should be placed at: [414, 130] currently at: [412, 128] to move in line with slider
Object at 00:44:765 - should be placed at: [206, 233] currently at: [208, 232] to move in line with slider

[Normal]
Object at 01:40:546 - should be placed at: [67, 275] currently at: [68, 276] to move in line with slider
Object at 01:41:484 - should be placed at: [53, 75] currently at: [52, 76] to move in line with slider

I hope I didn't malfunction! C:

1. 00:11:953 (4) - there is a strong beat here that you ignore - couldn't use atleast make this a 00:22:500 (2) - repeating slider too or add a note since it ain't doing no harm?
2. 01:35:859 (3) - this kind of looks weird to me maybe just straighten it out to make it look better because it look kind of short
   http://imgur.com/a/zKAF3 - this is what I mean't btw if u got confuse
3. 01:33:984 (4,5) - fix this stack
4. 01:43:828 (5) - this can be curve slightly better - this is minor and barely noticeable just it pointing it out..
5. there could be a note right here since it ain't really messing up the patten - up to you though 02:01:171 -

DJ Lucky wrote:

From Queue
Hard

1. 00:11:953 (4) - there is a strong beat here that you ignore - couldn't use atleast make this a 00:22:500 (2) - repeating slider too or add a note since it ain't doing no harm? its clicked tho idrk what you mean
2. 01:35:859 (3) - this kind of looks weird to me maybe just straighten it out to make it look better because it look kind of short
   http://imgur.com/a/zKAF3 - this is what I mean't btw if u got confuse its blanketing the slider
3. 01:33:984 (4,5) - fix this stack aight
4. 01:43:828 (5) - this can be curve slightly better - this is minor and barely noticeable just it pointing it out.. idrk what you mean lol
5. there could be a note right here since it ain't really messing up the patten - up to you though 02:01:171 - nah it would be following nothing

Couldn't find anything in the other difficulties