[Nemesis] wrote:

M4M

Is that goddamn hentai music sure

Neko Rezu

00:15:448 (5) - bend it to the left so that it flows a bit better and corresponds with 00:15:682 (6,7) - a bit better You only click on the heads for kick sliders and even if you didn't this would drag the the end away from the next sldier making it worse
00:19:198 (4) - same applies, to the right this time ^
00:22:948 (3,4) - stacking these would implify the strong shift in music there that would be really bad since 00:22:011 (1,2) - aren't stacked. It would mean weird cursor movement overall
00:22:948 (3,5) - I recommend changing the shape of (5) to compose better with (3), like so: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8617219 That slider would be really random with the structure of the rest of the map
00:25:761 (1) - straighten up, flows better with 00:26:112 (2) - ...
00:49:667 (4) - bend it a little more, the curve is barely visible the point was not to make it bend too much
01:04:198 (5,6,7,8,1) - uhm, in all previous instances you used a different way (see here 01:02:323 (4,5) - ) to indicate a 1/4 corelation between a circle and a slider, why are they stacked now? keep the consistency going In all honesty I did for the nature of the transiton and the slider lengths are longer here but maybe..
01:07:948 (1,2,3) - how's 3 different from the others? I mean it's the only one that got a white anchor in it. I suggest you give this pattern a little "buildup", bend 01:08:182 (2) - about the half time as much as you did in 01:08:417 (3) I don't see why these need to be the same. Playing wise the play lick back and forth and the whole point is for it to suit the structure for the rest of the map
01:18:612 (2,3,4,5) - inconsistent spacings in identical moments of the song you mean like this 00:57:987 (2,3) ?
01:23:182 (5,6) - isn't this spacing a bit too high? I mean if (6) was reversed it wouldn't be a problem, but now not only do I have to make a huge jump, I also need to reposition my cursor to imply a flow that's directly inverse to the flow I've been using before.again, you only click the heads and I thought the spacing of 6 is a nice emphasis
01:37:948 (3,4,5) - as mentioned at the beginning of the mod same

Light Insane

00:11:815 - you're ignoring a sound here, I suggest a stream pattern instead just because there is a sound here doesn't mean I have to map it. it's not a part of the layer of music I'm following
00:15:448 (3) - 1/4 slider instead (00:22:948 (3,4,5) - is mapped the same way even though it doesn't have that sound in it) 00:15:448 (3,4) - Are the same sound in the layer I'm mapping so it would be stupid as hell to map them differently
00:19:198 (3) - for some reason, despite previously ignoring it you seem to be mapping the missing sound from now on, why? (I was thinking that you were undermapping the song for the sake of making it easier until this point) ugh
00:33:964 - blanket thnx
00:44:042 (3,4,1) - kind of an antiflow here, I bet that's not gonna be too comfortable to play did you even play it?
00:55:761 (1,2,3,4) - map it as such: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8617331 why though?
01:26:815 - missing sound again same reason as earlier
01:30:448 (3,4,5) - ignored sound again ^

Gonna stop here, 3 stars is my limit soz

JeZag wrote:

m4m fulfillment

you dont seem to have any issues so below are just suggestions and you should treat them as such. but do give me feedback if you do not agree ;w;

EZ
01:23:417 (5,1) - this stands out as particularly unpretty because its roughly close to a blanket but not a blanket. maybe its just me, but i would either make it a blanket or make it a definite not-blanket ok
nothing else zzz

NM
00:51:542 (3,4) - is polarity fixable here? it seems like 00:51:776 is a vocal beat and thus clickable to fix polarity, but if you have certain emphasis in mind then go ahead. honestly I like the rhythm, I don't think polarity is a must in every pattern since these are predominant sounds. I also don't like sound being held by a slider as shown in your example
the rhythm i had in mind
youre good here too really

HD
uhhhhhhh sorry nothing to say

INS
00:09:823 (3,4,5) - regarding everything in this section thats mapped this way in this section of the song (i.e. 00:13:573 (3,4,5) - etc etc), I want to know why the rhythm isnt mapped like 00:08:886 (1,2). the only difference in music between these two patterns (to my ear and from surface level listening) is the bass line, which i think is too insignificant.
I get if you want variation or you don't want it to be boring, but let me know if my ear is wrong
00:12:167 (5) - I think this should end on the red tick instead of blue because playing the song at 50% suggests that the melody changes notes on this beat which I think warrants a slidertail The only thing I can say about the 2 above points is that this was my attempt at intterpretation and creating a bit of a more creative rhythm to follow
00:15:917 (5) - same as last slider, except the red tick here seems to cut off the melody, and seems unfit for the sustain caused by the current slider ^
00:38:182 (3) - if im correct, this serves to sugar down the rhythm so its easy to read. even so, i dont think these 3 objects do this rhythm justice and so heres an alternative suggestion Actually the heads of 00:38:300 (4,5) mapped the 2 predominant drum beats on the heads that. Yes there are 4 drum sounds but the come in 2 pairs. 00:38:182 (3) Is an overmap but I don't see it as too unfitting to play and doesnt serve to put the player off. If ppl do tho I will just delete 00:38:182 (3) but yh when you play along with the song not having circle 3 kinda puts you off polarity wise

00:40:409 (4) - for this slider, i understand that the tail represents the vocal beat. however, consider making this 1/2 for the sustain, to create a larger emphasis on the downbeat on 00:40:761 (1). i feel that because this is so short as 1/4, it almost takes away from the irregular rhythm of 00:44:042 (3,4). Actually no, the kickslider is to map the distinguisable drum beat and not having it as the same object that the vocals map.
00:44:159 (4) - same as this for before ^
00:56:698 (5,6) - consider this rhythm below, i think its good because its pretty much as complex as 00:54:823 (3,4,5) and also has similar emphasis (vocals over the drum on the white tick) honestly I kinda like my switch to the instruments here, I feel like it plays well

01:04:198 (5,6) - same as beforee, and you can find the other two too
and same thing i said about sustained sliders yada yada yada

EX
00:07:479 (2) - i saw what you wrote above and to me, this doesnt quite sound 1/3. i say this because even on the head of 00:07:479 (2) , it seems that the vocals are a bit ahead of the beat which leads me to believe that the vocals are intended to be the following, just a tad bit ahead (because oops). also, currently 1/3 has the middle tick too early (but the last one correct, due to the oopsie offset of the vocals) I actually thought that both parts were 1/3 but yh. If it is the case that only the last one is then I would think a reverse slider here would be the best way to map this. The reverse is really played and the note in the middle is sort of ambiguous but the end note is the one you land on so if that's off then it makes your timing a bit off leaving the circle. Also because this is a reverse slider it feels like the most intutive way to play the pattern as a whole requiring minium focus on thrythm and timing. I think payability wise the reverse slider is the best approach
00:12:167 (7) - the sustain feels a lot more natural in this diff due to the density of this diff, so i actually think it belongs here. belongs where?
00:55:175 (6) - i was going to tell you to map the vocals here but then i slowed it down. wtf is this vocal rhythm??

sorry if i couldnt help much... feel free to call off the m4m if mines is little and yours would be too much