M4M (I'll attempt to mod lower diffs, don't expect too much though.)
GeneralI believe your spread is a bit unbalanced, there's a 2 star difference between Hard and Insane. I think you should consider buffing Hard a little bit, or adding a 4* Insane and renaming Insane to Extra
Insane00:09:977 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - how come you're suddenly changing the pattern here? I mean nothing too important changes in the song so why did you use different rhythm than in the previous two instances?
00:16:256 (4,5,6) - again, absolutely nothing changes there, I'm pretty sure of that.
00:21:837 (4) - move to x=378 y=130
00:41:023 (2) - move to x=68 y=156 for a more appealing overlap with 00:41:198 (3) -
00:57:244 (1) - move to x=271 y=35
Hard00:17:477 - add a circle, move 00:17:651 (2,3,1) - closer to 00:16:954 (1) - for consequency with your previous rhythm choices
00:21:489 (3,1) - isn't this gap a little too much? I mean 1/1 gaps have never before been so big in this diff so I think it may be a bit offthrowing
00:21:489 (3) - on a sidenote, stack it under 00:23:582 (3) - cause as it is rn it looks kinda awkward imo
https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/861998700:24:628 (5,6) - the first angle looks a little too small, I suggest you just copypaste (6) there
00:26:721 (5) - I feel like a straight slider would flow better, also it would transition a little better into 00:27:419 (6) -
00:33:000 (7,8) - stack is off
00:57:070 (3,1) - ugh, I don't feel like this is appropriate. Not only is this the first time that you've ever used such a pattern in this diff, the 1/2 distance there is a bit too high and I feel like many people would combobreak on this (applies to all)
Normal00:10:675 (2,3) - a straight line out of these would be way more appealing
00:24:628 (4,1) - switch NCs maybe? I feel like it will be more appropriate
00:35:093 (3,4) - why didn't you reverse the flow there, like you did previously?
00:54:628 (3,4) - I feel like the clickable object should've been on 00:55:326 - , how about you reverse the kickslider 4 times and then add a circle instead?
01:07:884 (2) - I don't feel like this flows that well, maybe copypaste 01:07:186 (1) - once more?
Rest is good. Gl