1. Futsuu (2,19 stars, 232 notes)
2. Kantan (1,73 stars, 139 notes)
3. Muzukashii (3,27 stars, 359 notes)
4. Oni (4,39 stars, 530 notes)

Alchyr wrote:

mod because mod

Oni

01:31:543 (527,528) - maybe emphasize string run slightly by making this kdd- actually maybe kkd considering that is the pattern usually used in this map kats are meant to be the snare idk thing you hear, dons are just filler

Muzukashii
00:22:928 (59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67) - maybe try to replace some d with k in here, it feels really monotonous as it is right now, while there is a bit of variation in the song, and its not like it would be too much of a concern for difficulty changed non-triplets to k
overall seems pretty solid, only ddd/kkk patterns for 1/4 for relatively simple to play diff

Futsuu
00:07:543 (5) - maybe k done on 00:07:235 (4) - with higher vocal pitch support
Seems ok... I really can't mod lower diffs well, I can't tell how much would be too much for the difficulty to be fine its fine dw i won't kill you

Kantan
I... I don't.. I don't know......

1. 01:23:235 - if i were you, i wouldn't make here a gap cause of loudness' growing up. Something like kat will follow this growing.

1. 00:17:389 - so loud sound to not be mentioned, imo. Kat maybe? It won't break overall density of this part.
2. 00:19:235 (92,93,94) - what about kdk? It will better emphasize your main 00:19:235 (92,94) - instrument here.
3. 00:22:312 (110,112,116) - a bit confusing to hear them different. You make this part vocal related, but instrumental is also loud here to not be considered. If you map here vocal, then 00:22:774 (112) - kat here doesn't suit the part. He emphasize nothing, only instrumental.
4. 00:25:235 (122,123,124) - d kk will be better, imo, due to tonality of vocal here.
5. 00:33:389 - here you can put don for filling the echo of vocal before.
6. 00:37:697 (196) - kat for better reading and emphasizing of vocal? But now i see, that all that vocal spots in this part are dons, so...Unnecessary to fix.
7. 00:41:697 - don't think, that you should lose that sound. Don here will be great. Pluse next, you have it 00:46:312 - in this part.
8. 01:07:774 - to emphasize stream ending and beginning of new part, you can make here a gap.
9. 01:17:620 - same as above.
10. 01:30:774 - lost sound or just did it specially here? Better without gap to not break that growing of loudness comparing to density.

Remus wrote:

Now i know, the meme of supercat is real.

Kantan and Futsuu are fine to me.

[Muzukashii]

1. 01:23:235 - if i were you, i wouldn't make here a gap cause of loudness' growing up. Something like kat will follow this growing. Partially disagree, the buildup is too faint to be really noticeable. If more people complain about it, I will surely add a kat.

[Oni]

1. 00:17:389 - so loud sound to not be mentioned, imo. Kat maybe? It won't break overall density of this part. The lack of note is to separate these patterns, as I didn't want to have something too long.
2. 00:19:235 (92,93,94) - what about kdk? It will better emphasize your main 00:19:235 (92,94) - instrument here. Yeah, either way it's a filler note and kats only landed on snaaaaares.
3. 00:22:312 (110,112,116) - a bit confusing to hear them different. You make this part vocal related, but instrumental is also loud here to not be considered. If you map here vocal, then 00:22:774 (112) - kat here doesn't suit the part. He emphasize nothing, only instrumental. I've changed the dkd to a single d where the k used to be (1/1 doesn't flow well)
4. 00:25:235 (122,123,124) - d kk will be better, imo, due to tonality of vocal here. I think they're already d kk
5. 00:33:389 - here you can put don for filling the echo of vocal before. There's no real echo here
6. 00:37:697 (196) - kat for better reading and emphasizing of vocal? But now i see, that all that vocal spots in this part are dons, so...Unnecessary to fix. Yeah, most vocal parts are confined to don (but honestly it's just a coincidence), but dkkdd will make the pattern weirder - even if it's accurate to vocal parts, I don't want potentially awkward patterns.
7. 00:41:697 - don't think, that you should lose that sound. Don here will be great. Pluse next, you have it 00:46:312 - in this part. The lack of note is voluntary, to clash the intensities between both parts more than putting 1/2 doubles right away. When they appear later, they are building up to the tatoe.
8. 01:07:774 - to emphasize stream ending and beginning of new part, you can make here a gap. yeah good catch, the following note has been changed to k (subject to change)
9. 01:17:620 - same as above. ^ same
10. 01:30:774 - lost sound or just did it specially here? Better without gap to not break that growing of loudness comparing to density. yeah good idea, i dont remember why i missed it.

Lol. It wasn't mod, i still owe you one. I tried to not write subjective things, so those are only i found. The rest is fine to me.
Good luck.

Greenshell wrote:

wow once in a lifetime i ss'd something

this quick and very subjective mod is read best with HRDT

General:

Add tatoe to tags for the memes? absolutely FIRED xd also add op as the acronym of opening yes

You sure the OD spread is appropiate for a simple tv size mapset? -.5 to each

HP 7 on all diffs nice been a staple for some maps, like lawn wake iv for instance, which has HP6 on all 7 diffs


[Kantan]

maybe HP 8 due to the length? 139 notes, 7.5 should be max - holding this

00:40:774 (50) - consider adding a finish for cymbals / new part of the song? that applies to the other diffs too soft crash, having a very strong note kinda contradicts it


[Futsuu]

01:09:697 (158) - kat to express the higher vocal pitch and to keep the kd doublets at the end of the patterns consistent? i'm actually doubtful but yeah, simplifies a bit imo


[Muzukashii]

if you apply HP8 to kantan, consider changing HP to 6 here to even up the HP spread

00:19:312 (59) - consider deleting this note? there's no real sound to emphasize and idk I feel like it stands out too much as it is yea

00:29:697 (83,84,85,86,87,88) - kkkddd to follow the guitar pitch? current pattern sounds weird imo i'm putting dddddd, i don't really remember the pitch changing all that much

00:54:158 (173) - kat? vocal pitch decreases on 00:54:312 (174) - and it's pretty similar to the two notes after that, so it'd give more contrast done it on 00:54:312 (173) - to follow 00:53:082 (167,168,169,170) -

01:20:005 (306) - is it intentional that this is the only diff with a finish here? no, that's what you call a fucking dumb mapper to let that slide


[Oni]

00:15:389 (60) - kat to show the violin is at its peak here? didn't follow the violin at all

00:29:697 (134,135,136,137,138,139) - same as muzu well same then

01:01:158 (306) - dkd doesn't sound fitting to me at this spot. as a suggestion, I'd make this triplet ddd and 01:01:697 (310,311,312) - kkd. I found that to be following the melody nicely, but maybe you find something better? i'm just gonna put ddd on both, i don't like the second kkd idea (but in retrospect dkd wasn't that good)

01:20:005 (446) - seeing you used more finishers in this diff compared to the others, consider adding a finish here too? but the muzukashii one was a fuckup....................... i cri

01:27:389 (494) - shouldn't this be a finish like 00:13:543 (47) - ? yea


I suck at modding /runs no you dont

good luck :eyes:
1 2
2 50