1. Advanced (2.99 stars, 386 notes)
2. Expert (5.99 stars, 671 notes)
3. Extreme v2 (6.39 stars, 579 notes)
4. Extreme v3 (6.82 stars, 606 notes)
5. Extreme (6.53 stars, 737 notes)
6. Feb's Extra (5.39 stars, 659 notes)
7. Hard (3.51 stars, 486 notes)
8. Insane (5.04 stars, 605 notes)
9. Normal (2.02 stars, 206 notes)

Arusamour wrote:

deltmin

-Harpuia- wrote:

short suc mod

[General]

1. Set the song / audio bitrate to at most 192kbps.
   Done, I'll change it after I finish responding to mods asdf
2. Not sure, but soft-hitfinish4.wav looks unused.
   It's not unused, I used it to hitsound the Ride Bell hits in the Bridges. For Example 00:46:350 - here and 00:46:950 - here.

[Extreme]

1. AR 9.8, I think, is a bit too much. Maybe 9.5 or 9.6 would be better.
   Changed.
2. 00:11:700 (4,5) - Unlike the previous parts, like 00:02:100 (4,5) - and 00:06:900 (4,5) - , there's a sudden drop in terms of distance here.
   Changed, increased spacing at 00:11:700 (4,5) -
3. 00:12:150 (7,1,2) - I suggest making the changes in DS here more apparent... Also making 00:12:300 (1,2) - have the higher one to follow the other parts prior.
   Spaced 00:12:300 (1,2) - more
4. 00:17:550 (2) - Don't this slider need to be placed farther from the previous adjacent object? (Also maybe same for 00:18:750 (2) -?)
   Done, I forgot to Ctrl+G this.
5. 00:19:650 (1,2,3,4) - I'm not quite sure on how this part is mapped, but I think the slider should come first before the circle (00:19:650 (1,2) - ).
   I disagree, I don't want a single tap on 00:19:950 - - because its a very weak sound. compared to the Snare on the downbeat and the bass drum on the offbeat of 1.
6. 00:26:550 (6,1) - imo flow could be better. Make the motion in 00:26:700 (1) - a bit more to the left then proceed to the right.
   I disagree, I think the flow is natural.
7. 00:35:550 (3,4) - 00:35:700 (4,5) - Switch spacing difference? I can't hear a heavy sound / increase in pitch at 00:35:700 (4) - . Or maybe there is and I'm just deaf
   Fixed.
8. 00:51:450 (3) - Reaaaally minor. This seems to have a distance a bit greater than the similar parts: 01:01:050 (3) - and others. Usually, with what I've noticed, it would apply to the next NC'ed object.
   Fixed.
9. 02:16:650 (3,4) - Shouldn't these be unstacked? (Reference: 02:04:650 (3,4) - 02:11:850 (3,4) - )
   Some are stacked and some aren't stacked for the sake of patterning.
10. 02:43:950 (1) - A small suggestion here. Make the slider body go through the previous slider's head. Better if it were to be in a spike.
    I don't like that design, I appreciate the suggestion though.
    
    Like this

    

Is all I could do (for now i guess)
Went through the other difficulties quickly for glaring issues; there seems to be none.

Good luck! Hope this helped. :3
No, you did great, I made lots of dumb mistakes.

Stingy wrote:

I really won't go over emphasis too much because I don't see it the same as you, so I won't waste my time with it.

[Extreme]
00:17:100 (1) - This slider isn't the same angle on both sides of the red nodes >.>
Fixed.
00:16:050 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1) - These jumps ALONE are comfortable, but I strongly suggest making them counter-clockwise to fit 00:17:100 (1) - this slider's direction... You can do that or just CTRL+H the slider and adjust accordingly. Right now, the jumps flow to the right but then the slider changes the flow drastically. I understand these types of patterns and things (at least, I think I do) but this particular set of object is quite uncomfortable.
I disagree, I think its comfortable because it makes a zig-zac kinda movement Similar to this pattern 00:07:200 (6,7,1).
00:17:850 (3,4,1) - Loosen the blanket just a tad bit.
Why would I need to loosen? It looks fine to me.

w

00:19:650 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - You use a Note-Slider rhythm to emphasis the snare for (1,2) but then (4,5) is a Slider-Note... I think you should change the rhythm so that the snare emphasis matches. (P.S., this happens more than once. If you accept, don't forget! :3)
I don't think that this kinda of consistency is as important as spacing consistency and rhythm consistency when comparing phrases that are the same.
00:21:600 (7) - Move this to the right so it's linear with the triple beforehand?
I don't think that's really a big deal.
00:36:000 (6) - I think this should blanket (1,2) (the stack before this slider) with the first part of this slider. This will leave room for reading and for 00:36:300 (1) - 's visibility.
I disagree, a common structural idea in my maps is overlapping the middle of sliders with other sliders or other single taps 00:06:900 (4,1) - 00:05:100 (1,4) - 01:52:800 (6,1) - 01:55:500 (1,4) - 01:58:800 (4,1) - 01:16:350 (3,4,1) -

00:48:300 (1,4) - Fix this stack.
What's wrong with it? Both slider tails have the exact same x and y values.
01:40:800 (2,2) - Move the note (2) up so the slider blankets it a bit better since it's stacked with the stream.
Actually, I wasn't trying to stack it with the stream, I was trying to make a triangle with 01:40:800 (2,1,2) -
02:09:750 (7,3) - Fix stack.
Again, they have the same x and y value, what's wrong with it?
[]

[Extra]
00:12:150 (7,1) - I think it'd be cool if you rotated (7) so it followed (1)'s curve.
No, I prefer opposing curves. I think that design looks better.
02:07:425 - Mute? There are quite a few of these after here so if you accept, get them too.
What the hell, I had all of these muted? Where did they all go?!?!?
[]

[Insane]
01:21:000 (2,2,2) - Fix these stacks.
Fixed.
[]

Hectique wrote:

hi bad modder


Normal
i have nothing to say


Advanced
is advanced easier than hard? nomenclature hep
02:32:606 (1) - probably remove nc
o ya forgot to do that

Hard
00:09:206 (2,3) - i think these sliders should be stacked circles
I see what you mean, as they are snare hits, however this would be too difficult for a Hard Especially with x2.50 spacing.
00:59:306 (1,2) - this is some serious misread material, change to 3 4xrepeat sliders?
I see what you mean here as well, but that rhythm doesn't fit the percussion part as well as I would like it to. The first 4 notes are snare hits,
then 2 bass drum hits, then 4 high-mid tom hits, then 2 bass drum hits, then a snare hit again. So the dominant change from bass drum to high-mid tom is highlighted in this pattern.
01:49:706 (1,2) - ^
01:59:906 (3,1) - i think this spacing is just a bit too small and could lead to a misread, maybe point the first slider more away?
That would ruin the structure of the pattern


Insane
01:25:406 (4,5) - i don't think these should be stacked
It's consistent with 00:35:006 (4,5,1,2) -
02:08:906 (1,2,3) - i think this drum pattern deserves more active playing, i'd mimic your 1/1 stacks from the rest of the section
I don't want something too dense in the half-time part of the song for a difficulty like this.
02:24:206 (6,1) - small spacing for a big sound
Yeah, it's supposed to ease the player from the jumps back into the half-time part.
02:32:906 (1,2,3) - same as 02:08:906 (1,2,3)


Extra
00:50:306 (1,2,3) - i think you could have more of an increase in spacing here to complement the buildup
I disagree here, since all 3 snare hits are equal in strength, I'd rather have them similar spacings. I did change the pattern, however.
01:23:606 (3,4,5,6) - this feels really weird to me but it's not, like, bad so idk
I think its fine
02:39:506 (2) - the sound after this note is so weak i'd use a slider instead, it'll be less jarring instead of sudden perfect stacks imo
I did something else to make it more consistent

Extreme
00:17:906 (3,4) - this double is stacked in opposition to the previous ones which just used small spacing and i'm not certain why
00:17:156 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6) - In these two measures, 00:17:906 (3,4) - has the weakest guitar part.
00:19:706 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - for this pattern, i think a the first circle > slider represents the drums really well and that the rest should reflect that, so i'd change it to 3,4,5 being circle, circle, slider respectively
Since everyone has been telling me to change it, I'll change it
00:20:306 (4,5,6) - this part has some really awkward flow going on from the rest of the pattern before it where circles strayed from the direction of the slider
Changed
00:23:906 (1) - remove nc
Done
00:40:556 (3,4,5,6) - i think the spacing here is a bit extraordinary even for the transition
I don't think so
00:43:106 (3,4) - the stacked circles here feel a little underwhelming, imo small jumps might be more fitting
It's supposed to be underwhelming, as its a half-time phrase.
01:08:306 (3,4) - same as 00:17:906 (3,4)
01:10:106 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - same as 00:19:706 (1,2,3,4,5,6)


sry if my points aren't very helpful, i find your style of mapping pretty interesting! :>
Nah they're helpful. And thanks!

pkhg wrote:

dab

3312 wrote:

haitai (HAITAI)
also my mods may apply to other patterns too but im too lazy to highlight them all xd
[Normal]
02:03:506 (2) - IMO i would rotate it more to the right (like this)
o k
00:17:156 (1,2) - blanket it reeeeee
Nop, that makes the incoming angle too sharp in my opinion. I think what I have now plays better.
[Advanced]
00:11:306 (4,5,6) - imo because the drum sounds are flow-ish? idk also
That spacing is way too big for an Advanced.
00:23:906 (5,1) - you could blanket this
I could, but like I said earlier, I don't think that plays as well for easier diffs.
00:22:706 (3,4,5,3,4,5) - whats with the inconsistent repeat slider shapes, 00:22:706 (3,4,5) - has a repeat slider with a white anchor, 00:25:106 (3,4,5) - has a repeat slider with a red anchor, and suddenly 00:27:506 (3,4,5) - all the repeat sliders have white anchor :thonkang:
They are two separate measures, so its fine.
01:04:106 (4) - you could curve it like this so it looks more better and not make the 3 sliders sound the same
I changed it asdf
[Hard]
00:22:406 (2,3) - most players will think that this is a 1/2 after 00:19:706 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1) - unless if they listen to the song ofc
I don't think they will. This is because 00:21:131 (2,3) - is spaced and not stacked. If it were stacked, it could be easily misread. In addition,
having 1/4 spacing in a hard is perfectly acceptable.
00:36:806 (2,3,4) - imo so it looks good while making the slider shapes represent the sounds
I think both are fine
[Insane]
00:38:456 (4,5,1) - this jump feels bad to aim :/
changed
00:42:506 (1,2) - i would ctrl+g this so the sound doesnt feel like the same as 00:41:906 (2,3) - idk
I don't think that's a big deal
01:24:356 (1) - this is the only cymbal/finish sound (idk im bad at music xd) that dont use red anchor, why
Yah, the cymbal is there but I think using a variety of slider shapes is perfectly acceptable, especially when this is effectively a "new measure." I prefer having similar slider shapes within measures and changing them between measures.
02:33:506 (3) - curve this a bit more
I disagree, I would prefer to have the structural idea that 02:32:906 (1,2,3) - are all the same slider shape in this drum fill.

[Extra]
00:02:606 (7,1) - sudden change on jump emphasis + weird placement makes it flow p weirdly imo
Changed
theres alot of cymbal/finish sound that doesnt use red anchor but i wont highlight them all xd
Yah, I don't think using them over and over is appropriate, its a design choice.
01:23:606 (3,4,5) - i know you did this because of emphasis and all (or do i? ) but it just feels bad to aim
Changed
01:51:506 (3,4,5) - aiming this makes aiming 01:52:106 (1,2,3,4,5) - harder (in a bad way) imo
Made it a sharper angle
02:33:206 (3,4,5,6,7) - imo because of the way 02:33:506 (5,6) - sound like
In this drum fill, I made the lower spaced jumps on the high-mid tom hits and the larger jumps on snare hits, where it is consistent with the map because snare hits have the largest spacing throughout the entirety of the map.
[Extreme]
00:09:206 (5) - i would put nc on this but idk /shrug
I don't think that's necessary
00:16:406 (3,4,5,6,7) - why did the jump on this one gets smaller while 00:11:606 (3,4,5,6,7) - which have the same emphasis get bigger jumps
I'm not sure what you mean, although there is x.2 discrepancies, they're pretty much the same jumps. 00:16:256 (2,3) - has x2.17 spacing and 00:11:456 (2,3) - has x2.18 spacing. However, I did change one jump k
00:21:656 (7,8) - i would put it like this imo just because i think it'll play better but idk
o k o
01:21:506 (4,5,6) - i feel like this jump is too big considering this part is p tame
changed
01:54:806 (2,3,4,5) - this DS is different from 01:45:506 (4,5) - and 01:59:156 (1,2,3,4) -
Okay I changed a lil but small discrepancies are fine for DS, they shouldn't have to be the exact same, especially in an Extreme.

IsomirDiYandere wrote:

Hi m4m from your queue
Already +14 star priority so the things I'm going to point out may seem light or useless but I didn't find any big problems in your mapset

[Insane]
00:09:806 (9,2,3,4,5) - I find these objects confusing to read because they all overlap maybe space them a little bit to make reading more clear, maybe just me
Changed
00:35:906 (5,1) - I find spacing between these objects too close, applies to all these rythms in the song, not going to point them all. It can be confusing as spacing before was large and it is suddenly is very close. Maybe you can ctrl+g the slow slider or you can also do a kickslider into the slow slider, like what you did in your extra diff
No, that's done for emphasis. 00:36:056 (1) - is a weak note and I emphasized the snare hits throughout the entirety of the map.
[Extra]
00:50:306 (1,2,3) - I think hitcircle jumps would fit better here, same for 01:40:706 (1,2,3) -
I disagree, I think both work fine
01:49:706 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5) - I think you should do a stream that changes speed to represent the drum better like what you did in 00:59:306 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5) -
Changed.
Sorry if it won't be useful to you but I couldn't find anything to say. (Must be because I'm a new mapper)
Map is cool, good luck for rank !

Origuon wrote:

Excuse me in advance if my mods won't be as good as your
insane:
00:01:406 - these slider looks weird
I disagree.
There is a lot of sliders stacked but they are not in the right end of the last slider they are stacked with and in my opinion it looks really weird
this notes: 00:07:406 (5) - 00:11:606 (2) - should be stacked in my opinion
01:21:506 (3) - 01:21:806 (5) - stacking this 2 notes should be good
I want to emphasize the snare hits, as I've done so consistently throughout the map. I do not want to stack here.
Expert:
00:49:706 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 00:59:606 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - these two streams are sharing the same sound but not the same spacing and i find it weird
what can i say more i'm not enough experienced sorry i tried saying what i can and i hope it will help
Changed.
Good luck improving your map and maybe rank :p

Lafayla wrote:

This is for [Extreme]
I have very little confidence in my modding skills so if you need to reject all my ideas, go right ahead !!!!!!

00:50:756 - Vocals enter again which makes the overall section feel more intense>>> perhaps a volume increase here to indicate this change in intensity would be appropriate>>
Disagreed, I want players to hear the hitsounds but not be too overwhelming.
The alternative to this would be to lower the volume at 00:22:406 - and have it reach 85% at ^^ section
00:57:206 (3) - I <3333 how the jumps are coordinated based on their hitsounds, whether intentional or not +1
yuh, they are. Emphasis on snare hits yah.
01:12:807 - This section is less intense than the previous so the map should reflect that, the jumps aren't very much different from the previous section, closing the gap between these jumps will help complement the slow section , but that's my opinion>>> its fine the way it is but this is just a personal preference don't shoot me please!!
Actually, I think that the jumps are different than the previous section. There's lots of 1 beat gaps because I'm obviously following the percussion part. Like how 01:13:706 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - this is much lower spaced than 01:01:706 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - this. Additionally, this is an Extreme, so stuff that generally high spaced is to be expected. However, emphasis is definitely given.
I would also lower hit sound volume for ^^ section>>

01:33:206 (2) - This slider's direction makes me upset >> (Don't shoot me please!!)
I think it plays fine!
02:13:406 (4) - ^^ same idea >> direction makes me upset again but after seeing this twice it can't be a coincidence so I guess this is what you are after, just not my taste

01:41:156 (1) - volume increase here will be wise.... I think.....

01:52:406 (3,5) - I like the similar hit sounds matching the jumps +1
:3
02:19:856 - +1 for break, fits perfectly>

02:33:356 (4) - has a different sound than 02:33:056 (2) - so I think this overlap might not be what you are looking for> doesn't match the consistency we were introduced previously in the map> perhaps putting the jump elsewhere would be wise>>
I think its fine, that wasn't my intention to overlap stuff with the same sound. It's a cool concept but what I preferred to do is keep higher spacing on snare hits and the lower spacing on mid tom hits.
02:44:006 (1) - this slider will make some people complain but I personally like it so feel free to do as you wish

and yea> thats that > I love the map
Thanks!
rejecting ideas helps me so if you need to reject everything > do so :3