00:01:028 (1) - Shouldn't this be slightly curved or at least maybe the same as 00:07:951 (2) - ? Feels not very smooth when it's just straight like that with a slider.
00:04:201 (1,2) - Gives the impression to dash but can catch it without dashing. Perhaps increase just a tiny bit more until dash is 100% needed ?
00:11:124 (1,2) - ^
00:31:319 (1,2) - Maybe slightly here too ^ Could move (1) a bit more right or (2) a bit more left (But who want's to move (2) off that perfect centre spot right :^) ?)
00:36:511 (1) - Compared to your previous notes this one felt a little cramped to the left side. Also that the note was note curved like previous times. Something like this would be nice (mine is on x:76 and just curved left).
00:41:704 (1) - Maybe same here but it's not as bad because it's not cramped ^
00:52:088 (1,2) - Hmmm previously these were hypered from one another. Maybe stay consistent here ?
00:59:011 (1) - ACK!. I mean it I don't mind this but the start of it should curve for better flow. (tbf I think a break is fine here instead).
01:09:396 (1) - Curve this to the right a bit maybe for better flow ?
01:16:031 (3,4) - This is different from 01:09:108 (3) - and I find it a bit extreme to have 2 hypers here for such a quiet section. I would stick with the first pattern you did.
01:29:877 (3,4) - Same as before (Although a bit more acceptable here). But also aren't you missing a clap hitsound on (4) here ?
01:36:223 (1,2) - Shouldn't this be a hyper here since you added to finish hitsounds to make it seem more intense ?
01:41:704 (2,1) - REALLY intense vocal change here. I know it might push it here but I think a hyper should be here for the new semi-stanza.
01:54:829 (3) - This is just my opinion but this anti-flow is kinda .... meh. In previous kiai this was flipped the other way too.
02:09:108 (2) - 2 nice piano sounds being missed out here and since it's an overdose I find they should be mapped. Maybe a pattern like this ? I also find the rest of the piano sounds should be mapped here.
02:11:271 (2,3,4) - I think this would be better in play and smoother if these were set out like this. (4) is behind (2).
02:13:867 (3) - Either slant more or curve because atm it's just a stand still job ;w;.
02:29:011 (1,2,3) - Could spread out these a bit more or rotate the whole set with CTRL + SHIFT + R by about -40 degree's maybe ? I don't really see almost stacked notes like this appealing to catch.
02:29:877 (4,5,6) - ^
02:35:069 (1,2) - I find another hyper would fit nicely here. Perhaps mirror it to (1) ?
02:38:242 (9,10) - Ouch hard 1/4 sliders to catch imo. I would slant these a bit more for flow.
02:42:281 (2,3,4,5) - Same suggestion as before when maybe rotating a bit more would help. Specially this stack.
02:48:915 (1,2,3) - Be nice to hyper between (1) and (2) also. Try moving (2, 3) together to x:308 and then (1) to somewhere like x:100. It seems nice this imo.
02:55:838 (1,2,3) - ^
02:59:300 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Maybe just slightly slant these to their sides of the screen just a little more ? For nicer flow. Maybe like these guys here
03:03:050 (3,4) -
03:01:896 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Same slant reasons as before.
03:17:281 (1) - Why not a spinner instead ? it would fit way way better. If not then maybe curve just a little more (or even an anchor point in the middle).
03:22:183 (1) - I know I mentioned it in general but this timing point really felt off. It makes it sound like this note should start on 03:22:262 - instead. (LOL IN 25% RATE IT SOUNDED LIKE THE CRASH BANDICOOT WOAH MEME! XDDD)
03:25:616 (3,4) - Pleeeease convert this into a 1/1 slider instead because it would fit the vocals sooooo nicely. ( And curve it :^) ).
03:34:493 (3,4) - ^ I don't really hear a prompt sound on (4) either.
03:40:309 (3,4) - ^
04:00:681 (1) - I personally find this would be nicer if CTRL + G'ed and moved to x:424
04:03:277 (1,2,3,4) - Don't you think there're one too many hypers here ? Imo I would remove one.
04:11:065 (1) - Curve again maybe ?
04:31:835 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4) - You know I would say about curving stuff or slanting here but holy crap that's a lot XD.
04:42:219 (1) - COOL SLIDER OWO! HAD TO MENTION.
04:54:479 (1) - Errm... this goes on for so long even when it runs out of music to spin on... Is this to just get onto 5 minutes ? Seems weird that it's this long.