General
00:00:040 - 00:14:733 - The hitsounds should be way quieter imo at around 30%. The hitsounds distract more than help emphasize the music.
Virtuoss
00:39:223 (1) - off-stack this under the stream so its easier readable. Its like the only thing which is hard to read in the map. Like
https://puu.sh/AjfBH/5530cbfcc3.png or even a bit more.
01:04:325 (9,10,11) - Why not put 1/4 sliders in here? You might want to change it up but the 1/2 really feels odd when the melody stays consistent.
01:14:121 (9,10,11) - same
01:48:714 (6,1) - This is pretty much almost not movement at all. It's really underwhelming considering its such a huge jump between the notes in the melody and their intensity. Either space them more and/or increase the SV to 1.3-1.4 for just these two.
it's really a shame that e.g. 01:40:448 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - and 01:50:244 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - are mapped with the same intensity (arguably the latter even less intense than the first). I really feel this Ending section could use some more diversity and nuance regarding feedback in regards to song intensity.
It's also a shame that the ending Climax (Kiai) is barely any distinct visually nor rhythmically but the barely noticeable 20% sv increase, especially when that speed is barely felt when slider bodies are omitted for constant slider lineincy cuts and with just a 1 to 1 increase in spacing in regards to the sv. It's just an upscaled version of the similar parts of the song.
02:17:182 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - I don't think i like the sudden shift from back and forth to barely-any-spacing 1/2 rhythm. The melody doesn't change this drastically between the two sections! Make them both the same type or come up with something more inventive, especially the transition 02:19:478 (8,1) - was dreadful. (Also 02:19:631 - is not as different from the prior two measures to warrant such a strong contrast)
Collab
00:36:774 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2) - this whole jump rhythm is off. It should be 4-4-1 and not 3-4-2 (the 00:37:233 - and 00:37:846 - ) repeat the same synth sounds as a finisher to the 4 hit rhythm). You guys aren't really taking any big liberties in term of rhythm in this so this was rather unexpected. I'd propose a Rhythm like that with the following movement emphasis:
https://puu.sh/AjgqY/7199066c29.jpg pretty much low spacing/ amount of movement between the 3rd and 4th notes which have the big drum hit to compensate which is still higher than spacing the 1st and 2nd notes have as a way to contrast everything nicely.
01:55:142 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2) - same
01:52:540 (5,1,2,3,4,5,1) - Woudl you mind explaining to me what rhythm you are going to follow in this part? What i can tell is that 00:39:223 (1,2,3,4,5) - goes for the bass but then 00:40:448 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - is some hybrid between piano drums and bass all of a sudden. At 00:49:019 - it seemed like you realised the piano takes over and went with that but neglect the bass, see: 00:51:468 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - or any other pattern in this half of the section. I would like to see some consistency in this as the only real thing holding this together is the played rhythm which falls apart gravely here.
01:52:540 (5,1,2,3,4,5,1) - I have a really hard time getting behind this movement. All your movement is predictable in some sense, this just does some random turns and twists around the playfield.
pachi
00:50:550 (6,7,8,9) - I would recommend you put a pattern here that stands out to emphasise the way the piano stands out when the all the other layers stop a brief time. You ar econstantly using tilted shapes so you could go with parallel lines to x for a quick fix or something greater. (you almost kidna did it here 01:29:427 (5,6,7,8) - i just wished you went all the way )
00:54:835 (4,5,6,7) - This stands out nicely but is blending in too well with the rest of the map.
01:44:121 (1,2,3) - you probably like this pattern, but having th ebig note in the melody clickable is something worth considering if you ask me. 01:44:886 - note here instead (especially when 01:44:580 (2) - isnt really on any significant long note in the song but just the continuation of where 01:44:121 (1) - started ) etc.
02:00:040 (1,2,3,4) - You had me hooked at 01:57:591 (1,2,3,4) - but then you hit me with this weak-ass pattern. You barely move on that darn thing and you call that proper emphasis... Just take a second and compare the two patterns good lord...
rest tomorrow, i need a drink after this oof