Various Artists - Lolis Short Medley

posted
Total Posts
166
show more
Mentai
from my queue

i wanna look at ur lower diffs because no one does that ever

Easy



nice, some quality of life things are needed though

00:21:664 (1) - why arent these the same slider body ? xd 00:24:331 (4) -

00:26:997 (6) - stacking in easy is not a good thing to do normally, players are new to the game, and are trying to figure out that distance between objects = distance between them musically. id reccomend fully ds'ing these, yes sometimes it looks ugly, but thats the price you pay for easy or normal diffs

00:45:497 (3,1) - u broke .8x ds here, pls fix

01:13:598 (2,4) - i think u have a lot of room to work with where you can make this overlap not happen

Normal



00:01:660 (2,3) - this is stuff u really shouldnt be doing, this is some crazy flow break AND it doesnt look good. in normal, still use slider flow like u would in easy, nothing needs to be too confusing like this really

00:04:886 (3) - this slider would make more sense if it landed on the white tick, musically

00:17:499 (3,4) - changing ds in a normal is a big no no

00:20:497 (4) - missed opportunity to make this a curved slider and blanket this 00:20:164 (3) - ;\

00:48:673 (1) - this probably needs to be angled down more and the curve made more lenient to look like a nicer blanket

00:51:969 (2,3) - another one of those flow breaks that u should just never do in ur beginner diffs. because even i, the 18k player, clicked the sliderend instead of the notehead. pls make it fit with ur slider flow

00:55:101 (1,1) - the blanket between these sliderends are off slightly

00:57:738 (1) - 1.2x ds?

00:59:222 (1,2,3) - what happened to ds here, seems all wonky

01:02:614 (3,4) - same thing from before, except you jump a to almost 2.0x ds here. normal cant do ds changes, very minor ones (like the 1.2x i mentioned) are readable for most, but stuff like this is just not for normal diffs. as ugly as the word is, its simply unrankable

the diff is really cramped and doesnt look great, luckily it plays well in flow for the most part (other than the really weird stuff you decided to do with the ds and stuff)

this one needs work!

Hard



00:04:241 (2) - can u make this slider a blanket that makes a nicer blanket with the next slider, its kinda in the awkward middle ground rn

00:18:998 (7,2) - at this level of difficulty, u can make minor changes in ds to avoid these aesthetically displeasing overlaps

00:48:331 (7) - move this to the left to dodge this overlap

00:58:563 (3,1) - can u make these parallel (or the same angle), this stuff looks really disorganized because of that (you do this in other places to, but this is the most glaring so far)

01:06:713 (4,4) - id manipulate this combo so you could stack these in the same position. same here 01:02:778 (4,3) - , you could be using more advanced placement in these sections

really my biggest complaint for this diff is how i feel like im going in a circle in the middle of the playing field so much, there isnt much linear movement to make things more interesting. sure it flows WELL, but to me, its just a bit boring

look into places you could use more advanced placements for stacking objects!



dont neglect your lower diffs, they are the bread and butter to your future mapping technique. ton of respect for making the entire set though, keep going!
Antlia-
NM from my queue!
General

Take out the character names from the tags, I don't feel like it's needed. Leave the other tags in tho.
You only need the 1117 offset timing point, take out the 531 offset one
I only denoted reoccurring problems once, remember to look out for them in the rest of the difficulty

Easy

00:03:757 (2,1) What is this overlap
00:25:664 (5) No sharp angles in a song like this, this song has no rhythms that suggest a sharp angle
00:26:997 (6,1) don't stack notes in an easy diff
00:59:222 (1) wtf is this slider shape

Normal

Lower the distance snap to 1, 1.3 isn't good for a normal at this BPM
1/6?
01:21:631 (3,4,5) This feels awkward in my opinion, Make a new combo and change the objects you use

Hard

00:37:664 (7,8,1) this is really awkward, remove the slider and make a 3 note stacked stream into the second slider
0:01:140 (5,6) take out the kick and make a stream, streams are ok in hard diffs
01:08:188 (1,2) I think this is a bad overlap

Insane

00:13:757 (1) KICK TO STREAM
00:25:331 (1,2,1) one combo pls( and make 00:25:831 (2) a start of a combo)
01:25:893 (1,2) separate the origin of each jump
01:27:701 (3,1) No overlap pls
01:40:795 (1,2,3) make this a larger jump to add emphasis to the fact that the represented noises are louder than the where previously

Insanity

You only need one insane diff
The overlaps feel messy and this diff doesn't flow well
00:47:997 You and your kicks oml

Insanity

00:14:241 (2,3,4,5) keep the jumps equally spaced as there is no crescendo
00:36:497 (1,4) do the messy overlaps end
00:58:563 (1,2) NO KICKS I'M SO HAPPY
01:01:795 (1) this is a weird slider
01:04:417(1) adjust the slider above to one like this bc they represent the same noise
01:25:401 (1,2) make this a star

Rhapsody of the lolicon

Nice diff name
this diff feels like PP spam
00:05:047 (1,2,1,2) keep this as one combo
I feel that you can push this too rank if get enough mods. Good Luck
Also, always request that all of your diffs be modded.
Topic Starter
Nevertary

Mentai wrote:

from my queue

i wanna look at ur lower diffs because no one does that ever

Easy



nice, some quality of life things are needed though

00:21:664 (1) - why arent these the same slider body ? xd 00:24:331 (4) - fixed

00:26:997 (6) - stacking in easy is not a good thing to do normally, players are new to the game, and are trying to figure out that distance between objects = distance between them musically. id reccomend fully ds'ing these, yes sometimes it looks ugly, but thats the price you pay for easy or normal diffs fixed

00:45:497 (3,1) - u broke .8x ds here, pls fix changing ds in a normal is a big no no

01:13:598 (2,4) - i think u have a lot of room to work with where you can make this overlap not happen

Normal



00:01:660 (2,3) - this is stuff u really shouldnt be doing, this is some crazy flow break AND it doesnt look good. in normal, still use slider flow like u would in easy, nothing needs to be too confusing like this really fixed

00:04:886 (3) - this slider would make more sense if it landed on the white tick, musically fixed

00:17:499 (3,4) - changing ds in a normal is a big no no fixed

00:20:497 (4) - missed opportunity to make this a curved slider and blanket this 00:20:164 (3) - ;\ fixed

00:48:673 (1) - this probably needs to be angled down more and the curve made more lenient to look like a nicer blanket fixed

00:51:969 (2,3) - another one of those flow breaks that u should just never do in ur beginner diffs. because even i, the 18k player, clicked the sliderend instead of the notehead. pls make it fit with ur slider flow fixed

00:55:101 (1,1) - the blanket between these sliderends are off slightly fixed

00:57:738 (1) - 1.2x ds?

00:59:222 (1,2,3) - what happened to ds here, seems all wonky fixed

01:02:614 (3,4) - same thing from before, except you jump a to almost 2.0x ds here. normal cant do ds changes, very minor ones (like the 1.2x i mentioned) are readable for most, but stuff like this is just not for normal diffs. as ugly as the word is, its simply unrankable fixed

the diff is really cramped and doesnt look great, luckily it plays well in flow for the most part (other than the really weird stuff you decided to do with the ds and stuff)

this one needs work!

Hard



00:04:241 (2) - can u make this slider a blanket that makes a nicer blanket with the next slider, its kinda in the awkward middle ground rn fixed
00:18:998 (7,2) - at this level of difficulty, u can make minor changes in ds to avoid these aesthetically displeasing overlaps fixed

00:48:331 (7) - move this to the left to dodge this overlap fixed

00:58:563 (3,1) - can u make these parallel (or the same angle), this stuff looks really disorganized because of that (you do this in other places to, but this is the most glaring so far) fixed

01:06:713 (4,4) - id manipulate this combo so you could stack these in the same position. fixed same here 01:02:778 (4,3) - it will be wrong distance between 2 and 3 & overlap between 1 and next combo 1 , you could be using more advanced placement in these sections

really my biggest complaint for this diff is how i feel like im going in a circle in the middle of the playing field so much, there isnt much linear movement to make things more interesting. sure it flows WELL, but to me, its just a bit boring

look into places you could use more advanced placements for stacking objects!



dont neglect your lower diffs, they are the bread and butter to your future mapping technique. ton of respect for making the entire set though, keep going!
thank you Mentai :)
Topic Starter
Nevertary

ahsoka08 wrote:

NM from my queue!
General

Take out the character names from the tags, I don't feel like it's needed. Leave the other tags in tho.
You only need the 1117 offset timing point, take out the 531 offset one fixed
I only denoted reoccurring problems once, remember to look out for them in the rest of the difficulty

Easy

00:03:757 (2,1) What is this overlap fixed
00:25:664 (5) No sharp angles in a song like this, this song has no rhythms that suggest a sharp angle fixed
00:26:997 (6,1) don't stack notes in an easy diff fixed
00:59:222 (1) wtf is this slider shape i dun think this is a problem

Normal

Lower the distance snap to 1, 1.3 isn't good for a normal at this BPM Ranking Criteria : Overall
Overall rules and guidelines apply to every kind of osu! difficulty. Rhythm related guidelines apply to approximately 180 BPM maps. If your song is drastically faster or slower, some variables might be different. Apply reasonable judgement in these cases.
Guidelines :
- When distance snap is used, try to keep it between 0.8x and 1.3x. Values too much higher or lower may make the difference between slider velocity and spacing counterintuitive. A higher distance snap can be used to avoid overlapping, but the slider velocity should be increased if you find yourself doing this often.

1/6?
01:21:631 (3,4,5) This feels awkward in my opinion, Make a new combo and change the objects you use fixed

Hard

00:37:664 (7,8,1) this is really awkward, remove the slider and make a 3 note stacked stream into the second slider fixed
0:01:140 (5,6) take out the kick and make a stream, streams are ok in hard diffs which the timing of this? i can't click it
01:08:188 (1,2) I think this is a bad overlap hmm

Insane

00:13:757 (1) KICK TO STREAM fixed
00:25:331 (1,2,1) one combo pls( and make 00:25:831 (2) a start of a combo) fixed
01:25:893 (1,2) separate the origin of each jump but why?
01:27:701 (3,1) No overlap pls i think this isn't a bad overlap
01:40:795 (1,2,3) make this a larger jump to add emphasis to the fact that the represented noises are louder than the where previously fixed

Insanity

You only need one insane diff the star rate between insane and extra is too high
The overlaps feel messy and this diff doesn't flow well
00:47:997 You and your kicks oml ???

Insanity
did you mean Extra?
00:14:241 (2,3,4,5) keep the jumps equally spaced as there is no crescendo There's a drum sound that can be made emphasis, therefore I made a large distance
00:36:497 (1,4) do the messy overlaps end i think this already gud
00:58:563 (1,2) NO KICKS I'M SO HAPPY
01:01:795 (1) this is a weird slider
01:04:417(1) adjust the slider above to one like this bc they represent the same noise this isn't extend slider like above
01:25:401 (1,2) make this a star fixed

Rhapsody of the lolicon

Nice diff name wwwwwww
this diff feels like PP spam
00:05:047 (1,2,1,2) keep this as one combo i'll use new combo for double
I feel that you can push this too rank if get enough mods. Good Luck
Also, always request that all of your diffs be modded.
thank you ahsoka08 :)
-NanoRIPE-
yee kudos

14:27 -NanoRIPE-: halo
14:27 -NanoRIPE-: ada waktu?
14:28 Nevertary: iya
14:28 -NanoRIPE-: ok
14:33 *-NanoRIPE- is editing [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/1344100 Takahashi Rie, Ozawa Ari, Rhodanthe*, Nanamori-chu*Goraku-bu & Petit Rabbit's - Lolis Short Medley [Easy]]
14:33 -NanoRIPE-: check aimod dulu
14:34 Nevertary: oh iya ini distance nya..
14:34 -NanoRIPE-: yaa
14:36 -NanoRIPE-: jujur easymu ini bikin gw bingung
14:37 Nevertary: duh ini dibenerin yg satu, problem distance yg lainnya malah muncul...
14:38 -NanoRIPE-: kwkwkw
14:38 -NanoRIPE-: 00:52:629 (5) - ini di reverse aja biar lebih mudah rhythmnya
14:40 Nevertary: sip udh
14:40 -NanoRIPE-: 00:53:947 (1,1,1) - nih slider lebih baik di akhiri di white tick aja biar kena drumnya
14:41 Nevertary: done
14:41 -NanoRIPE-: oh iya btw disitu knp slider velocitynya di bedain?
14:42 -NanoRIPE-: ada yg 0,85 ada yg 0,90
14:42 -NanoRIPE-: kan disitu beat musicnya sama aja
14:42 -NanoRIPE-: nggk ada bedanya
14:42 Nevertary: eh iya kebawa dari diff diatasnya wkk
14:43 -NanoRIPE-: gw pikir itu juga unrankable deh karena kebanyakan pakai variasi slider velocity
14:43 -NanoRIPE-: nanti newbie player yg main easy diff kebingungan imo
14:44 -NanoRIPE-: 01:06:385 (6) - mungkin ini bisa jadi 1/1 slider disini,karena di 01:06:713 - suara "Hai Hai"nya kenceng
14:44 -NanoRIPE-: 01:16:876 (6) - ^
14:45 Nevertary: done..
14:45 *-NanoRIPE- is editing [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/1343513 Takahashi Rie, Ozawa Ari, Rhodanthe*, Nanamori-chu*Goraku-bu & Petit Rabbit's - Lolis Short Medley [Normal]]
14:46 -NanoRIPE-: baru mulai dah ada overlap di 00:01:660 (2,3) -
14:46 -NanoRIPE-: kalau overlapnya terstrukture/rapi mah gpp tapi ini jelek banget overlap imo
14:47 Nevertary: ok, fixed
14:48 -NanoRIPE-: 00:09:564 (2) - mungkin disini circle aja (2 circle di white tick) biar ada space antara object (2,3) - karena kalau rhythmnya terlalu rapat agak susah di handle utk normal player
14:49 -NanoRIPE-: 00:16:015 - disini boleh pasang 1/2 slider karna normal diff (utk nge emphasis ke drumnya)
14:50 -NanoRIPE-: 00:52:629 (3,4) - absolutely unrankable karena nggk ikuti Distance snape
14:52 Nevertary: bingung nyimpen yg 4 ini dimana...
14:52 -NanoRIPE-: tuh circle 4 seharusnya di atasnya slider 3 bukan di bawahnya
14:52 -NanoRIPE-: kalau kamu taruh di bawah nggk konek flownya
14:53 -NanoRIPE-: 00:53:947 (1,1,1) - same as easy,di akhiri di white tick aja biar kena drumnya'
14:53 -NanoRIPE-: 00:59:881 (2) - turunin di bawah dikit biar enak flownya antara (1,2,3) -
14:54 -NanoRIPE-: 01:21:631 (3,4) - sama dgn yg tadi
14:55 -NanoRIPE-: tanyakan kalau ada yg kamu nggk ngerti
14:56 Nevertary: done~
14:56 -NanoRIPE-: udh semua?
14:57 Nevertary: yudh
14:57 Nevertary: *udh
14:58 -NanoRIPE-: 00:06:338 (1,2,3) - ini knp di deketin spacingnya? player nanti bakal missreading loh
14:58 Nevertary: btw klo yg 00:55:101 (1,1) - slide end nya harus ada di white tick juga gak?
14:59 -NanoRIPE-: eh btw tuh mod utk hard
14:59 -NanoRIPE-: iya
14:59 *-NanoRIPE- is editing [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/1325701 Takahashi Rie, Ozawa Ari, Rhodanthe*, Nanamori-chu*Goraku-bu & Petit Rabbit's - Lolis Short Medley [Hard]]
15:01 -NanoRIPE-: 00:06:338 (1,2,3) - ini spacingnya di ksh sama kayak yg di 00:18:498 (6,7,8) -
15:01 -NanoRIPE-: pokoknya jgn overlap kayak gitu
15:01 -NanoRIPE-: 00:23:664 (5,6) - unstack aja karna beatnya kuat di slider (6) -
15:02 Nevertary: tapi yg awal lagu kan lebih slow gimana gitu, emg space nya harus sama kyk 6,7,8 ya..
15:02 -NanoRIPE-: biar slow tapi kalau spacing harus ksh konsistent
15:03 -NanoRIPE-: kalau masuk di slow part kan tinggal main di rhythm aja,rhythmnya di ksh mudah aja
15:04 -NanoRIPE-: 00:25:331 (3,4,5) - ini spacingnya nggk seimbang atau cuma gw aja ya
15:04 -NanoRIPE-: 00:27:831 (2,3,4,5,6) - sama dgn sebelumnya
15:06 -NanoRIPE-: hmm itu aja utk hard
15:06 -NanoRIPE-: udh nice kok
15:06 Nevertary: hmm oke thx
15:07 -NanoRIPE-: ada pertanyaan?
15:07 -NanoRIPE-: sama2
15:08 Nevertary: post aja mod irc ini di thread mapnya om..
15:08 -NanoRIPE-: nggk usah
15:08 -NanoRIPE-: males
15:08 Nevertary: owh yaudh mksih
15:09 -NanoRIPE-: pokoknya yg di hard itu kamu perbaiki itu spacing yg saya bilang tadi ~
15:09 Nevertary: hmm oke
15:10 -NanoRIPE-: karena main problemnya disitu
15:12 -NanoRIPE-: di hard kalau ada slow part atau bagian yg slow tinggal atur/main di rhythm atau slider velocity,kalau spacing jgn kamu kecilin kayak tadi itu karena player bisa missreading (nanti player kira itu 1/4 rhythm padahal itu 1/2 rhythm)
15:12 Nevertary: sip om
15:13 -NanoRIPE-: sorry kalau penjelasannya agak rumit
15:13 -NanoRIPE-: jgn panggil saya om lah
15:13 -NanoRIPE-: msh anak2 saya
15:14 Nevertary: hmm iya sry deh hmm.. gan
15:14 -NanoRIPE-: ok
15:14 -NanoRIPE-: nah gitu
15:15 -NanoRIPE-: hmm post di thread aja ya (sebenarnya butuh kudos.tadi sok2 elit aja saia hehe)
Topic Starter
Nevertary

-NanoRIPE- wrote:

yee kudos

14:27 -NanoRIPE-: halo
14:27 -NanoRIPE-: ada waktu?
14:28 Nevertary: iya
14:28 -NanoRIPE-: ok
14:33 *-NanoRIPE- is editing [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/1344100 Takahashi Rie, Ozawa Ari, Rhodanthe*, Nanamori-chu*Goraku-bu & Petit Rabbit's - Lolis Short Medley [Easy]]
14:33 -NanoRIPE-: check aimod dulu
14:34 Nevertary: oh iya ini distance nya..
14:34 -NanoRIPE-: yaa
14:36 -NanoRIPE-: jujur easymu ini bikin gw bingung
14:37 Nevertary: duh ini dibenerin yg satu, problem distance yg lainnya malah muncul...
14:38 -NanoRIPE-: kwkwkw
14:38 -NanoRIPE-: 00:52:629 (5) - ini di reverse aja biar lebih mudah rhythmnya
14:40 Nevertary: sip udh
14:40 -NanoRIPE-: 00:53:947 (1,1,1) - nih slider lebih baik di akhiri di white tick aja biar kena drumnya
14:41 Nevertary: done
14:41 -NanoRIPE-: oh iya btw disitu knp slider velocitynya di bedain?
14:42 -NanoRIPE-: ada yg 0,85 ada yg 0,90
14:42 -NanoRIPE-: kan disitu beat musicnya sama aja
14:42 -NanoRIPE-: nggk ada bedanya
14:42 Nevertary: eh iya kebawa dari diff diatasnya wkk
14:43 -NanoRIPE-: gw pikir itu juga unrankable deh karena kebanyakan pakai variasi slider velocity
14:43 -NanoRIPE-: nanti newbie player yg main easy diff kebingungan imo
14:44 -NanoRIPE-: 01:06:385 (6) - mungkin ini bisa jadi 1/1 slider disini,karena di 01:06:713 - suara "Hai Hai"nya kenceng
14:44 -NanoRIPE-: 01:16:876 (6) - ^
14:45 Nevertary: done..
14:45 *-NanoRIPE- is editing [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/1343513 Takahashi Rie, Ozawa Ari, Rhodanthe*, Nanamori-chu*Goraku-bu & Petit Rabbit's - Lolis Short Medley [Normal]]
14:46 -NanoRIPE-: baru mulai dah ada overlap di 00:01:660 (2,3) -
14:46 -NanoRIPE-: kalau overlapnya terstrukture/rapi mah gpp tapi ini jelek banget overlap imo
14:47 Nevertary: ok, fixed
14:48 -NanoRIPE-: 00:09:564 (2) - mungkin disini circle aja (2 circle di white tick) biar ada space antara object (2,3) - karena kalau rhythmnya terlalu rapat agak susah di handle utk normal player
14:49 -NanoRIPE-: 00:16:015 - disini boleh pasang 1/2 slider karna normal diff (utk nge emphasis ke drumnya)
14:50 -NanoRIPE-: 00:52:629 (3,4) - absolutely unrankable karena nggk ikuti Distance snape
14:52 Nevertary: bingung nyimpen yg 4 ini dimana...
14:52 -NanoRIPE-: tuh circle 4 seharusnya di atasnya slider 3 bukan di bawahnya
14:52 -NanoRIPE-: kalau kamu taruh di bawah nggk konek flownya
14:53 -NanoRIPE-: 00:53:947 (1,1,1) - same as easy,di akhiri di white tick aja biar kena drumnya'
14:53 -NanoRIPE-: 00:59:881 (2) - turunin di bawah dikit biar enak flownya antara (1,2,3) -
14:54 -NanoRIPE-: 01:21:631 (3,4) - sama dgn yg tadi
14:55 -NanoRIPE-: tanyakan kalau ada yg kamu nggk ngerti
14:56 Nevertary: done~
14:56 -NanoRIPE-: udh semua?
14:57 Nevertary: yudh
14:57 Nevertary: *udh
14:58 -NanoRIPE-: 00:06:338 (1,2,3) - ini knp di deketin spacingnya? player nanti bakal missreading loh
14:58 Nevertary: btw klo yg 00:55:101 (1,1) - slide end nya harus ada di white tick juga gak?
14:59 -NanoRIPE-: eh btw tuh mod utk hard
14:59 -NanoRIPE-: iya
14:59 *-NanoRIPE- is editing [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/1325701 Takahashi Rie, Ozawa Ari, Rhodanthe*, Nanamori-chu*Goraku-bu & Petit Rabbit's - Lolis Short Medley [Hard]]
15:01 -NanoRIPE-: 00:06:338 (1,2,3) - ini spacingnya di ksh sama kayak yg di 00:18:498 (6,7,8) -
15:01 -NanoRIPE-: pokoknya jgn overlap kayak gitu
15:01 -NanoRIPE-: 00:23:664 (5,6) - unstack aja karna beatnya kuat di slider (6) -
15:02 Nevertary: tapi yg awal lagu kan lebih slow gimana gitu, emg space nya harus sama kyk 6,7,8 ya..
15:02 -NanoRIPE-: biar slow tapi kalau spacing harus ksh konsistent
15:03 -NanoRIPE-: kalau masuk di slow part kan tinggal main di rhythm aja,rhythmnya di ksh mudah aja
15:04 -NanoRIPE-: 00:25:331 (3,4,5) - ini spacingnya nggk seimbang atau cuma gw aja ya
15:04 -NanoRIPE-: 00:27:831 (2,3,4,5,6) - sama dgn sebelumnya
15:06 -NanoRIPE-: hmm itu aja utk hard
15:06 -NanoRIPE-: udh nice kok
15:06 Nevertary: hmm oke thx
15:07 -NanoRIPE-: ada pertanyaan?
15:07 -NanoRIPE-: sama2
15:08 Nevertary: post aja mod irc ini di thread mapnya om..
15:08 -NanoRIPE-: nggk usah
15:08 -NanoRIPE-: males
15:08 Nevertary: owh yaudh mksih
15:09 -NanoRIPE-: pokoknya yg di hard itu kamu perbaiki itu spacing yg saya bilang tadi ~
15:09 Nevertary: hmm oke
15:10 -NanoRIPE-: karena main problemnya disitu
15:12 -NanoRIPE-: di hard kalau ada slow part atau bagian yg slow tinggal atur/main di rhythm atau slider velocity,kalau spacing jgn kamu kecilin kayak tadi itu karena player bisa missreading (nanti player kira itu 1/4 rhythm padahal itu 1/2 rhythm)
15:12 Nevertary: sip om
15:13 -NanoRIPE-: sorry kalau penjelasannya agak rumit
15:13 -NanoRIPE-: jgn panggil saya om lah
15:13 -NanoRIPE-: msh anak2 saya
15:14 Nevertary: hmm iya sry deh hmm.. gan
15:14 -NanoRIPE-: ok
15:14 -NanoRIPE-: nah gitu
15:15 -NanoRIPE-: hmm post di thread aja ya (sebenarnya butuh kudos.tadi sok2 elit aja saia hehe)
oke siap a k m j
Xayah
NM from my queue

Rapsody of a Lolicon

  1. AR 9.5 i feel is a little too high considering this is below 200 bpm, perhaps something like 9.2 would be better
  2. 00:08:918 (1,2,3,4) - Not really a fan of this pattern, i feel its flow is a little off as well as the blankets are basically non existant and look a little weird
  3. 00:16:015 (1) - in my opinon doesnt need to be new combo'd
  4. 00:17:999 - Is this red line really needed? it changes the offset by 1 ms
  5. 00:23:497 (2,5) - I feel these notes are a little too close to each other
  6. 00:27:164 (6) - Should use a sharp angle here to continue the flow http://puu.sh/wBWO3/0063515165.png keeping similar angles while maintaining emphasis in the reducing tone
  7. 00:28:164 (4) - and 00:28:997 (3) - not a very nice looking overlap imo
  8. 00:37:997 (1) - Tilt this a few degrees, right now it looks a little off as a perfect horizontal slider
  9. You use these wide angles for example at 00:27:164 (6) - 00:47:497 (2,3,4) - 00:49:002 (2,3,4) - and while i was playing it, it was a little awkward, using sharper angles imo would play a lot better, this is throughout the whole map, not just this section.
  10. 00:37:164 (4) - You are mapping to the vocals so why not make this a 1/1 slider, there isnt a strong sound on the white tick that would be lost if you did so and you could still keep 00:37:664 (6) - placement as the flow would be very similar
  11. 00:56:914 (2,5) - Another overlap, keep an eye out for these, while they might not be noticable in editor, they are a little more noticable ingame
  12. 00:59:469 (2) - Going over the stream with the slider body isnt something i'd do as it doesnt look very good imo, perhaps tilt a few degrees and it might still be fine
  13. 00:59:222 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Feels Very cramped in my opinion
  14. 01:11:876 (6,7,8,9,10) - Stream shape seems a little off, could be a little more refined

    Pretty solid

Extra

  1. 00:14:886 (6) - Might just look better if you stacked this on the end of the burst due to your currently overlap feels like its trying to decide if it wants to overlap or not
  2. 00:15:047 (7) - place this on 00:16:015 (1) - to play better due to the player not needing to move his hand for no reason
  3. 00:47:997 (5,6,7,8,1) - These are a little close, could space them out to look a little less cramped
  4. 00:59:222 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - This looks much less cramped than the rapsody, much better
    Some angles could be looked at too, pretty solid as well

Insanity

  1. 00:01:177 (1,3,4) - Not sure why these are straight when nearly everything else in the section have an angle tilt
  2. 00:39:831 (4,5,6) - Maybe use a sharp angle, since you are trying to create a traiangle, wide angles into triangles generally dont play very well and i would advise against it, this occurs a few times in this section
  3. 00:47:997 (5,6) - these ignore the snares and the hitsounding + this rhythm choice sounds weird to me
  4. 01:11:631 (4,1,2,3,4,5,1) - To me this looks really odd, I would suggest perhaps not having a slider into it but it still works as is
    Seems good.

Insane

  1. 00:26:497 (3) - While playing, this felt a little too close to 00:25:831 (1) - and looked awkward
  2. 00:52:299 (4,1,2) - Since the angles before this are all sharp, using a wide angle flowing into a sharp triangle is really awkward so i would suggest continuing using the sharp angles to make it feel less awkward.
  3. 01:27:368 (1,2,3) - Since everything before is sharp angles, this feels uncomfortable due having a suddent change from what was before.
Topic Starter
Nevertary

- Rain - wrote:

NM from my queue

Rapsody of a Lolicon

  1. AR 9.5 i feel is a little too high considering this is below 200 bpm, perhaps something like 9.2 would be better this diff contained high jump, i think it might be more hard to read if i decrease the AR
  2. 00:08:918 (1,2,3,4) - Not really a fan of this pattern, i feel its flow is a little off as well as the blankets are basically non existant and look a little weird fixed
  3. 00:16:015 (1) - in my opinon doesnt need to be new combo'd fixed
  4. 00:17:999 - Is this red line really needed? it changes the offset by 1 ms fixed
  5. 00:23:497 (2,5) - I feel these notes are a little too close to each other fixed
  6. 00:27:164 (6) - Should use a sharp angle here to continue the flow http://puu.sh/wBWO3/0063515165.png keeping similar angles while maintaining emphasis in the reducing tone fixed
  7. 00:28:164 (4) - and 00:28:997 (3) - not a very nice looking overlap imo fixed
  8. 00:37:997 (1) - Tilt this a few degrees, right now it looks a little off as a perfect horizontal slider fixed
  9. You use these wide angles for example at 00:27:164 (6) - 00:47:497 (2,3,4) - 00:49:002 (2,3,4) - 00:50:156 (2,3,4) - Here too the same pattern but comfortable enough when I play it. and while i was playing it, it was a little awkward, using sharper angles imo would play a lot better, this is throughout the whole map, not just this section.
  10. 00:37:164 (4) - You are mapping to the vocals so why not make this a 1/1 slider, there isnt a strong sound on the white tick that would be lost if you did so and you could still keep 00:37:664 (6) - placement as the flow would be very similar but the strong sound But a strong sound is on the red tick, so if I make a 1/1 slider it will skip it
  11. 00:56:914 (2,5) - Another overlap, keep an eye out for these, while they might not be noticable in editor, they are a little more noticable ingame fixed
  12. 00:59:469 (2) - Going over the stream with the slider body isnt something i'd do as it doesnt look very good imo, perhaps tilt a few degrees and it might still be fine But it will make its slide shape doesn't match the next curve slider
  13. 00:59:222 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Feels Very cramped in my opinion
  14. 01:11:876 (6,7,8,9,10) - Stream shape seems a little off, could be a little more refinedfixed

    Pretty solid

Extra

  1. 00:14:886 (6) - Might just look better if you stacked this on the end of the burst due to your currently overlap feels like its trying to decide if it wants to overlap or not fixed
  2. 00:15:047 (7) - place this on 00:16:015 (1) - to play better due to the player not needing to move his hand for no reason fixed
  3. 00:47:997 (5,6,7,8,1) - These are a little close, could space them out to look a little less cramped fixed
  4. 00:59:222 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - This looks much less cramped than the rapsody, much better fixed
    Some angles could be looked at too, pretty solid as well

Insanity

  1. 00:01:177 (1,3,4) - Not sure why these are straight when nearly everything else in the section have an angle tilt i think this isn't a problem
  2. 00:39:831 (4,5,6) - Maybe use a sharp angle, since you are trying to create a traiangle, wide angles into triangles generally dont play very well and i would advise against it, this occurs a few times in this section fixed
  3. 00:47:997 (5,6) - these ignore the snares and the hitsounding + this rhythm choice sounds weird to me
  4. 01:11:631 (4,1,2,3,4,5,1) - To me this looks really odd, I would suggest perhaps not having a slider into it but it still works as is
    Seems good. fixed

Insane

  1. 00:26:497 (3) - While playing, this felt a little too close to 00:25:831 (1) - and looked awkward fixed
  2. 00:52:299 (4,1,2) - Since the angles before this are all sharp, using a wide angle flowing into a sharp triangle is really awkward so i would suggest continuing using the sharp angles to make it feel less awkward. fixed
  3. 01:27:368 (1,2,3) - Since everything before is sharp angles, this feels uncomfortable due having a suddent change from what was before.fixed
thank you Rain :)
CucumberCuc
Hi :3

[Easy]
Ctrl+a and 2 times "Q" and you can check Distance Snap
00:01:177 (1,2) do slightly are close
00:11:499 (2,1) make them a little further, they are close
00:25:664 to 00:36:997 due to the fact that you decided to diversify here, you get a bunch of errors with a range between sliders and circles, for example: 00:26:997 (6,1) you overlapped this very are close + 00:27:331 (1,2,3) you have the difference in range between the circles and sliders as I wrote above
00:40:331 (3,1) - 00:42:997 (3,1) the same error range overlap
00:45:497 (3,1) it's far
00:47:664 (3) start slider move left for better flow
00:47:664 (3,1,2) it's are close
00:52:629 (5,1) you might think that such a distance is normal, but they are too far because the beginner will have to quickly move the cursor to the next slider + 00:53:947 (1,1,1,1) not matched for range sliders
00:57:738 (1,2,1,2) this do be far
01:03:806 (3,4) - 01:05:773 (5,6) - 01:07:084 (1,2) do far
01:12:330 (1,2,3) like above - do far
01:14:298 (3,4) do are close + 4,5,6 do far
01:16:920 (6,1) far, do are close
01:22:494 (5) move slightly down for distance
01:25:445 (3,4,5) slightly different range

[Normal]
like for Easy (Distance Snap)
00:05:693 (4,1) i think flow this sliders can be good
00:10:854 (5) you can remove this slider and his start put circle and on 00:11:176 put slider to 00:11:499
00:23:831 (5,6) i think you can change on this (but can leave)
00:39:164 (3) - 00:41:831 (3) you can shortened this sliders to prev red tick and on white tick put circle to better fit to the words
00:47:831 (4,5) can ctrl+g i think better fit
01:27:420 to 01:36:586 it seems to me that the sounds for this section don't fit very well, can change them?

[Hard]
00:13:435 put circle for start voice?
00:20:164 (3) i think end slider can move right so distance between this and the next slider because of the loud sound was visible
00:32:664 (1) maybe remove reverse and on next white and red ticks put circle + 00:33:497 (2,3) remove and change on slider?
00:36:331 (3,4) you can do far and 4,5 do are close to celebrate loud sounds
00:46:997 (3,4) do slightly far
00:47:831 (6) I think that this slider is not very well suited for vocals, maybe a bit change?
01:15:445 (2,3) it seems to me that they can ctrl+g to better fit to the words
01:27:420 to 01:36:586 it seems to me that the sounds for this section don't fit very well, can change them?

[Insane]
00:10:693 (2) it's not good flow and place for circle, maybe move to x 259 y:83?
00:19:997 (3) move to x:86 y:168 for flow?

[Insanity]
00:25:331 (4) may be further from the next and previous circles, so it was more like *when i do not know as it correctly is called, but I think that is correct* tick the "correct action"?

Good luck :)
Aeril
easy

this is definitely a thing...
one thing i definitely notice right off the bat is that distance snap doesnt seemed to be used very well like
00:25:664 (5,6,1) - here it you shouldnt have such a difference in distance. easy players need that time distance equality given by distance snapping everything to understand the rhythm better. also changing the slider velocity is highly discouraged
i would also suggest raising the distance snap distance as all of these overlaps are kinda ehh and make reading harder
also 00:25:664 (5,6,1) - having variable spacing like this should only really be used on spacings higher than 2 white beats
t/517731 read up on this for more in depth things

other things about rhythm mostly is like 00:17:665 (2,3,4,5) - what is this following
you should probably try to follow a specific instrument other than the drum. the constant every other beat rhythm doesnt make sense to the rest of the music.
something like this https://puu.sh/wDTHv/b10f51e602.png imo makes more sense as it just follows the horn in the song

the rhythm in the kiai is good though

normal

00:14:080 (1,2) - you shouldnt vary slider velocity this much on a normal. around .2x of variation is like the max id say is good for a normal
00:58:563 (2,1,2,3) - you need to follow time distance equality in this lower difficulty. having such differences in spacing is confusing for lower level players.
01:00:541 (3,1,1) - i also really do not agree with nc usage like this, it just feels excessive in a lower difficulty. Personally i would just stick to ncing every big white tick or every other big white tick.
rhythm is good

hard

00:01:177 (1) - can u like remove the nc here lo
00:05:047 (3,4) - this stack feels unnecessary
00:20:497 (4,5,6,7) - things like this look messy as the slider shapes dont have any relation to eachother as the straights have different angles even though they look to be trying to be parallel
00:34:497 (6,7) - why is there a jump here?
00:45:997 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - this looks especially messy since in one combo the distance snap changes so much. too much variation looks like lazy mapping rather than following the music if executed badly. i would suggest keeping 2 values of ds, one for normal spacing and one for bigger spacing and jumps of the such on the emphasized parts.

these lower diffs all seem to have the same problems.
for now just going to check the top difficulty.

rhapsody of the lolicon

00:05:047 (1,2,1,2) - why are these ncd like this? if you're following the guitar, these are all the same note.
also 00:10:209 (1,2,3,4) - these visuals are quite messy just using random angles like this
00:33:332 (3,4,5,1) - why do you use such large spacing for a calmer part of the song?
spacing emphasis just doesnt really work using large spacing and even larger spacing.
01:09:707 (1,2,3,4,5) - you also switch flow halfway through here for seemingly no reason as in the first 3 notes it looks like it all follows clockwise rotation but since the 1/4 slider is so shorts, its more of a (forward through the slider, back to the next slider, forward again to the next slider, up the body, down to the bottom of the screen, and then clockwise jumps) its just, messy and hard to play with seemingly no reason for the song to call for it.

this needs alot of work to be up to ranking standards, the ideas are there they just arent executed well in the top diff and in the lower diffs, you just dont really know how it seems. look at the proposed ranking criteria page i sent you as it sets guidelines to make good lower difficulties.
aigoh

  • [General]
  1. The vivid combo colors like the ones I circled don’t fit with the rest.
  2. Good mapset, but the easy difficulty needs most improvement in rhythm
  3. 00:17:998 –white tick should start from here, so consider adding another red line.

    [Easy]
  4. 1.0x DS and 0.9 or 1.0 SV seems to work better for readability and organization
  5. SV needs to be consistent, and you need to calculate what SV it is whenever the bpm changes
    For example…(SV1)(BPM1) = (SV2)(BPM2) Then solve for whichever SV it is
  6. 00:11:499 (3,4) – swap NC
  7. 00:29:997 (1,3) - swap NC
  8. Ahh you need to do NC every 16 white beats! Fixing the rhythm should help too.
  9. 00:18:998 (4) –feels awkward to hit because there is a stronger sound at 00:19:164 –
  10. 00:16:499 –to 00:26:664 -: I think you should follow trumpet sounds. For example, start slider at 00:16:499 – and end at 00:17:331 -; start slider 00:17:831 – and end at 00:18:498 -.
  11. 00:55:101 (1) - 00:57:738 (1) - take out NC

    [Normal]
  12. 01:00:541 (3) – move to 436,216?

    [Hard]
  13. 01:18:068 (2,3) –too close

    [Extra]
  14. 00:56:420 (1,2) – ctrl G for rhythm? You did use a slider at 00:56:585 - in the next difficulty. It doesn’t really sound good to hear a cymbal at slider tail.
  15. 01:12:658 (2) – Bring down the slider tail a little? Angle-wise, it looks unfitting with 01:12:330 (1) – I noticed it during testplay.
  16. 01:15:937 (6,1,2) – stack doesn’t look good. Move 01:16:265 (1,2) – to 235,183?

    [Rhapsody of the Lolicon]
  17. 00:15:047 (7,1) – too close compared to the rest of the 1/1 spacing
  18. 00:56:585 (1,2,3,4,5) – I think 00:56:585 (1) – needs more spacing emphasis than 00:57:244 (4) –. I see you made an emphasis at 00:57:738 (1) –
  19. 01:08:232 (1) – You could make this slider neater, imo. It doesn’t fit with the rest of your neat sliders.

Good luck!
Topic Starter
Nevertary

CucumberCuc wrote:

Hi :3

[Easy]
Ctrl+a and 2 times "Q" and you can check Distance Snap
00:01:177 (1,2) do slightly are close
00:11:499 (2,1) make them a little further, they are close when i check the distance map, there's no problem with it..
00:25:664 to 00:36:997 due to the fact that you decided to diversify here, you get a bunch of errors with a range between sliders and circles, for example: 00:26:997 (6,1) you overlapped this very are close + 00:27:331 (1,2,3) you have the difference in range between the circles and sliders as I wrote above Because 6 and 1 are 1/1 snap, while 1, 2, and 3 are 2/1 snap
00:40:331 (3,1) - 00:42:997 (3,1) the same error range overlap Please check the distance map on the aimod and see if there is a problem here
00:45:497 (3,1) it's far ^
00:47:664 (3) start slider move left for better flow fixed
00:47:664 (3,1,2) it's are close same as 40:331
00:52:629 (5,1) you might think that such a distance is normal, but they are too far because the beginner will have to quickly move the cursor to the next slider fixed + 00:53:947 (1,1,1,1) not matched for range sliders same as 40:331
00:57:738 (1,2,1,2) this do be far fixed
01:03:806 (3,4) - 01:05:773 (5,6) - 01:07:084 (1,2) do far same as 40:331
01:12:330 (1,2,3) like above - do far same as 40:331
01:14:298 (3,4) do are close + 4,5,6 do far same as 40:331
01:16:920 (6,1) far, do are close fixed
01:22:494 (5) move slightly down for distance fixed
01:25:445 (3,4,5) slightly different range ....

[Normal]
like for Easy (Distance Snap)
00:05:693 (4,1) i think flow this sliders can be good fixed
00:10:854 (5) you can remove this slider and his start put circle and on 00:11:176 put slider to 00:11:499 I think this matches with the proportion of the song
00:23:831 (5,6) i think you can change on this (but can leave) fixed
00:39:164 (3) - 00:41:831 (3) you can shortened this sliders to prev red tick and on white tick put circle to better fit to the words
00:47:831 (4,5) can ctrl+g i think better fit wth.. *god left
01:27:420 to 01:36:586 it seems to me that the sounds for this section don't fit very well, can change them? what doesn't fit?

[Hard]
00:13:435 put circle for start voice? ???
00:20:164 (3) i think end slider can move right so distance between this and the next slider because of the loud sound was visible fixed
00:32:664 (1) maybe remove reverse and on next white and red ticks put circle + 00:33:497 (2,3) remove and change on slider?
00:36:331 (3,4) you can do far and 4,5 do are close to celebrate loud sounds but the sound on 3,4 is more lower than 4,5
00:46:997 (3,4) do slightly far fixed
00:47:831 (6) I think that this slider is not very well suited for vocals, maybe a bit change? should i replace it with 1/2?
01:15:445 (2,3) it seems to me that they can ctrl+g to better fit to the words it will hard to read, since this isn't insane
01:27:420 to 01:36:586 it seems to me that the sounds for this section don't fit very well, can change them? i think this gud enough

[Insane]
00:10:693 (2) it's not good flow and place for circle, maybe move to x 259 y:83? fixed
00:19:997 (3) move to x:86 y:168 for flow? fixed

[Insanity]
00:25:331 (4) may be further from the next and previous circles, so it was more like *when i do not know as it correctly is called, but I think that is correct* tick the "correct action"? hmm gud idea

Good luck :)
thank you CucumberCuc :)
Topic Starter
Nevertary

Aeril wrote:

easy

this is definitely a thing...
one thing i definitely notice right off the bat is that distance snap doesnt seemed to be used very well like
00:25:664 (5,6,1) - here it you shouldnt have such a difference in distance. easy players need that time distance equality given by distance snapping everything to understand the rhythm better. also changing the slider velocity is highly discouraged
i would also suggest raising the distance snap distance as all of these overlaps are kinda ehh and make reading harder
also 00:25:664 (5,6,1) - having variable spacing like this should only really be used on spacings higher than 2 white beats
t/517731 read up on this for more in depth things all distance problem fixed

other things about rhythm mostly is like 00:17:665 (2,3,4,5) - what is this following
you should probably try to follow a specific instrument other than the drum. the constant every other beat rhythm doesnt make sense to the rest of the music.
something like this https://puu.sh/wDTHv/b10f51e602.png imo makes more sense as it just follows the horn in the song

the rhythm in the kiai is good though

normal

00:14:080 (1,2) - you shouldnt vary slider velocity this much on a normal. around .2x of variation is like the max id say is good for a normal fixed
00:58:563 (2,1,2,3) - you need to follow time distance equality in this lower difficulty. having such differences in spacing is confusing for lower level players. fixed
01:00:541 (3,1,1) - i also really do not agree with nc usage like this, it just feels excessive in a lower difficulty. Personally i would just stick to ncing every big white tick or every other big white tick.
rhythm is good

hard

00:01:177 (1) - can u like remove the nc here lo fixed
00:05:047 (3,4) - this stack feels unnecessary fixed
00:20:497 (4,5,6,7) - things like this look messy as the slider shapes dont have any relation to eachother as the straights have different angles even though they look to be trying to be parallel
00:34:497 (6,7) - why is there a jump here? fixed
00:45:997 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - this looks especially messy since in one combo the distance snap changes so much. too much variation looks like lazy mapping rather than following the music if executed badly. i would suggest keeping 2 values of ds, one for normal spacing and one for bigger spacing and jumps of the such on the emphasized parts. fixed

these lower diffs all seem to have the same problems.
for now just going to check the top difficulty.

rhapsody of the lolicon

00:05:047 (1,2,1,2) - why are these ncd like this? if you're following the guitar, these are all the same note. I'll use circle for guitar sound and slider for vocal
also 00:10:209 (1,2,3,4) - these visuals are quite messy just using random angles like this
00:33:332 (3,4,5,1) - why do you use such large spacing for a calmer part of the song?
spacing emphasis just doesnt really work using large spacing and even larger spacing.
01:09:707 (1,2,3,4,5) - you also switch flow halfway through here for seemingly no reason as in the first 3 notes it looks like it all follows clockwise rotation but since the 1/4 slider is so shorts, its more of a (forward through the slider, back to the next slider, forward again to the next slider, up the body, down to the bottom of the screen, and then clockwise jumps) its just, messy and hard to play with seemingly no reason for the song to call for it.

this needs alot of work to be up to ranking standards, the ideas are there they just arent executed well in the top diff and in the lower diffs, you just dont really know how it seems. look at the proposed ranking criteria page i sent you as it sets guidelines to make good lower difficulties.
thank you Aeril :)
Topic Starter
Nevertary

aigoh wrote:


  • [General]
  1. The vivid combo colors like the ones I circled don’t fit with the rest.
  2. Good mapset, but the easy difficulty needs most improvement in rhythm
  3. 00:17:998 –white tick should start from here, so consider adding another red line. wut difficult is this?

    [Easy]
  4. 1.0x DS and 0.9 or 1.0 SV seems to work better for readability and organization fixed
  5. SV needs to be consistent, and you need to calculate what SV it is whenever the bpm changes
    For example…(SV1)(BPM1) = (SV2)(BPM2) Then solve for whichever SV it is
  6. 00:11:499 (3,4) – swap NC fixed
  7. 00:29:997 (1,3) - swap NC fixed
  8. Ahh you need to do NC every 16 white beats! Fixing the rhythm should help too. fixed
  9. 00:18:998 (4) –feels awkward to hit because there is a stronger sound at 00:19:164 –
  10. 00:16:499 –to 00:26:664 -: I think you should follow trumpet sounds. For example, start slider at 00:16:499 – and end at 00:17:331 -; start slider 00:17:831 – and end at 00:18:498 -.
  11. 00:55:101 (1) - 00:57:738 (1) - take out NC fixed

    [Normal]
  12. 01:00:541 (3) – move to 436,216? already fixed b4 your mod

    [Hard]
  13. 01:18:068 (2,3) –too close hmm i don't think so

    [Extra]
  14. 00:56:420 (1,2) – ctrl G for rhythm? You did use a slider at 00:56:585 - in the next difficulty. It doesn’t really sound good to hear a cymbal at slider tail. fixed
  15. 01:12:658 (2) – Bring down the slider tail a little? Angle-wise, it looks unfitting with 01:12:330 (1) – I noticed it during testplay. fixed
  16. 01:15:937 (6,1,2) – stack doesn’t look good. fixed Move 01:16:265 (1,2) – to 235,183? no...

    [Rhapsody of the Lolicon]
  17. 00:15:047 (7,1) – too close compared to the rest of the 1/1 spacing fixed
  18. 00:56:585 (1,2,3,4,5) – I think 00:56:585 (1) – needs more spacing emphasis than 00:57:244 (4) –. I see you made an emphasis at 00:57:738 (1) – how about ctrl+g ?
  19. 01:08:232 (1) – You could make this slider neater, imo. It doesn’t fit with the rest of your neat sliders.

Good luck!
thank you aigoh :)
Affirmation
Q

[lolicon]
00:07:951 (1,1) - delete NC
00:33:164 - can be clickable since this part has strong vocal.
00:39:165 (1,4) - this overlap looks messy, could you avoid it?
00:41:832 (1,2,3) - flow looks little bit weird
01:08:232 (1,2) - looks hard to read,

GL
Saltssaumure
Hi from Salt's mod queue :)


Turns out I can pass 5.7* now, so I'll mod all diffs, though with less detail on Extra and Rhapsody.


[Easy]
00:11:499 (1) - This slider shape will be confusing for new players, best to not use any overlap.
00:15:370 - Changing slider speed on Easy difficulty is not advised, especially here where you introduce a new slider type (reversing slider). Either don't change slider speed, or put the change at an easier slider.
00:24:331 (4,5) - Would look better if it was symmetrical.
00:26:997 (6) - Move this to the right so it is offset from the next slider.
00:57:738 (4) - Get this slider to bend right in the middle.
01:12:330 (1,2) - Blanket here.
01:24:134 (2) - Get this slider to bend on a slider tick.
01:36:586 - Spinner here.
01:40:847 (2) - Using a slider reduces the number of active notes. It would be better to just to have two circles.

[Normal]
The background has a lot of red and splatter patterns, kinda looks like blood imo...
Normal diff must be distance snapped for the most part, and no spacing changes for no reason. Please check the spacing because it seems to vary a lot even in the same combo.
00:25:331 (3) - Rotate this slider counter-clockwise some, it feels very rigid.
00:26:997 (6) - Move this slider down so it is offset from the previous slider
00:51:310 (1,2) - These are two strong notes, put them not in a straight line to add emphasis.
00:52:629 (3,4,5) - Confusing for new players to read.
01:13:642 (4) - Move this up so it follows the pattern made by 2 and 3.
01:14:298 (1,1) - Blanketing?
01:16:265 (4) - Move this up so it follows the pattern made by 2 and 3.
01:22:494 (5,1,2) - Blanketing?
01:25:609 (2,3,4) - These are mapping similar sounds, use the same shape and put them in a pattern.
01:36:586 - Spinner here.
01:40:847 (1) - This would feel better as circles, as each note has equal emphasis.

[Hard]
00:06:338 (1,2,3) - Spacing here feels too small. Smaller spacing is ok, but this looks like 1/4 spacing.
00:08:918 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Angles in this section are a bit random.
00:21:831 (1,2) - Is there a reason for these sliders to overlap?
00:37:997 (1,2) - Blanket shape isn't quite right.
00:47:164 (4,5,6,7) - Spacing here is uneven.
01:36:586 - Why not put some spinner here instead? It will help to prevent a stagnant leaderboard.

[Insane]
The dark purple combo colour is too dark to read on high background dim.
00:01:499 (2,3) - Not quite in a straight line
00:07:951 (6,7,8) - Move 6 down a little so it is the same distance away from 7 and 8.
00:18:498 (3,4,1) - Jump distance and angle seems too much for the music, place 4 so it is blanketed by 3.
00:24:997 (2,3,1,2,3) - Could make these into a pattern for easier reading.
00:39:164 (1,2,3,4) - Make these into a square shape.
00:43:997 (3,4,5) - Make these into an equilateral triangle.
00:55:925 (3,4,5,1) - Square.
01:01:189 (1,2,3,4,5) - 5 isn't stacked properly, place it underneath 1-4.
01:07:084 (1,2,3,4,5) - Many changes in direction in this section emphasises notes that don't need emphasis.

[Insanity]
The dark blue and dark purple combo colours are hard to read with 100% background dim, because the other combo colours are light colours.
00:04:080 (2,3,1) - 2 and head of 1 are too close together, looks strange.
00:25:164 (3,4,5) - Large distance between 3 and 4 makes sense, but having the same distance between 4 and 5 doesn't work because 5 is a weak note.
00:30:497 (3,4,1) - The pattern of increasing angle is cool, make 3 point upwards though so it flows better.
00:38:331 (2,3) - Not quite in a straight line.
00:39:497 (2,3,4,5) - Would look neater in as an equilateral triangle.
00:43:997 (3,4,5,1) - ^
00:45:164 (3,4,5,1) - Put 5 on the head of 1 instead, it would read better.
00:55:925 (3,4,5,1) - Would look neater as a square.
00:56:749 (2,3,4,5) - Triangle, and put 5 in line with 2 and 4
01:02:166 (2,3) - This angle is neither narrow nor wide, it feels strange to play.
01:06:101 (2,3,4) - Make these exactly the same curve.
01:07:412 (2,3,4) - Tiny angle here looks untidy, either increase it or remove it.
01:16:593 (2,3,4) - Make these exactly the same curve.
01:21:675 (2,3,4,5) - Make into triangle.
01:25:445 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Try to keep the angle and distance of jumps here the same, or have a specific pattern.
01:27:084 (2,1,2,3) - Make into triangle.
01:29:586 (2,3,4) - Make the distance between sliders here the same, it will show the pattern more clearly.
01:40:191 (4,5,6) - Triangle
01:40:847 (1,2,3) - ^

[Extra]
The dark blue combo colour problem, same as in Insanity diff.
00:36:498 (1,2,3,4) - It would look neater as an equilateral triangle, and wouldn't make much difference to gameplay to change it.
01:01:027 (3) - No sound here.
01:04:461 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Would look neater as a perfect star shape.
01:07:412 (2,3,4,5,6) - ^
01:12:330 (1,2) - Blanketing here?
01:12:658 (2,3,4,5,6) - Jump angles here are unintuitive, especially going from 3 to 4. I think having 4 closer to the centre of the map would make more sense, as then the angles would slowly increase between jumps instead of being random.
01:17:576 (1,2) - Would look and read better if stacked.
01:21:838 (3) - Move to the right a little to make it line up with 1 and 2.
01:27:753 (3,4) - There's no overlap between slider end and start on a 1/4 rhythm. You've used overlap for every other 1/4 rhythm, change this.
01:29:086 (2,3,4,5) - these jump angles are way too small
01:29:920 (1,2,3) - These sliders would be more logical in a triangle shape.
01:37:569 (5,6,1) - Spacing change here places far too much emphasis on 1.
01:38:389 (2,3,4) - Would be more comfortable if these were curved.
01:40:519 (2,1) - Although having a stack matches the pattern earlier in the song, it doesn't fit the song here as the notes following 1 are not stronger than 1. Make a jump between these two notes to give equal emphasis to all notes.

[Rhapsody]
00:26:832 (4,5,6) - Should be longer distance between 5 and 6, shorter distance between 4 and 5. 6 is an important note while 5 is less important.
00:31:165 (1,2,3) - Tiny angle here looks untidy, either increase it or remove it.
00:34:498 (3,4,5) - ^
01:01:027 (4) - There's no sound here
01:01:513 (9,1) - Uncomfortable flow for no reason?
01:04:953 (3,4,5,6,7) - Would look better as a perfect star shape
01:06:101 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - Gap between 1 and 2 should increase for every combo to match song.
01:15:445 (3,4,5,6,7,1) - Star shape, same as above. 3 and start of 1 can also be in the same place.
01:16:593 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - Increasing jump distance for every combo, same as above.
01:31:753 (2,3,4) - Tiny angle, same as above.
01:35:919 (4,5,6) - ^
01:37:897 (1,2,3,4) - 4 could be moved up to follow the rotation more smoothly.
Topic Starter
Nevertary

Saltssaumure wrote:

Hi from Salt's mod queue :)


Turns out I can pass 5.7* now, so I'll mod all diffs, though with less detail on Extra and Rhapsody.


[Easy]
00:11:499 (1) - This slider shape will be confusing for new players, best to not use any overlap.
00:15:370 - Changing slider speed on Easy difficulty is not advised, especially here where you introduce a new slider type (reversing slider). Either don't change slider speed, or put the change at an easier slider.
00:24:331 (4,5) - Would look better if it was symmetrical.
00:26:997 (6) - Move this to the right so it is offset from the next slider. i can't cuz i use distance snap
00:57:738 (4) - Get this slider to bend right in the middle
01:12:330 (1,2) - Blanket here.
01:24:134 (2) - Get this slider to bend on a slider tick.
01:36:586 - Spinner here. . next to 01: 39: 372 - here's another object, so I guess it's too hard spinner for a beginner since this isn't song's end
01:40:847 (2) - Using a slider reduces the number of active notes. It would be better to just to have two circles. i've alternative

[Normal]
The background has a lot of red and splatter patterns, kinda looks like blood imo...
Normal diff must be distance snapped for the most part, and no spacing changes for no reason. Please check the spacing because it seems to vary a lot even in the same combo.
00:25:331 (3) - Rotate this slider counter-clockwise some, it feels very rigid.
00:26:997 (6) - Move this slider down so it is offset from the previous slider
00:51:310 (1,2) - These are two strong notes, put them not in a straight line to add emphasis.
00:52:629 (3,4,5) - Confusing for new players to read.
01:13:642 (4) - Move this up so it follows the pattern made by 2 and 3.
01:14:298 (1,1) - Blanketing? i use distance snap, i can't move it to make blanket
01:16:265 (4) - Move this up so it follows the pattern made by 2 and 3. it'll be overlap with the next 1
01:22:494 (5,1,2) - Blanketing? i use distance snap, i can't move it to make blanket
01:25:609 (2,3,4) - These are mapping similar sounds, use the same shape and put them in a pattern. it'll look a little weird if i change 4 into curved slider like 2 and 3
01:36:586 - Spinner here. same as easy
01:40:847 (1) - This would feel better as circles, as each note has equal emphasis.

[Hard]
00:06:338 (1,2,3) - Spacing here feels too small. Smaller spacing is ok, but this looks like 1/4 spacing. rly? but the 1/4 spacing look like 00:53:618 (2,3,1) -
00:08:918 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Angles in this section are a bit random.
00:21:831 (1,2) - Is there a reason for these sliders to overlap? If it'sn't overlap then the spaces will be too far
00:37:997 (1,2) - Blanket shape isn't quite right.
00:47:164 (4,5,6,7) - Spacing here is uneven.
01:36:586 - Why not put some spinner here instead? It will help to prevent a stagnant leaderboard. uncomfortable to make an spinner

[Insane]
The dark purple combo colour is too dark to read on high background dim. Avoid using combo colors, slider borders or hitcircleoverlays with ~50 luminosity or lower. Dark colors like these impact readability of approach circles with low background dim and the other elements partially give up their functions as borders.
Avoid using combo colors with ~220 luminosity or higher during kiai times. They create bright pulses which can be unpleasant to the eyes.
the combo colors aren't <50 luminosity or >220 luminosity

00:01:499 (2,3) - Not quite in a straight line
00:07:951 (6,7,8) - Move 6 down a little so it is the same distance away from 7 and 8. nope, for emphasize
00:18:498 (3,4,1) - Jump distance and angle seems too much for the music, place 4 so it is blanketed by 3.
00:24:997 (2,3,1,2,3) - Could make these into a pattern for easier reading.
00:39:164 (1,2,3,4) - Make these into a square shape.
00:43:997 (3,4,5) - Make these into an equilateral triangle.
00:55:925 (3,4,5,1) - Square.
01:01:189 (1,2,3,4,5) - 5 isn't stacked properly, place it underneath 1-4.
01:07:084 (1,2,3,4,5) - Many changes in direction in this section emphasises notes that don't need emphasis. ....

[Insanity]
The dark blue and dark purple combo colours are hard to read with 100% background dim, because the other combo colours are light colours. same as insane
00:04:080 (2,3,1) - 2 and head of 1 are too close together, looks strange.
00:25:164 (3,4,5) - Large distance between 3 and 4 makes sense, but having the same distance between 4 and 5 doesn't work because 5 is a weak note.
00:30:497 (3,4,1) - The pattern of increasing angle is cool, make 3 point upwards though so it flows better.
00:38:331 (2,3) - Not quite in a straight line.
00:39:497 (2,3,4,5) - Would look neater in as an equilateral triangle.
00:43:997 (3,4,5,1) - ^
00:45:164 (3,4,5,1) - Put 5 on the head of 1 instead, it would read better. But that will make it overlap, while overall the song is not like that
00:55:925 (3,4,5,1) - Would look neater as a square.
00:56:749 (2,3,4,5) - Triangle, and put 5 in line with 2 and 4
01:02:166 (2,3) - This angle is neither narrow nor wide, it feels strange to play.
01:06:101 (2,3,4) - Make these exactly the same curve.
01:07:412 (2,3,4) - Tiny angle here looks untidy, either increase it or remove it.
01:16:593 (2,3,4) - Make these exactly the same curve.
01:21:675 (2,3,4,5) - Make into triangle.
01:25:445 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Try to keep the angle and distance of jumps here the same, or have a specific pattern.
01:27:084 (2,1,2,3) - Make into triangle.
01:29:586 (2,3,4) - Make the distance between sliders here the same, it will show the pattern more clearly.
01:40:191 (4,5,6) - Triangle
01:40:847 (1,2,3) - ^

[Extra]
The dark blue combo colour problem, same as in Insanity diff. same as insanity
00:36:498 (1,2,3,4) - It would look neater as an equilateral triangle, and wouldn't make much difference to gameplay to change it.
01:01:027 (3) - No sound here.
01:04:461 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Would look neater as a perfect star shape.
01:07:412 (2,3,4,5,6) - ^
01:12:330 (1,2) - Blanketing here?
01:12:658 (2,3,4,5,6) - Jump angles here are unintuitive, especially going from 3 to 4. I think having 4 closer to the centre of the map would make more sense, as then the angles would slowly increase between jumps instead of being random.
01:17:576 (1,2) - Would look and read better if stacked. this is a 1/4 snap, i think it will hard to read if stacked

01:21:838 (3) - Move to the right a little to make it line up with 1 and 2.
01:27:753 (3,4) - There's no overlap between slider end and start on a 1/4 rhythm. You've used overlap for every other 1/4 rhythm, change this. But if this doesn't overlap it will be more hard to play
01:29:086 (2,3,4,5) - these jump angles are way too small
01:29:920 (1,2,3) - These sliders would be more logical in a triangle shape.
01:37:569 (5,6,1) - Spacing change here places far too much emphasis on 1.
01:38:389 (2,3,4) - Would be more comfortable if these were curved. i've alternative
01:40:519 (2,1) - Although having a stack matches the pattern earlier in the song, it doesn't fit the song here as the notes following 1 are not stronger than 1. Make a jump between these two notes to give equal emphasis to all notes.

[Rhapsody]
00:26:832 (4,5,6) - Should be longer distance between 5 and 6, shorter distance between 4 and 5. 6 is an important note while 5 is less important.
00:31:165 (1,2,3) - Tiny angle here looks untidy, either increase it or remove it.
00:34:498 (3,4,5) - ^
01:01:027 (4) - There's no sound here
01:01:513 (9,1) - Uncomfortable flow for no reason? this is in accordance with the form of stream
01:04:953 (3,4,5,6,7) - Would look better as a perfect star shape
01:06:101 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - Gap between 1 and 2 should increase for every combo to match song. but the vocal has a same sound
01:15:445 (3,4,5,6,7,1) - Star shape, same as above. 3 and start of 1 can also be in the same place.
01:16:593 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - Increasing jump distance for every combo, same as above. same as above
01:31:753 (2,3,4) - Tiny angle, same as above.
01:35:919 (4,5,6) - ^ i don't think so..
01:37:897 (1,2,3,4) - 4 could be moved up to follow the rotation more smoothly.
no reply = fixed

thanks salts :)
Topic Starter
Nevertary

Neoskylove wrote:

Q

[lolicon]
00:07:951 (1,1) - delete NC i'll use nc for every guitar sound
00:33:164 - can be clickable since this part has strong vocal. uncomfortable to play compared with the rest of song
00:39:165 (1,4) - this overlap looks messy, could you avoid it? fixed
00:41:832 (1,2,3) - flow looks little bit weird fixed
01:08:232 (1,2) - looks hard to read, ....

GL
thank you Neoskylove :)
Saltssaumure

Nevertary wrote:

Saltssaumure wrote:

Hi from Salt's mod queue :)


Turns out I can pass 5.7* now, so I'll mod all diffs, though with less detail on Extra and Rhapsody.
[Easy]
00:11:499 (1) - This slider shape will be confusing for new players, best to not use any overlap.
00:15:370 - Changing slider speed on Easy difficulty is not advised, especially here where you introduce a new slider type (reversing slider). Either don't change slider speed, or put the change at an easier slider.
00:24:331 (4,5) - Would look better if it was symmetrical.
00:26:997 (6) - Move this to the right so it is offset from the next slider. i can't cuz i use distance snap
00:57:738 (4) - Get this slider to bend right in the middle
01:12:330 (1,2) - Blanket here.
01:24:134 (2) - Get this slider to bend on a slider tick.
01:36:586 - Spinner here. . next to 01: 39: 372 - here's another object, so I guess it's too hard spinner for a beginner since this isn't song's end
At Easy diff, minimum spinner length is 4 beats, and minimum time after spinner is 4 beats. There's enough time for a spinner here.
01:40:847 (2) - Using a slider reduces the number of active notes. It would be better to just to have two circles. i've alternative

[Normal]
The background has a lot of red and splatter patterns, kinda looks like blood imo...
Normal diff must be distance snapped for the most part, and no spacing changes for no reason. Please check the spacing because it seems to vary a lot even in the same combo.
00:25:331 (3) - Rotate this slider counter-clockwise some, it feels very rigid.
00:26:997 (6) - Move this slider down so it is offset from the previous slider
00:51:310 (1,2) - These are two strong notes, put them not in a straight line to add emphasis.
00:52:629 (3,4,5) - Confusing for new players to read.
01:13:642 (4) - Move this up so it follows the pattern made by 2 and 3.
01:14:298 (1,1) - Blanketing? i use distance snap, i can't move it to make blanket
It's still possible, if you rotate repeating slider 1, like this:

01:16:265 (4) - Move this up so it follows the pattern made by 2 and 3. it'll be overlap with the next 1
Like this, there is no overlap:

01:22:494 (5,1,2) - Blanketing? i use distance snap, i can't move it to make blanket
Same again here, you don't need to move the slider head at all, just change the curve on the slider body:

01:25:609 (2,3,4) - These are mapping similar sounds, use the same shape and put them in a pattern. it'll look a little weird if i change 4 into curved slider like 2 and 3
01:36:586 - Spinner here. same as easy
At Normal diff, a spinner only needs to last 3 beats and have 2 beats afterwards, so there is definitely enough time to spin here.
01:40:847 (1) - This would feel better as circles, as each note has equal emphasis.

[Hard]
00:06:338 (1,2,3) - Spacing here feels too small. Smaller spacing is ok, but this looks like 1/4 spacing. rly? but the 1/4 spacing look like 00:53:618 (2,3,1) -
Sorry, I was looking at the previous 1/2 spaced object before this one. Correct mod:
00:04:241 (2,3) - Spacing here is too large, compared to other 1/2 beat spacing.

00:08:918 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Angles in this section are a bit random.
00:21:831 (1,2) - Is there a reason for these sliders to overlap? If it'sn't overlap then the spaces will be too far
Makes sense, it would be good to make sure the overlap doesn't look accidental. Change to something like this, with better aesthetics and flow:

00:37:997 (1,2) - Blanket shape isn't quite right.
00:47:164 (4,5,6,7) - Spacing here is uneven.
01:36:586 - Why not put some spinner here instead? It will help to prevent a stagnant leaderboard. uncomfortable to make an spinner

[Insane]
The dark purple combo colour is too dark to read on high background dim. Avoid using combo colors, slider borders or hitcircleoverlays with ~50 luminosity or lower. Dark colors like these impact readability of approach circles with low background dim and the other elements partially give up their functions as borders.
Avoid using combo colors with ~220 luminosity or higher during kiai times. They create bright pulses which can be unpleasant to the eyes.
the combo colors aren't <50 luminosity or >220 luminosity

If all of the combo colours were quite dark, this would not be a problem, as your eyes would adjust. However, the blue combo colour before purple is 120 luminosity, making it hard to see the 64 luminosity purple afterwards as the eyes are used to seeing brighter colours.
00:01:499 (2,3) - Not quite in a straight line
00:07:951 (6,7,8) - Move 6 down a little so it is the same distance away from 7 and 8. nope, for emphasize
00:18:498 (3,4,1) - Jump distance and angle seems too much for the music, place 4 so it is blanketed by 3.
00:24:997 (2,3,1,2,3) - Could make these into a pattern for easier reading.
00:39:164 (1,2,3,4) - Make these into a square shape.
00:43:997 (3,4,5) - Make these into an equilateral triangle.
00:55:925 (3,4,5,1) - Square.
01:01:189 (1,2,3,4,5) - 5 isn't stacked properly, place it underneath 1-4.
01:07:084 (1,2,3,4,5) - Many changes in direction in this section emphasises notes that don't need emphasis. ....

[Insanity]
The dark blue and dark purple combo colours are hard to read with 100% background dim, because the other combo colours are light colours. same as insane
See above comment about too much contrast between combo colour luminosity.
00:04:080 (2,3,1) - 2 and head of 1 are too close together, looks strange.
00:25:164 (3,4,5) - Large distance between 3 and 4 makes sense, but having the same distance between 4 and 5 doesn't work because 5 is a weak note.
00:30:497 (3,4,1) - The pattern of increasing angle is cool, make 3 point upwards though so it flows better.
00:38:331 (2,3) - Not quite in a straight line.
00:39:497 (2,3,4,5) - Would look neater in as an equilateral triangle.
00:43:997 (3,4,5,1) - ^
00:45:164 (3,4,5,1) - Put 5 on the head of 1 instead, it would read better. But that will make it overlap, while overall the song is not like that
The position of 5 right now isn't good for reading. What you said about overlap makes sense, so maybe this design will be more effective:
(Yellow 1 is parallel with yellow 3.)

00:55:925 (3,4,5,1) - Would look neater as a square.
00:56:749 (2,3,4,5) - Triangle, and put 5 in line with 2 and 4
01:02:166 (2,3) - This angle is neither narrow nor wide, it feels strange to play.
01:06:101 (2,3,4) - Make these exactly the same curve.
01:07:412 (2,3,4) - Tiny angle here looks untidy, either increase it or remove it.
01:16:593 (2,3,4) - Make these exactly the same curve.
01:21:675 (2,3,4,5) - Make into triangle.
01:25:445 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Try to keep the angle and distance of jumps here the same, or have a specific pattern.
01:27:084 (2,1,2,3) - Make into triangle.
01:29:586 (2,3,4) - Make the distance between sliders here the same, it will show the pattern more clearly.
01:40:191 (4,5,6) - Triangle
01:40:847 (1,2,3) - ^

[Extra]
The dark blue combo colour problem, same as in Insanity diff. same as insanity
See above comment about too much contrast between combo colour luminosity.
00:36:498 (1,2,3,4) - It would look neater as an equilateral triangle, and wouldn't make much difference to gameplay to change it.
01:01:027 (3) - No sound here.
01:04:461 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Would look neater as a perfect star shape.
01:07:412 (2,3,4,5,6) - ^
01:12:330 (1,2) - Blanketing here?
01:12:658 (2,3,4,5,6) - Jump angles here are unintuitive, especially going from 3 to 4. I think having 4 closer to the centre of the map would make more sense, as then the angles would slowly increase between jumps instead of being random.
01:17:576 (1,2) - Would look and read better if stacked. this is a 1/4 snap, i think it will hard to read if stacked

01:21:838 (3) - Move to the right a little to make it line up with 1 and 2.
01:27:753 (3,4) - There's no overlap between slider end and start on a 1/4 rhythm. You've used overlap for every other 1/4 rhythm, change this. But if this doesn't overlap it will be more hard to play
I'm saying there needs to be more overlap here, so that the slider end of 3 and the slider start of 4 are overlapping.
01:20:199 (1,2) - A good example here, you have a small overlap between slider end of 1 and circle 2, because it is 1/4 rhythm.

01:29:086 (2,3,4,5) - these jump angles are way too small
01:29:920 (1,2,3) - These sliders would be more logical in a triangle shape.
01:37:569 (5,6,1) - Spacing change here places far too much emphasis on 1.
01:38:389 (2,3,4) - Would be more comfortable if these were curved. i've alternative
01:40:519 (2,1) - Although having a stack matches the pattern earlier in the song, it doesn't fit the song here as the notes following 1 are not stronger than 1. Make a jump between these two notes to give equal emphasis to all notes.

[Rhapsody]
00:26:832 (4,5,6) - Should be longer distance between 5 and 6, shorter distance between 4 and 5. 6 is an important note while 5 is less important.
00:31:165 (1,2,3) - Tiny angle here looks untidy, either increase it or remove it.
00:34:498 (3,4,5) - ^
01:01:027 (4) - There's no sound here
01:01:513 (8,1) - Uncomfortable flow for no reason? this is in accordance with the form of stream
Right now, moving from 8 to 1 isn't a smooth curve, and is two separate movements which feels uncomfortable.

It would be more comfortable like this:

01:04:953 (3,4,5,6,7) - Would look better as a perfect star shape.
01:06:101 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - Gap between 1 and 2 should increase for every combo to match song. but the vocal has a same sound
01:15:445 (3,4,5,6,7,1) - Star shape, same as above. 3 and start of 1 can also be in the same place.
01:16:593 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - Increasing jump distance for every combo, same as above. same as above
01:31:753 (2,3,4) - Tiny angle, same as above.
01:35:919 (4,5,6) - ^ i don't think so..
01:37:897 (1,2,3,4) - 4 could be moved up to follow the rotation more smoothly.
no reply = fixed

thanks salts :)
np!
Yuuya_ke
someone played this map in a multiplayer session once and I choked near the end



  • 00:18:998 (4,5,1) - these long, extended sliders seemingly don't map anything well. sure, they have the snare hitsounds but that doesn't mean that you can connect them all with long sliders, albeit this is an easy difficulty. the main melody of the trumpet (or whatever instrument it is I'm deaf) seems to be the most prominent sounds of this section, and I feel that using these long extended sliders to map over them undermines it and ultimately makes this weak as fuc- but anyways, since you used 1/2 rhythms in the difficulty already (pointing at 01:40:847 (2,3) - ) I don't suppose you could use it to map the trumpet's high-pitched notes like on 00:19:155 using, for example, 00:16:499 (1) - this slider's length? tl;dr lack of support xd

    00:32:331 (6,1) - this is super minor but aligning these two in a straight line makes it look more pleasing since they're so close to that point of being in a straight line already

    00:36:997 (6) - I feel as if you could use that 1/2 rhythm stuff again here, seeing as vocals are strong on 00:37:164 - and the guitar also has a noticeable change in chord; I mean tbh you could just use a single circle and it'll work fine but this extended slider stuff feels clashy

    01:41:175 (3) - the song ends on 01:41:831 - but the slider ends up extending to the white tick; I noticed this in some other difficulties, if not all, when I took a quick glance at them in the past



  • 00:08:596 (5,1) - blanket to improve aesthetics or something like that

    00:59:222 (1) - this seems more like 1/3 rhythm than what you have now... especially the hitsound on the end of the reverse slider is off so that's a thing

    01:25:445 (1) - aww I thought the white color combo was only for when the lolis say "TANOSHII" :^( 'cause it's a special pattern just for this song section, right?

  • 00:52:299 (4) - I think you should replace with slider and circle, so that you can map the vocals nicely on 00:52:629

    00:59:222 (1,2) - 1/3 rhythm stuff I mentioned in the normal difficulty mod

    and yeah that's about it I think

  • 00:59:222 (1,2) - 1/3... you get it

  • wait...w tf is "insanity" allowed to be a diff name in this kind of spread

    01:11:838 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - ok so I see that it stacks fine when stacking is enabled but when stacking is disabled, circle 1 is way off... but you could argue that "oh it's fine 'cause players won't notice" so I saw what happened with Hard Rock enabled and 1 is off so... fix please

    01:22:330 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - this, too

    01:38:717 (4,5,6,7,8,9) - this, too (to be completely honest 2/3 of these stacking issues I didn't even bother checking with HR I just assumed that based on the first one with HR the rest would be the same xd)

  • 00:14:080 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - what's with the spacing of 1 and 2 being so different from spacing of 3 and 4; I can understand that the spacing is larger at 3 to 4 but then the spacing from 4 to 5 is even larger... here's my perspective of this: 1, 2, and 3 is "separate" from 4, 5, etc. because the guitarist in the background strums harder on the circles 1 and 4, hence you could get away with spacing of 3 to 4, but it's pretty lacking in support of the music since it seems slightly random, for ex. compare spacing of 4→5 vs 5→6

    01:38:881 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - something about this stream's shape is odd... or at least to me it looks odd...

  • 01:01:513 (8,1) - hmm... if you made them flow linearly, that'd be nice... or go with the circular option since slider leniency lets players not follow that circle-shaped slider completely and skip on to the next object → https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8554705

    01:37:077 (2,3,4,5,6) - oooo did you adjust the angles into the angles of congruent geometric shapes according to pitch? but I more wanted to mention that 01:36:586 (1,2,3) - could be adjust to something like... → 01:36:586 (1,2,3) - 'cause the angle you have now doesn't look nice imo

tetris
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply