Guest
home
beatmaps
rankings
community
store
help
forum
  1. Forums
  2. Beatmaps
  3. Ranked Beatmaps (Archived)

Waterparks - Hawaii (Stay Awake)

posted
Total Posts
70
show more
Stack
osu! Alumni
729 posts
Joined March 2015
Stack
m4m from my queue

General

ending time is not consistent across diffs

also combo colors

You really don't need 2 timing points, using 1 on 00:04:541 is good enough (also fixes your nc's not being on the downbeat)

Normal

01:01:718 (6,7) - don't make these look similar, they are totally different
The first one is 1/4 and the second one has only 1/2sounds

aimod complains about ds so take a look at that

really don't have much too say, it's consistent in its patterning and looks okay

Hard

00:07:718 (7,8) - 7 is only curved so little that you should just copy 8 and flip it so it looks a bit better

00:14:071 (9,1) - stack this more like 00:08:424 (9,1) - as the first type of stacking looks way better

00:46:895 (11) - you messed up your nc'ing here

00:55:012 (3,6) - would look way better if they were actually stacked nicely

The biggest thing that bugs me on this diff is the intesity decrease at spots like 00:30:306 (6,7,8) -, Beacause following instruments and then decreasing the object density based on the vocals while the instrumentals keep going feels wrong

Insane

In this diff nc'ing every downbeat would be better to make sure the combo doesn't go above 10 every time

00:11:424 (11) - even though the sound is alot more quiet, decreasing the sapcing by this much doesn't fit, it's also not like you did the same thing at similar spots liek 00:14:071 (10,11) -

On an insane and up map this part, as it's perfectly mappable with some lower sv and object density

00:33:836 (5,6,1) - choose 1 type of mapping triples and don't mix it up (if the sections sound similar ofcourse)

00:36:659 (5,1,2) - would making for some better visible spacing distance to make sure that 12 doesn't look the same as 51 as the gap is 1/1

00:58:189 (1) - feels pretty out of place being the only really curved slider in the kiai

01:06:306 (5,1) - oh man, this overlap tilts me

01:10:895 (1,2,3) - would space these differently as placing these in the same stack with any nc to differentiate timing gaps is quite misleading

link to my map https://osu.ppy.sh/s/623776

Gl with the map
Dashyy-
751 posts
Joined May 2015
Topic Starter
Dashyy-
SPOILER

gottagof4ast wrote:

m4m from my queue

General

ending time is not consistent across diffs

also combo colors

You really don't need 2 timing points, using 1 on 00:04:541 is good enough (also fixes your nc's not being on the downbeat) i used it as a metronome reset

Normal

01:01:718 (6,7) - don't make these look similar, they are totally different
The first one is 1/4 and the second one has only 1/2sounds 7 is 1/4 if u listen closely

aimod complains about ds so take a look at that

really don't have much too say, it's consistent in its patterning and looks okay

Hard

00:07:718 (7,8) - 7 is only curved so little that you should just copy 8 and flip it so it looks a bit better its my mapping style!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

00:14:071 (9,1) - stack this more like 00:08:424 (9,1) - as the first type of stacking looks way better

00:46:895 (11) - you messed up your nc'ing here i actually messed up in a different place but ok

00:55:012 (3,6) - would look way better if they were actually stacked nicely

The biggest thing that bugs me on this diff is the intesity decrease at spots like 00:30:306 (6,7,8) -, Beacause following instruments and then decreasing the object density based on the vocals while the instrumentals keep going feels wrong but i'm following vocals there

Insane

In this diff nc'ing every downbeat would be better to make sure the combo doesn't go above 10 every time don't think it's too big of a deal to have high combos since players at this level should be able to read them fine

00:11:424 (11) - even though the sound is alot more quiet, decreasing the sapcing by this much doesn't fit, it's also not like you did the same thing at similar spots liek 00:14:071 (10,11) -

On an insane and up map this part, as it's perfectly mappable with some lower sv and object density again, it seems kinda boring to map that part, but i'll think about it

00:33:836 (5,6,1) - choose 1 type of mapping triples and don't mix it up (if the sections sound similar ofcourse)

00:36:659 (5,1,2) - would making for some better visible spacing distance to make sure that 12 doesn't look the same as 51 as the gap is 1/1

00:58:189 (1) - feels pretty out of place being the only really curved slider in the kiai i like to mix up my sliders

01:06:306 (5,1) - oh man, this overlap tilts me

01:10:895 (1,2,3) - would space these differently as placing these in the same stack with any nc to differentiate timing gaps is quite misleading during testplays the people who played this part had no trouble reading it so it should be fine

link to my map https://osu.ppy.sh/s/623776

Gl with the map

no reply=fix

ty for mod!!!!
faygo
283 posts
Joined November 2014
faygo
hello NM~

Insane
Good map~
However during the kiai time you use curved sliders sometimes but other times u decided to use sliders with red point to achieve the same bended effect. I don't see any coherent patterns regarding your use and neither can I identify any significant changes in rhythm: http://i.imgur.com/ixyE3GA.jpg

  1. 00:28:542 (1) Move it a bit further away from (2) like you do for similar patterns in the later part?
  2. 00:37:718 (2) Just keep it curved like the others?
  3. 00:40:895 (5) and 00:43:718 (4) are not stacked but 00:45:130 (5) is? In my opinion I feel stacking is okay here as it isn't too confusing
  4. 01:00:659 (5,6) The spacing actually becomes smaller compared with 00:59:953 (2,3), make it bigger like u do for 01:01:365 (8,9)
  5. 01:08:071 (1) and 01:09:482 (5) is another example: one is curved while another one has similar shape but is linear
  6. 01:16:542 Green tick is not snapped should be 01:16:541 instead, plus the slider is a bit ugly. Maybe this instead? http://i.imgur.com/aocUwZS.jpg
good job and good luck!
Dashyy-
751 posts
Joined May 2015
Topic Starter
Dashyy-

Faygor wrote:

hello NM~

Insane
Good map~
However during the kiai time you use curved sliders sometimes but other times u decided to use sliders with red point to achieve the same bended effect. I don't see any coherent patterns regarding your use and neither can I identify any significant changes in rhythm: http://i.imgur.com/ixyE3GA.jpg il don't see the huge deal as to why the sliders have to be the same. idk i just like to vary sliders in my maps.

  1. 00:28:542 (1) Move it a bit further away from (2) like you do for similar patterns in the later part? this section is noticeably calmer than the later part, so i decided to use lower spacing
  2. 00:37:718 (2) Just keep it curved like the others? nah it looks fine
  3. 00:40:895 (5) and 00:43:718 (4) are not stacked but 00:45:130 (5) is? In my opinion I feel stacking is okay here as it isn't too confusing
  4. 01:00:659 (5,6) The spacing actually becomes smaller compared with 00:59:953 (2,3), make it bigger like u do for 01:01:365 (8,9)
  5. 01:08:071 (1) and 01:09:482 (5) is another example: one is curved while another one has similar shape but is linear changed 01:08:071 (1), not the other one tho
  6. 01:16:542 Green tick is not snapped should be 01:16:541 instead, plus the slider is a bit ugly. Maybe this instead? http://i.imgur.com/aocUwZS.jpg chnaged it but not ur suggestion
good job and good luck!
no reply=fix

ty for modding!!!!!!!!!!
Juiceys
530 posts
Joined June 2016
Juiceys
Insane:

00:37:012 (1,2,3) - I'm not sure why the vocals are mapped here. They aren't prominent enough to justify mapping to them and there are perfectly fine instrumental noises you could map here instead. Mapping the vocals seems pointless and it makes the map flow weird imo

00:43:718 (4,1,5,1) - Make these both perfect, or imperfect stacks, keeps the map consistent and cleaner, making them different even though the sounds they're mapped to are similar is pointless

The Kiai: The volume level stays consistent throughout the entire kiai, So if you want to implement higher DS you should do it ONLY on the prominent drum noises in this song, which you do for the most part, but if you don't do it for all of them such as

00:56:777 (1) - The sliderend
00:58:189 (1) - ^

And when you map this sound, it should be a higher DS than the notes around it to emphasize this sound

01:07:718 (5) - Here the jump should be larger because of the drum
01:09:130 (4) - Jump to this note should be larger than the jump to 01:08:777 (3) -

Short mod, Hope it helped! good luck
Dashyy-
751 posts
Joined May 2015
Topic Starter
Dashyy-

Juiceys wrote:

Insane:

00:37:012 (1,2,3) - I'm not sure why the vocals are mapped here. They aren't prominent enough to justify mapping to them and there are perfectly fine instrumental noises you could map here instead. Mapping the vocals seems pointless and it makes the map flow weird imo due to popular demand i did it

00:43:718 (4,1,5,1) - Make these both perfect, or imperfect stacks, keeps the map consistent and cleaner, making them different even though the sounds they're mapped to are similar is pointless

The Kiai: The volume level stays consistent throughout the entire kiai, So if you want to implement higher DS you should do it ONLY on the prominent drum noises in this song, which you do for the most part, but if you don't do it for all of them such as

00:56:777 (1) - The sliderend
00:58:189 (1) - ^

And when you map this sound, it should be a higher DS than the notes around it to emphasize this sound

01:07:718 (5) - Here the jump should be larger because of the drum jump is large enough i think
01:09:130 (4) - Jump to this note should be larger than the jump to 01:08:777 (3) - can't make it larger :(

Short mod, Hope it helped! good luck
no reply=fix

ty!!!!!!!!!
PandaHero
662 posts
Joined November 2011
PandaHero
Hey! M4m from my queue.

[General]
1. This break looks so lazy in 1:10 song, I would like you to map it.
2. Check AiMod, it says that kiai isn't snapped.
3. Normal is a bit hard for being easiest diff in mapset, will be cool if you add easy in your mapset.
4. I definitely needs more combo colors :c

[Normal]
00:51:130 - do you really need this red line here? o.o
00:37:012 (1,2,3) - make it as a three 1/1 sliders? Looks a bit undermap, especially after this patterns - 00:34:189 (1,2,3,4,5,6).
00:59:600 (3) - hm, you can nc it for showing that the rhythm is changed.

[Hard]
00:05:953 (2) - add nc as you did in normal diff?
00:14:424 (1,1,1,1) - looks like nc spam for me, I can't understand why you nc'd these sliders, there are no sv changes here.
00:28:189 (3) - these follow points looks not very nice, you can put nc here.
00:28:365 (4,1) - it will be better to play if you make spacing here the same as here - 00:28:012 (2,3).
00:28:541 - this slider-only section is so boring, I guess you can add notes in some places. For example here - 00:31:718 (2) - make it as a two notes, because there are two different words in the text of song. Same here - 00:32:424 (4), 00:34:542 (2) - ,
00:29:953 (5) - I would like to nc it for separating the patterns.
00:32:777 (5) - ^
00:31:011 (8,1) - I recommend you to increase spacing a bit for showing that here is new tact.
00:39:130 (4) - add nc here?
00:39:836 (1,2) - two different sounds here, it's feel so strange for me that you stacked it. Maybe smth like this?
00:42:659 (9,1) - swap nc's?
00:48:306 (1,2,3,4) - hm, you can gradually increase the sv of these sliders, because volume lvl of the song is increasing too.
00:49:365 (4,5) - too small spacing for the sound on 5 note imo, will be cool if you increase it.
01:05:247 (10) - nc?
01:13:718 (5) - ^
01:10:894 (1,2) - increase spacing between a 1/1 objects? It will be fine even if you make it as here - 01:11:953 (4,5).

[Insane]
00:05:953 (1) - add finish
00:08:776 (1) - ^
00:11:600 (1) - ^
00:14:424 (1,2,1) - ^
00:28:542 (1) - ^
00:34:189 (1) - ^
00:37:011 (1) - ^
00:14:071 (5) - missed clap.
00:33:836 (5) - ^
00:41:600 (2) - ^
00:42:306 (6) - ^
00:43:012 (2,4) - ^
00:44:424 (2,5) - ^
00:45:836 (2,5) - ^
00:47:248 (2,7) - ^
00:55:718 (3) - ^
01:04:188 (2,6) - ^
01:08:071 (1) - clap on slider's end.
01:10:541 (5) - clap on the head.
01:13:718 (1) - finish on it's head?
01:16:541 (2) - ^
00:38:423 (6) - nc?

I don't like some overlaps, but the rest of diff looks fine.

That's all from me, good luck with this set.
FunnyA
643 posts
Joined April 2016
FunnyA
Hello... from FunnyA's Modding Queue

Conclusions
The conclusion what i got :

General


00:17:423 - 00:27:658 - Break Time is only used for Normal and Hard diff only. You can also create and add some objects, especially in insane diff. After that you add their hitsound by shrink the volume, it's about 30%

00:51:129 - 01:03:717 - The location of the kiai time is not right on the downbeat. You can try carefully to mark and check the exact kiai time (on the white line above).

Timing

Volumes that have reached 100% should be deducted, at least up to 60% or lower.

Metadata

Turn off or remove the checklist on Widescreen Support (Advanced) in Normal and Hard diff. Because it is turned on your map that it has Storyboard.

Normal


00:05:601 (1,1) - The distance is too far .... You can use the recommended distance snap for easy and normal diff, so the player is not confused to determine between the distance and rhythm.
01:15:130 (2,3) - ^
00:42:658 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Bad Flow
00:45:483 (1,2,1) - ^
00:41:248 (1,2) - Blanket... it's better

Hard


00:05:953 (1) - New Combo
00:08:424 (8,1) - Stacked it perfectly
00:10:895 (7,8,9) - ^
00:13:716 (7,8,9) - ^
00:14:953 (1,1,1) - Delete New Combo Colour
00:16:681 - NC
00:35:953 (6,1) - Overlap Please ^^
00:37:364 - Add just one hitcircle, please
00:42:659 (9) - NC
00:43:012 (1) - Delete New Combo Colour
01:05:247 (10) - NC
01:13:718 (5) - ^

Insane


00:08:069 (3,4,5,6,1) - Bad Flow ... maybe you can change like in this picture (next time i 'll give you some example picture)

Positions (5) and (6) must be exchanged so that players are not confused reading the note. You can also swap quickly (click both hitcircle directly and click Ctrl G simultaneously).

00:06:481 (2,3,4,5) - Bad flow
00:38:423 (6,10,13) - NC
01:07:542 (4,6) - Make the same position


In my opinion
Your hitsound is very good. You are also understand in music and I love that song ^^
But you must also improve the flow especially the insane diff so the pattern is more interesting.
I'm sorry if I gave you a little advice. But, if any of my suggestions that you do not change it, no problem. And it depends on you whether it's good for you or not.

For example the picture I'll send in this forum next time. Be patient ^^

I hope you will get ranked map. Good luck :)
Dashyy-
751 posts
Joined May 2015
Topic Starter
Dashyy-
SPOILER

PandaHero wrote:

Hey! M4m from my queue.

[General]
1. This break looks so lazy in 1:10 song, I would like you to map it. its too slow to map :(
2. Check AiMod, it says that kiai isn't snapped.
3. Normal is a bit hard for being easiest diff in mapset, will be cool if you add easy in your mapset. it's a rankable spread tho. most of the testplayers said normal played alright for them
4. I definitely needs more combo colors :c i think 4 is enough

[Normal]
00:51:130 - do you really need this red line here? o.o
00:37:012 (1,2,3) - make it as a three 1/1 sliders? Looks a bit undermap, especially after this patterns - 00:34:189 (1,2,3,4,5,6). hard uses 3 1/1 sliders so i wanted normal to have an easier pattern
00:59:600 (3) - hm, you can nc it for showing that the rhythm is changed.

[Hard]
00:05:953 (2) - add nc as you did in normal diff?
00:14:424 (1,1,1,1) - looks like nc spam for me, I can't understand why you nc'd these sliders, there are no sv changes here.
00:28:189 (3) - these follow points looks not very nice, you can put nc here. i don't get how a nc would make it play better
00:28:365 (4,1) - it will be better to play if you make spacing here the same as here - 00:28:012 (2,3). i wanted to signify that this section is slower than the previous section, so i made the jump small
00:28:541 - this slider-only section is so boring, I guess you can add notes in some places. For example here - 00:31:718 (2) - make it as a two notes, because there are two different words in the text of song. Same here - 00:32:424 (4), 00:34:542 (2) - ,
00:29:953 (5) - I would like to nc it for separating the patterns. in this section, i nc when a new measure comes in
00:32:777 (5) - ^
00:31:011 (8,1) - I recommend you to increase spacing a bit for showing that here is new tact.
00:39:130 (4) - add nc here? don't feel like it's necessary
00:39:836 (1,2) - two different sounds here, it's feel so strange for me that you stacked it. Maybe smth like this? i stacked it to hint players that more stacks are coming up
00:42:659 (9,1) - swap nc's?
00:48:306 (1,2,3,4) - hm, you can gradually increase the sv of these sliders, because volume lvl of the song is increasing too. feels too difficult for hard, i'll do it in insane tho
00:49:365 (4,5) - too small spacing for the sound on 5 note imo, will be cool if you increase it.
01:05:247 (10) - nc?
01:13:718 (5) - ^
01:10:894 (1,2) - increase spacing between a 1/1 objects? It will be fine even if you make it as here - 01:11:953 (4,5). players at this level should be able to read the 1/1 jump

[Insane]
00:05:953 (1) - add finish
00:08:776 (1) - ^
00:11:600 (1) - ^
00:14:424 (1,2,1) - ^
00:28:542 (1) - ^ there's no cymbal there :(
00:34:189 (1) - ^
00:37:011 (1) - ^
00:14:071 (5) - missed clap.
00:33:836 (5) - ^
00:41:600 (2) - ^
00:42:306 (6) - ^
00:43:012 (2,4) - ^
00:44:424 (2,5) - ^
00:45:836 (2,5) - ^
00:47:248 (2,7) - ^
00:55:718 (3) - ^
01:04:188 (2,6) - ^
01:08:071 (1) - clap on slider's end.
01:10:541 (5) - clap on the head.
01:13:718 (1) - finish on it's head?
01:16:541 (2) - ^
00:38:423 (6) - nc?

I don't like some overlaps, but the rest of diff looks fine.

That's all from me, good luck with this set. ty!!!!!!!

ulfanirahmi wrote:

Hello... from FunnyA's Modding Queue

Conclusions
The conclusion what i got :

General


00:17:423 - 00:27:658 - Break Time is only used for Normal and Hard diff only. You can also create and add some objects, especially in insane diff. After that you add their hitsound by shrink the volume, it's about 30% i already explained why i didn't want to map the break, but i'm 100% positive that breaks can be used in insane+ diffs lol

00:51:129 - 01:03:717 - The location of the kiai time is not right on the downbeat. You can try carefully to mark and check the exact kiai time (on the white line above).

Timing

Volumes that have reached 100% should be deducted, at least up to 60% or lower. i used 100% volume since the object was really loud

Metadata

Turn off or remove the checklist on Widescreen Support (Advanced) in Normal and Hard diff. Because it is turned on your map that it has Storyboard.

Normal


00:05:601 (1,1) - The distance is too far .... You can use the recommended distance snap for easy and normal diff, so the player is not confused to determine between the distance and rhythm.
01:15:130 (2,3) - ^
00:42:658 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Bad Flow there's no such thing as bad flow. and i don't know what ur talking about since the section has been using circular flow which is the most comfotable flow there is
00:45:483 (1,2,1) - ^
00:41:248 (1,2) - Blanket... it's better that would break the flow i'm using

Hard


00:05:953 (1) - New Combo
00:08:424 (8,1) - Stacked it perfectly i'm an edgy mapper which means edgy stacks
00:10:895 (7,8,9) - ^
00:13:716 (7,8,9) - ^
00:14:953 (1,1,1) - Delete New Combo Colour
00:16:681 - NC doesn't fit
00:35:953 (6,1) - Overlap Please ^^ looks really bad
00:37:364 - Add just one hitcircle, please i don't get what you mean? you linked me to a sliderend
00:42:659 (9) - NC
00:43:012 (1) - Delete New Combo Colour
01:05:247 (10) - NC
01:13:718 (5) - ^

Insane


00:08:069 (3,4,5,6,1) - Bad Flow ... maybe you can change like in this picture (next time i 'll give you some example picture)

Positions (5) and (6) must be exchanged so that players are not confused reading the note. You can also swap quickly (click both hitcircle directly and click Ctrl G simultaneously). players at this level should be able to read overlaps easily

00:06:481 (2,3,4,5) - Bad flow plays fine
00:38:423 (6,10,13) - NC
01:07:542 (4,6) - Make the same position its fine how it is


In my opinion
Your hitsound is very good. You are also understand in music and I love that song ^^
But you must also improve the flow especially the insane diff so the pattern is more interesting.
I'm sorry if I gave you a little advice. But, if any of my suggestions that you do not change it, no problem. And it depends on you whether it's good for you or not.

For example the picture I'll send in this forum next time. Be patient ^^

I hope you will get ranked map. Good luck :) ty!!!!!!!!

no reply=fix
nextplay
976 posts
Joined December 2015
nextplay
hi


[General]

Maybe consider add a easy? your normal uses a lot of 1/2 and 3-4 circles in a row which is pretty hard (for noobs). I can make one if you want xd

[Normal]

00:10:894 (4) - This is a bit too close at 3 move it to 230|348
00:48:306 (1,2,3,4,5) - too hard for a normal could use some 1/1 slider
idk actually the diff is pretty okay I just dislike the concept with 3-4 Circles in a row and the most curved slider which could be just straight ones

no kds
Dashyy-
751 posts
Joined May 2015
Topic Starter
Dashyy-

My Angel Kanan wrote:

hi


[General]

Maybe consider add a easy? your normal uses a lot of 1/2 and 3-4 circles in a row which is pretty hard (for noobs). I can make one if you want xd hmu

[Normal]

00:10:894 (4) - This is a bit too close at 3 move it to 230|348
00:48:306 (1,2,3,4,5) - too hard for a normal could use some 1/1 slider it's the peak tho
idk actually the diff is pretty okay I just dislike the concept with 3-4 Circles in a row and the most curved slider which could be just straight ones my style consists of weird sliders lo

no kds
i gave kds before reading the mod darn it
Nao Tomori
Nomination Assessment Team
3,089 posts
Joined December 2014
Nao Tomori
[insane]
00:06:483 (2,3,4) - 1/1 slider here would be nice since it's the next note from 00:05:953 (1) - imo

00:07:012 (5,6) - much better as a 1/1 slider here, since it matches to 00:05:953 (1) - in the song

00:16:894 (3) - imo this 1 should be a pretty high spacing jump, highest pitch and all that

00:27:836 (1,2,3) - 4 circles? you put 4 circles on this in the intro

00:39:836 (1,2,3,4,5) - here i think there should be a more dramatic change in something; sv, spacing, whateever, but this part is really different from earlier so highlighting that contrast is cute

00:52:189 (5,6) - making all of these 5s into 1/1 sliders could be nice. you'd highlight the fact that it's an extended vocal a lot more.

00:57:306 (2,3) - 1/1 slider?

00:58:718 (2,3) - same
highlighting cute vocals is nice

01:00:659 (5,6,7) - u could do some mad edgy rhythm following the background piano like http://puu.sh/wMMZL/bd049d827c.jpg xd

01:06:659 (1) - random 1 combo nc? lol

01:08:600 (2,3) - these ones too, ctrl g or 1/1 slider is really nice

[hard]
00:06:483 (2,3) - at least on hard, definitely good to put 1/1 here.

00:33:835 (9,1) - unrankable pixel overlap

00:41:248 (5,6) - you could follow the offbeat vocals here to make the section more unique

00:56:777 (1) - uhh the vocal here is pretty clear on the red tick at 00:57:305 - , making 2 1/1s here definitely fits more

[normal]
ok i like the normal xd
Dashyy-
751 posts
Joined May 2015
Topic Starter
Dashyy-

Naotoshi wrote:

[insane]
00:06:483 (2,3,4) - 1/1 slider here would be nice since it's the next note from 00:05:953 (1) - imo following drums tho :(

00:07:012 (5,6) - much better as a 1/1 slider here, since it matches to 00:05:953 (1) - in the song

00:16:894 (3) - imo this 1 should be a pretty high spacing jump, highest pitch and all that

00:27:836 (1,2,3) - 4 circles? you put 4 circles on this in the intro

00:39:836 (1,2,3,4,5) - here i think there should be a more dramatic change in something; sv, spacing, whateever, but this part is really different from earlier so highlighting that contrast is cute how about all of them

00:52:189 (5,6) - making all of these 5s into 1/1 sliders could be nice. you'd highlight the fact that it's an extended vocal a lot more. would kinda derail from the rhythm i had

00:57:306 (2,3) - 1/1 slider?

00:58:718 (2,3) - same
highlighting cute vocals is nice

01:00:659 (5,6,7) - u could do some mad edgy rhythm following the background piano like http://puu.sh/wMMZL/bd049d827c.jpg xd but muh important drum sounds

01:06:659 (1) - random 1 combo nc? lol

01:08:600 (2,3) - these ones too, ctrl g or 1/1 slider is really nice

[hard]
00:06:483 (2,3) - at least on hard, definitely good to put 1/1 here.

00:33:835 (9,1) - unrankable pixel overlap

00:41:248 (5,6) - you could follow the offbeat vocals here to make the section more unique i like the rhythm right now

00:56:777 (1) - uhh the vocal here is pretty clear on the red tick at 00:57:305 - , making 2 1/1s here definitely fits more don't want to ignore the important drum sounds tho

[normal]
ok i like the normal xd
ty!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Nowaie
1,021 posts
Joined December 2014
Nowaie
M4M from sm8 que

You can mod this -> https://osu.ppy.sh/s/656787

[]

General

00:05:601 - You don't need a red line here since you can have objects before the first one

Fix tags and kiai time snaps (aimod)

The map isn't hitsounded

01:19:364 - It would be nice to have the end's volume lowered a bit

00:48:305 - I feel like the hitsound here isn't audible enough. It may be with the additions whenever you add them but right now... not really. The volume might be too low aswell to represent the cymbal + drum hit


Easy

00:05:953 (2) - Maybe NC this since you have done that in the other difficulties

00:07:011 (3,1) - I mean structurally it would look better if this kind of overlapping would not happen


Normal

Some DS stuff in aimod

00:36:658 (5,1) - Perhaps you could suit visual flow here aswell? It kinda looks odd to have that one pattern not really flowing when literally everything else is atleast to some degree

00:37:011 (1,2,3) - Also it'd be nice to see if these would've formed some kind of a pattern since they all are mapped on the hold vocals, for example https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9131647

00:45:482 (1,3) - Visuals & structure kinda lacking because of the overlap :S

00:56:776 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - I feel like the 3 on the second pattern should be a 1/2 slider because of the vocal is different on it

00:59:600 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5) - No matter if you make that hitcircle I mentioned above into a 1/2 slider, the continuous object chain is extremely long for a normal difficulty. I'd recommend to remove the hitcircle on 01:00:835 (4) - , preferably 01:00:129 (2) - aswell, since the 4 is mapped on a silent synthesizer sound and the 2 is mapped on a similar drum hit you have ignored here 01:00:482 - for example


Hard

00:05:953 (1,2,1,2) - It'd be nice if you could work on the invisible structure atleast in your future maps ^^ (hit animations off if you want to see the overlaps properly)

00:08:070 (4,5) - 00:10:541 (3,4,5,6) - You really should be consistent with the rhythm and patterning choices. osu! is a rhythm game so similar rhythm should have similar representation through the mapping. Also regarding this, I think 00:10:894 (4,5,6) - this is bit too big spacing for a hard difficulty

00:37:011 (1,2) - This could be better if it was a 1/1slider|hitcircle or 1/2slider|hitcircle|hitcircle since it kinda feels awkward to have a hold on the 2 as there isn't really anything specific the hold would represent

00:40:894 (4,5,4,4,4,5) - I'm kinda confused why these aren't 1/2 sliders. The hitcircles are all mapped on hold vocals plus there is a drum beat on nearly every single red tick after the hitcircle

00:49:011 (3,4,5,6,7) - This pattern should have spacing emphasis for pretty obvious reasons

01:01:011 (6) - NC maybe since the combo getting quite long there

01:09:482 (4) - NC for consistency with 00:56:776 (1,2,3,1,2,3) -


Insane

00:11:600 (1,3) - Blanket

00:08:070 (4,5,6) - 00:13:717 (4,5,6,7) - Consistency in rhythm and spacing...

00:51:129 (1,2,3,4,5) - This kind of continuing ellipse movement feels weird when compared to the usual back and forth style. Most of the time you use ellipse movement for couple of objects 01:05:247 (1,2,3) - but then change back to the back and forth style 01:05:776 (3,4,5,6,7,8) -

00:51:129 (1,2) - Spacing like this just doesn't feel correct since the 2 is mapped on a snare drum which is supposed to be a strong beat. This could be fine for 3/4 slider->hitcircle but not for 1/2 sider->hitcircle. You might of course prioritize vocals but i don't think it'd fit to this kind of a song on this level since you follow the instrumentals through mapping choices while representing vocals through patterning and that doesn't really go hand in hand

Regarding the issue stated above if you are following vocals, why do you suddenly change the spacing emphasis to prioritize the melody here 00:53:247 (4,5,6,7) - ? 00:53:600 - Is definitely not that strong of a vocal

01:02:423 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - Combo gets really long here again

[]

Good luck~
Hectic
511 posts
Joined August 2015
Hectic
hi, nm from my queue

  1. why 2 red points? just make one on 00:04:542 -
  2. aimod
insane:
  1. 00:58:188 (1,2) - too close visually
  2. 01:16:541 (2) - nc for sv change?
hard:
  1. 00:08:070 (4,5,1) - make (1) a bit further from (4) and (5), visual distance
  2. 00:34:541 (2,4) - 00:52:894 (5,7) - 00:33:482 (3,1) - 00:54:482 (2,4) - too close
  3. 00:59:600 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - this place feels a bit too difficult imo. jumps, high object density
normal:
  1. 00:45:482 (1,3) - it looks meh
  2. 00:59:600 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5) - this chain of 1/2 gaps is too long, i'd make 1/1 somewhere
easy:
  1. 00:05:600 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - sliders deem to be difficult for beginners, perhaps make some circles
  2. 00:45:482 (3) - nc?
  3. 00:59:600 (1,2) - a bit too close
Hope I helped. Good luck
Dashyy-
751 posts
Joined May 2015
Topic Starter
Dashyy-

DTM9 Nowa wrote:

M4M from sm8 que

You can mod this -> https://osu.ppy.sh/s/656787

[]

General

00:05:601 - You don't need a red line here since you can have objects before the first one fix

Fix tags and kiai time snaps (aimod) a

The map isn't hitsounded a

01:19:364 - It would be nice to have the end's volume lowered a bit done

00:48:305 - I feel like the hitsound here isn't audible enough. It may be with the additions whenever you add them but right now... not really. The volume might be too low aswell to represent the cymbal + drum hit with the hitsounds i have in mind it should provide enough feedback


Easy

00:05:953 (2) - Maybe NC this since you have done that in the other difficulties yea

00:07:011 (3,1) - I mean structurally it would look better if this kind of overlapping would not happen doesn't impact gameplay too much so i think it should be fine


Normal

Some DS stuff in aimod

00:36:658 (5,1) - Perhaps you could suit visual flow here aswell? It kinda looks odd to have that one pattern not really flowing when literally everything else is atleast to some degree did

00:37:011 (1,2,3) - Also it'd be nice to see if these would've formed some kind of a pattern since they all are mapped on the hold vocals, for example https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9131647 kinda like how it is right now

00:45:482 (1,3) - Visuals & structure kinda lacking because of the overlap :S i tried to fix

00:56:776 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - I feel like the 3 on the second pattern should be a 1/2 slider because of the vocal is different on it fixy

00:59:600 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5) - No matter if you make that hitcircle I mentioned above into a 1/2 slider, the continuous object chain is extremely long for a normal difficulty. I'd recommend to remove the hitcircle on 01:00:835 (4) - , preferably 01:00:129 (2) - aswell, since the 4 is mapped on a silent synthesizer sound and the 2 is mapped on a similar drum hit you have ignored here 01:00:482 - for exampleyea done!!


Hard

00:05:953 (1,2,1,2) - It'd be nice if you could work on the invisible structure atleast in your future maps ^^ (hit animations off if you want to see the overlaps properly)invisible structure? wat

00:08:070 (4,5) - 00:10:541 (3,4,5,6) - You really should be consistent with the rhythm and patterning choices. osu! is a rhythm game so similar rhythm should have similar representation through the mapping. Also regarding this, I think 00:10:894 (4,5,6) - this is bit too big spacing for a hard difficulty ok no clue what i was doing for both of those lol

00:37:011 (1,2) - This could be better if it was a 1/1slider|hitcircle or 1/2slider|hitcircle|hitcircle since it kinda feels awkward to have a hold on the 2 as there isn't really anything specific the hold would represent following guitars eeeee

00:40:894 (4,5,4,4,4,5) - I'm kinda confused why these aren't 1/2 sliders. The hitcircles are all mapped on hold vocals plus there is a drum beat on nearly every single red tick after the hitcircle i didn't hear drum beat on red tick when i first mapped unlucky

00:49:011 (3,4,5,6,7) - This pattern should have spacing emphasis for pretty obvious reasons kinda looks retarded but i did something

01:01:011 (6) - NC maybe since the combo getting quite long there i nced on repeat sliders instead

01:09:482 (4) - NC for consistency with 00:56:776 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - d


Insane

00:11:600 (1,3) - Blanket don't see why i should

00:08:070 (4,5,6) - 00:13:717 (4,5,6,7) - Consistency in rhythm and spacing... d

00:51:129 (1,2,3,4,5) - This kind of continuing ellipse movement feels weird when compared to the usual back and forth style. Most of the time you use ellipse movement for couple of objects 01:05:247 (1,2,3) - but then change back to the back and forth style 01:05:776 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - i like to use varying movement with the same rhythm. it shouldn't be too big of an issue playability wise

00:51:129 (1,2) - Spacing like this just doesn't feel correct since the 2 is mapped on a snare drum which is supposed to be a strong beat. This could be fine for 3/4 slider->hitcircle but not for 1/2 sider->hitcircle. You might of course prioritize vocals but i don't think it'd fit to this kind of a song on this level since you follow the instrumentals through mapping choices while representing vocals through patterning and that doesn't really go hand in hand i was expecting some criticism on this so i guess i'll explain my reasons. yes, i was prioritizing vocals, as every circle leads into a jump to slider, where the next vocal verse is sung. now lets talk about what you mentioned here: i put sliders on "count" "the" "times", and times is held out for longer than normal, so i decided to map instruments on rather than making a long slider. stuff like that has been done on maps such as https://osu.ppy.sh/b/913490&m=0

for the part about the mapping choices or smth, i honestly don't understand what you mean. i tried to keep the style of the map consistent, so hopefully it's not too much of an issue that my patterns are too varying lol. if u could explain this point a little better that would help a ton.

Regarding the issue stated above if you are following vocals, why do you suddenly change the spacing emphasis to prioritize the melody here 00:53:247 (4,5,6,7) - ? 00:53:600 - Is definitely not that strong of a vocal snare hit, but not following vocals

01:02:423 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - Combo gets really long here again did

[]

Good luck~ ty!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

h4d0uk3n1 wrote:

hi, nm from my queue

  1. why 2 red points? just make one on 00:04:542 -
  2. aimod
insane:
  1. 00:58:188 (1,2) - too close visually tried something
  2. 01:16:541 (2) - nc for sv change? yes
hard:
  1. 00:08:070 (4,5,1) - make (1) a bit further from (4) and (5), visual distance moved 4 and 5 back instead cuz no room to move 1 :(
  2. 00:34:541 (2,4) - 00:52:894 (5,7) - 00:33:482 (3,1) - 00:54:482 (2,4) - too close fixed
  3. 00:59:600 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - this place feels a bit too difficult imo. jumps, high object density should be fine bcuz intense buildup
normal:
  1. 00:45:482 (1,3) - it looks meh fixd
  2. 00:59:600 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5) - this chain of 1/2 gaps is too long, i'd make 1/1 somewhere
easy:
  1. 00:05:600 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - sliders deem to be difficult for beginners, perhaps make some circles don't want it to become too scarce
  2. 00:45:482 (3) - nc? a
  3. 00:59:600 (1,2) - a bit too close looks fine imo
Hope I helped. Good luck !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Nowaie
1,021 posts
Joined December 2014
Nowaie

Dashyy- wrote:

00:51:129 (1,2) - Spacing like this just doesn't feel correct since the 2 is mapped on a snare drum which is supposed to be a strong beat. This could be fine for 3/4 slider->hitcircle but not for 1/2 sider->hitcircle. You might of course prioritize vocals but i don't think it'd fit to this kind of a song on this level since you follow the instrumentals through mapping choices while representing vocals through patterning and that doesn't really go hand in hand i was expecting some criticism on this so i guess i'll explain my reasons. yes, i was prioritizing vocals, as every circle leads into a jump to slider, where the next vocal verse is sung. now lets talk about what you mentioned here: i put sliders on "count" "the" "times", and times is held out for longer than normal, so i decided to map instruments on rather than making a long slider. stuff like that has been done on maps such as https://osu.ppy.sh/b/913490&m=0

for the part about the mapping choices or smth, i honestly don't understand what you mean. i tried to keep the style of the map consistent, so hopefully it's not too much of an issue that my patterns are too varying lol. if u could explain this point a little better that would help a ton.
Wrote this mod during a single lesson so it was kinda quickly written. By mapping choices i meant rhythm generally and mostly universally for the map begin inconsistent

Dashyy- wrote:

Regarding the issue stated above if you are following vocals, why do you suddenly change the spacing emphasis to prioritize the melody here 00:53:247 (4,5,6,7) - ? 00:53:600 - Is definitely not that strong of a vocal snare hit, but not following vocals
This is basically what i mean. In one part you clearly prioritize the vocals through patterning but in the next one you have super high spacing for a snare drum (prioritize drums through spacing even though there are vocals). osu! is a rhythm game and in rhythm games it's not really a good thing that a level constantly changes it's focus as it will create an experience that does not... work with itself

Since you are prioritizing vocals in the kiais (mostly) why aren't you for example prioritizing them here 00:34:188 (1,2,3,4,5) - in this pattern nor in generally in this section... or the next section?

[]

Dashyy- wrote:

00:51:129 (1,2,3,4,5) - This kind of continuing ellipse movement feels weird when compared to the usual back and forth style. Most of the time you use ellipse movement for couple of objects 01:05:247 (1,2,3) - but then change back to the back and forth style 01:05:776 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - i like to use varying movement with the same rhythm. it shouldn't be too big of an issue playability wise
It's not a big deal (+the visual look is subjective so i didn't point it out) and different kind of movement is a really nice feeling element. It only comes a problem when you consistently do one thing and then throw a single significantly different concept into the mix. My point was bit badly represented since I quickly wrote this mod but simply put, i'd love to see more different kind of concepts since most of the time the movement goes pretty quickly to this 01:02:952 (3,4,5,1,2,3,4) - kind of back and forth movement. When you are modding my map, I use a ton of different movement ideas but I change it all the time which makes the map feel much more interesting atleast imo

[]

Also by invisible structure I mean structure that is not visible on the playfield for the player. Most of it can be seen with hit animations off since you can structure the map so the patterning about a second before can be taken into the count. I'll quote my map (again) since that would be the easiest way of showing this. 02:33:990 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Over these ~4 seconds nothing, taking even sliderbodies into the count, overlaps unless it's pretty much perfectly stacked. That kind of patterning can be seen throughout the map with intentional exceptions which actually improves the overall structure and visual patterning. This is not necessary for the sake of ranking process as it's not showing for the player directly but you could think about it in future maps. For your hard diff i kinda pointed that out as the sliderbodies and hitcircles were pretty badly overlapping (and because similar stuff happens in hard and insane a lot c: )

[]

The mapset is really nice no matter what but you should consider the consistency throughout the mapset in rhythm choice, emphasis and through that pattern choice as inconsistency does not really work out too well in a rhythm game D:
Avena
2,158 posts
Joined December 2012
Avena
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

General
  1. Why not map the break? you cut the mp3 to a third of it, at least map all that you got.
Insane
  1. You can start the map with a spinner, it can emphasize the sounds nicely.
  2. 01:00:657 (3) - 01:01:363 (3) - Unsnapped Objects.
  3. 00:37:364 (2) - Move this down so it doesn't touch (1). It looks kind of messy right now.
  4. 00:43:011 (3) - Move this to the right so it doesn't touch (7).
  5. 00:53:247 (4,5,6,7,1) - Flow here is a little choppy, I don't really know the reasoning, but it just doesn't play so nicely. The main issue is the transition between 7 and 1. Maybe just move 1 to the right of 7? it could work.
  6. 00:56:776 (1,2) - Maybe blanket these a little better? could look neat.
  7. 00:57:305 (2,1) - Again, messy overlap.
  8. 01:08:070 (1,2) - Blanket could be a little better. If you temporarily ctrl+G (2), You can see that the approach circle doesn't fit on the slider body of (1).
  9. 01:08:600 (2,1) - Again, messy overlap.
  10. 01:10:012 (2,3) - ^
Hard
  1. Why are you using CS4.2? There's no reason for such circlesize, especially since Insane is CS4.
  2. 00:05:953 (1,1) - Overlap looks untidy, please make these not touch.
  3. 00:06:658 (3,2) - ^
  4. 00:08:423 (5,3) - ^
  5. 00:34:541 (2,4) - ^
  6. 00:42:658 (1,4) - ^
  7. 00:44:070 (1) - If you rotate this by 6 degrees, you can see that the slider isn't actually following the same angle.
  8. 00:44:776 (3,4) - Overlap
  9. 00:53:952 (1) - Again, angles aren't identical.
  10. 00:54:482 (2) - Not the most visually pleasing slider, but it can pass if you really like it. The main issue with it that it's very random compared to the rest of the map that uses pretty basic shapes.
  11. 01:04:188 (5,8) - That's a good overlap! Do em like that!
  12. 01:09:129 (3) - Missing hitsound
  13. 01:09:482 (1,2) - again
Normal
  1. You chose the worst distance snap possible, the circles touch but only on the edges, it just looks ehhhhhhhhh
  2. 00:11:600 (1,4) - Maybe make these the same angle for nice visuals?
  3. 00:15:482 (1,2) - Spacing Error.
  4. 00:38:423 (3,1) - aaa
  5. 00:45:482 (5) - ok this is the same thing i said on the previous diff.
Easy is fine, except for like, the same angle issues i mentioned previously.
Overall, the mapset plays really well, but your visuals and structure are heavily lacking.
If you want, I can give you a few tips about that, feel free to message me ingame for a chitchat :^)!
Rizen
1,662 posts
Joined August 2013
Rizen
hitsound remarks mentioned in Easy apply to other diffs too

Easy
  1. 00:27:835 - perhaps you can map these percussion beats with a 1/1 slider. They're rather prominent and you did it at one stage (00:05:600 (1) - )
  2. 01:08:070 (1) - missing clap on slider end
  3. 00:45:482 (1) - perhaps add a finish hitsound here for the cymbal crash in the music
  4. 01:13:364 (4) - I would add a clap here too, same percussion hit as 01:13:011 (3) - which was hitsounded with a clap
  5. 01:15:129 (6) - try adding a whistle here? would work better with the heavy guitar/drum imo
  6. 01:10:894 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - combo a bit too long (deviates from ususal NC per two measures pattern). Consider adding an NC at 01:13:717 (5) - or 01:15:129 (6) -
Normal
  1. 00:15:482 (1) - excessive NC. An NC only at 00:14:423 (1) - will suffice. Also because you didn't use this "NC pattern for any of the other diffs at this point of time
  2. 00:15:482 (1,2) - careful with spacing! (currently 1.37x when it should be around 1.2x)
  3. 00:28:541 (3) - add an NC here? It would fit well with the music as the verse starts here
  4. 00:45:482 (5) - missing NC
  5. 00:46:894 (7) - offscreen object
  6. 01:10:894 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - same as in Easy
Hard
  1. 00:09:482 (3,4) - you typically increase spacing for this type of rhythm/pattern e.g. 00:14:070 (5,1) - , 00:12:305 (3,1) - . so you can probably apply the same idea here. Also don't forget to NC if you do
  2. 00:12:658 (1) - the curve at the end of the slider doesn't seem very necessary. it actually breaks some of the slider design cohesion i.e. to 00:07:011 (1) -
  3. 00:34:541 (2,4) - the very slight overlap here seems kinda messy. Would make more sense imo if you overlap it some more like how you did it at 00:35:952 (2,4) -
  4. 00:45:129 (4) - possible to space this slider a little bit more to avoid the overlap with 00:44:776 (3) - ? e.g. https://puu.sh/xGgjm/42c5874de0.png
  5. 01:13:364 (8,9,1) - the flow here is kinda awkward. you have Anti-clockwise flow at 01:12:835 (5,6,7,8,9) - but then go the opposite rotational direction at 01:13:717 (1) - . I suggest ctrl+h'ing the slider to allow the rotational flow direction to continue in an Anti-clockwise manner. I think this would make the pattern play a bit better
Insane
  1. check AIMod for unsnapped objects
  2. 00:14:423 (1,5) - perhaps you can silence the slider ends of these extended sliders. There's no beat on those blue ticks so having a quieter hitnormal for those ticks would be beneficial
  3. 00:38:423 (5,6) - the "flow pattern" deviates from the other instances 00:37:011 (1,2) - and 00:37:717 (3,4) - in which the sliders are pretty much parallel (or opposing ends). I suggest coming up with new placements to continue on this idea e.g. https://puu.sh/xGgQJ/cb490cbce0.png
  4. 00:43:011 (3) - the idea i'm getting from the previous parts in this section is that you increase spacing for the snare/claps. however that idea isn't seen here. perhaps increase spacing here to make the idea more consistent
  5. 00:48:305 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - 20% volume for the start seems a bit too quiet imo. Consider applying the same increasing volume idea but starting at a higher initial volume. ~40% should be nice (e.g. 40/55/70/85/100)
  6. 00:53:952 (1,2) - a bit too spaced compared to other instances (e.g. 00:51:129 (1,2) - , 01:05:247 (1,2) - ). decrease spacing here a tad
  7. 01:10:894 (1,1) - same thing I mentioned previously about extended slider slider ends
glgl
Dashyy-
751 posts
Joined May 2015
Topic Starter
Dashyy-
for nowa, i did the 3/4 slider thing. the other thing about patterns i still don't think is a huige deal. if more people see it as an issu i'll change it tho

Avena wrote:

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

General
  1. Why not map the break? you cut the mp3 to a third of it, at least map all that you got. idk how to properly map break Lol
Insane
  1. You can start the map with a spinner, it can emphasize the sounds nicely. can't rlly do that cuz idk where to put it without sounding weird + placing green line to change volume unsnaps circle in beginning rip
  2. 01:00:657 (3) - 01:01:363 (3) - Unsnapped Objects. yes
  3. 00:37:364 (2) - Move this down so it doesn't touch (1). It looks kind of messy right now. yes
  4. 00:43:011 (3) - Move this to the right so it doesn't touch (7). yes
  5. 00:53:247 (4,5,6,7,1) - Flow here is a little choppy, I don't really know the reasoning, but it just doesn't play so nicely. The main issue is the transition between 7 and 1. Maybe just move 1 to the right of 7? it could work. yes
  6. 00:56:776 (1,2) - Maybe blanket these a little better? could look neat. not yes cuz blankets are overrated B)
  7. 00:57:305 (2,1) - Again, messy overlap. yes
  8. 01:08:070 (1,2) - Blanket could be a little better. If you temporarily ctrl+G (2), You can see that the approach circle doesn't fit on the slider body of (1). not yes
  9. 01:08:600 (2,1) - Again, messy overlap. not yes cuz that one is ok
  10. 01:10:012 (2,3) - ^not even an overlap wut



  1. Why are you using CS4.2? There's no reason for such circlesize, especially since Insane is CS4. g
  2. 00:05:953 (1,1) - Overlap looks untidy, please make these not touch.
  3. 00:06:658 (3,2) - ^
  4. 00:08:423 (5,3) - ^
  5. 00:34:541 (2,4) - ^
  6. 00:42:658 (1,4) - ^ did all but last one because idk how too fix that one :(
  7. 00:44:070 (1) - If you rotate this by 6 degrees, you can see that the slider isn't actually following the same angle. fix
  8. 00:44:776 (3,4) - Overlap f
  9. 00:53:952 (1) - Again, angles aren't identical. with what tho
  10. 00:54:482 (2) - Not the most visually pleasing slider, but it can pass if you really like it. The main issue with it that it's very random compared to the rest of the map that uses pretty basic shapes. it's a pishifat slider mmmmmm
  11. 01:04:188 (5,8) - That's a good overlap! Do em like that! i tried but it's really hard to get exact positioning for these :(
  12. 01:09:129 (3) - Missing hitsound fix ur program grumd
  13. 01:09:482 (1,2) - again
Normal
  1. You chose the worst distance snap possible, the circles touch but only on the edges, it just looks ehhhhhhhhh all low distance snaps on lower diffs look eh, this is like the only ok one
  2. 00:11:600 (1,4) - Maybe make these the same angle for nice visuals? forgot to copy paste f
  3. 00:15:482 (1,2) - Spacing Error. a
  4. 00:38:423 (3,1) - aaa dfkjasdfjlasdkfo;s
  5. 00:45:482 (5) - ok this is the same thing i said on the previous diff. didn't point anything out for this object on previous diff gg. if u talking about overlap tho i like this ojne the way it is
Easy is fine, except for like, the same angle issues i mentioned previously.
Overall, the mapset plays really well, but your visuals and structure are heavily lacking.
If you want, I can give you a few tips about that, feel free to message me ingame for a chitchat :^)!

a q p w wrote:

hitsound remarks mentioned in Easy apply to other diffs too

Easy
  1. 00:27:835 - perhaps you can map these percussion beats with a 1/1 slider. They're rather prominent and you did it at one stage (00:05:600 (1) - ) sure
  2. 01:08:070 (1) - missing clap on slider end a
  3. 00:45:482 (1) - perhaps add a finish hitsound here for the cymbal crash in the music fffffff
  4. 01:13:364 (4) - I would add a clap here too, same percussion hit as 01:13:011 (3) - which was hitsounded with a clap afasfasdfa
  5. 01:15:129 (6) - try adding a whistle here? would work better with the heavy guitar/drum imo asdasdasdasdasd
  6. 01:10:894 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - combo a bit too long (deviates from ususal NC per two measures pattern). Consider adding an NC at 01:13:717 (5) - or 01:15:129 (6) - added!!!!!!!!!!
Normal
  1. 00:15:482 (1) - excessive NC. An NC only at 00:14:423 (1) - will suffice. Also because you didn't use this "NC pattern for any of the other diffs at this point of time did
  2. 00:15:482 (1,2) - careful with spacing! (currently 1.37x when it should be around 1.2x)
  3. 00:28:541 (3) - add an NC here? It would fit well with the music as the verse starts here nced
  4. 00:45:482 (5) - missing NC nced
  5. 00:46:894 (7) - offscreen object not offscreen tho
  6. 01:10:894 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - same as in Easy
Hard
  1. 00:09:482 (3,4) - you typically increase spacing for this type of rhythm/pattern e.g. 00:14:070 (5,1) - , 00:12:305 (3,1) - . so you can probably apply the same idea here. Also don't forget to NC if you do i didn't tho?
  2. 00:12:658 (1) - the curve at the end of the slider doesn't seem very necessary. it actually breaks some of the slider design cohesion i.e. to 00:07:011 (1) - it looks fine tbh (it''s a pishi slider mmmm)
  3. 00:34:541 (2,4) - the very slight overlap here seems kinda messy. Would make more sense imo if you overlap it some more like how you did it at 00:35:952 (2,4) -
  4. 00:45:129 (4) - possible to space this slider a little bit more to avoid the overlap with 00:44:776 (3) - ? e.g. https://puu.sh/xGgjm/42c5874de0.png
  5. 01:13:364 (8,9,1) - the flow here is kinda awkward. you have Anti-clockwise flow at 01:12:835 (5,6,7,8,9) - but then go the opposite rotational direction at 01:13:717 (1) - . I suggest ctrl+h'ing the slider to allow the rotational flow direction to continue in an Anti-clockwise manner. I think this would make the pattern play a bit better used that to emphasize 1 cuz strongest sound eeeeeeee
Insane
  1. check AIMod for unsnapped objects
  2. 00:14:423 (1,5) - perhaps you can silence the slider ends of these extended sliders. There's no beat on those blue ticks so having a quieter hitnormal for those ticks would be beneficial ok
  3. 00:38:423 (5,6) - the "flow pattern" deviates from the other instances 00:37:011 (1,2) - and 00:37:717 (3,4) - in which the sliders are pretty much parallel (or opposing ends). I suggest coming up with new placements to continue on this idea e.g. https://puu.sh/xGgQJ/cb490cbce0.png did
  4. 00:43:011 (3) - the idea i'm getting from the previous parts in this section is that you increase spacing for the snare/claps. however that idea isn't seen here. perhaps increase spacing here to make the idea more consistent did things
  5. 00:48:305 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - 20% volume for the start seems a bit too quiet imo. Consider applying the same increasing volume idea but starting at a higher initial volume. ~40% should be nice (e.g. 40/55/70/85/100) ok
  6. 00:53:952 (1,2) - a bit too spaced compared to other instances (e.g. 00:51:129 (1,2) - , 01:05:247 (1,2) - ). decrease spacing here a tad
  7. 01:10:894 (1,1) - same thing I mentioned previously about extended slider slider ends ggggg
glgl
ty!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Uber
133 posts
Joined May 2016
Uber
i gave a bad irc mod
Dashyy-
751 posts
Joined May 2015
Topic Starter
Dashyy-
^ helped with aesthetics plz don't deny
Ambrew
431 posts
Joined January 2016
Ambrew
fmq~

Just some really minor things on insane

[Insane]
00:27:835 (1,2,3,4) - Review this hitsounding. Should be clap-whistle-whistle-clap, not clap-clap-whistle-clap
00:33:658 (4) - x:505 y:351
00:33:835 (5) - x:408 y:222
00:38:423 (5,6) - I would use bigger spacing here, since the sound starts to grow louder right around here
00:42:305 (7) - x:273 y:15
00:53:423 (5) - x:245 y:356
01:08:070 (1,2) - Blanket to me looks slightly off on the right side
01:10:541 (3) - Could fix the off-stack, here (01:09:129 (3) - ) next is 0.05, and here 01:10:541 (3) - it's 0.03

This is probably the only diff I can mod in, the rest of them look great, so I can't find anything to really improve

best of luck!
Dashyy-
751 posts
Joined May 2015
Topic Starter
Dashyy-

Ambrew wrote:

fmq~

Just some really minor things on insane

[Insane]
00:27:835 (1,2,3,4) - Review this hitsounding. Should be clap-whistle-whistle-clap, not clap-clap-whistle-clap a
00:33:658 (4) - x:505 y:351
00:33:835 (5) - x:408 y:222 how does that make them better tho
00:38:423 (5,6) - I would use bigger spacing here, since the sound starts to grow louder right around here yea
00:42:305 (7) - x:273 y:15
00:53:423 (5) - x:245 y:356 how does that make them better tho
01:08:070 (1,2) - Blanket to me looks slightly off on the right side did
01:10:541 (3) - Could fix the off-stack, here (01:09:129 (3) - ) next is 0.05, and here 01:10:541 (3) - it's 0.03 such a small difference i don't think anyone is gonna notic it while playin g lol

This is probably the only diff I can mod in, the rest of them look great, so I can't find anything to really improve

best of luck! ty!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Simuzax
251 posts
Joined September 2015
Simuzax
M4M return from your queue. Sry for late

[General]
maybe you could stop kiai here 01:01:717 then resume it here 01:02:423 to emphasize vocals a bit

[Easy]
01:16:541 (1) - youre missing a sound here, maybe reduce spinner duration by 1 tick or so and then put a circle at this timestamp for the guitar

[Normal]
01:13:717 (1) - kiai should end here
01:16:541 (1) - youre missing a sound here, maybe reduce spinner duration by 1 tick or so and then put a circle at this timestamp for the guitar

[Hard]
00:06:482 (2,2) - stack
00:08:423 (5,2) - ^
00:10:894 (7,2) - move these a bit and stack them
01:04:188 (5,8) - stack with sliderend
01:04:541 (6,1) - ^
01:04:717 (7,2) - stack
01:07:011 (5,8) - stack with sliderend

[Insane]
00:27:835 (1) - 00:31:364 (1) - theres a lot of unnecessary overlaps between these and its pretty weird looking when playing, idk why you did that
i'm not the best at doing that but you can use these placements if you want
SPOILER
147,242,27835,5,8,0:0:0:0:
320,264,28011,1,2,0:0:0:0:
236,160,28188,1,2,0:0:0:0:
244,284,28364,1,8,0:0:0:0:
340,152,28541,6,0,P|353:105|358:69,1,75
226,100,28894,2,0,L|239:184,1,60,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
320,264,29247,1,0,0:0:0:0:
340,152,29423,1,0,0:0:0:0:
164,168,29600,2,0,L|96:165,1,60,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
244,284,29952,6,0,P|252:317|251:350,1,60
140,301,30305,2,0,L|147:234,1,60,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
156,96,30658,1,0,0:0:0:0:
240,200,30835,1,0,0:0:0:0:
104,165,31011,1,8,0:0:0:0:
220,32,31188,1,0,0:0:0:0:
220,32,31276,1,0,0:0:0:0:
220,32,31364,6,0,P|261:34|300:46,1,60

00:44:600 (4,6) - stack these
00:45:482 (1,4) - ^
00:45:835 (3,1) - unnecessary overlap
01:09:835 (2) - ?

I cant find much tbh, the set itself is pretty clean and enjoyable, just have some weird looking overlaps. GL with the map, i hope to see it ranked. :)
Gordon
531 posts
Joined January 2016
Gordon
Heyo. From one of my modding queues.

EASY

00:07:011 (2,1) - Not one really for these kinds of overlaps. But its fine playing wise for easy players I suppose. Just think that there might be a better way to blanket this?

NORMAL

00:38:423 (3,1) - Blanket (3) in the curve of (1)
00:48:305 (1,2,3,4) - Ambiguous rhythm for a normal diff. Doable but highly doubt it will settle well with newer players.

HARD

00:08:423 (5,2) - Blanket
00:10:894 (7,2) - ^
00:49:011 (3,4,5,6,7) - The pattern is off.Mainly the (6) and (7) correlation. Try to make it visually the same.
01:01:717 (1) - Never really enjoy double repeats but hards are a stepping stone where you could start to introduce small streams.
Look over your overlapping objects and make them clean by blanketing them or spacing them slightly more.

INSANE

00:08:776 (1,3) - Overlap
00:28:188 (3,2) - ^
00:29:247 (3,1) - ^
00:44:600 (4,6) - ^
00:45:482 (1,4) - ^
00:48:835 (4,7) - ^
00:52:188 (5,3) - ^
00:55:011 (5,5) - ^
00:55:717 (3,6) - ^
00:56:423 (6,2) - ^
Only a few of some I'd like your to reconsider what to do with. But check this map again for its overlaps with upcoming and previous note overlaps.
00:39:129 (7) - NC
01:09:394 (1,2) - Unrankable

Good luck with your set. :) Fun song.
Dashyy-
751 posts
Joined May 2015
Topic Starter
Dashyy-

Simuzax wrote:

M4M return from your queue. Sry for late

[General]
maybe you could stop kiai here 01:01:717 then resume it here 01:02:423 to emphasize vocals a bit ok

[Easy]
01:16:541 (1) - youre missing a sound here, maybe reduce spinner duration by 1 tick or so and then put a circle at this timestamp for the guitar noobs need time to react to spinner tho eee

[Normal]
01:13:717 (1) - kiai should end here o
01:16:541 (1) - youre missing a sound here, maybe reduce spinner duration by 1 tick or so and then put a circle at this timestamp for the guitar noobs need time to react to spinner tho eee

[Hard]
00:06:482 (2,2) - stack
00:08:423 (5,2) - ^
00:10:894 (7,2) - move these a bit and stack them
01:04:188 (5,8) - stack with sliderend
01:04:541 (6,1) - ^
01:04:717 (7,2) - stack
01:07:011 (5,8) - stack with sliderend

stacks r dum

[Insane]
00:27:835 (1) - 00:31:364 (1) - theres a lot of unnecessary overlaps between these and its pretty weird looking when playing, idk why you did that
i'm not the best at doing that but you can use these placements if you want fixed these by myself
SPOILER
147,242,27835,5,8,0:0:0:0:
320,264,28011,1,2,0:0:0:0:
236,160,28188,1,2,0:0:0:0:
244,284,28364,1,8,0:0:0:0:
340,152,28541,6,0,P|353:105|358:69,1,75
226,100,28894,2,0,L|239:184,1,60,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
320,264,29247,1,0,0:0:0:0:
340,152,29423,1,0,0:0:0:0:
164,168,29600,2,0,L|96:165,1,60,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
244,284,29952,6,0,P|252:317|251:350,1,60
140,301,30305,2,0,L|147:234,1,60,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
156,96,30658,1,0,0:0:0:0:
240,200,30835,1,0,0:0:0:0:
104,165,31011,1,8,0:0:0:0:
220,32,31188,1,0,0:0:0:0:
220,32,31276,1,0,0:0:0:0:
220,32,31364,6,0,P|261:34|300:46,1,60

00:44:600 (4,6) - stack these
00:45:482 (1,4) - ^
00:45:835 (3,1) - unnecessary overlap fixed all aaa
01:09:835 (2) - ? ? whats wrong

I cant find much tbh, the set itself is pretty clean and enjoyable, just have some weird looking overlaps. GL with the map, i hope to see it ranked. :)

Xoul wrote:

Heyo. From one of my modding queues.

EASY

00:07:011 (2,1) - Not one really for these kinds of overlaps. But its fine playing wise for easy players I suppose. Just think that there might be a better way to blanket this? tried to make it better

NORMAL

00:38:423 (3,1) - Blanket (3) in the curve of (1) can't do that with ds :(
00:48:305 (1,2,3,4) - Ambiguous rhythm for a normal diff. Doable but highly doubt it will settle well with newer players. ficd

HARD

00:08:423 (5,2) - Blanket no
00:10:894 (7,2) - ^ no
00:49:011 (3,4,5,6,7) - The pattern is off.Mainly the (6) and (7) correlation. Try to make it visually the same. ok i tried
01:01:717 (1) - Never really enjoy double repeats but hards are a stepping stone where you could start to introduce small streams. but double repeats are more common in hards
Look over your overlapping objects and make them clean by blanketing them or spacing them slightly more.most of them are fine tho

INSANE

00:08:776 (1,3) - Overlap
00:28:188 (3,2) - ^
00:29:247 (3,1) - ^
00:44:600 (4,6) - ^
00:45:482 (1,4) - ^
00:48:835 (4,7) - ^
00:52:188 (5,3) - ^
00:55:011 (5,5) - ^
00:55:717 (3,6) - ^
00:56:423 (6,2) - ^
Only a few of some I'd like your to reconsider what to do with. But check this map again for its overlaps with upcoming and previous note overlaps. again most of them aren't even that big of a deal lol
00:39:129 (7) - NC ok
01:09:394 (1,2) - Unrankable what the fuck how did that happen

Good luck with your set. :) Fun song.

ty!!!!!!!
ShinodaYuu
631 posts
Joined May 2016
ShinodaYuu
Hi, from my queue

[Easy]
00:11:600 (1,2) - Space equally
00:16:541 (3) - Uncomfortable, CTRL G

[Normal]
00:28:541 (3) - NC

[Hard]
00:09:835 (4) - NC, also it's offscreen object (unrankable)

[Insane]
00:51:129 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - I understand the idea, but it doesn't represent song well. First one is OK, but you should change the second and third one to 1/2
00:53:952 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - ^

Hope will be helpful
Nice map, I'll leave a star :D
Sharkie
343 posts
Joined May 2014
Sharkie
what up my dude


[General]
00:39:835 - 00:48:129 - This whole section has floor toms on every eighth note. (Every 1/2)
I'd hitsound that

[Easy]
  1. 00:12:658 (2) - Not sure why this is spaced x.87, should be x1 or x.99 like everything else
  2. 01:00:658 (2) - I'd move this to x:333 y:255 so it looks better. Like this.

    good
[Hard]
  1. 00:16:541 (5,6) - Same thing as the easy (what I said about 00:12:658 (2) -)
[Insane]
  1. 00:45:482 (1) - Considering how accented this note is, I'd space it out more.
cool set +1
BlakeIsMyWaifu
50 posts
Joined March 2015
BlakeIsMyWaifu
From my modding Q

Easy
00:12:658 (2) - Everything is 1.0x DS then this is 0.87x?
00:16:541 (3,1) - That is a long break that you could map. Is there a reason or just lazy?

Hard
00:45:482 (1) - That slider looks ugly
00:54:482 (2) - ^
01:12:835 (5,6,7,8,9) - It is a hard, be nice
01:16:541 (2) - Another odd looking slider

Good luck with mapset!
Dashyy-
751 posts
Joined May 2015
Topic Starter
Dashyy-

Milar001 wrote:

Hi, from my queue

[Easy]
00:11:600 (1,2) - Space equally fic
00:16:541 (3) - Uncomfortable, CTRL G why tho it's slow enough to react to

[Normal]
00:28:541 (3) - NC g

[Hard]
00:09:835 (4) - NC, also it's offscreen object (unrankable) fixx

[Insane]
00:51:129 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - I understand the idea, but it doesn't represent song well. First one is OK, but you should change the second and third one to 1/2 all three of them are held out tho
00:53:952 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - ^

Hope will be helpful
Nice map, I'll leave a star :D

Sharkie wrote:

what up my dude


[General]
00:39:835 - 00:48:129 - This whole section has floor toms on every eighth note. (Every 1/2)
I'd hitsound that did

[Easy]
  1. 00:12:658 (2) - Not sure why this is spaced x.87, should be x1 or x.99 like everything else
  2. 01:00:658 (2) - I'd move this to x:333 y:255 so it looks better. Like this. ok

    good
[Hard]
  1. 00:16:541 (5,6) - Same thing as the easy (what I said about 00:12:658 (2) -)not all of hard is dsed
[Insane]
  1. 00:45:482 (1) - Considering how accented this note is, I'd space it out more. did
cool set +1 thanks babe

BlakeBestWaifu wrote:

From my modding Q

Easy
00:12:658 (2) - Everything is 1.0x DS then this is 0.87x?
00:16:541 (3,1) - That is a long break that you could map. Is there a reason or just lazy? song here is zzzzzzzzzzzzz

Hard
00:45:482 (1) - That slider looks ugly it's a pishi slider which means best slider
00:54:482 (2) - ^
01:12:835 (5,6,7,8,9) - It is a hard, be nice intense portion of song = big spacing
01:16:541 (2) - Another odd looking slider ok how is that odd it's pretty common

Good luck with mapset!
ty!!
HLN
193 posts
Joined August 2016
HLN
From my queue )/

Normal
00:46:541 (1) - Add nc.

Hard
00:06:482 (2,2) - Make these notes at the same position.
01:09:482 (1,2) - Try removing the overlap.
01:13:717 (1,2) - Very long sliders, looks awkward.

Good luck with the mapset :)
DeletedUser_423548
DeletedUser_423548
Have you read my post?
p/6313495/
You are mod modifying another map. :(
Actually M4M does not hold, but I do mod. You do not need to mod into the map I recently posted
This time it's special :)

Easy
  1. 00:07:011 (2,1) - I think that overlapping of the slider slides is fine, but it is better to avoid overlapping at the beginning of the slider
  2. 00:28:541 (1,3) - It is very close and looks cramped (3) should be brought a little to the left
  3. 00:52:894 (3,2) - overlap
  4. 00:56:776 (1,1) - 01:02:070 (4,2) - I think that it is better to stack
    If you are making it intentionally please go through
  5. 01:02:070 (4) - Additions Drum Clap is better
  6. 01:04:188 (3,2) - overlap
  7. 01:08:070 (1,2) - I am very awkward.
    01:08:070 (1) - 01:08:070(1) - I think that you can copy this and make it 90 ° with Ctrl+Shit+R Image
Normal
  1. 00:14:423 (1,1) - Can not stack?
  2. 00:58:188 (1,2) - 01:07:717 (7,1) - Why are the distances different?
  3. 01:02:070 (7) - Additions Drum Clap is better
  4. 01:13:011 (3) - Add NC
    00:16:541 (1) - like this
Hard
  1. 00:15:482 (3) - 00:16:541 (5) - Add NC
    just like Normal
  2. 01:02:070 (2) - Additions Drum Clap is better
  3. 00:14:423 (1,2,3,4) - 01:10:894 (1,2,3,4) - Why is the rhythm different?
Insane
  1. 00:31:364 (1,3) - overlap
  2. 00:32:247 (4,1) - Considering your mapping I think that it is better not to be a stack
  3. 01:02:070 (5,6,7,8) - Additions Drum Clap is better
Good luck!
Dashyy-
751 posts
Joined May 2015
Topic Starter
Dashyy-

LowLevelPro wrote:

From my queue )/

Normal
00:46:541 (1) - Add nc. did

Hard
00:06:482 (2,2) - Make these notes at the same position. fine as it is
01:09:482 (1,2) - Try removing the overlap. made it nicer
01:13:717 (1,2) - Very long sliders, looks awkward. idk it looks fine rn

Good luck with the mapset :)

Yasaija 714 wrote:

Have you read my post?
p/6313495/
You are mod modifying another map. :(
Actually M4M does not hold, but I do mod. You do not need to mod into the map I recently posted
This time it's special :) in ur post ithe link brought me to beaver lol must've clicked the wrong link srry

Easy
  1. 00:07:011 (2,1) - I think that overlapping of the slider slides is fine, but it is better to avoid overlapping at the beginning of the slider ok i did something
  2. 00:28:541 (1,3) - It is very close and looks cramped (3) should be brought a little to the left did
  3. 00:52:894 (3,2) - overlap why tho it looks gross
  4. 00:56:776 (1,1) - 01:02:070 (4,2) - I think that it is better to stack yes
    If you are making it intentionally please go through
  5. 01:02:070 (4) - Additions Drum Clap is better dont get why? added custom clap here tho so i guess kinda changed
  6. 01:04:188 (3,2) - overlap
  7. 01:08:070 (1,2) - I am very awkward. no ur not ur cute <3
    01:08:070 (1) - 01:08:070(1) - I think that you can copy this and make it 90 ° with Ctrl+Shit+R Image ok
Normal
  1. 00:14:423 (1,1) - Can not stack? did
  2. 00:58:188 (1,2) - 01:07:717 (7,1) - Why are the distances different? fix
  3. 01:02:070 (7) - Additions Drum Clap is better
  4. 01:13:011 (3) - Add NC
    00:16:541 (1) - like this fix
Hard
  1. 00:15:482 (3) - 00:16:541 (5) - Add NC ok
    just like Normal
  2. 01:02:070 (2) - Additions Drum Clap is better
  3. 00:14:423 (1,2,3,4) - 01:10:894 (1,2,3,4) - Why is the rhythm different? fixed
Insane
  1. 00:31:364 (1,3) - overlap looks bad imo
  2. 00:32:247 (4,1) - Considering your mapping I think that it is better not to be a stack did
  3. 01:02:070 (5,6,7,8) - Additions Drum Clap is better
Good luck!
ty!!!!
Mir
osu! Alumni
2,151 posts
Joined July 2016
Mir
Hitsounding

00:51:394 - Please silence these ends on Insane they feel so out of place.

Insane
- 00:28:894 (2,5) - A bit too close, move 5 away a bit?
- 00:31:364 (1,3) - eee ^
- 00:56:070 (4,5,6,7) - Felt underwhelming compared to the song, maybe buff this a bit? https://i.imgur.com/9QoZNAY.png or something idk
- 00:56:776 - How come you did something different for here and 01:08:070 -? The latter has stacks and the former doesn't?
- 01:16:541 (1) - Try higher SV? Feels a bit weak too. Maybe NC it too. Apply for all diffs (the NC).

Visuals feel slightly unorganized... might want to make things a bit more structured in that sense. Example: 01:05:247 (1,3,5) - If 1 and 3 are curved and all follow the same thing, shouldn't 5 also be curved? 00:28:541 (1,2) - 00:29:952 (1,2) - same thing. Would be nicer if they were the same shape instead of juxtaposing two different shapes for the same thing.

That's pretty much all it is, you can easily fix some of this.

Normal
- 00:08:423 (7) - Circle could fit to lower density a bit here. Could do this for all of these patterns.
- 01:16:541 - Better circle than spinner tbh. Spinner has no impact. Same for Easy diff.

Easy
- 00:09:835 (2) - Sugoi jump!

Seems to be okay for the most part. I'll possibly come back, but don't call me.
CucumberCuc
1,316 posts
Joined January 2016
CucumberCuc
Hello
M4M
[Easy]
00:08:776 (1,2) check distance pls
00:29:952 (3,1,2) ^
01:01:717 (3,4,1) ^
01:03:835 (2) i think this can move a bit left-down for better distance
[Normal]
00:14:070 (7,1) do slightly are close for better distance?
01:07:717 (7,1) overlap very are close
[Hard]
01:11:776 maybe put here circle?
01:16:011 ^ for vocal sound
[Insane]
*slightly not good for mod this diff*
00:12:658 (1,5) have bad overlap
00:30:835 (4) maybe move slightly up what be 2,4 slightly was not are close
00:32:070 (3) ^ too, but down
00:29:247 (3,1) - 00:32:247 (4,1) different overlap distance
00:45:835 (3) i think end slider can move left for better flow
strange moment when you 00:52:188 (5,1) do slightly far and on 00:55:011 (5,1) have overlap
01:02:423 (1,2) have very are close overlap then next objects 3,4, maybe try this?
01:16:011 as for Hard
Dashyy-
751 posts
Joined May 2015
Topic Starter
Dashyy-

Mir wrote:

Hitsounding

00:51:394 - Please silence these ends on Insane they feel so out of place. ok did

Insane
- 00:28:894 (2,5) - A bit too close, move 5 away a bit? fix
- 00:31:364 (1,3) - eee ^ fix2
- 00:56:070 (4,5,6,7) - Felt underwhelming compared to the song, maybe buff this a bit? https://i.imgur.com/9QoZNAY.png or something idk kinda like how it is atm since 6 and 7's vocals are lower pitch so i used lower spacing zzz
- 00:56:776 - How come you did something different for here and 01:08:070 -? The latter has stacks and the former doesn't? yeah idk what i was doing there fixed
- 01:16:541 (1) - Try higher SV? Feels a bit weak too. Maybe NC it too. Apply for all diffs (the NC). it's nced tho? did sv thing

Visuals feel slightly unorganized... might want to make things a bit more structured in that sense. Example: 01:05:247 (1,3,5) - If 1 and 3 are curved and all follow the same thing, shouldn't 5 also be curved? 00:28:541 (1,2) - 00:29:952 (1,2) - same thing. Would be nicer if they were the same shape instead of juxtaposing two different shapes for the same thing. i kinda liked the whole thing with the different slider shapes as i think it's kind of a unique concept (trying to explain my reasoning without saying it's my style lol) i'll fix some that look rlly ugly tho

That's pretty much all it is, you can easily fix some of this.

Normal
- 00:08:423 (7) - Circle could fit to lower density a bit here. Could do this for all of these patterns. did
- 01:16:541 - Better circle than spinner tbh. Spinner has no impact. Same for Easy diff. ok

Easy
- 00:09:835 (2) - Sugoi jump! Hai!

Seems to be okay for the most part. I'll possibly come back, but don't call me.

CucumberCuc wrote:

Hello
M4M
[Easy]
00:08:776 (1,2) check distance pls
00:29:952 (3,1,2) ^
01:01:717 (3,4,1) ^ did all
01:03:835 (2) i think this can move a bit left-down for better distance ok
[Normal]
00:14:070 (7,1) do slightly are close for better distance? would break time distance equality :(
01:07:717 (7,1) overlap very are close fix
[Hard]
01:11:776 maybe put here circle?
01:16:011 ^ for vocal sound don't do either in any diffs so would be confusing
[Insane]
*slightly not good for mod this diff*
00:12:658 (1,5) have bad overlap both objects are far enough to the point where it doesn't look terrible z
00:30:835 (4) maybe move slightly up what be 2,4 slightly was not are close ok
00:32:070 (3) ^ too, but down don't like that one tho
00:29:247 (3,1) - 00:32:247 (4,1) different overlap distance fix
00:45:835 (3) i think end slider can move left for better flow fine how it is
strange moment when you 00:52:188 (5,1) do slightly far and on 00:55:011 (5,1) have overlap it's my bad aesthetics
01:02:423 (1,2) have very are close overlap then next objects 3,4, maybe try this? did something else cuz ur suggestion is offscreen :(
01:16:011 as for Hard
ty both!!!!!!!!!

will mod both of ur maps tommorow zz
_orange
440 posts
Joined September 2015
_orange
m4m, great song!

[Easy]

01:04:188 (3,2) - Could you possibly get rid of this overlap? it might be possible if you move some things around a bit

[Normal]

00:15:482 (1) - I don't think this NC is really necessary, it's really similar to 00:14:423 (1,2) - anyway 01:11:952 (1,2) - same here
00:59:247 (3) - Imo you could make this into a single circle so that it's the same as 00:56:776 (1,2,3) - and i think it just feels better with a small recovery break

[Hard]

00:42:305 (5) - Kinda awkward, could you ctrl+h it or something?
01:00:658 (5,8) - Make these parallel, it makes it look a lot cleaner
01:09:482 (1,2) - Blanket this pls :p
01:10:894 (4) - NC
01:11:423 (5) - 01:12:482 (2) - Missing hitsounds like in the insane diff

The spacing emphasis in some parts of this diff is a bit problematic. 00:51:129 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,1,2,3) - This whole section doesn't have any spacing emphasis. At least do it on downbeats like you did before the kiai section. 00:56:776 (1) - 00:53:952 (1) - 01:05:247 (1) - 01:08:070 (1) -

You also have these jumps in two specific parts 01:12:835 (3,4,5,6,7,1) - in the rest of the diff you only break dsitance spacing on really important notes. so these jumps at the end seem unfitting and really difficult. 00:49:364 (5,6,7) - also applies here to a smaller extent. Just to show you how hard these actually are, I deleted the jumps and the diff went from 3.35* to 3.07* which is pretty huge imo.

Despite the spacing problems, I really like this diff! I love the slider design and the flow

[Insane]

00:41:952 (6,7) - Space these out more
00:51:482 (2) - Clap
00:54:305 (2,3) - Increase spacing
01:13:011 (5) - NC?
01:09:129 (3) - 01:10:541 (6) - Missing claps on the heads
There's a few overlaps that aren't so pretty

Love the song and map c: I hope you get this ranked
Dashyy-
751 posts
Joined May 2015
Topic Starter
Dashyy-

_orange wrote:

m4m, great song!

[Easy]

01:04:188 (3,2) - Could you possibly get rid of this overlap? it might be possible if you move some things around a bit ok

[Normal]

00:15:482 (1) - I don't think this NC is really necessary, it's really similar to 00:14:423 (1,2) - anyway 01:11:952 (1,2) - same here agree
00:59:247 (3) - Imo you could make this into a single circle so that it's the same as 00:56:776 (1,2,3) - and i think it just feels better with a small recovery break it's a nice buildup + 01:01:011 (5,6) - provided recovery here so should be alright

[Hard]

00:42:305 (5) - Kinda awkward, could you ctrl+h it or something? how is it awkward? it goes with 00:41:247 (1,2,3,4) - 's flow
01:00:658 (5,8) - Make these parallel, it makes it look a lot cleaner ok
01:09:482 (1,2) - Blanket this pls :p ok2
01:10:894 (4) - NC yes
01:11:423 (5) - 01:12:482 (2) - Missing hitsounds like in the insane diff thx

The spacing emphasis in some parts of this diff is a bit problematic. 00:51:129 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,1,2,3) - This whole section doesn't have any spacing emphasis. At least do it on downbeats like you did before the kiai section. 00:56:776 (1) - 00:53:952 (1) - 01:05:247 (1) - 01:08:070 (1) - ok yeah i did some

You also have these jumps in two specific parts 01:12:835 (3,4,5,6,7,1) - in the rest of the diff you only break dsitance spacing on really important notes. so these jumps at the end seem unfitting and really difficult. 00:49:364 (5,6,7) - also applies here to a smaller extent. Just to show you how hard these actually are, I deleted the jumps and the diff went from 3.35* to 3.07* which is pretty huge imo. but like drums at the end are intense so intense jumps to show that climax

Despite the spacing problems, I really like this diff! I love the slider design and the flow

[Insane]

00:41:952 (6,7) - Space these out more tried
00:51:482 (2) - Clap no snare hit tho
00:54:305 (2,3) - Increase spacing already spaced as far as possible
01:13:011 (5) - NC? a
01:09:129 (3) - 01:10:541 (6) - Missing claps on the heads aaaaa
There's a few overlaps that aren't so pretty

Love the song and map c: I hope you get this ranked
ty!
HootOwlStar
750 posts
Joined May 2014
HootOwlStar
  • easy
  1. 00:07:011 (2,3,1) - there should be an alternative to avoid the overlap and i'm sure you could find out one
  2. 01:10:894 (1) - could consider making the slider to be 3/2 instead, taking 00:14:423 (1,2) - as reference
  • normal
  1. 00:33:835 (5) - adjusting the position to be lower than 00:32:776 (4) - would introduce a better circular flow instead of the current one which is rather obstructed
  2. 00:59:600 (1,2,3,4,5) - these don't seem to follow major musical beats and serve more as filler rhythms, in which they are unnatural to play imo. following the synths would be better
  • hard
  1. 00:05:601 (1,1) - stacking or bigger distances would emphasize the introduction better since it provides the kick better idk the idea is as you implemented in the highest difficulty
  2. 01:16:541 - personally think that stopping the map here would be better since the continuation from the cut-off point is quite weird frankly. same as insane though
  • insane
  1. 01:07:717 (6,7) - consider to ctrl+g these two notes to provide a better flow
  2. 01:10:894 (1,2) - relative distance time concept is ruined here. this is the only exception where 1/4 gap is spaced so maybe fix it up or sth
sorry for bad modding. good luck in everything!
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply

0
8 / 70