beep boop, sorrymasen
[Inner Oni]
00:36:946 (190,191,192,193) - really strange usage of 1/6; from the idea it can work but the dkkd constellation looks less senseful to me. it'd rather work out as dddk or instead to have the 1/6 starting at 00:37:130 - where the sounds are stronger and more audible. Although I believe you probably will prefer to keep the 1/6 on 00:36:946 - .
00:41:179 (225,226,227,228,229,230) - this plays straight oddly. While other parts sounds pretty nice with doublets and quadralets, this (and some other incoming) works not well. ddk d k is the way I'd suggest.
00:45:596 - 00:49:645 - The hitsounding here looks confusing and less senseful than the first loop between 00:39:339 - 00:45:228 - . Whether if you don't want necessarily to copy+paste that (or making it not too similar) or if you have structure for this part is up to you but this doesn't look well done to me.
00:51:670 (308,309,310,311,312,313) - another case similar to 00:41:179 (225,226,227,228,229,230) - . oo oooo or oo oo o works out better than oooo oo.
00:54:615 (331,332,333,334,335,336) - This could also be changed into oo oooo, preferably kk dkkd. That one would sound pretty nice.
01:03:541 (402) - I felt that a oo o ooo pattern sounds much better. The kat sounds would be by far stronger and more emphasized to the song.
01:06:486 (422) - ^
01:12:468 (464,465,466,467,468) - What about ddkdk or ddkkk? I don't really get behind the current pattern constellation.
01:21:118 (530,531,532,533,534,535) - I think I get behind the idea of that pattern - which I like it - however, I see another option of having ooooo o instead, maybe kdkkk d?
01:22:406 (540,541,542,543,544,545,546) - ddkdd kdd would work out better if you ask me, the quadralet usage for this part of the song is indeed weird.
01:25:351 (563,564,565,566,567,568) - another case where the quadralet + doublet barely makes sense to me. I'd go with o ooooo but I don't know if there's something behind the current pattern.
01:27:008 (576,577,578,579) - I'd do dkkd if you urgently want to keep the hitobjects on their current time spots.
So to summarize: 01:20:566 - 01:32:345 - and 00:45:228 - 01:02:897 - are veeeeeeeeeeeeeery questionable, even quite oddly to follow. Some attempts of creating your "own rhythm" with the usage of quadra- and doublets are good - and I support them - but many feels overdone and either skips actually stronger beats or feels "wrong" in the way of sounding not that good.
[Oni]
I still have to say that the doublet usage take some getting used to listen/play but they're MUCH MUCH better than the Inner Oni. However, I still find you can reduce/redo some.
00:25:995 (89) - ddk d seems to work as well and it'd actually make it out. It's not dramatical but still weird to me.
00:28:940 (109) - ^
00:30:688 (122,123,124,125,126) - What about kkd k d? It's still a different sort of pattern AND connects better to the rest of that part.
00:33:633 (142,143,144,145,146) - ^
01:42:652 (571) - I'd go with kkddk, the choice of having this note as d despite the rest gets for this sound of the song a kat sound is... odd.
[Muzukashii]
The kkd triplets and kd doublets feels really uncomfortable to me, difficulty-wise. The actual "strength" of the difficulty is the slightly higher density (mostly due the spread but that's okay) and using a fair amount of triplets. I wouldn't go further by using even more complex elements. For the rest I am actually fine the way it is.
I briefly went over Kantan/Futsuu since it's nearly six a.m. and I didn't expect that I'd be that late with the mod. However, from what I saw they're fine and will be - for the next time - checked once more. For now, the main problem is the Inner Oni, as well Oni could also be adjusted a bit - while Oni uses them in much more appropriate ways. I consulted some opinions from #taiko have some "confirmation" that I am not the only one with this opinion. As well to have some more ideas/alternatives/blah to support you.
[Inner Oni]
00:36:946 (190,191,192,193) - really strange usage of 1/6; from the idea it can work but the dkkd constellation looks less senseful to me. it'd rather work out as dddk or instead to have the 1/6 starting at 00:37:130 - where the sounds are stronger and more audible. Although I believe you probably will prefer to keep the 1/6 on 00:36:946 - .
00:41:179 (225,226,227,228,229,230) - this plays straight oddly. While other parts sounds pretty nice with doublets and quadralets, this (and some other incoming) works not well. ddk d k is the way I'd suggest.
00:45:596 - 00:49:645 - The hitsounding here looks confusing and less senseful than the first loop between 00:39:339 - 00:45:228 - . Whether if you don't want necessarily to copy+paste that (or making it not too similar) or if you have structure for this part is up to you but this doesn't look well done to me.
00:51:670 (308,309,310,311,312,313) - another case similar to 00:41:179 (225,226,227,228,229,230) - . oo oooo or oo oo o works out better than oooo oo.
00:54:615 (331,332,333,334,335,336) - This could also be changed into oo oooo, preferably kk dkkd. That one would sound pretty nice.
01:03:541 (402) - I felt that a oo o ooo pattern sounds much better. The kat sounds would be by far stronger and more emphasized to the song.
01:06:486 (422) - ^
01:12:468 (464,465,466,467,468) - What about ddkdk or ddkkk? I don't really get behind the current pattern constellation.
01:21:118 (530,531,532,533,534,535) - I think I get behind the idea of that pattern - which I like it - however, I see another option of having ooooo o instead, maybe kdkkk d?
01:22:406 (540,541,542,543,544,545,546) - ddkdd kdd would work out better if you ask me, the quadralet usage for this part of the song is indeed weird.
01:25:351 (563,564,565,566,567,568) - another case where the quadralet + doublet barely makes sense to me. I'd go with o ooooo but I don't know if there's something behind the current pattern.
01:27:008 (576,577,578,579) - I'd do dkkd if you urgently want to keep the hitobjects on their current time spots.
So to summarize: 01:20:566 - 01:32:345 - and 00:45:228 - 01:02:897 - are veeeeeeeeeeeeeery questionable, even quite oddly to follow. Some attempts of creating your "own rhythm" with the usage of quadra- and doublets are good - and I support them - but many feels overdone and either skips actually stronger beats or feels "wrong" in the way of sounding not that good.
[Oni]
I still have to say that the doublet usage take some getting used to listen/play but they're MUCH MUCH better than the Inner Oni. However, I still find you can reduce/redo some.
00:25:995 (89) - ddk d seems to work as well and it'd actually make it out. It's not dramatical but still weird to me.
00:28:940 (109) - ^
00:30:688 (122,123,124,125,126) - What about kkd k d? It's still a different sort of pattern AND connects better to the rest of that part.
00:33:633 (142,143,144,145,146) - ^
01:42:652 (571) - I'd go with kkddk, the choice of having this note as d despite the rest gets for this sound of the song a kat sound is... odd.
[Muzukashii]
The kkd triplets and kd doublets feels really uncomfortable to me, difficulty-wise. The actual "strength" of the difficulty is the slightly higher density (mostly due the spread but that's okay) and using a fair amount of triplets. I wouldn't go further by using even more complex elements. For the rest I am actually fine the way it is.
I briefly went over Kantan/Futsuu since it's nearly six a.m. and I didn't expect that I'd be that late with the mod. However, from what I saw they're fine and will be - for the next time - checked once more. For now, the main problem is the Inner Oni, as well Oni could also be adjusted a bit - while Oni uses them in much more appropriate ways. I consulted some opinions from #taiko have some "confirmation" that I am not the only one with this opinion. As well to have some more ideas/alternatives/blah to support you.