extra
00:11:000 (1,2,3,4) - could do something differently with the second two sliders as they add those hard sounds you use the normal hitnormal for. just separating the sets in a different pattern or flipping can do the trick if you don't want to make them active 1/4s. the simples solution i can come up with would be <!-- m --><a href='https://mok.s-ul.eu/sNLBqEG0' rel='nofollow'>https://mok.s-ul.eu/sNLBqEG0</a><!-- m --> , optionally with a ctrl g on 3 or something fancy that would however be asymmetric
00:11:715 (1) - in case you deny the first suggestion. maybe ctrl j+h this one. you usually have higher spacing on these long notes on downbeats, so having it so low here seems out of place. pute flipping causes some overlaps that might not be in line with what you want with the map though and creates harsh movement. so perhaps better go about it in some new way
00:23:143 (1) - i'd suggest a rhythm like <!-- m --><a href='https://mok.s-ul.eu/TZV3ojns' rel='nofollow'>https://mok.s-ul.eu/TZV3ojns</a><!-- m --> . i find it rather odd to not map those 1/4s in any way as they are of the same instrument as the sliders and there being nothing else to keep that focus
00:28:322 (6,7,8) - ctrl g for aligning spacing with pitches and not having that uncharacteristic back and forth on unequal sounds
00:30:286 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1) - recommending a rearrangement like <!-- m --><a href='https://mok.s-ul.eu/5f314Wbu' rel='nofollow'>https://mok.s-ul.eu/5f314Wbu</a><!-- m --> . reason being that pitch changes are neatly bundled together with 1 being in a different place and you can capture that second triple that is paired with the first one in the song
00:44:572 (1,2,3,4) - maybe stack those so you don't assimilate the two instuments in the stream as much. would take a repositioning as well for example with the sliders stacking on the note you now stack 8 on <!-- m --><a href='https://mok.s-ul.eu/2ZMHZYtP' rel='nofollow'>https://mok.s-ul.eu/2ZMHZYtP</a><!-- m -->
00:56:000 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16) - i imagine you'll want to keep this simple but i'll present the alternative of splitting the stream up according to the gaps in the song like <!-- m --><a href='https://mok.s-ul.eu/f44Jt4y5' rel='nofollow'>https://mok.s-ul.eu/f44Jt4y5</a><!-- m --> or different placing if this doesn't suit your taste. i just personally dislike it being one uniform stream evne with that trumpet
01:25:108 (3) - suggesting to split this, the instrument the three sliders are mapped to has two rather than just one hit here, quite prominently so.
01:31:179 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - this burst is quite out of place in this map i feel in several ways. the split to the slider is unprecedented and the manual horizontal stacking is also new
insane
00:04:572 (1) - remove finish? not sure if i'm getting the intention right but they're also missing on 00:07:429 (1) - and 00:01:715 (1) - so i'm assuming it's that low sound on every second downbeat that calls for it
00:16:536 (3) - make that one two notes or a 1/4 slider plus note or triple? the 3/4 sound instrument does perform two notes there. in the top diff you opted for a triple which worked out quite well
00:19:393 (3) - should probably use some 1/4 timing here or use regular 3/4 on 00:18:411 (3) - as well. those don't mix very well. probably the latter as you do so in the next iteration
00:44:572 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - i'd like to suggest a rhythm like <!-- m --><a href='https://mok.s-ul.eu/mKSRyAwl' rel='nofollow'>https://mok.s-ul.eu/mKSRyAwl</a><!-- m --> to get the instrument differentiation down
01:36:893 (7) - usually you put the 1/4 sliders on these trumpets into their own patterns, separate from the previous one. here not so much. so i'd use a new pattern for 7,8,9
normal
01:15:643 (2) - i'd just use a normal note if anything. the section has a clear focus on the trumpet and snares. that note has neither. so just a single note suffices bridge
i agree with mirash on the easy. it's going to be off putting for new players if the slider speed is so considerably different from the movement between circles
i'd be interested in pushing this set but having two trial bns is useless. so i'll leave this to mirash.
00:11:000 (1,2,3,4) - could do something differently with the second two sliders as they add those hard sounds you use the normal hitnormal for. just separating the sets in a different pattern or flipping can do the trick if you don't want to make them active 1/4s. the simples solution i can come up with would be <!-- m --><a href='https://mok.s-ul.eu/sNLBqEG0' rel='nofollow'>https://mok.s-ul.eu/sNLBqEG0</a><!-- m --> , optionally with a ctrl g on 3 or something fancy that would however be asymmetric
00:11:715 (1) - in case you deny the first suggestion. maybe ctrl j+h this one. you usually have higher spacing on these long notes on downbeats, so having it so low here seems out of place. pute flipping causes some overlaps that might not be in line with what you want with the map though and creates harsh movement. so perhaps better go about it in some new way
00:23:143 (1) - i'd suggest a rhythm like <!-- m --><a href='https://mok.s-ul.eu/TZV3ojns' rel='nofollow'>https://mok.s-ul.eu/TZV3ojns</a><!-- m --> . i find it rather odd to not map those 1/4s in any way as they are of the same instrument as the sliders and there being nothing else to keep that focus
00:28:322 (6,7,8) - ctrl g for aligning spacing with pitches and not having that uncharacteristic back and forth on unequal sounds
00:30:286 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1) - recommending a rearrangement like <!-- m --><a href='https://mok.s-ul.eu/5f314Wbu' rel='nofollow'>https://mok.s-ul.eu/5f314Wbu</a><!-- m --> . reason being that pitch changes are neatly bundled together with 1 being in a different place and you can capture that second triple that is paired with the first one in the song
00:44:572 (1,2,3,4) - maybe stack those so you don't assimilate the two instuments in the stream as much. would take a repositioning as well for example with the sliders stacking on the note you now stack 8 on <!-- m --><a href='https://mok.s-ul.eu/2ZMHZYtP' rel='nofollow'>https://mok.s-ul.eu/2ZMHZYtP</a><!-- m -->
00:56:000 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16) - i imagine you'll want to keep this simple but i'll present the alternative of splitting the stream up according to the gaps in the song like <!-- m --><a href='https://mok.s-ul.eu/f44Jt4y5' rel='nofollow'>https://mok.s-ul.eu/f44Jt4y5</a><!-- m --> or different placing if this doesn't suit your taste. i just personally dislike it being one uniform stream evne with that trumpet
01:25:108 (3) - suggesting to split this, the instrument the three sliders are mapped to has two rather than just one hit here, quite prominently so.
01:31:179 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - this burst is quite out of place in this map i feel in several ways. the split to the slider is unprecedented and the manual horizontal stacking is also new
insane
00:04:572 (1) - remove finish? not sure if i'm getting the intention right but they're also missing on 00:07:429 (1) - and 00:01:715 (1) - so i'm assuming it's that low sound on every second downbeat that calls for it
00:16:536 (3) - make that one two notes or a 1/4 slider plus note or triple? the 3/4 sound instrument does perform two notes there. in the top diff you opted for a triple which worked out quite well
00:19:393 (3) - should probably use some 1/4 timing here or use regular 3/4 on 00:18:411 (3) - as well. those don't mix very well. probably the latter as you do so in the next iteration
00:44:572 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - i'd like to suggest a rhythm like <!-- m --><a href='https://mok.s-ul.eu/mKSRyAwl' rel='nofollow'>https://mok.s-ul.eu/mKSRyAwl</a><!-- m --> to get the instrument differentiation down
01:36:893 (7) - usually you put the 1/4 sliders on these trumpets into their own patterns, separate from the previous one. here not so much. so i'd use a new pattern for 7,8,9
normal
01:15:643 (2) - i'd just use a normal note if anything. the section has a clear focus on the trumpet and snares. that note has neither. so just a single note suffices bridge
i agree with mirash on the easy. it's going to be off putting for new players if the slider speed is so considerably different from the movement between circles
i'd be interested in pushing this set but having two trial bns is useless. so i'll leave this to mirash.