Well you were exiled so, not too much of a surprise
How can you still suck up to the mods when half of the things you talk about would be banned if the rules were enforced to their full extent. Threads were randomly locked in the past, but it was definitely far from systematic.DaddyCoolVipper wrote:
Exactly, that's basically why so many threads got locked in the first place. The 1 thread/day limit is pretty much the only real change, imo
I know, mods like you have always come into OT randomly and caused problems at arbitrary whims. Do you actually think you're helping anything, or are you just doing it for the fun of it?Ephemeral wrote:
you've always been at the whim of my decisions as to what is silly and serious, nothing is new in that regard
Can you provide solid evidence of this?B1rd wrote:
You want rules to stop people whom you don't like from posting,
This is why I made this.Zain Sugieres wrote:
If people are too autistic and fail to simply use common sense as the rules, specific rules to counter their retarded behaviors need to be set.
wtf are you talking aboutabraker wrote:
@Ephemeral: Requesting to have thread posting slots similar to beatmapping. More good threads = less waiting time. What do you say?
Hyerim wrote:
It would be unfair to the rest of the users.
In beatmapping you can have 4 maps uploaded at a time, if your a supporter you can have 5, and for each ranked map you aquire the number rises. (I think it stops like 8).DaddyCoolVipper wrote:
wtf are you talking aboutabraker wrote:
@Ephemeral: Requesting to have thread posting slots similar to beatmapping. More good threads = less waiting time. What do you say?
shhhDaddyCoolVipper wrote:
That idea makes no sense
Loooool xdB1rd wrote:
I really don't care what rights you would give away, some men just like to lick the boot of authority. What I'm more concerned about it the posting rights of myself and everyone else.
the latterB1rd wrote:
I know, mods like you have always come into OT randomly and caused problems at arbitrary whims. Do you actually think you're helping anything, or are you just doing it for the fun of it?Ephemeral wrote:
you've always been at the whim of my decisions as to what is silly and serious, nothing is new in that regard
Strange i can upload 8 beatmap a time even without any rank mapCanadian Baka wrote:
In beatmapping you can have 4 maps uploaded at a time, if your a supporter you can have 5, and for each ranked map you aquire the number rises. (I think it stops like 8).
I guess he means he wants to have "slots" for how many threads we can upload.
These numbers are wrong in its entirety.Canadian Baka wrote:
In beatmapping you can have 4 maps uploaded at a time, if your a supporter you can have 5, and for each ranked map you aquire the number rises. (I think it stops like 8).
Well apparently it got changed a year ago, but these numbers were correct at one point in time.Endaris wrote:
These numbers are wrong in its entirety.Canadian Baka wrote:
In beatmapping you can have 4 maps uploaded at a time, if your a supporter you can have 5, and for each ranked map you aquire the number rises. (I think it stops like 8).
Canadian Baka wrote:
Endaris wrote:
Canadian Baka wrote:
In beatmapping you can have 4 maps uploaded at a time, if your a supporter you can have 5, and for each ranked map you aquire the number rises. (I think it stops like 8).
These numbers are wrong in its entirety.
Well apparently it got changed a year ago, but these numbers were correct at one point in time.
Stefan wrote:
Yeah, this has been changed around a year ago, it works in both ways - having supporter gives you temporary some slots while you can increase it up to 10 (with ranked maps). Ranked maps permantely increases your available slots, up to 10.