Again, please read former posts thoroughly before you post something.
As I said, you can find the reasons why I started ranking process again, and two BNs have nominated this map.
Replying only for your convenience, not to make you read all the discussions.
shionelove wrote:
it's around 00:08,called build up in music theory.snare rhythm is not simple 1/4,so some 2nd note in two-notes-jack are ghost,and others are not. anyway,it depends on community,if QAT says 2+2=5,it's 5.
First, I apologize to you and ddmythical for my misunderstandings of your post, not providing a proper explanation, and being an indirect cause of emotional responses. I thought your post was about other parts. However, I hope you two don't blame me too much since there were no timing points in the first post which could be a hint for me.
Going back to the point you've mentioned, those notes are not for snares. It's for the flow of the sounds. Rather than interpreting indistinct sounds with unsure snappings, notes are placed equally as 1/4 streams. This semi-dump is used for better play and visuals. I and protastic, and few other people who I asked for testplays had some discussions about that part but ended up with keeping the current patterns, since it does not cause any big problems.
P.S.
If QAT says 2+2=5, it's still 4. QATs have their power, yet they are the same mappers. They can make mistakes, they may have different view and understandings about mapping, and their own rules for ranked section may change. We mappers, individually have rights to deny QATs' suggestion if we think there are proper reasons for keeping our own patterns, although we may be wrong, and that's why we can have diversity in ranked section.
Why would 2 BNs just icon a map without changing patterns that QAT's suggested? There's one straightforward answer, the mapper did not necessarily have to follow that suggestion. If you want to post any other problems, I strongly ask you to read former posts and make your post to be constructive. Simply pouring your emotions and dissatisfaction here does not improve my map, nor help anyone to maintain neutral emotions towards others.
Also, please think once more before posting anything. Do not make any drama.
shionelove wrote:
drama incoming?
This is not a good attitude as a person who wants to point out problems of other mapper's map. I cannot be friendly to a person who potentially can cause a drama, or who is willing to cause a drama for the map's disqualification.