00:40:365 - tbh i'd prefer if the stream pattern was continued here (same goes for the others, if any)
Nope. For different emphasis between kiai 1 and 2, as you already know.
01:36:165 - why not add note at col 3 for the sound
I followed pitch with strong sounds that are noticable with 100% speed.
01:36:525 (96525|2) - i think it's better to follow the sound only rather than vocal
It's not for vocal, definitely.
01:44:205 (104205|3,104445|1,104685|1) - i'm not really sure what these are following
Same with above, pitch, but with a bit of hand balance.
02:14:505 - hey you did continue the stream here
yeah this is definitely rank material
some might not think that way, i'm just trying to respect their opinions
thanks for stoping by
FontesThanks for stopping by.
02:32:205 - 02:24:525 - shouldn't here be some Kick hitsound for snare emphasize? example: 02:28:365 - same for last diff, didn't check others
This was intentional in order to emphasize 02:24:765 - . Also that sound is snare focused, not kick.
I have problem with your priorities. Some 1/8 sounds (let's call them "woobs") are mapped as triple LN and some are mapped as 1/8 rolls, main difference is intense and pitch of woobs. Don't you think it's way too different ways to represent such similar sounds?
I'm pretty sure you can make it more clear and systematic so it doesn't look random.
For example 02:38:925 - and 02:46:605 - are literally the same sounds but mapped differently.
So basically it's like woobs wubs weebs or whatever and the structure is 1/8 streem with stutter -> slowjam LN.
However, that first triple LN is, for emphasis of a new section starting, which is expressed with different SVs.
When kiai passes, make all long woobs as 1/8 rolls. For example:
02:23:565 - this should be a roll, but 02:25:485 - these are fine as triple LNs because of often pitch changing
02:29:325 - this is also good for roll
etc. I hope you got my point
I believe 02:13:965 (133965|2,133965|3,134025|0,134085|1,134145|2) - and 02:14:205 (134205|1,134205|0) - are pretty similar (they are kinda two halfs of one sound). But the SV power difference is so big that it makes it look like these are pretty different sound when they are not.
02:13:965 - nerf this SV to maybe 1.5x>0.5x or something like that so it doesn't stand out so much
Well, they are still different sounds and somehow played okay, so I believe it'll be okay. Also slowjam isn't that weak comparing with stutters.
I checked only second half of the map so you might want to apply it for the first half as well
i was going to put modding about ghost notes here,but it was already discovered by QAT and NOT FIXED.Hi drama
i don't want to talk about mapping quality because i can't handle this kind of 4k properly but...I have to say ghost notes should be NEVER allowed.
it's around 00:08,called build up in music theory.snare rhythm is not simple 1/4,so some 2nd note in two-notes-jack are ghost,and others are not. anyway,it depends on community,if QAT says 2+2=5,it's 5.First, I apologize to you and ddmythical for my misunderstandings of your post, not providing a proper explanation, and being an indirect cause of emotional responses. I thought your post was about other parts. However, I hope you two don't blame me too much since there were no timing points in the first post which could be a hint for me.
drama incoming?This is not a good attitude as a person who wants to point out problems of other mapper's map. I cannot be friendly to a person who potentially can cause a drama, or who is willing to cause a drama for the map's disqualification.
If QAT says 2+2=5, it's still 4. QATs have their power, yet they are the same mappers. They can make mistakes, they may have different view and understandings about mapping, and their own rules for ranked section may change. We mappers, individually have rights to deny QATs' suggestion if we think there are proper reasons for keeping our own patterns, although we may be wrong, and that's why we can have diversity in ranked section.I love you