1. LOVELY diff. My only question is why the volume is a bit low? More impacting parts of the song overshadow hitsounds sometimes. I'd +10%, the feedback is important. Also... maybe HP6? Why be nice?

1. 00:31:593 (16) - d? Just for a touch more pattern simplicity here in Oni. 00:37:616 - Doing it here too is honestly up to you!
   00:34:216 (32,33,34,35,36) - Then this could be kkddk just to not look similar x)
2. 01:32:603 (68) - May as well delete this if we're not following drums here anyways. Syncopated into even number 1/4 seems annoying for Oni players.
3. 01:43:193 - A note here maybe? Since you're sticking to drum mapping after all.

1. 00:17:021 (50,62) - It's not that it's too difficult or anything, but maybe removing just these two notes to differ from Oni a tiiiny biiit more would raise less eyebrows and keep it clean.
2. 00:29:359 (100,108) - While most people would probably see this and want 1/4 removed for spread sake, I think taking out these 1/2 keeps the integrity but makes it look much less like Oni. 00:32:467 - Would apply here and to later happenings too. Up to you. Looking through the diffs with these changes looks nice ok.
3. 00:52:675 (216,217) - Swapping these follows snare and wind instrument sound :>
4. 01:14:339 - Delete just this note, for spread and nicer emphasis on increasing triplet amount.
5. 01:26:872 (27) - You should be ok without this note, the length of the chain gets a little big here. Same with 01:39:307 (88) - . Sorry ahead of time that the combo is probably throwing something off.

1. 00:25:667 (1) - Maybe d _ k k d d k k? ( _ is a 1/2 tick in this case). Helps spread and in general is pretty slick as far as following the song. If you think it's too hard coming after other 1/2 business you can shave off the last k or something.
   
2. 00:33:633 - Since spread is a little weird here, what I'd recommend is adding a note here but deleting 00:34:605 (19) - as a break.
3. 00:37:908 - Similar here, but no break needed since that 2/1 exists at least.
4. 01:01:613 (86) - I think you're better off putting this note a 1/2 back.
5. 01:15:408 (1) - Maybe something like d k, d k, d k, d, (S)? Kantan still works with spinner only if you do this.
6. 01:52:908 (88) - I think deleting this gives the K a bit more emphasis (and cuts down on ddk amount).

1. OD4 please, 3's a bit too forgiving. Sorry if you have a linear kink.
2. 01:05:304 (54) - Deleting this note to seperate both parts of the song better would be nice.
3. 01:31:729 (19) - Delete as a break.

_DUSK_ wrote:

Mod request from Ayyri

(Kantan)
00:25:278 (16) - add k here, goes along well with the song. Feels empty without a note being preset there
00:29:553 (2) - The pitch here is too high for a d, I suggest making this a k so it becomes k k d
00:35:771 (12,13,14) - ^
00:32:662 (7,8,9) - The pitch is lower here, so make this d d k
01:06:081 (54) - High pitch here, make this k. You've this same exact part in the music a k at 01:12:299 (61) - so I don't see why the first note I linked shouldn't be a k
01:25:512 (8,9,10) - Either make this kdk or kkk because I hear high pitch, low pitch, high pitch
01:30:952 (18) - High pitch here, add k
01:32:506 (19) - If you don't agree with the suggestion before this, this should definitely be a k. The pitch is far too high to be a d
01:57:085 (18) - I would move this to 01:56:891 - . Because of the unusual area you have placed it, newer players will mistime hitting the d and will later miss the finisher due to such an abrupt change in the way the rhythm changes
01:58:154 (1) - Spinner should start here. Seems loo late

(Futsuu)
01:58:154 (1) - spinner should start here. Seems too late.
Very good diff

done the changes on baby difficulties, idk what was up with the spinners and that weirdly placed note at 01:57:085 (18) on kantan uwu

(Muzukashii)
00:42:183 (167,168) - Ctrl+G these two. Sounds much better imo
01:00:252 - I don't think the sound effect here is enough for there to have been a finisher here
01:24:540 - add a k here? Goes with the rhythm more
01:58:154 - (For Duski to read) Ayyri has put her spinner on the timestamp that I'm suggesting you to put it on. If you leave it the way it is, not only will it play too late, it will also lead to inconsistency, making the set unrankable)

soon™

(Oni)
The start of this diff seems too dense. The song is calm at the start, so try to map the start in a more relaxed way. You can do this by changing 00:06:237 (17) - to a k (High pitch there) and deleting the note at 00:06:626 (19) - . You've done something like this at 00:12:649 (18,19,20,21) -, so do it here as well for consistency
00:38:102 (56) - Why no finisher here? There is a strong sound. If you think it will be hard to hit the finisher, remove the note before it so it becomes kdkk D
00:53:646 (155) - Strong sound, a finisher should be present
01:00:641 (176) - Why make this a finisher? This same sound effect is present at parts like 01:02:195 (182) - and 01:03:749 (187) - , so why are they not finishers? You should remove the finisher imo
01:37:752 (98,99,100) - I hear a high pitch, low pitch, high pitch here so either make this kkk or kdk

diddly done'd

(Inner Oni)

00:09:346 (31,32) - Make this a 1/2 kdkd - idk if i misunderstood what you meant by this but didn't really feel this one
Great diff

Overall, set is good
Good luck
thank

Nepuri wrote:

[Muzukashii]
00:52:092 (215,219) - These could be kats in order to emphasize the snares occuring on their points in time. These snares have been mapped by 00:52:869 (220,222,223) - already and would compliment them imo.

01:05:596 (245,246,247) - those could be kats to in order to emphasize the snares. Sounds contradictory when hearing the clear snare note at 01:05:304 (244) - followed by a dd d being backed by snares mostly.

01:07:830 (252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260) - Seems a bit too dense compared to 01:15:796 (283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295,296,297,298) - This buildup section, being musically more intense, but equal in density.
Id suggest you slightly nerf these 2 combos (01:14:048 - and 01:07:830 - ) to create some nice contrast between those 2 sections.

01:23:763 (11,12,13,14,15) - While pattern fits magnificently to the music due to an onbeat violin melody, 01:22:208 (4,5,6,7,8) - this does not due to the 3/4 3/4 2/4 violin melody that is still playing. This pattern interrupts the focus for a brief moment from the violin to the main beat (or something improvised) only to return to the violin quickly after. This sounds a bit weird.
Heres a possible pattern choice that incorporates the violin, and approximately keeps the density of the pattern: https://puu.sh/yUAC1/bdb2f0132f.png

Additionally there is an inconsistency where pattern choice varies very widely at 01:28:620 - where the violin melody repeats. This should be considered to be fixed whether you accept pattern choice above or not, just for consistencies sake.

01:47:953 (118,119) - considering you listened to finishers before, you might wanna incorporate one by changing this pattern, else this noteworthy "Arp" sound goes without emphasis until about 5 seconds later, where it suddenly is emphasized again, making it sound/feel weird.

OzzyOzrock wrote:

Change Kantan's HP to 8, it's currently the same as Futsuu's.

I'm still a bit iffy about Muzukashii's spread with Futsuu in the part before the first kiaii, but not enough so to feel guilty bubbling it. If the next BN wants to drop some opinions regarding it that'd be good.

Sinnoh wrote:

Just here to point out some snaps, but note that I'm not too experienced with taiko rhythm simplification

Inner Oni]
01:46:885 (2) - uh all of those high pitched noises are 1/6