1. ColaSoft0's Insane (4,2 stars, 779 notes)
2. Normal (1,65 stars, 321 notes)
3. Spicy (4,67 stars, 772 notes)

tatatat wrote:

Consider changing the color of Combo Color 1. Its kind of an ugly blue. Thats your call though.
You should probably make a hard difficulty
You need to include any guest difficulty mappers in the tags of your map
You may want to decrease the hitsound volume a little. Like 10-20% off all the timing points.
Normal:
The OD and HP drain are a little low, consider increasing them.
Unsnapped slider end at 02:47:551 (2) -
The overlapping slider and circle patterns at 00:05:905 (1,2,3,4,5) - are probably too hard for a normal difficulty.
Same with 00:11:552 (1,2,3,4,5,6) -
00:11:552 (1,2,3) - and 00:12:963 (4,5,6) - should probably be seperate combos
00:36:963 (1,3) - these two sliders should probably be curved similarly.
There isn't enough time to recover at the end of the slider at 00:36:963 (1,3) - Consider adding another beat of recovery time
Same as above with 00:36:963 (1,3) -
Another overlapping slider that probably shouldn't be overlapping. 02:06:257 (4,5) -
02:06:257 (4,5) - Another spinner. Needs more recovery time
02:06:257 (4,5) - Slider shape may be too complex for a normal difficulty
02:06:257 (4,5) - Needs more recovery time

1. MUST (or strongly recommend) making a 3* map (maybe a 2* as well just to be sure) to fill out the spread
2. if you ctrl-a all your maps in the spread, you will see the distribution of your circles in the playfield. try mapping in the whole playfield and not just the center -- makes for a more interesting map
3. for combo colors, you should take some colors off of the background (probably a light red or pink, a nice teal, a blue, a green) but you use a yellow, orange, red. strongly suggest changing this.
   if you need help, try (rgb values) 0 150 0, 0 183 183, 0 128 192, 253 190 179
   also, ordering matters (probably should go with rainbow order most of the time)
   
   
4. for this mod, i'm not going to point out specific points that you need to fix, but more like general areas of improvement, because i'm sorry to say that i don't think this map is ready for rank in its current state. please prepare for a lot of information at a short time!

1. stack leniency is pretty high for an insane, try 3 or 4 (i recommend 3)
2. 00:03:963 (4,6) - overlaps like these are generally not that aesthetically pleasing. try something more along the lines of http://puu.sh/wtguf/fc4cfb13f6.jpg unless you have good reason, generally you want to either fully stack or fully separate items. this happens a LOT of the time in this map
3. 00:10:846 (3,4,5,6) - during this, you use clockwise flow, so you probably should continue it in the next notes. try flipping 00:11:728 (3) - vertically. generally, you want to continue flow unless there is a large change in the music
   if you do not know what flow is, flow is the general movement of the cursor:
   
   SPOILER

   in the first image, you see the flow (follow the blue lines 1,2,3,4 etc) https://puu.sh/wthlF/06765f3581.jpg
   in the second image, you see the flow continue, so you basically have a few options: followin teh red movement or the orange (this is what you want to change)
   https://puu.sh/wthrE/fe0a1d2bc3.jpg
   there are other types of flow too but this one is the most basic and easiest to understand
   00:22:846 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6) - this is an example of clockwise flow that you use well
   00:26:022 (5,6,7) - but this is another example of breaking flow for no real reason
   01:11:905 (5,6,7) - i would consider this a better place to break flow because the music changes somewhat in this area
4. 00:25:669 (4) - strongly consider new comboing here (this is a downbeat, so you want to emphasize it)
   generally, you want to either use nc's at downbeats (large white ticks in the editor timeline) or to separate patterns. for now, mostly nc on downbeats
   example: 00:28:493 (1) - this is good nc: this is a downbeat as well as a new phrase in the music
   00:35:375 (1) - this is an example of bad nc: this does not separate a pattern nor does it emphasize the music nor is it on a downbeat. move to 00:35:552 (2) - this note instead.
5. 00:54:434 (3,1) - consider changing this so that the beginning of 1 matches the end of 3 and also 00:56:375 (3) - match this as well
6. 00:56:375 (3) - this is a more intense section of the song, so perhaps a higher slider velocity might make that more clear in the map too
7. 01:07:140 (6,7,8,9) - you change the rhythm here from straight 1/2 (1/2 a beat, or red ticks), to 1/1 (red tick to red tick or white tick to white tick, etc), but you keep the same flow and almost the same distance from notes.
   this is one example of a place where you could change flow to reflect the change in the map and make the player realize that there is a change in rhythm. or, you could make the distance spacing between 6 and 7 much higher
8. 01:24:963 - there is a loud gong here but you don't map it! maybe put a jump here. Also, not sure why you didn't map this part because it doesn't really fit there being a break there.
9. 01:47:552 - since this is a quieter section, maybe make the slider velocity smaller here as well as spacing
10. 02:02:022 (2,3,4) - this time, there isn't really change in music but you make a huge distance in spacing for no reason. i would definitely try to map 4 farther apart, like http://puu.sh/wtiIw/0ce321f708.jpg
11. 02:36:963 (1) - generally, i like to stay away from double reverse sliders because they are pretty hard to read. also, to put a triple after this is really hard to read too, especially with the stacking you are using here
12. 02:40:493 (6) - i *THINK this is unrankable but it's pretty burai. i get what you're doing with the slider though. you have to check with a bn if you really want to know the answer
13. 02:43:140 (3,4,5,6) - to me, the rhythm is actually not what you mapped here becuase the wubs in the song are much more audible than what you are mapping. consider changing
14. 03:06:610 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - to me, this is pretty random placement of notes. usually you want to have a reason behind most notes that you are doing. i would seriously consider making them all the same distance snap at least from each other, and maybe forming a large pattern with them as well
    then, when you do this, 03:12:257 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - you might be able to follow the pattern or continue the pattern in a really cool way
15. 04:08:728 (1) - cool.
16. okay, i know it's a lot to take in, but i'm doing my best to try to make you a better mapper there are a lot of things that i didn't mention in particular, but just look for similar stuff to what i mentioned (you repeat a lot of patterns (which is good), so look in similar places to where i mention).