hi
[opinion]
- to make 1/4 and 1/6 streams more distinctive, how about making collection of combo colours that are rather dull for 1/4s and perhaps really intense colour for only 1/6? Making this point since spacing between 1/4 streams and 1/6 streams are pretty hard to distinguish let alone stacks. Here is a
good example - look at 01:47:461 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - this really stands out of rest of 1/4 and helps tremendously in reading.
- overall, the slider (arts) seems very dull and repeats too often. would be really nice edition to this map if you can introduce more slider shapes and bit more intuitive than sliders with few red anchor points that wiggles sharply.
[another]
00:01:696 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - I am not sure if 00:01:504 (5) - is long enough to make players to get used to 1/6. seems like
if you never heard this song, well too bad sort of thing
00:04:677 - not sure why you left this out, but there is distinctive tone in the song.
00:05:446 (1,1) - rather looks messy...
00:09:293 (1,2) - is there reason why this is not stacked unlike everything else near this timepoint?
00:25:158 (1) - cut reverse to 00:25:254 and making 1/4 slider at 00:25:350 feels better since there is pretty nice kick sound there.
00:44:389 (1,1) - and 00:44:869 (2,1) - feels better with them stacked with each other since before there was already whole lot of circle->slider stacks to represent similar sounding part of the song.
00:12:850 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - wait hold on, why this 1/6 active notes not NCed for easier reading when 00:56:696 (1,1,1,1,1,1) - is ._.
I have hard time believing notes like 00:57:946 (2,3,4) - is 1/4 there
01:00:350 (1,1) - doesnt look aesthetically pleasing that its covering almost entire slider. 01:12:658 (1,1) - atleast this look better
01:25:927 (1,1) - I am guessing that you`re not going for aesthetic looks
01:27:562 (5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4) - rather not play with ds since its really confusing when only thing that distinguishes between 1/4 and 1/6 is ds.
01:30:350 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - Supporting above point, half of above is smaller spacing than this 1/6 spacing.
01:32:658 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28) - Perhaps NC?
01:38:812 (2,3,4,5) - i think you put this on slider for emphasis purpose but not sure if that is a clean solution.. try 208|100? end of stack to next object is plenty good emphasis
01:52:273 (2) - i dont think this is 1/6 rather 1/8
02:09:676 (1) - this doesnt look very nice and just stands out since rest of them were angular
02:21:840 (1) - I have no idea what this is mapped to, if this is mapped to shaker, it sounds bit too late
02:32:978 (1,2,3,4) - really confusing when you use that spacing visually same with 02:30:734 (1,2,3,4,5,6) -
02:33:619 (1,2,3,4,1,1,1,1) - this part sort of lost me with rhythm choices and nc. all those sliders 02:34:388 (1,1,1) - are just regular 1/4s so i dont see why they deserve nc
02:36:696 (9) - can you atleast have nc here so there is huge speed change - _ -
02:50:157 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24) - rhythm is rather variable so nc? the combo is getting pretty long anyways. (tho imo, this entire section mapping the piano instead of dramatic drum is bit overkill, it is very confusing and not very ideal from my perspective)
there is weak tone at every triple, so perhaps make each last note into 1/4 slider? 02:56:888 (3) - | 02:57:272 (6) - | 02:57:657 (9) -
02:58:042 (3) - unlike above, the tone at passive hit sliderend is rather discouraged, perhaps use circle or anything clickable?
03:10:830 (3,4) - feels better if there is another note at 03:11:022 and connects well with 03:11:119 (1) - .
03:12:465 (1,2,3,4,5) - this visual spacing is less than much faster 03:13:042 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - stream right after it
03:24:484 (1) - I prefer
this red one`s shape but i guess this is personal pref
03:26:311 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13) - would be nice if this wasnt same visually spacing with one 1/6 stream just right before it
04:09:013 (8,9) - rhythm wise i prefer slider #8 without reverse and clickable notes until 04:09:590
04:24:975 (1,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - for this, I actually prefer 00:11:504 (1,2,1,1,1,2,1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - `s rhythm. Current one seems bit confusing... in terms of spacing and etc
04:33:533 (1) - ??
05:11:033 (5) - this really maps to just single circle
05:12:667 (3,4,5,6) - that is really confusing due to significant overlapping and interferes with reading
this song sounds incredibly complex, so kudos to you for mapping it. hope this helps a bit