M4M!
In an earlier thread (p/6029023) Sing pointed out that the girl in the bg is more visible if you flip the bg. I actually recommend this lol, because otherwise the song in song select doesnt have character
good luch guys! this is an awesome birthday present
In an earlier thread (p/6029023) Sing pointed out that the girl in the bg is more visible if you flip the bg. I actually recommend this lol, because otherwise the song in song select doesnt have character
RLC
• 00:14:469 (2) - The note under this circle is extremely faint and out of rhythm (the note is actually around 00:14:540 - ) I would suggest removing this circle
thats it
thats it
val
• 00:48:007 (1,2,3) - The notes at 00:48:431 - 00:48:856 - have the same intensity, but the hit objects are spaced differently. I'd suggest spacing 00:48:007 (1,2) - less or spacing 00:48:856 (3) - more (The latter would fit the rest of your part the best)
shira
• 01:10:365 (6,1) - This can easily be mistaken as a 1/4 because of the spacing at 01:11:497 (3,4) - and the perfect 1/8 overlap at 01:08:384 (1,2) - . Be consistent with your 1/4 and 1/8 spacing here somehow
• 01:17:936 (3,4) - The same as above applies here too, but I would strongly advise against this rhythm overall. People will perceive the second vocal note to be at 01:17:868 - ,even if it is at the 1/8. This doesn't really play naturally because of this.
• 01:17:936 (3,4) - The same as above applies here too, but I would strongly advise against this rhythm overall. People will perceive the second vocal note to be at 01:17:868 - ,even if it is at the 1/8. This doesn't really play naturally because of this.
appleeaterx
• 01:45:743 (5,2) - faulty blanket is easily noticable here
• 02:03:856 (1,2) - This spacing choice is new, why did you decide to stack this note out of all other notes?
• 02:07:960 - This note feels ignored in the midst of all the other guitar notes you mapped in this part
• 02:03:856 (1,2) - This spacing choice is new, why did you decide to stack this note out of all other notes?
• 02:07:960 - This note feels ignored in the midst of all the other guitar notes you mapped in this part
narcissu
• 02:21:144 (3,4,5,6) - This combination of spacing and angles here really does not make this pattern play well and makes it feel unnatrual. It would feel a lot better if you used crtl+g on 02:21:421 (5,6) -
• 02:25:310 - Feels weird how you skip this vocal note when 02:25:588 (2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - revolves around the vocals
• 02:25:310 - Feels weird how you skip this vocal note when 02:25:588 (2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - revolves around the vocals
kibbleru
• 02:58:557 - Why did you ignore this note? You mapped others like it already (like 02:52:472 (3,4,5) - )
• 02:59:264 (2,3,4) - This is a pretty big jump in spacing compared to what you've already been doing after sliderends
• 02:59:264 (2,3,4) - This is a pretty big jump in spacing compared to what you've already been doing after sliderends
handsome
• 03:10:868 (1) - why this drastic sv change on this note above all others? You could have done it here 03:13:132 (2) - here 03:15:396 - etc. but you chose not to for some reason
• 03:13:698 (4,5,1) - This change in spacing is very uncomfortable to play in general
• 03:19:500 (1,2,3) - as far as rhythm goes i cant tell the difference in between this and 03:13:557 (2,3,4) - or 03:25:443 (2,3,4) -
• 03:19:076 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - 03:21:340 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - don't really understand many of your mapping choices here. how do your changes in spacing relate to the music?
• 03:20:774 (1,1,1,1) - Don't see how these notes stand out in anyway for them to be special enough for 1/16 sliders and ncs. Again it doesn't really feel like this correlates to anything
• 03:13:698 (4,5,1) - This change in spacing is very uncomfortable to play in general
• 03:19:500 (1,2,3) - as far as rhythm goes i cant tell the difference in between this and 03:13:557 (2,3,4) - or 03:25:443 (2,3,4) -
• 03:19:076 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - 03:21:340 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - don't really understand many of your mapping choices here. how do your changes in spacing relate to the music?
• 03:20:774 (1,1,1,1) - Don't see how these notes stand out in anyway for them to be special enough for 1/16 sliders and ncs. Again it doesn't really feel like this correlates to anything
haurto #2
• 03:34:925 (1,2) - Don't hear anything under those reverse arrows, a 1/2 slider would be more fitting here if you want to use sliders imo.
probox
• 03:56:009 (3) - It sounds like the strong note is on the sliderend here, ctrl+g 03:55:868 (2,3) - would be a better rhythm. Samekind of thing for 04:05:066 (3,4) -
and for your triangle part
05:05:491 (1,1) - Are these triangles really rankable? even if the sliderend isn't visible at all? xp
and for your triangle part
05:05:491 (1,1) - Are these triangles really rankable? even if the sliderend isn't visible at all? xp
fanzhen
• 04:30:113 (4,5) - 04:34:641 (4,5) - This spacing reads like a 1/4 gap, compared to 04:28:132 (1,2,3,4) -
asphyxiz
• 04:53:038 (4,5) - space these both evenly from the middle slider? would fix up the aesthetics, don't really see a reason not to
good luch guys! this is an awesome birthday present