returning m4m
[RLC]
00:09:233 (1,3) - you could swap those NCs to emphasize the start of a different section
[Haruto]
00:38:101 (6,7) - i believe the bigger spacing should be on 7 rather than 6 because of how much stronger it is to add more emphasis than the flow break already implies, you could just turn 00:37:818 (5) - into a repeat slider like 00:40:082 (2) - ?
03:31:387 (4,5,6) - i don't think you should stick with that triple when this is such a calm part
[val0108]
00:49:422 (1,2) - i think this could have a much lower spacing considering how barely noticeable the spacing difference with 00:49:565 (2,3) - is considering how strong 3 is
00:49:988 (4) - so this could've been spaced further compared to how large 00:49:422 (1,2,3) - is since it's as strong if not stronger than 3
00:50:271 (1,2) - can these be the same sliders please
00:51:969 (2) - this could be spaced further to make a nice triangle with 00:51:261 (5,1) - 's tails, place it at x198 y117?
00:53:526 (3) - this is so spaced for a not so strong sound, you could try stacking it on 00:52:818 (1) - 's tail
01:06:120 (1,2,3,4) - i don't get the spacing here, why is it so inconsistent?
[ShiraKai]
01:17:936 (3) - yeah as bor said this isn't necessary, vocal ending on 1/6 should be enough
[appleeaterx]
01:51:969 (1) - why is this NC'd?
[Narcissu]
02:28:088 (6) - this is a really big jump when the snare is actually on 5, you could ctrl+g 02:27:949 (5,6) -
[handsome]
03:16:245 (1,1,1,1) - how about only keeping the NC spam for the 1/6 stream and the 1/16 sliders to make them stand out more?
[ProfessionalBox]
04:05:491 (1) - is that NC really necessary? doesn't seem that important
05:05:491 (1) - i mean if you wanna keep it you might want to lower the SV and make the right part shorter so ppl know which way this goes :^)
05:06:340 (1) - ya same
pretty good
[RLC]
00:09:233 (1,3) - you could swap those NCs to emphasize the start of a different section
[Haruto]
00:38:101 (6,7) - i believe the bigger spacing should be on 7 rather than 6 because of how much stronger it is to add more emphasis than the flow break already implies, you could just turn 00:37:818 (5) - into a repeat slider like 00:40:082 (2) - ?
03:31:387 (4,5,6) - i don't think you should stick with that triple when this is such a calm part
[val0108]
00:49:422 (1,2) - i think this could have a much lower spacing considering how barely noticeable the spacing difference with 00:49:565 (2,3) - is considering how strong 3 is
00:49:988 (4) - so this could've been spaced further compared to how large 00:49:422 (1,2,3) - is since it's as strong if not stronger than 3
00:50:271 (1,2) - can these be the same sliders please
00:51:969 (2) - this could be spaced further to make a nice triangle with 00:51:261 (5,1) - 's tails, place it at x198 y117?
00:53:526 (3) - this is so spaced for a not so strong sound, you could try stacking it on 00:52:818 (1) - 's tail
01:06:120 (1,2,3,4) - i don't get the spacing here, why is it so inconsistent?
[ShiraKai]
01:17:936 (3) - yeah as bor said this isn't necessary, vocal ending on 1/6 should be enough
[appleeaterx]
01:51:969 (1) - why is this NC'd?
[Narcissu]
02:28:088 (6) - this is a really big jump when the snare is actually on 5, you could ctrl+g 02:27:949 (5,6) -
[handsome]
03:16:245 (1,1,1,1) - how about only keeping the NC spam for the 1/6 stream and the 1/16 sliders to make them stand out more?
[ProfessionalBox]
04:05:491 (1) - is that NC really necessary? doesn't seem that important
05:05:491 (1) - i mean if you wanna keep it you might want to lower the SV and make the right part shorter so ppl know which way this goes :^)
05:06:340 (1) - ya same
pretty good