-NeBu- wrote:

overall hard to mod it for me, seems wrong but after all seems good, so... gl!

Insane

1. 00:20:728 (6) - clap here
2. 00:56:298 - 00:56:727 - place slider instead
3. 01:07:013 - Not sure why you put a spinner, it seems better off w/ keeping it as a break
4. 01:29:298 - NC here instead of 01:29:727
5. 01:31:870 - NC?
6. 01:37:871 (1,2) - ctrl+g
7. 01:47:192 (6) - 0.6 DS
8. 01:47:299 (7) - ^

Matrotic wrote:

from #modreqs

Insane

1. 01:07:013 - Not sure why you put a spinner, it seems better off w/ keeping it as a break Theres a slight rising sound, and the break felt too long.
2. 01:29:298 - NC here instead of 01:29:727 Split the pattern in two colors instead
3. 01:31:870 - NC? Same pattern continues so ill leave it like that
4. 01:37:871 (1,2) - ctrl+g I used inverse sliders to foreshadow the pattern.
5. 01:47:192 (6) - 0.6 DS Streams pattern DS is 0,5-0,7-0,9-1,1
6. 01:47:299 (7) - ^

1. 00:00:585 (1,2) - why not make this a return slider instead to reduce the note density compared to your other sections since this is the weakest part of the song and kinda connected in the music,
2. 00:05:728 (4,5,6,7) - here visually you could structure (5,6,7) to form a blanket with (4) aswell since its so close to one atm
3. 00:07:442 (1,1,2,1) - bit too hard rythm here for still beign in the easy and quite denser then the other parts of the intro even though its the same intensity
4. 00:09:156 (2,3,4) - strucure wise, you could make this an even triangle or something through visual spacing so it feels a bit more connected
5. 00:14:299 (1,2) - ds wise would be nice if this was still similar like earlier since the music only changes on this downbeat 00:15:585 (3) -
6. I not sure what your NC pattern you have going for tbh like, bit examples 00:15:585 (3,1) - (1) is really strong here since a new section starts on this downbeat so an NC there would be nice; 00:20:728 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - really long combo with multiple downbeats covered compared to 00:27:585 (5,1,2) - this is also one musical sentence so the NC is a bit off compared to the (9) combo;00:32:513 (5,1) - these are more confusing for an advanced diff then if they weren't NC since you alrdy indiciated the different rythm through spacing, here at 00:39:156 (1,2,3,1,2) - NC and sv doesnt represent the music that well, those slow sliders should start at 00:41:299 - like at 00:37:228 (4,1) - and NCing is bit questionable tho right in the middle ofthe downbeat. For this type of song I'd just stick to NCing every 2 downbeats/1downbeat and on noticable SV changes tbh since your rhythm follows the downbeats too like take this again 00:39:585 (2,3,1,2) - you can hear 231 is connected in the music and theres a change on 00:41:299 (2) - so downbeat NCing would make that a lot clearer
7. 00:20:728 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - this combo is still similar intensity wise so the sv change in the middle feels a bit odd, maybe move that to 00:25:871 (1) - ?
8. 00:21:156 (2,3) - etc those finishes are way too powerful for this sound here, leave those for where the cymbals are (usually at the end/beginning of new section in the song) something like the normal-hitnormal instead of the soft-hitnormal could represent that 'tick sound' alot better
9. 00:29:299 (1,2) - try switching hitsounds here so you have the finish on the cymbals and the claps on the snares
10. 00:39:156 (1) - bit bad shape just a straight slider here would be better since the sliderleniency will make it play the same anyway
11. 00:44:299 (3) - circle instead and start this slider 1/2 afterwards, is more inplace with the rest of this sectio nfor the similar rythms like 00:47:942 (4,5) - , 00:51:371 (2,3) - ,00:56:299 (4,5) - with the vocals
12. 00:50:728 (3,4,1) - bit sudden spacing increase here 00:50:299 (2,3,4) -
13. 00:54:156 (1,2,3) - ^
14. 01:12:371 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - that same drum is still going so bit weird to change full hitsounds here, would use the same additions for these 01:12:585 (2,5) - for example there isnt really anything that represents a wishle sound atm
15. 01:25:013 (1,1) - try to avoid these kinds of overlaps by structuring it a bit better, makes the map a bit cleaner
16. 01:46:228 (2,3) - bit too hard on that jump, somethign like you did at 01:59:942 (3,1) - works better for this diff
17. 01:43:228 (6,1,2) - if your gonna make those small jumps why place the jump for 01:43:871 (2) - its way stronger then the rest in this combo
18. 01:54:585 (2) - control g would be nice for 01:54:156 (1,2) -
19. 01:55:442 (2,1) - hard to tell the rythm gap here, noticable ds increase compared to the 1/2 rythm of stacking this would be better to read the gap
20. 02:03:585 (1,2,3,4,5) - can use control+shift+d to create a perfect pentagon here
21. bit in general here but for a light advanced, try to keep your ds between major sections in the music (intro/1st verse/kiai) more or less the same and only emphasize thing that really stand out in the song, leave the more variable stuff for insane+ :d

1. 00:00:584 (1) - just a circle is good here since there isnt really anything noticalbe on the red + same as advanced
2. 00:09:585 (6) - why not an extended here aswell? Music seems to build towards 00:10:013 (7) - so bit weird to cut it off early
3. 00:14:299 (1,2,3) - could silence these aswell like before
4. 00:16:228 (7,8) - some spacing here would be nice so you have a pattern for that unique sound as being stacked with 00:19:656 (2) - and 00:21:370 (3)
5. 00:22:227 (6,2) - stack
6. 00:17:299 (1,2) - one of those minor things that makes it feel more connected, have this visual spacing be the same as 00:18:156 (3,4) -
7. 00:23:727 (5) - would be nice as a slider so you don't lose momentum for 00:24:156 (1) - and it has that beat aswell
8. 00:30:799 (7,1) - feel like this should be closer together with how you do 1/1 gaps
9. 01:22:228 (1) - circle would be good here since its part of the prev stanza still and this transistion of rythm atm 01:22:228 (1,2,3) - doesnt play that well
10. 01:22:442 (2,3,4,5,6) - 01:22:871 (3,4) - would be better as a rythm like 01:22:442 (2) - or 4 circles since 01:22:442 (2,3,4) - is the same intensity and 01:23:299 (5,6) - are the same intensity so cutoff is a bit weird
11. 01:35:942 (7) - why no circles here? its finished the buildup so denser rythm seems fitting imo
12. 01:36:156 (1,1,2) - bad cutoff here, 01:36:156 (1) - either a return more or 2 2x returns would fit better since these kind of rythms happen extremely rarely in a /4 timed song and the midde of 01:36:906 (1,2,3) - deserves to be clickable for that unique sound (can make those 3 unique sounds also as 3 jsut 3 circles with 3/4breaks since its a tricky rythm)
13. 01:31:228 (2,3) - reduce ds a bit here pretty huge jump compared to the rest when not even in kiai
14. 01:43:442 (5,6) - end of the return is really strong here so something like 01:46:013 (7,8,1) - fits alot better since it kinda goes against the snap of the song to have a return there
15. 01:52:441 (2,3,4,5,6) - could move this a bit to the right so (6) blankets with 01:51:584 (1) - for bit more structured
16. 01:57:156 (3,4,5,6) - only 4 beats clickable with a break there doesnt look that good since it goes against your 5 beat streams in all the other parts, so having his a 5 note stream would be good or could also make it a 4 note stream + 1/4slider at the end
    

1. Be careful ! Your timing points don't have the same offset !
2. In Light Advanced, Your SV is of 2.86x for the 1st part of your kiai time, but 2.00x for the second, maybe make them equal to be consistent
3. There's 2 .mp3 files, delete the unused file
4. Maybe recheck your NCs because there aren't on the biggest ticks 00:01:871 - is an example, so I think there is a second timing point, because the big ticks are unmapped or unclickable, Example in Light Advanced 00:03:585 - 00:07:013 - 00:10:442 - 00:13:871 - etc.
5. Be careful about overlaps, I didn't mentionned them in the mod, so try to recheck fast and to avoid some of them

1. The inherithed points at 00:04:330 - and 00:04:340 - are not needed
2. 00:01:013 (2,3) - Blanket ?
3. 00:04:442 (2,3) - Improve blanket
4. 00:07:871 (1,1) - Maybe reduce the volume of these notes because they're too loud compared to the music imo (add unherithed points or move these ones : 00:07:775 - 00:08:192)
5. 00:10:871 (1,2) - (2) is too curved in this blanket
6. 00:25:228 (9) - Move (9) to 00:25:013 - to be consistant with 00:16:013 (1,2,4,5,6,2,5) -
7. 00:37:871 (1) - It may be a bit too slow, If this slider was a little bit more fast, it could give a nice flow
8. 00:41:299 (2,3) - Same
9. 01:10:442 (1,2,3,4,5) - Some inherithed points are not needed at all here
10. 01:10:442 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5) - Really nice section !
11. 01:22:871 (1) - Maybe a bit too curved, doesn't give a good impression
12. 01:39:156 (1,2) - Don't approach so much the reverse to (2), it could give something good if you move it
13. 01:40:871 (1) - 01:46:871 (1) - 01:53:728 (3) - 01:54:585 (2) - 01:57:156 (2) - 02:00:585 (3) - Same

Lexis wrote:

M4M from my queue~

[General]

In Light Advanced, Your SV is of 2.86x for the 1st part of your kiai time, but 2.00x for the second, maybe make them equal to be consistent Second part is a 1/4 gap for Kiai burst so its not that important

There's 2 .mp3 files, delete the unused file I was planning to map the next part of the song

[Light Advanced]

The inherithed points at 00:04:330 - and 00:04:340 - are not needed These came from Insane, they don't hurt so I'll just leave them

00:25:228 (9) - Move (9) to 00:25:013 - to be consistant with 00:16:013 (1,2,4,5,6,2,5) - Theres nothing on the white tick, and I think the spacing is enough to read it.

00:37:871 (1) - It may be a bit too slow, If this slider was a little bit more fast, it could give a nice flow
00:41:299 (2,3) - Same I'll leave the second part, I really want the slow sliders :p

01:39:156 (1,2) - Don't approach so much the reverse to (2), it could give something good if you move it
01:40:871 (1) - 01:46:871 (1) - 01:53:728 (3) - 01:54:585 (2) - 01:57:156 (2) - 02:00:585 (3) - Same [Those reverses were originally double reverses, then I realized it shouldnt be like that, thats the result :p I'll change the spacing though/list]

Fursum wrote:

Lexis wrote:

M4M from my queue~

[Light Advanced]

The inherithed points at 00:04:330 - and 00:04:340 - are not needed These came from Insane, they don't hurt so I'll just leave them

P.S : They should be deleted because they aren't needed, If you delete them in this diff, they won't be deleted in Insane diff, I was just saying that they are not useful, and so, to delete them.

[...]

00:25:228 (9) - Move (9) to 00:25:013 - to be consistant with 00:16:013 (1,2,4,5,6,2,5) - Theres nothing on the white tick, and I think the spacing is enough to read it.

I was talking about consistency, not reading, don't forget that consistency is really important in a map !