Guest
home
beatmaps
rankings
community
store
help
forum
  1. Forums
  2. Beatmaps
  3. Ranked Beatmaps (Archived)

Alice In Videoland - Lay Me Down

posted
Total Posts
14
mrtn
osu! Alumni
1,065 posts
Joined March 2008
Topic Starter
mrtn
This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on zaterdag 27 september 2008 at 11:44:25

Artist: Alice In Videoland
Title: Lay Me Down
BPM: 150
Filesize: 4631kb
Play Time: 02:38
Difficulties Available:
  1. Normal (4,7 stars, 299 notes)
  2. Hard (4,81 stars, 435 notes)
Download: Alice In Videoland - Lay Me Down
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
NOTE: may be for mature audiences only due to the use of bad language (f-word sometimes)
New map of mine.

I'll add more difficulties if the timing on this 1 is fine.

update 18-sep: added difficulty [normal]
update 25-sep: fixed a few issues in normal
update 26-sep: fixed timing on sinistro's suggestion (add 25ms to offsets) also fixed a few minor issues that were pointed out by sinistro.
update 27-sep: followed eiji's comments. Spinner removed, it was indeed pretty hard for a normal map :p
Last edited by mrtn , edited 18 times in total.
mrtn
osu! Alumni
1,065 posts
Joined March 2008
Topic Starter
mrtn
new difficulty is up.
Larto
4,128 posts
Joined June 2008
Larto
My favourite beatmap. Well, except of Fiends and Shake it, but you still did one great job there.
You already did some fixes I wrote you in IRC. I think Normal is fine now.

About hard:

- 00:18:712 (2): Should be placed 1/4 earlier.

- 00:28:712 (14): Should be placed 1/4 earlier.

- 00:43:512 (1): Should be placed 1/4 later.

- 00:57:112 (1): Should be placed 1/4 later.

- 01:00:712 (11): Should be placed 1/4 earlier.

- 01:25:112 (1): Should be placed 1/4 later

- 01:37:912 (1): Should be placed 1/4 later

- 01:44:810 (3): Should be placed a little bit higher to fit into the system.

- 02:25:910 (1): Should be placed 1/4 later.

- 02:38:710 (1): Should be placed 1/4 later.

This definitely is one of my favourite maps, you did a great job there. There actually aren't that many problems, you just copied one problem into the whole beatmap, but when you fixed this, this imo should be ranked. Would star if I could.
mrtn
osu! Alumni
1,065 posts
Joined March 2008
Topic Starter
mrtn

Larto wrote:

My favourite beatmap. Well, except of Fiends and Shake it, but you still did one great job there.
You already did some fixes I wrote you in IRC. I think Normal is fine now.

About hard:

- 00:18:712 (2): Should be placed 1/4 earlier.

- 00:28:712 (14): Should be placed 1/4 earlier.

- 00:43:512 (1): Should be placed 1/4 later.

- 00:57:112 (1): Should be placed 1/4 later.

- 01:00:712 (11): Should be placed 1/4 earlier.

- 01:25:112 (1): Should be placed 1/4 later

- 01:37:912 (1): Should be placed 1/4 later

- 01:44:810 (3): Should be placed a little bit higher to fit into the system.

- 02:25:910 (1): Should be placed 1/4 later.

- 02:38:710 (1): Should be placed 1/4 later.

This definitely is one of my favourite maps, you did a great job there. There actually aren't that many problems, you just copied one problem into the whole beatmap, but when you fixed this, this imo should be ranked. Would star if I could.
fixed all, thx for modding and I'm glad you like it ^^

Now it's time to wait for a BAT's opinion :).
Sinistro
osu! Alumni
1,412 posts
Joined January 2008
Sinistro
Offset feels early; try adding 25ms to the first section's offset and 27 ms to each of the other two. Resnap.

Both difficulties
01:52:41 - Make this the start of a new combo, since it's right after a break.

Hard
00:43:71 (1) - Move this 1/4 backwards.

Consider finding a background image, although the absence of one will not prevent ranking.
mrtn
osu! Alumni
1,065 posts
Joined March 2008
Topic Starter
mrtn

Sinistro wrote:

Offset feels early; try adding 25ms to the first section's offset and 27 ms to each of the other two. Resnap.

Both difficulties
01:52:41 - Make this the start of a new combo, since it's right after a break.

Hard
00:43:71 (1) - Move this 1/4 backwards.
all fixed :)
Sinistro
osu! Alumni
1,412 posts
Joined January 2008
Sinistro
Bubbling!
mrtn
osu! Alumni
1,065 posts
Joined March 2008
Topic Starter
mrtn
thanks! :D
EiJi
osu! Alumni
647 posts
Here since the beginning
EiJi
Hard: Fine.

Normal: Don't agree with the spinner 02:13:43 (1) - it's not fitting for a 'normal' difficulty.

Cosmetics:
Normal:
01:56:43 (4) - would look better directly under the slider.
02:22:83 (5) - same as above

There are others, but those two caught my attention.

Cosmetics are optional, but that spinners makes this unrankable for me personally.

Fun map.
mrtn
osu! Alumni
1,065 posts
Joined March 2008
Topic Starter
mrtn

EiJi wrote:

Hard: Fine.

Normal: Don't agree with the spinner 02:13:43 (1) - it's not fitting for a 'normal' difficulty.

Cosmetics:
Normal:
01:56:43 (4) - would look better directly under the slider.
02:22:83 (5) - same as above

There are others, but those two caught my attention.

Cosmetics are optional, but that spinners makes this unrankable for me personally.

Fun map.
fixed, agreed on the cosmetics so I fixed that through the entire map aswell.
EiJi
osu! Alumni
647 posts
Here since the beginning
EiJi
Ugh. One last request. For normal. Last one I swear.

02:04:23 (8) - could you move this elsewhere? Maybe below the 7 and 9? The shadow of the 5 is still present when this 8 pops up.

After this I'll rank it.
mrtn
osu! Alumni
1,065 posts
Joined March 2008
Topic Starter
mrtn

EiJi wrote:

Ugh. One last request. For normal. Last one I swear.

02:04:23 (8) - could you move this elsewhere? Maybe below the 7 and 9? The shadow of the 5 is still present when this 8 pops up.

After this I'll rank it.
done :)
EiJi
osu! Alumni
647 posts
Here since the beginning
EiJi
Thanks for your cooperation :P



Download: IRON ATTACK! - Cavalrymaid (fartownik) [Insane2].osu
Twistshock
2 posts
Joined February 2010
Twistshock
The normal difficulty gives a stupid amount of pp if you've below 1k and get a halfway decent score. Probably due to there being less than 1000 ranked scores at the time of writing.
Please sign in to reply.

New reply

0
1 / 14