xJ1 wrote:

Heyo, from my mod queue

A.S.L:

I think the sound starts here 00:02:772 - for the spinner, also it helps not always getting a 100 on it ^-^ lol

01:28:820 (1,2) - 2 can be 180 degree rotate of 1 for better flow and aesthetics i think pattern now have better flow

01:46:784 (5,6) - Spacing here should be lowered

02:21:634 (1,2,3) - This is very hard to hit, idk when I playtested, it was a pain to hit, mapping it passively could help idk but will change later

02:31:694 (1,2,3) - Idk, imo, I think these should be played passively since it's really hard to hit it with 4 consecutive 1/4 sliders preceding it ...i'll come up a new pattern to figure it out ;w;

General:

I really like this map, it flows very well and plays smoothly. GL~! Thank you!

Sinnoh wrote:

00:04:030 (1) - You could easily use many more whistles or clack sounds in this area, currently not enough feedback. Could also increase volume since 20% is too low.
00:10:137 (3,6) - Why not blanket this?
00:13:550 (7) - Move this to y=210, 90 degrees is a bit more organised. do put a bit down but i guess is not the way you said lol
00:14:808 (1) - You're missing custom hitsounds, these are default claps.
00:38:521 (1) - Why not move dont think necessary
01:10:497 (2,3) - This jump is quite overspaced, violin isn’t really strong enough for this jump.
01:34:568 (1,2) - Use of not circular flow is a bit much here, ctrl-j each slider would be much more comfortable to play. didnt change 2 cuz i wanna break the flow here
01:36:544 (2,3,4) - Same as above. I think this could work if you can ctrl-j 01:36:724 (3,4,5,1,2) - and do some adjustments.
01:43:191 (1,2,3,4) - Overspaced compared to 01:31:694 (1,2,3) -
01:58:640 (7,8) - You can still focus on the snares with ½ clickable rhythm if you make these ¼ sliders, would follow the really dominant ¼ here. during this part i don't want to show any 1/4 unless i think really necessary (like 01:58:191 (4) - ). btw they are 1/8 lul
03:13:910 (6,7,8) - Lots of ¼ here, could use a buzz slider or something then it will be to intense imo

Set looks fine but I don’t nominate stuff with unreasonably high spacing like this, even if it’s not farmable. Just not my kind of set (marathons are zzzzzzz for me sorry)
That's why i hate mapping marathon since it's really boring and can never get ranked zzzz i'll find you with another short map when u open u q again (￣︶￣)

DeRandom Otaku wrote:

1. 00:02:772 - The spinner is a bit too short tbh lol. you could safely start it from 00:02:772 - here since the held sound in the song also starts from this point
2. 01:00:077 - 01:00:167 - The beats are stronger than 01:00:347 - 01:00:437 - so it would be cooler to have 01:00:077 - these mapped as well
3. 01:23:431 (1) - A lot better as two circles instead because the drums are really strong here. you did two circles at 03:21:275 (1,2) - as well so ye
4. 01:23:431 (1) - Also using some kind of hitsounds here such as drum clap would be nice. leaving it without hs doesn't sound that good
5. 01:32:772 (4) - Remove clap
6. 03:18:670 (8,1) - The jump is totally unnecessary and doesn't make much sense at all
7. 04:04:030 (1) - Remove finish from the whole slider

yea, reply to previous mods and this one and call me back all fixed

1. 00:14:808 - Increase volume to 35
2. 02:44:988 - Isn't this section supposed to have gray combo colors? Its not much different from 02:50:736 -
3. 01:23:431 (1,2) - Circles are nicer but jump would make it a lot better. Anti jump doesn't go well with the song and plays weirdly considering how strong the drums are
4. 04:59:718 (1,2,1) - The song is 1/3 here

DeRandom Otaku wrote:

1. 00:14:808 - Increase volume to 35 Sure
2. 02:44:988 - Isn't this section supposed to have gray combo colors? Its not much different from 02:50:736 - ok
3. 01:23:431 (1,2) - Circles are nicer but jump would make it a lot better. Anti jump doesn't go well with the song and plays weirdly considering how strong the drums are applied some jumps here
4. 04:59:718 (1,2,1) - The song is 1/3 here i'd like to ignore drums at background. 1/3 is not that apparent so follow guitar here is more reasonable choice imo

Meat Inspector wrote:

offset should be +15 -> so you need a rebubble (also for the first redline, its messed up because when you look at the timing right before the second redline its 1ms off pls make it line up) i set offset +12 now it should be good. also red line was fixed


quick thoughts tho
compare 01:23:431 (1,2,1) - and 03:21:275 (1,2,1,2) - I'm not really a fan of how you ignore the vocals the second time and not the first, it comes off as inconsistent, if you were going to map 03:21:814 (1,2) - i would say ignore the vocals in the first part as well. I would say you have to pick between the two on the second part there are two additional drum hit which don't show up in the first part, and that's why I chose to follow vocal at first part. so no change here

some streams are very clearly additive like 04:25:317 (9,10,11,1) - 04:11:215 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 04:11:215 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - etc pls look into this (most noteably the yellow tick notes for them)
04:29:898 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - this is extremely ambiguous but I think its still 1/3 (or 1/6 for this bpm)
04:36:365 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - most of these are additive

04:25:317 (9,10,11,1) - for this one, nice catch. i didn't notice that there is no clear 1/4 （/w\）. However i put some kick sliders here so that they don't lose their intensity
For the rest, i think they are fine cuz they kinda feel like guitar tremolo (Yeah i googled for that word lol) to me so some stream would be nice imo

also 04:21:455 (1,2,3) - stuff like this is technically additive but its good because of the guitar stuff so pls keep

good luck

Thank you!

Chromoxx wrote:

hi

01:03:131 (2,3) - maybe ctrl the rhythm here and rearrange pattern accordingly for better vocal emphasis? nice!
02:31:694 (1,2,3) - it's pretty hard to tell that these are 1/3 from the visual spacing and there isn't any natural leadup to it like there was at 02:19:838 - so i'd suggest making these a slider instead rebuilt this part so now they are just like 02:20:566 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3) - (and also become much harder)
03:55:407 (1,2,3,4) - this is kinda personal but i don't really find the stacks here visually appealing, you also don't really seem to use stuff like this in the rest of the diff, maybe space them normally instead? ok :3 (and they turned harder too omg)

nothing more, really nice map!

Thank you for your help!

Also raised ar to 9.2 cuz i found those 1/6 were kinda hard to read. Hope this work :S

Kurai wrote:

Hey! Why did you put 91Days in the tags and not in the source?

Ryuusei Aika wrote:

91Days放一下source

Ryuusei Aika wrote:

Ryuusei Aika wrote:

91Days放一下source

GG当时没反应过来什么意思想了半天Source是啥玩意

求求你再多做点凛冽时雨吧我爱死这个乐队了

Feb wrote:

don't want to be assparty here, but noticed following while playing because it might be because you forgot to place it down

02:47:872 (1,2,3) - is the note on 02:48:231 - purposely missing
because if yes it's quite confusing to play that other one being mapped right after at 02:48:950 (3) - with identical patterns and identical sounds.

Good map tho keep it up. Liked that other Tk map from you too.

it's not a missing, i just followed piano here and some abnormal break at this quite part works pretty well imo
Thank you for your attention! Hope you enjoy it:3