SkinnyJommy wrote:

from what i understand, you can have at the most half of the hitcircle off of the grid, and nothing is going past that!

I don't really know who told you that, but every object needs to be entirely visible on both 16:9 and 4:3 resolutions.
Imagine if you need to hit something you cannot see completely? :thinking:

FruityEnLoops wrote:

SkinnyJommy wrote:

from what i understand, you can have at the most half of the hitcircle off of the grid, and nothing is going past that!

I don't really know who told you that, but every object needs to be entirely visible on both 16:9 and 4:3 resolutions.
Imagine if you need to hit something you cannot see completely? :thinking:

if you arent allowed to go off the grid, then why is it possible?

SkinnyJommy wrote:

if you arent allowed to go off the grid, then why is it possible?

Placing objects in 4:3 is different than in 16:9, some object mapped in 16:9 appear lower.
This is why in 4:3 some object are out of the grid.
Your set needs to be compatible for all resolutions.
I'm one of the rare person that mods in 4:3 these days though :'(

Here we go again.



Best of luck to you! ^_________^

Tyraenos wrote:

Here we go again.

Mod

00:23:871 (2) - Awkward playing this slider since parallel. it feels fine to me!

01:16:052 (2,3) - These feel like the same sounds but one is slider and one is circle. I don't hear the sound at slider end. they pretty much are the same sound but i used the first note as a slider to create the feel that your cursor is still going? idk its hard to explain but you dont get that feel with just 2 circles, at least not to me. and yeah i muted the slider ends on those parts!

01:26:744 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - this kai time stream is less intense then all your other streams to be fair none of the streams are very intense except for one

02:10:706 (4,1) - The end of stream jump here is very extreme when directly compared to KAI TIME streams. In your kai time streams they end with very little jumps. This is a HUGE spike. it has less spacing than the end of the first kiai though?? and this part is just as intense if not more intes

02:13:658 (3) - The placement of this slider feels inconsistent with the rest of your map. what do you mean??

02:41:184 (5,6,7,1) - Based off of previous streams this slider either needs a spacing change or needs to follow the angle of the stream. i dont like things being the same for every similar section, it limits creativity for new patterns and rhythm and flow for absolutely no reason. if its still playable,
it shouldnt be an issue. this is a map, not a song. i want to explore all that i can create

02:56:105 (1,2,3,4) - I don't understand these notes. Sounds like you were trying to accent the violins but you have one extra note (strong beat should be slider head) and spacing is different for each note.

02:58:658 (1,2,3,4,1) - 02:58:658 (1,2,3,4,1) - You did the same thing here with the spacing. I get that you are trying to decrease spacing to correlate to decreasing pitch but 02:59:137 (4,1) - is an increase in jump and you are kinda overlapping things so the effect feels lost. Either make it STAND OUT or it feels not worth doing. you right! i was only counting the 4 violin strums and didnt count the 5th, whoops my bad

03:44:615 (1) - This slider starts on her voice instead of the guitar, then proceeds to ignore a syllable. i realize that it doesnt start when the guitar hits, but if you move the slider onto where the guitar actually comes in, it doesnt feel right to me, idk

General

Now lets talk about your 8 note streams. You have three streams that change direction suddenly but the first 5 notes are in smooth shape. five that change direction with a distance spacing jump on notes 4-5. These were not consistant with kai time at all. very randomly distributed. This is only including EIGHT note streams that have SUDDEN change in direction. Unify them.

SPOILER

4 note 04:03:764 (3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4) - 01:26:744 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - 02:53:551 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - 03:36:956 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 04:13:339 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) -
5 note 01:47:169 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - 02:10:148 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - 02:40:945 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - as i said before, i dont like being consistant with similar parts, i map whatever comes to mind

Best of luck to you! ^_________^

thanks for le mod!!

if there any hs mod please sparate it and ill check later

update hs
https://puu.sh/wgxxY/8212a6f0be.osz

Just dropping, particles shouldn't be capitalized in their first letter so in this case the title should be "Yume no Tsubomi"
The map is good for me so gl

no kds

00:02:488 (1) - this combo still has 3 notes before a strong note, so basically nc 00:02:968 (4) - , remove nc from 00:03:127 (1) - and adjust patterns

00:08:712 (2,3,4,5,6,1,2) - this would look a lot better if the spacing inbetween objects was more consistent
00:33:765 (1,2,3,4,5) - move 00:33:765 (1,3) - under 00:33:127 (3) - and move 00:34:244 (4) - a bit to the top right, it creates a nice looking symmetrish pattern

01:00:893 (2) - way too close to 01:00:414 (4) - , i recommend ctrl+h on 01:00:893 (2,3) - and then moving them both so 01:00:893 (2) - is more in the middle of the previous pattern.
01:08:233 (1,2,3) - the sliderends of (2) and (3) being so differently far away from the sliderbody of (1) looks really odd, please equalize that distance

01:26:744 (1) - nothing really wrong with the current burst but ctrl+h on the first stack and then adjusting the stack a bit makes it look like 350% better
01:47:488 (1) - nc here is mandatory because the stream changes so drastically in structure here

01:47:808 (1) - this doesnt work because the strongest sound in this whole stream has the least emphasis through spacing, even a 1/4 jump would be justified (you do exactly that in the second chorus so ??). you need to move up the rest of the stream a bit but that doesnt come in conflict with any other object

02:27:860 (3,6) - i recommend nc's

02:39:828 (5) - i think this 1/4 jump is unjustified, you have multiple spots in the map with the same emphasis (a slightly stronger note on the melody + bass drum) which you emphasize with just a 1/4 slider, which is better imo

03:06:158 (3,5) - notes are way too close in the timeline, please do not use such a small overlap

03:29:615 (3) - move this a bit to the right, it currently is closer to (1) than (4) is to (2)

03:34:722 (2) - rotate this a bit to anti-clockwise so it stands perpendicular to the sliderbody of (1). remember to adjust (3) afterwards aswell

03:47:488 (3) - please move this to somewhere around x368 y320, the current position looks plain wrong

04:13:977 (1) - linear 1/4 jumps like this play really unforgiving, id tone it down for playability sake (though it is justified in the song ehhehe)


there was an update of the map in the middle of my mod so if you think you fixed sometihng beforehand you probably did

ukod wrote:

00:02:488 (1) - this combo still has 3 notes before a strong note, so basically nc 00:02:968 (4) - , remove nc from 00:03:127 (1) - and adjust patterns i think the nc's are fine as is!

00:08:712 (2,3,4,5,6,1,2) - this would look a lot better if the spacing inbetween objects was more consistent fixed!

also made sliders less sharp

00:33:765 (1,2,3,4,5) - move 00:33:765 (1,3) - under 00:33:127 (3) - and move 00:34:244 (4) - a bit to the top right, it creates a nice looking symmetrish pattern i see you, fixed

example

01:00:893 (2) - way too close to 01:00:414 (4) - , i recommend ctrl+h on 01:00:893 (2,3) - and then moving them both so 01:00:893 (2) - is more in the middle of the previous pattern. yeah thats what i fixed in the update during your mod!

example

01:08:233 (1,2,3) - the sliderends of (2) and (3) being so differently far away from the sliderbody of (1) looks really odd, please equalize that distance i think its fine as it is now

01:26:744 (1) - nothing really wrong with the current burst but ctrl+h on the first stack and then adjusting the stack a bit makes it look like 350% better not really a fan of the look of the first half of that stream, but i agree with the nc

also nc'd the starts of each individual stack but thats up to you

01:47:488 (1) - nc here is mandatory because the stream changes so drastically in structure here you right, fixed!

01:47:808 (1) - this doesnt work because the strongest sound in this whole stream has the least emphasis through spacing, even a 1/4 jump would be justified (you do exactly that in the second chorus so ??). you need to move up the rest of the stream a bit but that doesnt come in conflict with any other object you're right, im an idiot!!! fixed

02:27:860 (3,6) - i recommend nc's i think youre right, fixed

02:39:828 (5) - i think this 1/4 jump is unjustified, you have multiple spots in the map with the same emphasis (a slightly stronger note on the melody + bass drum) which you emphasize with just a 1/4 slider, which is better imo i suppose youre right, no one likes that part anyway

03:06:158 (3,5) - notes are way too close in the timeline, please do not use such a small overlap you right!!! fixed

03:29:615 (3) - move this a bit to the right, it currently is closer to (1) than (4) is to (2) good eye! fixed

03:34:722 (2) - rotate this a bit to anti-clockwise so it stands perpendicular to the sliderbody of (1). remember to adjust (3) afterwards aswell got it!

03:47:488 (3) - please move this to somewhere around x368 y320, the current position looks plain wrong fixeed

04:13:977 (1) - linear 1/4 jumps like this play really unforgiving, id tone it down for playability sake (though it is justified in the song ehhehe) i think they play fine, they arent really that bad tbh


there was an update of the map in the middle of my mod so if you think you fixed sometihng beforehand you probably did

thanks for the mod! s orry for the update in the middle

Azzy Approves!

I suck at modding and your map is good so I'm gonna have some trouble finding stuff to point out. In any case,

[Dream]

00:53:552 (2,3) - Going from .8x SV to 1.5x SV seems a bit high here.
01:01:850 (1,1) - ^ maybe try to introduce faster speeds more gradually?
01:22:116 (1) - Sorry if I'm missing something but this slider shape seems a bit out of place.
01:38:393 (5,1) - Would feel like the slider would look better if it were overlapping this circle.
02:52:434 (6,1) - Idk if you were trying to get these sliders to be vertical reflections, but if you were, the first slider is slightly too far from the center.
03:30:573 (1,2) - I feel like these 2 circles shouldn't be part of the same combo color, otherwise the player might try to hit the second one on the red tick instead of the white tick.
04:10:626 (1) - You use these kinds of sliders a few times, but they just seem a bit less pretty than the rest of them, even though they're clearly blanketing circles and stuff. Probably a personal issue, but I feel like a better shape would fit, or at least one that's more balanced, like 04:43:817 (1) -

Basically that's all that I can find, so sorry that I cannot help much. Good luck with your map anyhow!

Kradfiz wrote:

I suck at modding and your map is good so I'm gonna have some trouble finding stuff to point out. In any case,

[Dream]

00:53:552 (2,3) - Going from .8x SV to 1.5x SV seems a bit high here.
01:01:850 (1,1) - ^ maybe try to introduce faster speeds more gradually? i feel what youre saying, but i like the speeds at which they are at atm
01:22:116 (1) - Sorry if I'm missing something but this slider shape seems a bit out of place. hmm... you might be right, but i wanted to use different sliders all over the place
01:38:393 (5,1) - Would feel like the slider would look better if it were overlapping this circle. ill have to check this out, thanks!
02:52:434 (6,1) - Idk if you were trying to get these sliders to be vertical reflections, but if you were, the first slider is slightly too far from the center. no they werent supposed to be identical, but youve got a good eye!
03:30:573 (1,2) - I feel like these 2 circles shouldn't be part of the same combo color, otherwise the player might try to hit the second one on the red tick instead of the white tick. youre right! fixed
04:10:626 (1) - You use these kinds of sliders a few times, but they just seem a bit less pretty than the rest of them, even though they're clearly blanketing circles and stuff. Probably a personal issue, but I feel like a better shape would fit, or at least one that's more balanced, like 04:43:817 (1) - fixed!

Basically that's all that I can find, so sorry that I cannot help much. Good luck with your map anyhow!

thank you for the mod!

[mada mada mada]
00:10:148 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1) - would be better if you make those a not so low spacing stream, it doesn't play so good...

00:13:659 (1) - space this one more ofr rhythm sake
00:13:978 (1) - ^

00:41:265 (5) - make this 2 circles

01:04:084 (1) - space stuff like this more pls!

01:35:361 (1,1,1) - tbh you don't need to spam nc here

01:47:808 (1) - low the spacing pls
03:14:615 (1) - ^

01:50:839 (1,2) - hitsounds???
01:52:595 (7,9,10) - ^

02:56:264 (2,3,4) - unusual flow you are usuing here, try avoid this linear flow..
02:58:817 (2,3,4) - ^

03:30:573 (1) - space this more pls!!

03:32:328 (1) - ugly slider imo xd

03:58:977 (7,1) - really low spacing

rly good map dude!!
gl

Sotarks wrote:

[mada mada mada]
00:10:148 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1) - would be better if you make those a not so low spacing stream, it doesn't play so good... i think it plays fine!
and i did the small circular stream cause of the instrument here, i think it emphasizes it pretty well!

00:13:659 (1) - space this one more ofr rhythm sake you right, fixed!
00:13:978 (1) - ^ fixed

00:41:265 (5) - make this 2 circles ahh yes i see, fixed!

01:04:084 (1) - space stuff like this more pls! got it boss

01:35:361 (1,1,1) - tbh you don't need to spam nc here hmm im not sure... i must see with time

01:47:808 (1) - low the spacing pls its not that high though!
03:14:615 (1) - ^ but i really like this!

01:50:839 (1,2) - hitsounds??? sorry sometimes i delete notes and i forget they have hitsounds on them!
01:52:595 (7,9,10) - ^ ^

02:56:264 (2,3,4) - unusual flow you are usuing here, try avoid this linear flow..
02:58:817 (2,3,4) - ^ the point of this weird decreasing linear flow is to follow the string sound that is lowering pitch

03:30:573 (1) - space this more pls!! fixed!

03:32:328 (1) - ugly slider imo xd just because my slider has a pimple you... think its ugly?? WOW

03:58:977 (7,1) - really low spacing true... but i kind of like it that way!

rly good map dude!!
gl

thank you for the mod bro!!!

hs update
https://puu.sh/wiCNr/405baeac1d.osu

(copy paste from "Timing Points" section until end)

Time Capsule wrote:

hs update
https://puu.sh/wiCNr/405baeac1d.osu

(copy paste from "Timing Points" section until end)

thanks!

quickly irc mod

Just sparate if theres any mod to the hs and ill check it by myself later on
https://puu.sh/wkHJY/544b5f2c33.osu

(same as before)

H E L L O T H E R E
here is m4m

Dream

1. I listen few more times and made little timing fixes for you
   
   TRY ME

   [TimingPoints]
   590,319.148936170213,4,2,2,60,1,0
   5686,319.148936170213,4,2,1,55,1,0
   5686,-133.333333333333,4,2,1,55,0,0
   13345,-133.333333333333,4,2,2,55,0,0
   14143,-133.333333333333,4,2,1,55,0,0
   14462,-100,4,2,1,55,0,0
   14702,-100,4,2,1,5,0,0
   14782,-100,4,2,1,55,0,0
   15021,-100,4,2,1,5,0,0
   15101,-100,4,2,1,55,0,0
   15340,-100,4,2,1,5,0,0
   15420,-100,4,2,1,55,0,0
   15899,-100,4,2,1,70,0,0
   23568,319.148936170213,4,2,1,50,1,0
   23568,-125,4,2,1,50,0,0
   33143,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,50,0,0
   33781,-125,4,2,1,50,0,0
   41600,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,60,0,0
   42159,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,5,0,0
   42238,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,60,0,0
   43515,-66.6666666666667,4,2,2,30,0,0
   43994,-125,4,2,1,50,0,0
   44632,-125,4,2,2,50,0,0
   44951,-125,4,2,1,50,0,0
   45270,-125,4,2,2,50,0,0
   45430,-125,4,2,1,50,0,0
   45909,-125,4,2,2,50,0,0
   46068,-125,4,2,1,50,0,0
   49738,-125,4,2,2,50,0,0
   49898,-125,4,2,1,50,0,0
   50377,-125,4,2,2,50,0,0
   50696,-125,4,2,1,50,0,0
   51015,-125,4,2,2,50,0,0
   51175,-125,4,2,1,50,0,0
   53568,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,50,0,0
   54207,-125,4,2,1,50,0,0
   61866,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,50,0,0
   64340,-100,4,2,1,5,0,0
   64419,-100,4,2,1,60,0,0
   75111,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,60,0,0
   75749,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,60,0,0
   75988,-100,4,2,1,5,0,0
   76068,-100,4,2,1,60,0,0
   76148,-100,4,2,1,5,0,0
   76228,-100,4,2,1,60,0,0
   76866,-100,4,2,2,60,0,0
   77026,-90.9090909090909,4,2,1,70,0,1
   110855,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,70,0,1
   111813,-90.9090909090909,4,2,1,70,0,1
   112930,-90.9090909090909,4,2,1,70,0,1
   115483,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,70,0,1
   116840,-100,4,2,1,5,0,1
   116919,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,70,0,1
   116999,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,5,0,1
   117079,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,70,0,1
   118036,-90.9090909090909,4,2,1,70,0,0
   130802,319.148936170213,4,2,1,60,1,0
   130802,-125,4,2,1,60,0,0
   140376,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,60,0,0
   141014,-125,4,2,1,60,0,0
   148674,-100,4,2,1,70,0,0
   150908,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,70,0,0
   151147,-100,4,2,1,5,0,0
   151227,-100,4,2,1,60,0,0
   161520,-100,4,2,1,5,0,0
   161599,-100,4,2,1,60,0,0
   161679,-100,4,2,1,5,0,0
   161759,-100,4,2,1,60,0,0
   161839,-100,4,2,1,5,0,0
   161919,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,70,0,0
   162317,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,5,0,0
   162397,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,60,0,0
   162477,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,5,0,0
   162557,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,60,0,0
   162796,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,5,0,0
   162876,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,60,0,0
   162956,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,5,0,0
   163036,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,60,0,0
   163355,-66.6666666666667,4,2,2,60,0,0
   163833,-90.9090909090909,4,2,1,70,0,1
   197663,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,70,0,1
   198621,-90.9090909090909,4,2,1,70,0,1
   202291,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,70,0,1
   203647,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,5,0,1
   203727,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,70,0,1
   203807,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,5,0,1
   203887,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,70,0,1
   204206,-66.6666666666667,4,2,2,70,0,1
   204844,-100,4,2,1,70,0,0
   209392,-100,4,2,1,5,0,0
   209472,-100,4,2,1,70,0,0
   209552,-100,4,2,1,5,0,0
   209631,-100,4,2,1,70,0,0
   209711,-100,4,2,1,5,0,0
   209791,-100,4,2,1,70,0,0
   209871,-100,4,2,1,5,0,0
   209950,-100,4,2,1,70,0,0
   212344,-83.3333333333333,4,2,1,70,0,0
   214658,-100,4,2,1,70,0,0
   215775,-100,4,2,1,5,0,0
   215855,-100,4,2,1,70,0,0
   215934,-100,4,2,1,5,0,0
   216014,-100,4,2,1,70,0,0
   216094,-100,4,2,1,5,0,0
   216174,-83.3333333333333,4,2,1,70,0,0
   216972,-100,4,2,1,70,0,0
   217610,-142.857142857143,4,2,2,40,0,0
   224631,-100,4,2,1,50,0,0
   225270,-100,4,2,1,50,0,0
   227823,-100,4,2,1,60,0,0
   232371,-100,4,2,1,5,0,0
   232450,-100,4,2,1,60,0,0
   232530,-100,4,2,1,5,0,0
   232610,-100,4,2,1,60,0,0
   232690,-100,4,2,1,5,0,0
   232770,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,50,0,0
   233009,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,5,0,0
   233089,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,60,0,0
   233169,-100,4,2,1,5,0,0
   233248,-100,4,2,1,60,0,0
   233887,-100,4,2,2,60,0,0
   234046,-80,4,2,1,70,0,1
   267876,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,70,0,1
   269950,-80,4,2,1,70,0,1
   272982,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,70,0,1
   275057,-80,4,2,1,70,0,1
   280163,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,70,0,1
   281520,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,5,0,1
   281599,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,70,0,1
   281679,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,5,0,1
   281759,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,70,0,1
   282397,-50,4,2,2,70,0,1
   282637,-100,4,2,1,5,0,1
   282716,-90.9090909090909,4,2,1,70,0,0
   295498,319.148936170213,4,2,1,70,1,0
   295857,-100,4,2,1,5,0,0
   296002,368.098159509202,4,2,1,70,1,0
   296370,-100,4,2,1,5,0,0
   296556,410.958904109589,4,2,1,70,1,0
   300511,-100,4,2,1,5,0,0

2. 00:09:038 (5,6,1) - thats early, too huge jumps imo even for this strong part
3. 00:10:792 - more emphasize for this jumps please, for example: following music here 00:10:793 (1,2,3,4,1,2) - you can decreasing spacing, but for this 00:11:751 (3,4) - two notes bigger jumps, 00:12:068 - I could leave this sound empty like its pretty weak with rest of them, but you also can stack it with prev note, here 00:12:707 - same too
4. 00:18:293 (5,1) - sharper angle for this jump please
5. 00:22:920 - another weak sound xd
6. 00:25:324 (4) - this slider should finishing prev reverse jumps, try place it around this 00:25:005 (2) - circle or may be farther like new part
7. 00:32:984 (1,2,3) - just stack them feels better imo
8. 00:33:463 (4,2) - imo thats hard to notice this circle under slider
9. 00:44:633 (3,4,1) - thats not comfortable movement, moving up here 00:45:112 (4,1) - plays better imo
10. 01:57:957 (4,1) - meh, this 1/4 jump unnecessary or at least set it in opposite direction please
11. 02:01:388 (4,5,6,1) - uncomfotable movement
12. 03:09:365 (1) - ctrl+Ged this slider plays better imo, may be rework a little this pattern?
13. 03:17:026 (7,8,1) - just stack them please
14. 03:24:207 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - actually this cross screen stream looks weaird xd may be make very small spaced stream instead?
15. 04:47:663 (8,9,1) - stack them please xd
16. 04:53:887 (7,5) - stack?

thats it from me, overall you should use little move emphasizing for jumps imo
nice map =w=b
good luck!

WISPG_G wrote:

H E L L O T H E R E
here is m4m

Dream

1. I listen few more times and made little timing fixes for you okay, ill try this!
   
   TRY ME

   [TimingPoints]
   590,319.148936170213,4,2,2,60,1,0
   5686,319.148936170213,4,2,1,55,1,0
   5686,-133.333333333333,4,2,1,55,0,0
   13345,-133.333333333333,4,2,2,55,0,0
   14143,-133.333333333333,4,2,1,55,0,0
   14462,-100,4,2,1,55,0,0
   14702,-100,4,2,1,5,0,0
   14782,-100,4,2,1,55,0,0
   15021,-100,4,2,1,5,0,0
   15101,-100,4,2,1,55,0,0
   15340,-100,4,2,1,5,0,0
   15420,-100,4,2,1,55,0,0
   15899,-100,4,2,1,70,0,0
   23568,319.148936170213,4,2,1,50,1,0
   23568,-125,4,2,1,50,0,0
   33143,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,50,0,0
   33781,-125,4,2,1,50,0,0
   41600,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,60,0,0
   42159,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,5,0,0
   42238,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,60,0,0
   43515,-66.6666666666667,4,2,2,30,0,0
   43994,-125,4,2,1,50,0,0
   44632,-125,4,2,2,50,0,0
   44951,-125,4,2,1,50,0,0
   45270,-125,4,2,2,50,0,0
   45430,-125,4,2,1,50,0,0
   45909,-125,4,2,2,50,0,0
   46068,-125,4,2,1,50,0,0
   49738,-125,4,2,2,50,0,0
   49898,-125,4,2,1,50,0,0
   50377,-125,4,2,2,50,0,0
   50696,-125,4,2,1,50,0,0
   51015,-125,4,2,2,50,0,0
   51175,-125,4,2,1,50,0,0
   53568,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,50,0,0
   54207,-125,4,2,1,50,0,0
   61866,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,50,0,0
   64340,-100,4,2,1,5,0,0
   64419,-100,4,2,1,60,0,0
   75111,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,60,0,0
   75749,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,60,0,0
   75988,-100,4,2,1,5,0,0
   76068,-100,4,2,1,60,0,0
   76148,-100,4,2,1,5,0,0
   76228,-100,4,2,1,60,0,0
   76866,-100,4,2,2,60,0,0
   77026,-90.9090909090909,4,2,1,70,0,1
   110855,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,70,0,1
   111813,-90.9090909090909,4,2,1,70,0,1
   112930,-90.9090909090909,4,2,1,70,0,1
   115483,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,70,0,1
   116840,-100,4,2,1,5,0,1
   116919,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,70,0,1
   116999,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,5,0,1
   117079,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,70,0,1
   118036,-90.9090909090909,4,2,1,70,0,0
   130802,319.148936170213,4,2,1,60,1,0
   130802,-125,4,2,1,60,0,0
   140376,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,60,0,0
   141014,-125,4,2,1,60,0,0
   148674,-100,4,2,1,70,0,0
   150908,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,70,0,0
   151147,-100,4,2,1,5,0,0
   151227,-100,4,2,1,60,0,0
   161520,-100,4,2,1,5,0,0
   161599,-100,4,2,1,60,0,0
   161679,-100,4,2,1,5,0,0
   161759,-100,4,2,1,60,0,0
   161839,-100,4,2,1,5,0,0
   161919,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,70,0,0
   162317,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,5,0,0
   162397,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,60,0,0
   162477,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,5,0,0
   162557,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,60,0,0
   162796,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,5,0,0
   162876,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,60,0,0
   162956,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,5,0,0
   163036,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,60,0,0
   163355,-66.6666666666667,4,2,2,60,0,0
   163833,-90.9090909090909,4,2,1,70,0,1
   197663,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,70,0,1
   198621,-90.9090909090909,4,2,1,70,0,1
   202291,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,70,0,1
   203647,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,5,0,1
   203727,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,70,0,1
   203807,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,5,0,1
   203887,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,70,0,1
   204206,-66.6666666666667,4,2,2,70,0,1
   204844,-100,4,2,1,70,0,0
   209392,-100,4,2,1,5,0,0
   209472,-100,4,2,1,70,0,0
   209552,-100,4,2,1,5,0,0
   209631,-100,4,2,1,70,0,0
   209711,-100,4,2,1,5,0,0
   209791,-100,4,2,1,70,0,0
   209871,-100,4,2,1,5,0,0
   209950,-100,4,2,1,70,0,0
   212344,-83.3333333333333,4,2,1,70,0,0
   214658,-100,4,2,1,70,0,0
   215775,-100,4,2,1,5,0,0
   215855,-100,4,2,1,70,0,0
   215934,-100,4,2,1,5,0,0
   216014,-100,4,2,1,70,0,0
   216094,-100,4,2,1,5,0,0
   216174,-83.3333333333333,4,2,1,70,0,0
   216972,-100,4,2,1,70,0,0
   217610,-142.857142857143,4,2,2,40,0,0
   224631,-100,4,2,1,50,0,0
   225270,-100,4,2,1,50,0,0
   227823,-100,4,2,1,60,0,0
   232371,-100,4,2,1,5,0,0
   232450,-100,4,2,1,60,0,0
   232530,-100,4,2,1,5,0,0
   232610,-100,4,2,1,60,0,0
   232690,-100,4,2,1,5,0,0
   232770,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,50,0,0
   233009,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,5,0,0
   233089,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,60,0,0
   233169,-100,4,2,1,5,0,0
   233248,-100,4,2,1,60,0,0
   233887,-100,4,2,2,60,0,0
   234046,-80,4,2,1,70,0,1
   267876,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,70,0,1
   269950,-80,4,2,1,70,0,1
   272982,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,70,0,1
   275057,-80,4,2,1,70,0,1
   280163,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,70,0,1
   281520,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,5,0,1
   281599,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,70,0,1
   281679,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,5,0,1
   281759,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,70,0,1
   282397,-50,4,2,2,70,0,1
   282637,-100,4,2,1,5,0,1
   282716,-90.9090909090909,4,2,1,70,0,0
   295498,319.148936170213,4,2,1,70,1,0
   295857,-100,4,2,1,5,0,0
   296002,368.098159509202,4,2,1,70,1,0
   296370,-100,4,2,1,5,0,0
   296556,410.958904109589,4,2,1,70,1,0
   300511,-100,4,2,1,5,0,0

2. 00:09:038 (5,6,1) - thats early, too huge jumps imo even for this strong part i think it fits well
3. 00:10:792 - more emphasize for this jumps please, for example: following music here 00:10:793 (1,2,3,4,1,2) - you can decreasing spacing, but for this 00:11:751 (3,4) - two notes bigger jumps, 00:12:068 - I could leave this sound empty like its pretty weak with rest of them, but you also can stack it with prev note, here 00:12:707 - same too i like this the way it is!
4. 00:18:293 (5,1) - sharper angle for this jump please fixed!
5. 00:22:920 - another weak sound xd
6. 00:25:324 (4) - this slider should finishing prev reverse jumps, try place it around this 00:25:005 (2) - circle or may be farther like new part i like it the way it is tbh
7. 00:32:984 (1,2,3) - just stack them feels better imo i dont like them stacked here D:
8. 00:33:463 (4,2) - imo thats hard to notice this circle under slider it plays fine to me!
9. 00:44:633 (3,4,1) - thats not comfortable movement, moving up here 00:45:112 (4,1) - plays better imo
10. 01:57:957 (4,1) - meh, this 1/4 jump unnecessary or at least set it in opposite direction please its not necessary, but i like it
11. 02:01:388 (4,5,6,1) - uncomfotable movement it feels okay to me!
12. 03:09:365 (1) - ctrl+Ged this slider plays better imo, may be rework a little this pattern? hm.. i shall think about it
13. 03:17:026 (7,8,1) - just stack them please i dont really like them stacked here
14. 03:24:207 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - actually this cross screen stream looks weaird xd may be make very small spaced stream instead? i love this stream!
15. 04:47:663 (8,9,1) - stack them please xd i like the non stack triples after the stacked ones!
16. 04:53:887 (7,5) - stack? youre right! fixed

thats it from me, overall you should use little move emphasizing for jumps imo
nice map =w=b
good luck!

thank you for the mod!

411 pp for ss


let's go farmin bois

Hello!
Here are some of my personal opinion regarding to the maps, feel free to respond it whichever you may find fits

Dream
- In general, I believe you can do better job to decide the rhytmical usage of the diff. As I find there're overmapping that I don't think fits, section that will plays better with slider instead of circle, and vice versa. Your milage may vary though :thinking:
- 00:08:079 (6) - to make this notes more comfortable to hit, how about placing them around 448|91? That way, it'll also make the jump to the next slider to have sharper angle and possibly gave it more emphasis
- 00:11:908 (4,1) - and 00:12:547 (4,1) - I will personally change this into 1/2 slider because those synth melody (not drum) that used to create the jump pattern doesn't exist on both of the white tick
- 00:20:366 (3,5) - how about crtl+g these two? It will make the pattern have gradual spacing increase & avoid those (way too) extreme sharp jump on 00:20:047 (2,3,4) -
- 00:22:281 (1,2,3) - after such constant triangular jump, I don't think diagonal back and forth jump are that flowy to play. If you still want to keep back and forth jump, this placement is more sensible to me http://puu.sh/wnhyH/3149c6ae87.jpg Or you can just simply remake those particular jump to make them more flowy
- 00:25:163 (3) - move around 480|254 to emphasize the vocal more? http://puu.sh/wnhBx/22d7b257b9.jpg
- 00:41:121 (4,5) - how about something like this instead? because here 00:41:280 - you literally mapped to nothing, and it seems more correct to have white tick to be the clickable one http://puu.sh/wnhGJ/b8ce9df3d2.jpg
- 00:47:663 (5,1) - what do you think of this? imo it can bring more emphasis, and 5 is more natural to hit this way http://puu.sh/wnhQp/82677c3f8d.jpg
- 00:52:131 (2,3) - To me, it seems like you arrange this pattern the way it is now to compensate the lack of rhythm on the 00:52:450 -. If I were you, I would do something like this instead http://puu.sh/wnhZN/c8c463aeb6.jpg indeed vocal are less emphasized, but there'll be no ghost rhythm anymore lol
- 01:02:983 (4,1) - I'd rather have this as a 1/2 slider to be honest. 01:03:143 (1) - is unjustifiable to me because of lack of dominant instrument on them
- 01:35:058 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - I have a hard time justifying this pattern, NC, and general spacing on this part. Since there're no obvious increase of song intensity nor 1/2 drum sound. I think you should at least make the spacing less dramatic, and change them into a unified jumjpy pattern (eg:octagonal), rather than one-two type of jumps
- 01:47:185 (3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4) - personal opinion, I'm not very fond of this style of "break" stream since they literally break the flow. but your mileage may vary
- 02:05:536 (5) - how about 292|203? More of thriangular kind of jump will be better here
- 02:45:589 (2) - change into 2 circle? It would fits better for me
- 02:53:567 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - same
- 02:56:121 (1,2,3,4) - This is really unexpected. Because you use sharp jumps almost all the time, people would not expect "flowy" 1/2 circle on this map
- 02:58:674 (1,2,3,4) - same thing as above.
- 03:01:865 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - I like pattern on these section better here compared to your first and third kiai owo
- 03:03:142 - Can't say that I'm agree with this lol. I personally would reverse the stream direction of 03:03:302 (1,2,3) - to make it easier to play
- 03:16:387 (3,4,5) - any reason why you use triplets here? Because I think 1/2 slider + circle will represent music better
- 03:28:195 - NC?
- 03:30:270 (3) - change this into 1/2 slider?
- 03:47:823 - to be honest I hink you can make some jump pattern that is more creative than just increasing star pattern. As you can hear, the music is not constant or similar all the way through this section. Some point like 03:48:461 (1,2,3,4) - and 03:49:578 (4,1,2,3) - needs to be different because they have other sound in the foreground that begs to be differentiated from the others. Just my thought here, hope you can understand what I meant & consider it.
- 04:12:078 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - same thing as the first kiai
- 05:00:665 - You need to end the spinner at least here to met 5 minutes drain time requirement for approval map

As for the hitsound, there're several things that I think can be improved, I'll just mention some of it as it's pretty much the same thing all the way
- 01:28:833 -, 01:31:387 -, 01:49:259 -, and so on. You'd be better of putting the clap in the next white tick, as the drum sound is there. (and you can place whistle in the place it left off to make it sounds fuller)
- 02:10:802 - from here till 02:19:419 - I can't hear clap sound in the usual place

I think thats it! I hope this could help you a little bit
Good luck!

Yohanes wrote:

Hello!
Here are some of my personal opinion regarding to the maps, feel free to respond it whichever you may find fits

Dream
- In general, I believe you can do better job to decide the rhytmical usage of the diff. As I find there're overmapping that I don't think fits, section that will plays better with slider instead of circle, and vice versa. Your milage may vary though :thinking:
- 00:08:079 (6) - to make this notes more comfortable to hit, how about placing them around 448|91? That way, it'll also make the jump to the next slider to have sharper angle and possibly gave it more emphasis good idea!
- 00:11:908 (4,1) - and 00:12:547 (4,1) - I will personally change this into 1/2 slider because those synth melody (not drum) that used to create the jump pattern doesn't exist on both of the white tick i like the jumps here!
- 00:20:366 (3,5) - how about crtl+g these two? It will make the pattern have gradual spacing increase & avoid those (way too) extreme sharp jump on 00:20:047 (2,3,4) - fixed!
- 00:22:281 (1,2,3) - after such constant triangular jump, I don't think diagonal back and forth jump are that flowy to play. If you still want to keep back and forth jump, this placement is more sensible to me http://puu.sh/wnhyH/3149c6ae87.jpg Or you can just simply remake those particular jump to make them more flowy i like what i currently have!
- 00:25:163 (3) - move around 480|254 to emphasize the vocal more? http://puu.sh/wnhBx/22d7b257b9.jpg not really feeling that tbh
- 00:41:121 (4,5) - how about something like this instead? because here 00:41:280 - you literally mapped to nothing, and it seems more correct to have white tick to be the clickable one http://puu.sh/wnhGJ/b8ce9df3d2.jpg i mapped to the vocals here
- 00:47:663 (5,1) - what do you think of this? imo it can bring more emphasis, and 5 is more natural to hit this way http://puu.sh/wnhQp/82677c3f8d.jpg i like what i have currently!
- 00:52:131 (2,3) - To me, it seems like you arrange this pattern the way it is now to compensate the lack of rhythm on the 00:52:450 -. If I were you, I would do something like this instead http://puu.sh/wnhZN/c8c463aeb6.jpg indeed vocal are less emphasized, but there'll be no ghost rhythm anymore lol no rhythm??? the piano is playing here
- 01:02:983 (4,1) - I'd rather have this as a 1/2 slider to be honest. 01:03:143 (1) - is unjustifiable to me because of lack of dominant instrument on them no thanks!
- 01:35:058 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - I have a hard time justifying this pattern, NC, and general spacing on this part. Since there're no obvious increase of song intensity nor 1/2 drum sound. I think you should at least make the spacing less dramatic, and change them into a unified jumjpy pattern (eg:octagonal), rather than one-two type of jumps i think that its plenty intsense for this pattern and nc, due to the increase in volume in the vocals, not necessarily the instruments
- 01:47:185 (3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4) - personal opinion, I'm not very fond of this style of "break" stream since they literally break the flow. but your mileage may vary
- 02:05:536 (5) - how about 292|203? More of thriangular kind of jump will be better here i like the feel of this flow currently!
- 02:45:589 (2) - change into 2 circle? It would fits better for me i like the slider
- 02:53:567 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - same
- 02:56:121 (1,2,3,4) - This is really unexpected. Because you use sharp jumps almost all the time, people would not expect "flowy" 1/2 circle on this mapthey wouldnt expect it, which is why i love it!
- 02:58:674 (1,2,3,4) - same thing as above. ^
- 03:01:865 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - I like pattern on these section better here compared to your first and third kiai owo
- 03:03:142 - Can't say that I'm agree with this lol. I personally would reverse the stream direction of 03:03:302 (1,2,3) - to make it easier to play i think it plays fine
- 03:16:387 (3,4,5) - any reason why you use triplets here? Because I think 1/2 slider + circle will represent music better because i want to
- 03:28:195 - NC? fixed!
- 03:30:270 (3) - change this into 1/2 slider? i dont like that
- 03:47:823 - to be honest I hink you can make some jump pattern that is more creative than just increasing star pattern. As you can hear, the music is not constant or similar all the way through this section. Some point like 03:48:461 (1,2,3,4) - and 03:49:578 (4,1,2,3) - needs to be different because they have other sound in the foreground that begs to be differentiated from the others. Just my thought here, hope you can understand what I meant & consider it. i like stars
- 04:12:078 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - same thing as the first kiai
- 05:00:665 - You need to end the spinner at least here to met 5 minutes drain time requirement for approval map okay!

As for the hitsound, there're several things that I think can be improved, I'll just mention some of it as it's pretty much the same thing all the way
- 01:28:833 -, 01:31:387 -, 01:49:259 -, and so on. You'd be better of putting the clap in the next white tick, as the drum sound is there. (and you can place whistle in the place it left off to make it sounds fuller)
- 02:10:802 - from here till 02:19:419 - I can't hear clap sound in the usual place

I think thats it! I hope this could help you a little bit
Good luck!

thanks for the mod!

Hello!
I felt that there were not much correction points.

1. I feel whole offset was off center. (About -6)
2. 01:06:015 (1,2,3) - 01:08:568 (2,3,4) - 02:32:823 (2,3,4) - 02:35:376 (2,3,4) - If it matches the song, here is a Whistle rather than a clap.
3. 01:37:451 (1) - 03:04:259 (1) - 04:14:472 (1) - I think that erasing the Finish of this and fitting the finish to 01:37:930 (2) - 03:04:738 (2) - 04:14:950 (2) - will fit the song.
4. 04:16:706 (2,4) - 04:21:812 (6,8) - It should erase the Clap here and put a Clap on 04:16:865 (3) - 04:21:972 (7) - .
5. 04:27:556 (2,3,4) - I feel that it is not triple.
   

I hope this beatmap Ranked. Good luck!

m4m

[Dream]

1. 00:04:563 (1,2,3,1,2) - For the progression of the background instrument, I would love if you could slowly increase the spacing of each note starting at 1 to 2.
2. 00:12:063 (1) - I want to know why there is a jump here since the sounds around here are much stronger than this one.
3. 00:21:478 (4,1) - A new combo belongs at 4 instead of 1? Most of the time you put NCs to violin.
4. 00:35:680 (5) - Readability of this whole part would be improved if you added a NC here.
5. 00:38:074 (3,4) - Why is these not parallel to each other?
6. 00:46:850 (2,3,4) - You probably wanted a different pattern here but your emphasis on 2 should still be there so you should increase the spacing between 1 and 2.
7. 01:08:233 (1,2) - NC should be at 2 if you followed your NC patterning at 01:05:999 (1) -
8. 01:15:095 (1) - ^ Add NC to follow patterning at 01:14:616 (1) -
9. 01:09:430 (1,2) - The spacing between these is way too huge. I almost got it confused with 1/2
10. 01:17:488 (2,3) - Rhythm interpretation for this would best be represented with back and forth circle jumps
11. 01:22:120 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - ^.
12. 01:47:492 (1) - I don't think this is the best stream transition even if nc makes it more readable.
13. 01:54:514 (2,1,2,3,4,1,2) - Pentagon shape here could be improved.
14. 01:57:067 (3) - Definitely needs a NC because the 1/4 jump is quite sudden.
15. 01:57:705 (1,2,3,4) - I want to know the reason behind the sudden decrease of stream spacing when compared to 01:47:492 (1,2,3,4) -
16. 01:44:620 (1) - NC is inconsistent with the first half of the kiai.
17. 01:59:620 (2,3) - Why aren't these parallel?
18. 02:05:524 (5,1) - I'd prefer you add a note between 5 and 1 and stack them all with the slider 1. It would emphasize trumpet more.
19. 02:13:981 (1) - Wrong NC placement when compared to 00:26:748 (4) - ????
20. 00:33:131 (3) - Add NC here or remove from 02:20:364 (1) -

Tari wrote:

m4m

[Dream]

1. 00:04:563 (1,2,3,1,2) - For the progression of the background instrument, I would love if you could slowly increase the spacing of each note starting at 1 to 2. good idea!
2. 00:12:063 (1) - I want to know why there is a jump here since the sounds around here are much stronger than this one. because im following the instruments and there is sound there
3. 00:21:478 (4,1) - A new combo belongs at 4 instead of 1? Most of the time you put NCs to violin. fixed!
4. 00:35:680 (5) - Readability of this whole part would be improved if you added a NC here. i dont see a reason to nc that
5. 00:38:074 (3,4) - Why is these not parallel to each other? they arent supposed to be!
6. 00:46:850 (2,3,4) - You probably wanted a different pattern here but your emphasis on 2 should still be there so you should increase the spacing between 1 and 2. i think its fine
7. 01:08:233 (1,2) - NC should be at 2 if you followed your NC patterning at 01:05:999 (1) - they are completely different parts, the 2nd part is not the same as the first so it doesnt call for a nc
8. 01:15:095 (1) - ^ Add NC to follow patterning at 01:14:616 (1) -
9. 01:09:430 (1,2) - The spacing between these is way too huge. I almost got it confused with 1/2 wat
10. 01:17:488 (2,3) - Rhythm interpretation for this would best be represented with back and forth circle jumps i dont think so
11. 01:22:120 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - ^.
12. 01:47:492 (1) - I don't think this is the best stream transition even if nc makes it more readable. yes but i like it!
13. 01:54:514 (2,1,2,3,4,1,2) - Pentagon shape here could be improved.
14. 01:57:067 (3) - Definitely needs a NC because the 1/4 jump is quite sudden. i dont like that
15. 01:57:705 (1,2,3,4) - I want to know the reason behind the sudden decrease of stream spacing when compared to 01:47:492 (1,2,3,4) - because i just wanted to lol, thats it
16. 01:44:620 (1) - NC is inconsistent with the first half of the kiai. fixed!
17. 01:59:620 (2,3) - Why aren't these parallel? because i do not want them to be
18. 02:05:524 (5,1) - I'd prefer you add a note between 5 and 1 and stack them all with the slider 1. It would emphasize trumpet more. no thanks!
19. 02:13:981 (1) - Wrong NC placement when compared to 00:26:748 (4) - ???? fixed!
20. 00:33:131 (3) - Add NC here or remove from 02:20:364 (1) - fixed!

thanks for the mod!

Hs update
https://puu.sh/wrNdE/fb7c5aa1bf.osu

Hi

• 
  [General]

1. 02:10:802 - This timing point is meaningless
2. Let's fix Artist Title Source Tag

• 
  [Mada Mada Mada]

1. 00:10:792 - It is good to use the sound of soft-hitwhistle 2 here
2. 00:21:164 (2,3) - stack miss?
3. 00:33:142 - I think that SV1.5 is early
   1.3 × is better
4. 00:52:131 (2,3) - I think it is very close.
   I think that (3) should be located at (4)
5. 00:53:568 - 00:33:142 - same
6. 01:02:983 (4) - Add NC 01:03:143 (1) - remove NC
   01:03:143 (1,2,3,4,5) - I can understand using NC to make star type.
   However, NC in a place where there is no big sound and the SV does not change is very mysterious
7. 01:06:015 (1,2,3) - The flow is strange
   01:06:015 (1,2) - Ctrl+H 01:06:015 (1,3) - stack
   I think this way is also good
8. 01:17:504 (2) - I think that circle is better all
   01:22:611 (2,3) - just like here
9. 02:17:663 (2,3) - I think this is too far away
10. 02:41:360 (7,1) - Why did you shorten the distance?
11. 02:44:312 (2) - 01:17:504 (2) - same
12. 02:49:419 (2,3) - ^
13. 02:50:216 (5,1,2) - That's weird
    01:20:855 (1,2) - this is better
14. 03:03:780 (3) - Add NC is better
15. 04:31:865 (1) - Add NC

Good luck!

Yasaija 714 wrote:

Hi

• 
  [General]

1. 02:10:802 - This timing point is meaningless
2. Let's fix Artist Title Source Tag

• 
  [Mada Mada Mada]

1. 00:10:792 - It is good to use the sound of soft-hitwhistle 2 here hm.. ill think about it
2. 00:21:164 (2,3) - stack miss? fixed!
3. 00:33:142 - I think that SV1.5 is early
   1.3 × is better i really like it!
4. 00:52:131 (2,3) - I think it is very close. intended
   I think that (3) should be located at (4)
5. 00:53:568 - 00:33:142 - same
6. 01:02:983 (4) - Add NC 01:03:143 (1) - remove NC
   01:03:143 (1,2,3,4,5) - I can understand using NC to make star type.
   However, NC in a place where there is no big sound and the SV does not change is very mysterious fixed!
7. 01:06:015 (1,2,3) - The flow is strange it feels good to me
   01:06:015 (1,2) - Ctrl+H 01:06:015 (1,3) - stack
   I think this way is also good
8. 01:17:504 (2) - I think that circle is better all
   01:22:611 (2,3) - just like here i dont like circles all everywhere
9. 02:17:663 (2,3) - I think this is too far away i tihnk its okay
10. 02:41:360 (7,1) - Why did you shorten the distance? because i wanted to!
11. 02:44:312 (2) - 01:17:504 (2) - same
12. 02:49:419 (2,3) - ^
13. 02:50:216 (5,1,2) - That's weird whats so weird??
    01:20:855 (1,2) - this is better
14. 03:03:780 (3) - Add NC is better fixed!
15. 04:31:865 (1) - Add NC fixed!

Good luck!

ty for the mod!

M4M from my queue

Red: unrankable issues
Purple: highly recommend to fix

Dream
00:00:909 (3) - stack back to 00:00:590 (1) - will match with the music better and it'll also explain your NC usage here
00:01:866 (3) - ^ stack to 00:01:547 (1) -
00:48:621 (3,4,1) - doesn't flow really nice imo, maybe try to place 1 on the left of 3 to make a more anti-clockwise flow
01:01:387 (4,5,1) - flow feels kinda forced here, maybe move 5 a bit lower?
01:03:143 (2) - don't think this beat deserve such big jump here, currently it makes the downbeat on 01:02:983 (1) - seem so under-emphasized
01:20:217 (4,6) - blanket better
01:28:833 (2) - clap should be at end instead of on head according to the music, same for 01:31:387 (2) - and the similar ones in later kiais
01:47:743 (4,1) - why spacing so inconsistent with 01:27:318 (4,1) -
02:01:547 (6,1) - a bigger spacing between them is preferred, should really be bigger than that between 02:01:228 (3,4) -
02:29:950 (2) - same as 01:03:143 (2) -
03:07:929 (6) - move this more to the right to make the flow of 03:07:610 (5,6,1) - more natural
03:23:408 (1,2,3) - spacing so small compared to last kiai
03:24:206 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - what's this whistle spam?
03:36:174 (1) - really need finish on head
03:59:153 (1,2,3) - spacing so uncomfortable, the drum on should deserve a much bigger spacing than that to 3
04:15:589 (6) - move it down to around (116,84) for better flow to 04:15:748 (1) -
04:24:525 (5,6) - inconsistent with all those streams in former kiais
04:27:078 (4,5,1) - the first and the only time you use this kind of spacing for a triple iirc, pretty confusing and inconsistent I'd say, better change that

that's all, good luck

Zero__wind wrote:

M4M from my queue

Red: unrankable issues
Purple: highly recommend to fix

Dream
00:00:909 (3) - stack back to 00:00:590 (1) - will match with the music better and it'll also explain your NC usage here fixed!
00:01:866 (3) - ^ stack to 00:01:547 (1) - fixed!
00:48:621 (3,4,1) - doesn't flow really nice imo, maybe try to place 1 on the left of 3 to make a more anti-clockwise flow i think it flows pretty nice actually
01:01:387 (4,5,1) - flow feels kinda forced here, maybe move 5 a bit lower? dont really wanna change this!
01:03:143 (2) - don't think this beat deserve such big jump here, currently it makes the downbeat on 01:02:983 (1) - seem so under-emphasized fixed
01:20:217 (4,6) - blanket better fixed
01:28:833 (2) - clap should be at end instead of on head according to the music, same for 01:31:387 (2) - and the similar ones in later kiais
01:47:743 (4,1) - why spacing so inconsistent with 01:27:318 (4,1) - just wanted to do something different
02:01:547 (6,1) - a bigger spacing between them is preferred, should really be bigger than that between 02:01:228 (3,4) - ill think about it!
02:29:950 (2) - same as 01:03:143 (2) - fixed
03:07:929 (6) - move this more to the right to make the flow of 03:07:610 (5,6,1) - more natural fixed!
03:23:408 (1,2,3) - spacing so small compared to last kiai hmm...
03:24:206 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - what's this whistle spam?
03:36:174 (1) - really need finish on head fixed
03:59:153 (1,2,3) - spacing so uncomfortable, the drum on should deserve a much bigger spacing than that to 3 fixed!
04:15:589 (6) - move it down to around (116,84) for better flow to 04:15:748 (1) - fixed
04:24:525 (5,6) - inconsistent with all those streams in former kiais
04:27:078 (4,5,1) - the first and the only time you use this kind of spacing for a triple iirc, pretty confusing and inconsistent I'd say, better change that fixed!

that's all, good luck

thanks for the mod!

you can actually play a little bit with mp3 editing to make the duration >5min drain
where you can push easily to approval instead. I know someone who good at it actually, ask Hokichi

well just in case you still trying and have interest to

This modding thread has been migrated to the new "modding discussions" system. Please make sure to re-post any existing (and unresolved) efforts to the new system as required.