Guest
home
beatmaps
rankings
community
store
help
forum
  1. Forums
  2. Beatmaps
  3. Ranked Beatmaps (Archived)
  4. Beatmap Graveyard

Ray - Baby Lady LOVE

posted
Total Posts
11
Annex
249 posts
Joined February 2016
Topic Starter
Annex
This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on Friday, June 23, 2017 at 1:53:13 PM

Artist: Ray
Title: Baby Lady LOVE
Source: ネコぱらOVA
Tags: nekopara nekoworks sayori catgirl nekochan chocola vanilla azuki maple cinnamon coconut shigure kashou eroge galgame vn visual novel さより
BPM: 177
Filesize: 20086kb
Play Time: 01:26
Difficulties Available:
  1. Easy (1.55 stars, 113 notes)
  2. Hard (3.29 stars, 259 notes)
  3. Insane (4.04 stars, 314 notes)
  4. Neko: Chocola (4.73 stars, 356 notes)
  5. Neko: Vanilla (5.07 stars, 368 notes)
  6. Normal (2.22 stars, 162 notes)
Download: Ray - Baby Lady LOVE
Download: Ray - Baby Lady LOVE (no video)
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
Ray - Baby Lady LOVE「Nekopara OVA」



Check out -Rain-'s set: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/562021

All aboard the hype train~~

Vol. 3 and OVA~~~

SPOILER
Neko: Chocola
Chocola is always happy-go-lucky, and cheerful. This map is dynamic like her personality. (I say this but this is basically standard mapping as well)

Neko: Vanilla
Vanilla however is one of those cheeky, silent, composed catgirl. So...this map only has sharp and straight sliders. Some of the jumps are a bit horizontal as well. Because her face is always straight and her insults are sharp, stabs you right in the heart. Oh did i mention some spicy triangles jump.

Two completely different personalities, but they're still twins regardless. So there some similarities in the composition between the 2 difficulties.

Ready for ranking ^.^
Last edited by Annex , edited 22 times in total.
-Helix-
67 posts
Joined February 2017
-Helix-
hi m4m from modreq (i use google translate
◾Neko: Chocola
00:08:881 (1,2) - Remove circles and increase slides.
00:16:508 (7) - Move right or left
00:39:390 (5) - Please insert curves like slide 4.
00:46:339 (3) - overlap
00:46:847 (2) - Please remove the slide and make it a circle.
00:51:085 (1) - overlap
01:05:491 (7,8) - The slide position is awkward.
01:25:322 (5) - Put it at the end of the slide.


◾Neko: Vanilla
00:16:508 (6) - move slightly up
00:34:983 (8) - I do not want to overlap.(its my opinion)
00:38:373 (1,2,5,6) - It is a bit closer to other jumps.
00:42:949 (2) - move left
00:46:339 (3) - overlap
01:13:966 (5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4) - Please make it smoother.
01:25:322 (5) - overlap


m4m my map please!
t/588826
good luck
Annex
249 posts
Joined February 2016
Topic Starter
Annex

wkdalstn29 wrote:

hi m4m from modreq (i use google translate
◾Neko: Chocola
00:08:881 (1,2) - Remove circles and increase slides.
00:16:508 (7) - Move right or left Moved up lol
00:39:390 (5) - Please insert curves like slide 4. Would break overlaps with the next few notes
00:46:339 (3) - overlap Easier to read this way
00:46:847 (2) - Please remove the slide and make it a circle. Would break intensity/diversity
00:51:085 (1) - overlap Same, easier to read/looks better.
01:05:491 (7,8) - The slide position is awkward. Flipped
01:25:322 (5) - Put it at the end of the slide. Fixed


◾Neko: Vanilla
00:16:508 (6) - move slightly up Hmm, youre right
00:34:983 (8) - I do not want to overlap.(its my opinion) Nah, there's other similar overlaps in the map
00:38:373 (1,2,5,6) - It is a bit closer to other jumps. Grid pattern
00:42:949 (2) - move left moved a few notes a little
00:46:339 (3) - overlap Nah
01:13:966 (5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4) - Please make it smoother. If youre talking about the shape, i like it. But the smoothness is already good
01:25:322 (5) - overlap I didn't overlap but moved it closer to the slider


m4m my map please!
t/588826
good luck
Thanks for the mods!
-NeBu-
435 posts
Joined March 2014
-NeBu-
Neko: Vanilla:

00:03:796 (5) - unsnapped?
00:05:152 (2) - if you move it slightly its unsnapped too
00:12:271 (6) - would NC it since velocity change
00:14:983 (7) - NC should start here
01:03:796 (7) - NC here, you even start Kiai here
01:05:491 (1) - kinda unnecessary NC

it's well mapped, I don't see anything to change in placement to be honest, but you should recheck whole map in term of NC, good luck!
guijcl
19 posts
Joined July 2016
guijcl
Hey there from m4m

Insane
00:13:118 - Wrong end?
00:15:661 (3) - Thise shape isnt needed since isnt a significal sound imo, same for the rest of the map
00:26:847 (3) - Rotate this a bit and maybe try to blanket with 00:27:186 (4) -
00:37:356 (5,7) - Overlap this
00:47:525 - Reduce the SV
00:50:407 (2,2) - Overlap
01:08:881 (5,4) - Overlap
01:14:305 (8) - Isnt spaced properly
01:15:830 (1,4) - Overlap

GL with the map, without some of those minor errors will be a good map for ranked, and dont forget to Overlap, u get structure from that
Annex
249 posts
Joined February 2016
Topic Starter
Annex
-NeBu-
SPOILER

-NeBu- wrote:

Neko: Vanilla:

00:03:796 (5) - unsnapped? Fixed
00:05:152 (2) - if you move it slightly its unsnapped too ^
00:12:271 (6) - would NC it since velocity change I dunno, would be too short, ill consider if other ppl think so
00:14:983 (7) - NC should start here ^
01:03:796 (7) - NC here, you even start Kiai here ^
01:05:491 (1) - kinda unnecessary NC ^

it's well mapped, I don't see anything to change in placement to be honest, but you should recheck whole map in term of NC, good luck!

q1ffaay

SPOILER

q1ffaay wrote:

Hey there from m4m

00:13:118 - Wrong end? What do you mean? lol wrong nc end?
00:15:661 (3) - Thise shape isnt needed since isnt a significal sound imo, same for the rest of the map Ill consider this
00:26:847 (3) - Rotate this a bit and maybe try to blanket with 00:27:186 (4) - Hmm youre right
00:37:356 (5,7) - Overlap this Fixed
00:47:525 - Reduce the SV Reduced the spacing of 00:47:525 (1) - from stream instead lol, i dont see a reason to lower sv, all my other diffs has the same sv in that part
00:50:407 (2,2) - Overlap Kinda like this
01:08:881 (5,4) - Overlap This one you're right
01:14:305 (8) - Isnt spaced properly Fixed
01:15:830 (1,4) - Overlap This is the same with 01:16:169 (3,5) - I don't like overlapping to much, it's confusing sometimes, so i just nudge it a bit

GL with the map, without some of those minor errors will be a good map for ranked, and dont forget to Overlap, u get structure from that

ty for the mods!
Fu Xuan
Beatmap Nominator
1,430 posts
Joined September 2015
Fu Xuan
Hello, from my queue

[General]
  1. Disable Widescreen Support
[Easy]
  1. Please check AiMod, Some of the notes do not follow distance snap. DS must be used in Easy difficulty
  2. 00:06:169 (4) - Put a clap to the slidertail? Since you put a clap here 00:03:796 (3) - it would sound consistent if you'd put a clap there too
  3. 00:06:169 (4,1) - You can blanket this
  4. 00:12:271 (1) - Spinner recovery time is less than 4 beats which breaks the ranking criteria guideline. I recommend ending this spinner on 00:13:457 -
  5. 00:17:017 (4,5) - Blanket
  6. 00:24:305 (1) - You can polish this and make a better slider art tbh
  7. 00:34:983 (5) - This slidertail ends on a big white tick, also the slider ended on a stronger sound than the sliderhead. Sliders must end on weaker or relatively equal sounds. I'd recommend this rhythm instead
  8. 00:50:237 (5,6) - Blanket
  9. 00:50:915 (6,7) - Same ^
  10. 01:11:593 (4) - The distance between this circle and (3) is too far. Like I said on my first point. DS must be used in Easy difficulty. And shall not be broken.
  11. 01:23:796 (7,1) - You can stack these two
  12. My only concerns about this is the aesthetics and the flow, for aesthetics, this 00:24:305 (1) - sliderart could've been more better. Also your blankets are off and that one stack I mentioned above. For flow, For example 00:26:169 (1,2) - this, you forced the player to move to the left instead of moving in a comfortable flow.
I don't want to wall so gl~
Annex
249 posts
Joined February 2016
Topic Starter
Annex

-Aqua wrote:

Hello, from my queue

[General]
  1. Disable Widescreen Support
[Easy]
  1. Please check AiMod, Some of the notes do not follow distance snap. DS must be used in Easy difficulty
  2. 00:06:169 (4) - Put a clap to the slidertail? Since you put a clap here 00:03:796 (3) - it would sound consistent if you'd put a clap there too
  3. 00:06:169 (4,1) - You can blanket this
  4. 00:12:271 (1) - Spinner recovery time is less than 4 beats which breaks the ranking criteria guideline. I recommend ending this spinner on 00:13:457 -
  5. 00:17:017 (4,5) - Blanket
  6. 00:24:305 (1) - You can polish this and make a better slider art tbh
  7. 00:34:983 (5) - This slidertail ends on a big white tick, also the slider ended on a stronger sound than the sliderhead. Sliders must end on weaker or relatively equal sounds. I'd recommend this rhythm instead
  8. 00:50:237 (5,6) - Blanket
  9. 00:50:915 (6,7) - Same ^
  10. 01:11:593 (4) - The distance between this circle and (3) is too far. Like I said on my first point. DS must be used in Easy difficulty. And shall not be broken.
  11. 01:23:796 (7,1) - You can stack these two
  12. My only concerns about this is the aesthetics and the flow, for aesthetics, this 00:24:305 (1) - sliderart could've been more better. Also your blankets are off and that one stack I mentioned above. For flow, For example 00:26:169 (1,2) - this, you forced the player to move to the left instead of moving in a comfortable flow.
Planning to remap the whole diff with 1.1 or 1.2 distance snap and higher cs, with your mods in mind ofc lol, i suck at mapping low star diffs.

I don't want to wall so gl~
Left
2,156 posts
Joined October 2014
Left
short free mod to help your future mapping

[Vanila]
- 00:06:847 (1) - until here was without strong kicksound. but from here we have kicksound in every white tick 1/1. but note isn't showing that. i mean, it would be better if you can put sth(clickable stuffs or 1/1 slidertail) every 1/1. like 00:07:525 -
- 00:08:542 (4) - this also breaks rhythm flow, just filling with slider is better.
- 00:57:356 (1,2) - ^
- 00:14:983 - try to use dynamic rhythm. from here notes are just like 1/2 slider or 1/2 jump, 1/2... for example if i were you, i can give 00:18:034 (1) - 1/1 slider here if i want to show high vocal :)
- 00:17:949 (6) - and can catch 1/1 to show song better.
- 00:21:424 (5,6) - omg avoid irregular high DS
- 00:24:983 (4) - sound strong, give more DS seems better
- 00:25:322 (5) - sound longers, just 1/2 slider looks not enough. i would give 5/4 here.
- 01:12:440 (1) - don't miss triplet that looks significant in this song ;w;

flow was nice overall (except for a few ones). but i think you should learm more about rhythm first, then Distance, then aesthetics. then you can rank a map xd
and dont forget everything should be for 'better expression of song'


good luck!
Rizen
1,662 posts
Joined August 2013
Rizen
from q
Easy
  1. 00:01:424 (1) - end slider on the next red tick? more audible sound (vocals) making it more intuitive to follow
  2. 00:09:559 (4) - forgot NC I think
  3. 00:20:407 - should really be clickable, rather audible beat. consider ctrl+g the rhythm for 00:19:390 (2,3,4) - to allow this.
  4. 00:21:085 (5) - forgot NC
  5. 00:29:898 (6) - shift lower so it doesn't overlap with 00:28:542 (4) - ?
  6. 01:05:491 (3,4) - ctrl+g rhythm here so it's circle then slider? would make both vocal beats clickable
  7. 01:07:864 (8,1) - kinda bad stacking here
Normal
  1. at this diff's current state, it's not rankable as a normal diff. you use different DS throughout many parts of the map, which a normal diff requires to be consistent throughout. I highly suggest remapping this diff since it does not meet the criteria for a normal diff. What I mean is things like 00:35:322 (3,4,5) - and 00:39:390 (5,1) - should all have the same DS value indicated at the top right corner.
Hard
  1. 00:09:729 (2,3) - slider then circle instead? makes the vocals on the second red tick clickable, which I think is important to do as it is a 'held vocal point'
  2. 00:21:254 (3,4,5) - would be nice if there was no stacking at 4-5 since there is an upscale piano part here. i.e. stacking here is rather underwhelming
  3. please be a bit more consistent with your DS; e.g. 00:29:898 (6,7) - vs 00:31:254 (1,2) - despite the intensity in both parts being the same
  4. 00:35:661 (8) - two circles instead? both percussion sounds rather prominent
  5. 00:49:729 (5) - change to a circle then 1/2 slider? the white tick is VERY audible and really should be clickable
  6. 00:51:085 (1,2,3) - spacing here not really fun to play, and causes unneccessary confusion x.x
  7. 01:10:746 (6,7) - doesn't work, the tick where the circle is on atm doesn't deserve to be clicked since it's rather weak compared to the other red tick and the white tick. consider ctrl+g the rhythm here so it's circle then 1/2 slider
Insane
  1. 00:07:864 (7,8) - ctrl+g rhythm here so it's circle then slider? works better with piano and vocals
  2. 00:10:746 (5) - loud crash in music so this should really be emphasised with spacing more than for 00:10:576 (4) -
  3. 00:12:271 (4) - NC because of SV change?
  4. 00:45:661 - there should reeeeaaallllly be a circle here to follow that melody instrument in the music
glgl
Annex
249 posts
Joined February 2016
Topic Starter
Annex

Left wrote:

short free mod to help your future mapping

[Vanila]
- 00:06:847 (1) - until here was without strong kicksound. but from here we have kicksound in every white tick 1/1. but note isn't showing that. i mean, it would be better if you can put sth(clickable stuffs or 1/1 slidertail) every 1/1. like 00:07:525 - ill try to fix this
- 00:08:542 (4) - this also breaks rhythm flow, just filling with slider is better.
- 00:57:356 (1,2) - ^ applied both
- 00:14:983 - try to use dynamic rhythm. from here notes are just like 1/2 slider or 1/2 jump, 1/2... for example if i were you, i can give 00:18:034 (1) - 1/1 slider here if i want to show high vocal :) This too
- 00:17:949 (6) - and can catch 1/1 to show song better.
- 00:21:424 (5,6) - omg avoid irregular high DS XD okay
- 00:24:983 (4) - sound strong, give more DS seems better
- 00:25:322 (5) - sound longers, just 1/2 slider looks not enough. i would give 5/4 here. ok
- 01:12:440 (1) - don't miss triplet that looks significant in this song ;w; Right

flow was nice overall (except for a few ones). but i think you should learm more about rhythm first, then Distance, then aesthetics. then you can rank a map xd
and dont forget everything should be for 'better expression of song' ill check out those maps, thank uu


good luck!
I'm sorry but isn't this mod for the chocola difficulty? I tried to correlate with vanilla and your mods seem to fit more to chocola one

In any case i applied them :3

And i accidentally gave u 2 kudosu, oh well XD thanks for the mods :)
BanchoBot
w00t p00t
34,830 posts
Here since the beginning
BanchoBot
This modding thread has been migrated to the new "modding discussions" system. Please make sure to re-post any existing (and unresolved) efforts to the new system as required.
Please sign in to reply.

New reply

0
1 / 11