Enon wrote:

[Easy]

1. 00:06:385 (2) - 블랭킷 더 제대로 할 수 있을 것 같네요.
2. 00:17:754 (4) - ^ 뒤쪽으로 갈 수록 벌어지는듯
3. 00:26:280 (2) - ^
4. 00:40:490 (1) - 이건 좀 취향의 문제이긴 한데, 슬라이더 커브 부분을 좀 더 둥글게 만들어주면 좋을 것 같아요. 밑에 예시를 첨부합니다.
   
   SPOILER

   
5. 너무 nazi 한 것만 잡은 것 같지만, 박자 밀도가 높지도 않고 곡도 느린 탓에 플레이 할 때 그런 부분들이 더 눈에 부각되기 때문에 고쳐주면 좋을 것 같아요.

나머지는 깔끔하게 잘 찍으셨네요.

Garven wrote:

From the... osu!idol discord I guess.

2017-08-15 22:17 Garven: boop
2017-08-15 22:17 ProEzreal: yo
2017-08-15 22:17 Garven: So easy
2017-08-15 22:17 Garven: 00:37:964 (1) -
2017-08-15 22:17 Garven: It'd be nice if you could put the kink right on the beat
2017-08-15 22:17 Garven: line the red point up with the tick
2017-08-15 22:17 Garven: 00:40:490 (1) - Is there a point in the not-smooth curve?
2017-08-15 22:19 Garven: I'd almost say get rid of 00:54:636 (2) -
2017-08-15 22:19 Garven: There's so little going on in the song here
2017-08-15 22:19 Garven: and having such a large space of blank is a nice emphasis on the ending
2017-08-15 22:20 Garven: Overall the map felt kinda formless and didn't really convey much of the feeling of the song
2017-08-15 22:20 Garven: Definitely tick rate 2 on the Normal though, considering the rhythms that you're using
2017-08-15 22:21 ProEzreal: 00:54:636 (2) - if i get rid of this
2017-08-15 22:21 ProEzreal: i might as well get rid of 00:53:197 (1) - this also
2017-08-15 22:21 Garven: Maybe turn it into a circle instead of a slider
2017-08-15 22:22 Garven: In Normal, not sure why you suddenly go with linear sliders 00:43:017 (1) -
2017-08-15 22:24 Garven: Eh, they're not my kind of maps honestly.
2017-08-15 22:24 Garven: They don't have much form to them and feel more randomply placed instead of having memorable patterns
2017-08-15 22:24 Garven: Which I guess is fine if you just want somethign to click on
2017-08-15 22:25 Garven: but it leads to an uninspiring playthrough

It's a plain set and doesn't break rules, but isn't exactly ground breaking either.
G'luck!

Thanks for the roast

Djulus wrote:

m4m ye https://osu.ppy.sh/b/1497766
Easy
00:34:175 (5) - replace on right side will be better in what way? also looks better with the blanket
00:40:490 (1) - maybe better sliderart? there isn't anything wrong with this. trying to keep the shapes pretty basic
00:25:332 (1,2) - fix blanket okok
00:52:520 (4,1,2) - what about make with sliders? like a normal diff circles are easier than sliders since you dont have to hold and follow
Normal
00:04:806 (5,1) - what about this rhythm https://puu.sh/yKSVh/c433e38787.png do you really think this kind of rhythm is suitable for a normal?
00:19:964 (7,1) - stack? no, there's a lower sound on 00:20:280 (1) - which makes it different
Aozora
00:19:964 (8,1) - stack will be better imo same reason as normal
gl

1. 00:07:648 (3) - Sliders like would be better as 1/1 imo to help capture those held sounds in the melody. Would also help lower the amount of 1/2 beats mapped and lower the density a bit and provide a better spread
2. 00:37:332 (4) - Sliders like would be good as circles to help contrast between the surrounding sliders and in turn give more emphasis to 00:37:964 . Same as top diff

2. For sliders like 00:02:596 (3) - how about making them circles like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9875386 (ignore object placements). These sounds are much more predominant than the ones earlier like 00:00:069 (1,2) and it would add some nice variety in rhythm.
3. 00:53:886 (1) - 00:55:505 (1) - NC spamming isn't necessary

Kisses wrote:

Easy is ok


Normal

1. 00:07:648 (3) - Sliders like would be better as 1/1 imo to help capture those held sounds in the melody. Would also help lower the amount of 1/2 beats mapped and lower the density a bit and provide a better spread amazing
2. 00:37:332 (4) - Sliders like would be good as circles to help contrast between the surrounding sliders and in turn give more emphasis to 00:37:964 . Same as top diffgood good good

Top

2. For sliders like 00:02:596 (3) - how about making them circles like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9875386 (ignore object placements). These sounds are much more predominant than the ones earlier like 00:00:069 (1,2) and it would add some nice variety in rhythm. will do~
3. 00:53:886 (1) - 00:55:505 (1) - NC spamming isn't necessary fixedd

[]
w ~

pishifat wrote:

can i qualify

pishifat wrote:

metadata men now know that r3 music box has two youtube channels

pishifat wrote:

metadata men