Hi, I suppose there are some things I'm curious about (nothing serious)
Inner Tenshi
Oni
Muzu
Kantan
Also your Futsuu and Kantan update to the cursed set so uhhhh idk what to do about that
I hope some of it helped and even if it didn't I'll at least know what was useful and why others weren't. Good luck!
Inner Tenshi
- 00:03:625 (2,3,4,5,6) - Hm, I was thinking kdkkd might fit more but that might change what you're going for. I just feel like it hits more of the prominent vocals there with the appropriate pitch.
- 00:07:018 (13,14) - Swapping these might give more to the vocals since the last one gets emphasized through rhythmic contrast?
- 00:07:911 (15,16) - Kinda same but if you swap this you get the k on the vocal which might be nice to cover since most of the vocals here are being followed with k (I think)
- 00:10:947 (4,5,6) - For this type of vocal I thought that kkd might fit better.
- 00:12:822 (20) - Maybe delete this so the pause in vocal on 00:12:732 - gets more emphasized?
- 00:14:518 (30) - This note has a pretty strong change on it also the melody thing gets very pronounced, it could work as k perhaps? Would also get more contrast from the previous note being d.
- 00:18:536 (60) - Could also delete this to have the two melody notes on 00:18:447 (59,61) - be more emphasized?
- 00:19:250 (67) - I think changing this to d would fit the repetition of the melody better than putting variation in it imo. Then if you want you can swap 00:19:964 (75,76) - as well to get the two drum hits on them? Would give 00:20:232 (77) - more emphasis through contrast I think?
- 00:27:197 - Mh, there's some drums here you could map but probably not necessary. Could easily ddk this if you wanted to.
- 00:33:893 (29) - To emphasize the vocal I would probably move this over to 00:33:714 - and make it a d since 00:33:804 - is quite emphasized in the song yet the map goes over it with a triple to emphasize 00:33:982 - instead which is considerably weaker.
- 00:35:411 (39) - Removing this might be nice to put more contrast on the 1/2 rhythm of 00:35:947 (41,42) - so instead of going from 1/2 gap to 1/1 gap to 1/2 gap again, you go from 1/1 gaps straight to 1/2 gaps. The strings in the song also emphasize those two areas 00:35:232 (38,40) -
- 00:37:197 (47) - I'd probably try to get the triple on 00:37:197 (47,48,49) - to end on 47 instead since you did a similar form of vocal/string emphasis on 00:37:911 (53,54,55) -
- 00:39:518 (63,65,66,67) - Considering 63 and 65 hit the vocals it might be nice to change 66 to d so that you get a kkdd arrangement which follows the pitch of the vocals better. It would also emphasize the downbeat and strings again on 00:40:232 (68).
- 00:45:143 - Maybe put something here considering you put something at 00:44:786 (7) - ? I think it would follow vocals again but I'm not sure what else you'd be following here (shows my inexperience really )
- 00:49:161 (42) - I would probably change this to D and 00:49:518 (43,44,45,46) - all to K or the other way around by changing 00:48:804 (41) - to K instead since the pitch clearly raises overall but this arrangement you have only emphasizes 00:49:161 (42) - which is only the middle part of the whole buildup.
- 00:54:072 (3,4) - Maybe swap these for the double-esque rhythm the vocals are producing here? You get a nice ddkkd rhythm here which imo fits better.
- 00:55:143 (13) - Maybe to separate the two vocalists and the two vocal phrases delete this note?
- 01:09:695 - This is a really strong beat here that gets ignored.. maybe D here and D 01:09:875 (19) - as well? Though.. after looking at this in play I'm not sure how well that would fit with the sv change. It might even be unrankable I don't know. 01:15:409 - Naturally here as well.
- 01:19:786 (52) - Would rather change to d to emphasize the last vocal more.
Oni
- The bg of this diff doesn't cover all the way at the top for some reason, it has a black bar there with empty space. x.x
- 00:14:339 (22,23) - Would swap these to emphasize the stop more and the pitch increase too?
- 00:44:697 - Would add something here for the vocal?
- 00:45:322 (10) - Similarly to complement ^ I'd move this over to 00:45:143 - instead as well to emphasize the stronger vocal on 00:45:232.
- 00:53:803 (54,55,56) - Hmmm, the vocal density increases very much here but the density of the map sort of stagnates and not only that but it even lowers with nothing on 00:54:339 - where the song is consistently building up to the pre-chorus section. I recommend adding notes to fill in these spots maybe a quint for 00:53:803 (54,55,56) - ?
- 00:54:697 (58) - Could probably move this one tick back to the blue?
Muzu
- Oh lord, this bg has the same problem as Oni just even more black space xD
- 00:07:018 (10) - Could make this k for vocal pitch and to emphasize the pause on the next note.
- 00:20:589 (39) - STACK THIS NOTE PLS
- 00:26:125 (52,53) - Ctrl+G this sounds much nicer as it hits the stronger vocal and snare with k.
- 00:27:375 (56) - Wouldn't make this the same as the note previously since the vocalist changes + section changes so with the current arrangement I'd suggest d instead.
- 00:36:482 (27,28,29,30,31) - Hmm listening to this, dkkdd sounds a lot more fitting to the vocals here to me.
- 00:53:804 (37,38,39) - Would also probably kdk this instead since it leads in more appropriately from the last vocal phrase in terms of pitch?
- 01:20:232 (36,37,38) - The emphasis here is really nice but I feel like having 01:20:945 (39) - as k kind of ruins the same idea before which was to emphasize the last note of the pattern. Maybe changing 01:20:945 (39,40,41) - to kkd might give variation and the same idea as the first iteration?
- 00:26:304 (32,33,34,35) - Maybe changing this to dkkd would show the pitches a bit better?
Kantan
- BG again xd
- 00:49:875 - Maybe you can add a note here since the song spikes in intensity quite a lot but it's similar in density to 00:45:947 (2,3,4) - which was fairly calm in comparison.
Also your Futsuu and Kantan update to the cursed set so uhhhh idk what to do about that
I hope some of it helped and even if it didn't I'll at least know what was useful and why others weren't. Good luck!