Dntm8kmeeatu wrote:

Do not make polls.

1. Nice source.
2. hss?
3. 00:25:515 (6,1) - might be avoid overlap on reverse arrow? it's readable but still might be confused with default skin. At least i suggest use this kind of overlap when player is used to it. (on 2nd reverse or 3rd).
4. 00:46:715 (1,2,3) - might do even triangle (with same sides) since You anyway didn't emphasis 00:47:115 (2) - strong beat by ds, so mb make more neat pattern.
5. 01:24:515 (4) - reduce ds to 1.2 since there weak beat and your prev ds with this time gap was 1.2.
6. 01:24:515 (4) - Also maybe curve this slider for shape consistency on this part 01:23:115 (2,3,1,2) - ? imo wil be more neat
7. 01:42:515 (1) - please delete curve, on small reverses it's looks agly
8. 01:51:915 (2,1,2,1) - will be great if You'll use same gamplay mechanic there... I try to explain. 01:51:915 (2,1) - there ds feels much smaller then 01:53:515 (2,1) - since in 1st example player have to move only half of slider to pass it , so distance between 01:51:915 (2,1) - like 2 time smaller in gameplay than it's in teory. 2nd examle use line structure, so player have to follow full shape of slider anyway and after take this 2.0 ds, so we get great difference between same sound parts. I suggest make them more consistent in this way. 01:51:915 (2,1,2,1,2,1) -
9. 01:55:515 (1,2,3) - why no overlap like You did 01:09:715 (2,3) -
10. 02:26:315 (2,3) - pretty uncomfortable flow... maybe 02:25:915 (1,2) - make reddots sliders for easier read this. just suggesstion
11. 02:27:515 (1) - mb buff ds on down beat? example: http://puu.sh/vGEE1.jpg
12. 02:40:115 (3,1) - overlap more like You did before
13. 03:02:715 (1) - up a bit like 03:02:115 (2,4) -
14. 03:17:915 (2,1) - same thig about overlap on reverse arrow
15. 03:35:315 (2,3,2,3) - hmmm, consistency pls
16. 04:07:110 (3,1) - stack them?
17. 04:14:710 (1,3) - this kind of overlap is bad idea imo, if You'd use this overlap concept for section at least , it will be not bad, but now it looks out of place.

Wonki wrote:

Hi

Arcwin's Marathon

00:03:468 - add note. It's not difficult

00:12:691 (12691|3) - delete. no chord here.

00:13:980 - add note here. as i said, not difficult

00:32:315 (32315|0,32315|1,32315|3) - delete one of these. what for 3note?

00:46:715 (46715|0,46715|1,46715|3) - same as above

00:49:915 (49915|3,49915|2,49915|0) - ^

00:50:715 - add note for kick sound

01:52:315 (112315|3,112315|2,112315|0) - same as 32sec

02:45:715 - add note for quitar sound

04:53:940 (293940|1,294040|3,294140|0,294340|2,294540|1,294740|2,294740|0) - Wrong snap should be 1/6

04:55:640 (295640|0,296140|2,296440|3) - also wrong. 1/6

Accepted all. Thank you so much for the mod! Much appreciated

Here's my update:
https://puu.sh/vKBOk/de546bed42.rar

Mitkoff wrote:

Hello
Quick NM from q

[Kaori]

1. Nice source.
2. hss?
3. 00:25:515 (6,1) - might be avoid overlap on reverse arrow? it's readable but still might be confused with default skin. At least i suggest use this kind of overlap when player is used to it. (on 2nd reverse or 3rd). still fine
4. 00:46:715 (1,2,3) - might do even triangle (with same sides) since You anyway didn't emphasis 00:47:115 (2) - strong beat by ds, so mb make more neat pattern. nah
5. 01:24:515 (4) - reduce ds to 1.2 since there weak beat and your prev ds with this time gap was 1.2. not too noticeable in gameplay, also it is a loud sound.
6. 01:24:515 (4) - Also maybe curve this slider for shape consistency on this part 01:23:115 (2,3,1,2) - ? imo wil be more neat don't see a good reason to do so
7. 01:42:515 (1) - please delete curve, on small reverses it's looks agly ^
8. 01:51:915 (2,1,2,1) - will be great if You'll use same gamplay mechanic there... I try to explain. 01:51:915 (2,1) - there ds feels much smaller then 01:53:515 (2,1) - since in 1st example player have to move only half of slider to pass it , so distance between 01:51:915 (2,1) - like 2 time smaller in gameplay than it's in teory. 2nd examle use line structure, so player have to follow full shape of slider anyway and after take this 2.0 ds, so we get great difference between same sound parts. I suggest make them more consistent in this way. 01:51:915 (2,1,2,1,2,1) - i dont really get what you're saying but fixed a bit maybe idk lol
9. 01:55:515 (1,2,3) - why no overlap like You did 01:09:715 (2,3) - because its not even the same part or sound
10. 02:26:315 (2,3) - pretty uncomfortable flow... maybe 02:25:915 (1,2) - make reddots sliders for easier read this. just suggesstion nope
11. 02:27:515 (1) - mb buff ds on down beat? example: http://puu.sh/vGEE1.jpg nope because it wont play well on a high DS
12. 02:40:115 (3,1) - overlap more like You did before i dont get what is 'before'
13. 03:02:715 (1) - up a bit like 03:02:115 (2,4) - Fixed
14. 03:17:915 (2,1) - same thig about overlap on reverse arrow same thing as before
15. 03:35:315 (2,3,2,3) - hmmm, consistency pls Fixed
16. 04:07:110 (3,1) - stack them? why
17. 04:14:710 (1,3) - this kind of overlap is bad idea imo, if You'd use this overlap concept for section at least , it will be not bad, but now it looks out of place. nope,this is what I intended

sinn wrote:

General

Pretty sure its supposed to be ＊なみりん under Artist ye boi ok
Make 2nd chorus 41% similarly to 1st chorus as there isn't any increased intensity ok

Kaori best grill /s

00:36:915 (1) - Consider changing to a stack to emphasise 00:37:115 - ? nah
01:09:115 (1,3) - Please try to avoid ugly overlaps like these,i don't really see the point of the overlaps,there are also some later in the map edgy mapping
From 02:33:915 - to 02:38:315 - i suggest u map to the drums the slider ticks do
04:08:310 (1) - Move this further away from 04:07:910 (5) - to abt x:416 y:224 cannot cuz if move too far the next note very hard to hit due to reverse flow

quick glance oni

That's it.
GL~

-Mo- wrote:

-Mo-d for standard

Kaori
- The timing points at the start of the map are using default samplesets and so the sliders aren't silenced.
- 00:12:291 (3) - I feel like this would be cooler if you did a circle-slider (or the reverse) rather than a single reverse slider so the extra clicks emphasise the faster piano notes. You've already used 1/2 clicking rhythms anyway. Fixed
- 01:05:515 (4,1) - Not sure what the goal was with this overlap but to me it looks weird and out of place. Fixed
- 01:23:115 (2,3) - I don't think these are supposed to use drum sampleset. Fixed, justmeepthings
- 01:31:515 (1) - Out of the three sliders you used for this slower section, this one is the odd one out. It uses more straight lines than the other two sliders and the final curve to me looks off for some reason (probably because of too many white nodes). I think you can do a better slider than this one. added a curve and cleaned it up a bit
- 02:03:515 (1) - This slider seems pretty odd in terms of rhythm to me. Assuming you're prioritising background sounds over the vocals for this section, there's a pretty strong beat on 02:04:315 that you completely miss. Fixed
- 02:17:115 (3) - I would personally rotate this (either by 30 degrees or 180 degrees) so that there are more contasting angles between the sliders to pair with the 02:16:315 (1,2) pattern better. Fixed
- 02:27:115 (5,6,1) - The spacing emphasis here could be improved I think. The stronger beats are 5 and 1, however the current spacing implies that 6 is stronger out of the three. repeated the back and forth jumps used in the first chorus instead
- 02:29:115 (3,4) - Similar thing, but aesthetically you could probably leave it. leavin it there~
- 02:32:315 (3) - I think I would just keep this as a regular slider shape rather than make it fancy looking. The different shapes suit better after the next measure when the music changes. Fixed
- 03:09:915 (1) - You could probably get away with not needing to NC this. It feels like there's too many NCs happening here. Fixed
- 03:11:915 (1,2,3) - I would try to map this in a way so that the 1/3 is easier to read and react to, either by spacing these out even further or using sliders instead. Fixed
- 03:17:915 (2,1) - Covering up slider reverses in this manner is unrankable now. fuk, fixed
- 04:23:710 (4) - Drum sampleset thing. Fixed
- 04:27:510 (1) - It's probably a good idea to remake this so that the loop is a little clearer and so that the slider ticks aren't overlapping each other.made it perfectly overlap

[XV] wrote:

Please rank this map

1. 00:59:915 (2) - I feel like having the slider end on this note would be surprising to play because you map this sound with circles at 01:00:515 (3,4) - but the slider end covers that sound in the first point which could be confusing to play. I think if you move 2 to 00:59:515 - you'll have the room to place a circle at 01:00:315 - which I feel better represents the sound.
2. 02:03:515 (1) - I feel the spacing should be larger in comparison to 02:01:915 (1,2) - as it sounds like the Pink 1 has more emphasis, so having a smaller jump might feel underwhelming while playing.
3. 02:29:115 (3) - I think the rhythm would play more intuitively here if you map the sound at 02:29:915 - with a circle, as having the slider end on that sound makes the distance to 02:30:115 (4) - feel stronger when there's less emphasis in comparison to 02:28:715 (2,3) -
4. 03:12:048 (2,3) - I feel since this is the first occurrence of 1/3 streams, they might be hard to anticipate when playing. If you contrast the 1/3 from the 1/4 streams by placing NCs on these notes it's a better indication these streams are snapped differently than 1/4.
5. 03:18:715 (1) - Covering the reverse arrow might be difficult to read, as the only indication this is a reverse slider isn't visible immediately. The criteria doesn't like covered reverse arrows, so I feel an easy fix would be to arrange it in a way where the reverse isn't completely invisible like https://puu.sh/zcLTi/81849dd502.jpg
6. 03:21:915 (1,2) - 2 doesn't seem as loud as 1, so the jump to 2 plays a little too forced in my opinion. I feel placing a 1/2 slider here instead would better fit the rhythm, as you can cover those 2 sounds while still placing emphasis on 3. https://puu.sh/zcM68/8efcb9ee2d.jpg
7. 04:01:748 (2) - I think a circle would be better here because a kick slider was used back at 01:00:915 (5) - to compliment the click sound, which doesn't sound like it's here, which I feel could throw the player off.

Bubblun wrote:

nm from irc

I'm 99% sure 'for rank' is not the source xpp https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EA6AUFSPS4c the video from namirin's channel I was directed to after clicking the 'featured artists' section. Try to clarify metadata with someone who's familiar with this kind of stuff. Ex. Kurai oki xd
The unicode artist for the taiko and mania diffs are in English. Please copy the Japanese name from the std diff to the others.
You need hitsounds in your map. 00:24:497 - Up to here is understandable, but past this section the song drowns out the hitsoft, so it's less likely the player will receive audible feedback from hitting the notes.
Those tags are lol

Kaori

1. 00:59:915 (2) - I feel like having the slider end on this note would be surprising to play because you map this sound with circles at 01:00:515 (3,4) - but the slider end covers that sound in the first point which could be confusing to play. I think if you move 2 to 00:59:515 - you'll have the room to place a circle at 01:00:315 - which I feel better represents the sound. done
2. 02:03:515 (1) - I feel the spacing should be larger in comparison to 02:01:915 (1,2) - as it sounds like the Pink 1 has more emphasis, so having a smaller jump might feel underwhelming while playing. Fixed
3. 02:29:115 (3) - I think the rhythm would play more intuitively here if you map the sound at 02:29:915 - with a circle, as having the slider end on that sound makes the distance to 02:30:115 (4) - feel stronger when there's less emphasis in comparison to 02:28:715 (2,3) - done
4. 03:12:048 (2,3) - I feel since this is the first occurrence of 1/3 streams, they might be hard to anticipate when playing. If you contrast the 1/3 from the 1/4 streams by placing NCs on these notes it's a better indication these streams are snapped differently than 1/4. Fixed
5. 03:18:715 (1) - Covering the reverse arrow might be difficult to read, as the only indication this is a reverse slider isn't visible immediately. The criteria doesn't like covered reverse arrows, so I feel an easy fix would be to arrange it in a way where the reverse isn't completely invisible like https://puu.sh/zcLTi/81849dd502.jpg Fixed, i just arranged the pattern slightly so it doesn't cover the reverse completely.
6. 03:21:915 (1,2) - 2 doesn't seem as loud as 1, so the jump to 2 plays a little too forced in my opinion. I feel placing a 1/2 slider here instead would better fit the rhythm, as you can cover those 2 sounds while still placing emphasis on 3. https://puu.sh/zcM68/8efcb9ee2d.jpg me likey, changed to your suggestion :>
7. 04:01:748 (2) - I think a circle would be better here because a kick slider was used back at 01:00:915 (5) - to compliment the click sound, which doesn't sound like it's here, which I feel could throw the player off. i think it fits since its a pretty fast sound, and placing a circle would confuse the player since the gap between the circle placed and 04:01:910 (1) - isn't exactly 1/2.

I can't nominate hybrid sets as I'm not qualified to look at Mania and Taiko modes, so call me back after responding to my mod and having respective BNs give the 'okay' for the other diffs.
ok boss
gl dude xp

Tofu1222 wrote:

Oh my god this is one of my favorite Japanese song + namirin*

Awesome, if need help call me.

Shmiklak wrote:

hello random modding from #modreqs because im bored

[General]

1. I am not the original storyboarder of this beatmap, but seems that it was made for widescreen displays because some sprites have coordinates that are supposed to be visible on widescreen displays only. Contact storyboarders tho. will do
2. Epilepsy warning isn't that required here, because the sb doesn't have really much strobes, but still it would be useful. Ups to you. gonna leave it there
3. I actually cannot understand the diffnaming you used. Currently it's like STD has some Japanese (or w/e) word as its name, Taiko difficulty has name Taiko what is weird lmao, and Mania one is Marathon. I highly recommend to follow something one instead of doing random things like this. You can call all your difficulties Kaori, so it will be like Kaori, Volta's Kaori and Arcwin's Kaori, but I'd personally call them Hard, Muzukashii and HD. we'll discuss and see what to do about it xdxd
4. Mania difficulty is shorter than 5 minutes so it's unrankable. I amn't experienced in mania but I guess you could add a slider here 04:57:140 - or smth to make it the same length as other diffs will tell arc to add a LN at the end xd
5. Weird, but Volta actually has more contribution then the actual beatmap submitter. Volta has mapped 301440 ms while _Meep_ mapped only 300740 (700 ms difference). You may make change spinner length in one of the difficulties or just let Volta resubmit it, but it would be useless because you will have to repass the modding and hype process again. theres stuff like tags, hitsounds, metadata, many stuff that I done that he didn't need to, thus I am still able to own this mapset, map time isn't the only factor here.
6. Add all people who contributed in the beatmap to tags. As far as I see from your description you should add these guys: volta arcwinolivirus -_frontier_- comfywolf im dumb as fuck ok added
7. 00:19:553 - The offset of this point sounds off. I think smth around 19603 would be better settling with 19576
8. 00:25:915 - this point sounds off as well. 25925 would be better this one seems fine tho
   I'd recommend calling some experienced timer to time the map, because there are many parts where it seems to be awkward.

ok

[Kaori]

1. Don't you think that HP 4 is too low for such difficulty? I'd increase it to 6 put to 5
2. 04:33:915 - 04:53:140 - 04:55:040 - at these points Timing and Inheriting sections are conflicting. Unrankable thing Fixed
3. 04:27:510 (1) - this slider is unrankable because its movement isn't really logical. When I testplayed it, I thought it should be smth like this: https://puu.sh/zdEQw/211764a6d4.jpg while the actual movement is https://puu.sh/zdETh/61e3b11657.jpg My suggestion is doing smth like this https://puu.sh/zdEUW/7c2522e67e.jpg its just sliderart ;/ I dont think it's that hard to read at all, all the testplayers I've seen play this got this correct
4. 04:32:310 (1) - the slider end falls on the non actual sound. The actual sound is on 04:33:915 - Check [ur=https://paper.dropbox.com/doc/osu-Slider-Pixel-Length-Calculation-LPgRouhtjMEDvYVb8Lfgbl]this[/url] page to see how you may fix this its just 5ms off ._. I doubt anyone has or will ever notice this at all lol
5. 00:48:915 - you could emphasis vocals here too by putting a circle like you emphasized them everywhere else. 00:49:715 - Here the circle isn't really useful so I amn't suggesting to put it here, but you still may do this. I think that'll make the note density a bit too high for these very calm parts, which isn't what I had in mind when mapping this.
6. 01:14:315 (3) - overlap with HP bar. can we let this slide? owo
7. 01:18:715 - I'd suggest such rhythm here to emphasis the sounds and vocals better: https://puu.sh/zdFLf/5e7599fd4a.jpg nah, I don't want to overmap and add in extra notes wherever, also the this specific part in every chorus is increasing in note density according to which chorus it is.
   200iq
8. 01:25:115 - ignoring vocals while you emphasized them before isn't really good, try this https://puu.sh/zdFNU/4ea2f73acd.jpg I felt that the vocals weren't as prominent here, the finishes in the song were more powerful and impactful than the vocals since the vocals didn't exactly line up. vocal points like 01:25:715 - and 01:26:515 - don't feel powerful enough to be clickable to me, therefore i used the 3 sliders to emphasise the finishes in the song,
   
9. 02:01:715 - this vocal could be emphasized too note density in this area would be a bit too high(not talking just about if i add one note, will have to add it to other parts too) and wouldnt fit.
10. 02:30:115 (5,1) - the blanket could be polished. 03:17:915 (2,3) - this one too intended to make it unblanketed. for emphasis

Good polished difficulty, but the rhythm choice could be improved a lot. I personally would want to see more emphasized vocals instead of blind ignoring them. If you accepted my rhythm suggestions check out other parts of the map and do similar things with them because similar things repeat sometimes

[Mania]
I am not a mania mapper, modder and not even a player, so I'm just writing what Modding Assistant says:
00:00:350 (volume level) (hitsound set) (custom set number)
00:24:697 (volume level) (hitsound set)
00:41:915 (volume level) (hitsound set) (custom set number)
03:42:723 (volume level) (hitsound set) (custom set number)
03:55:148 (volume level) (hitsound set) (custom set number)
04:01:910 (volume level) (hitsound set) (custom set number)
04:33:915 (volume level) (hitsound set) (custom set number)
04:53:140 (volume level) (hitsound set) (custom set number)
04:55:040 (volume level) (hitsound set) (custom set number)

Overall a good mapset, the unrankable issues aren't as difficult for fixing so I guess it has all chances to be pushed forward by BNG members after getting some more work, I amn't sure about the other gamemodes though. Best of luck~

1. As far as I know, drain time is the most important thing because setting tags and other things isn't smth that can be called smth really hard, even I can make them for you, but it wouldn't be counted like I contributed in the map a lot that I deserve my nickname is tags. Dude, everything you need is just increase your spinner length, that's all.
2. I know that this is a slider art, but why cannot you just edit it a bit so it's more suitable for ranking criteria and wouldn't hurt anyone? You say that all testplayers didn't have issues with it, then amnt I a player too? I guess I am and I actually had some issues with it.
3. Ranking criteria tells us that every object must be snapped to the actual beats of the music, so the sliderend thing you have is actually unrankable. Even if you say no-one would notice it, there are some players who pay attention on that, for example me. I actually noticed it even without actual listening to the song closely
   

Shmiklak wrote:

1. As far as I know, drain time is the most important thing because setting tags and other things isn't smth that can be called smth really hard, even I can make them for you, but it wouldn't be counted like I contributed in the map a lot that I deserve my nickname is tags. Dude, everything you need is just increase your spinner length, that's all. fine fixed
2. I know that this is a slider art, but why cannot you just edit it a bit so it's more suitable for ranking criteria and wouldn't hurt anyone? You say that all testplayers didn't have issues with it, then amnt I a player too? I guess I am and I actually had some issues with it. as in, it's very readable,
   even the slider ticks would show you the way. Sliderart like this is common nowadays and I've asked some people after you raised the concern, none of them said it looks confusing
3. Ranking criteria tells us that every object must be snapped to the actual beats of the music, so the sliderend thing you have is actually unrankable. Even if you say no-one would notice it, there are some players who pay attention on that, for example me. I actually noticed it even without actual listening to the song closely well i changed it to 25929, its most probably decimal bpm from what I've seen but we'll see

[XV] wrote:

-NM-

Kaori

1. I tested it multiple times, and OD 7 would work just as fine. Fixed
2. Like someone else mentioned, I'm pretty sure it's half the bpm (75). eh fuck it lmao
3. 01:41:115 (1,1) - you should map the white ticks if you are following the bells, especially because you end it here 01:42:515 (1) - . Something like this. Instead I added notes on 01:43:515 - and 01:43:915 - to follow the violin better.
4. Try making this slider 01:57:115 (1) - follow the vocals using shapes. It is, the first one isn't following because it doesn't realy deserve a red anchor, i tried it before and it sucked.
5. While the concept here 02:33:915 (1,1,2,3,1) - it's super cool (slider following drums and vocals), I don't think it works, because of a few things.
   You still have drums on the background, loud enough and clear too. In fact, that whole section is pretty much the same as before in the kiai. Skipping vocals here 02:34:315 - and here 02:35:115 - and clear drum hits too, makes it very wierd to play. Not to mention how you closely follow vocals, yet here at the start of one sentence, you completely kill it, by making it the end of the slider 02:37:115 (1) - . Please, I implore you oh great _Meep_, to reconsider this section. Upon great consideration, I have decided to remap this small part cuz of u <3 tell me what u think of the new change, extended the kiai to fit the storyboard too
6. 02:51:915 (2,3,1,2,3) - Hell yeah, nailed it there. yeboi
7. 04:01:748 (2) - Ctrl + G ? ehhh, why not, sure
8. 04:17:510 (2,1) - Blanket maybe? nah, I think it's fine this way, it feels more natural imo
9. First of all, beautiful slider 04:27:510 (1) - but again, I question the usage of long sliders relying only on the strings for the sustained effect. I'd suggest something like this for rhythm. Hmm, I'll look for more opinions on this, but I think it's fine since its the last chorus + it gets really calm at that part.
10. 04:36:315 (1,2,1) - Man, thanks for these. They feel great to play. <3

1. 01:09:115 - idk about this 1.10x, man. it's a bit hard to play, especially when it is aimed for low level folks
2. 01:28:315 - unsnapped sv. and 1.10 to 70 is kind of ehh. also aren't you putting it wrong? you put this part slower than 01:34:715 - . imo the one that should have slower sv is the later one.
3. 02:00:315 - no speed up? there's a lot more going on here and you did that in 00:54:715 - .
4. 02:33:915 - I assume this is just an oversight? 0.7x in this part is just ridiculous imo
5. 02:40:315 - this part and 01:34:715 - aren't on the same level of intensity, therefore you shouldn't give them the same sv

1. 00:46:715 - Why is it a hand? This one 00:45:115 - isn't.
2. 01:13:915 (73915|3,73915|1) - Only piano here. Shouldn't it be a single instead?
3. 02:34:315 - Missed sound
4. 02:41:415 (161415|2,161415|3,161615|3,161615|1,161615|0) - what
5. 02:45:115 (165115|1,165315|2) - Both are also snare and kick.
6. 02:45:715 - No triple?
7. 03:01:715 - No triple? It's there in 03:04:915 -

neonat wrote:

Kaori

Your tags conflict as well as your uninhenrited timing points

00:03:472 (1) - this sounds too early, 3490 would be more on the music Made it 3500
00:13:091 (1) - too early, it's at 13102 changed to 13115
00:13:948 (2) - too early, it's at 13961 done
00:22:684 (1) - too early, 22695 changed to 22710
00:23:505 (2) - too early, 23524 changed to 23535
i just fucking retimed the whole map so yea good enough
00:30:329 (2,3) - don't overlap so much, at the very most, under 1 of the heads only:

SPOILER

or at least follow the rest of the psacing used elsewhere, this one is the odd one out Fixed
00:40:329 (3,4,5,6) - every spacing between each of them greatly differs, 00:40:929 (5,6) - should not be so much greater than 00:40:729 (4,5) - any increas in spacing between 00:40:729 (4,5) - looks underwhelming from 00:40:329 (3,4) - even though peak appears at 00:40:929 (5) - fixed the spacing for 00:41:523 (6) -
01:00:315 (2,3) - 01:00:715 (4,5) - why are the bigger spacings on these beats, 01:00:315 (2,3) are more connected to each other rather than differentiating from each other the first two is spaced because theres a change in pitch of the piano. The distance between 3 and 4 is lower because the piano goes slightly lower tune, therrefore lower spacing. 01:00:715 (4,5) - Even though this has a higher spacing, it's much easier to hit because its a mirror movement of 01:00:315 (2,3) - . Same with 01:00:915 (5,1) - , it's the same movement from 01:00:515 (3,4) - .
01:05:915 (1) - move it more to the left, the movement from 01:05:515 (4) - is really acute and there is no impact made for the change in tone in the music Fixed some stuffs to make there have impact in the notes
03:17:915 (2,1) - do you really need to overlap this way, this can easily be avoided Fixed
03:21:915 (1,2,3) - visual spacing looks really close yea, meant to be close, I think its fine
03:24:115 (2,3) - given how big this is, the lead in to the next phrase 03:24:915 (4,1) - is really weak Fixed
03:30:715 (3,4) - at the very least, 03:31:115 (4,1) - should be as much or greater in spacing than this changed to circles
03:32:315 (5,6) - why the jump in spacing here? And not at 03:32:915 (6,1) - Fixed
04:56:740 (1) - doesn't hit exactly with the current timing reduced it to 1 reveres and placed it 1 tick infront in 1/4.

Can really be polished much more, especially spacing-wise. many at times the small spacing leading to a new phrase or holds and new vocals hinders movement and emphasis more than it could be

Good Luck

Volta wrote:

Hello, i have an update for taiko diff since you changed the timing and some stuffs are messed: https://volta.s-ul.eu/zyAwpZGQ

Also You'll need to add some uninherited (red) timing points to other diffs for consistency with my taiko diff since they are necessary in taiko for omitting/showing the barlines. The points are at the following timestamps:
00:21:124 -
03:42:715 -
03:55:561 -
03:58:661 -
04:33:910 -
04:53:135 -
04:54:770 -

OR you may just copy my uninherited timing points from my updated diff (be aware of the hitsound, since i'm only using default normal).
Good luck~

Eraser wrote:

requested by Meep

1/2/3/4
Jump = 2 notes
Hand = 3 notes
Quad = 4 notes

[Arcwin's Marathon]
I think you should give a gradual increase/decrease to each sv change because it feels kind of clunky right now imo.

1. 01:09:115 - idk about this 1.10x, man. it's a bit hard to play, especially when it is aimed for low level folks
2. 01:28:315 - unsnapped sv. and 1.10 to 70 is kind of ehh. also aren't you putting it wrong? you put this part slower than 01:34:715 - . imo the one that should have slower sv is the later one.
3. 02:00:315 - no speed up? there's a lot more going on here and you did that in 00:54:715 - .
4. 02:33:915 - I assume this is just an oversight? 0.7x in this part is just ridiculous imo
5. 02:40:315 - this part and 01:34:715 - aren't on the same level of intensity, therefore you shouldn't give them the same sv
   
   The SVs are not intended as it was affected on STD's inherited / timing points. With that, I neutralized all the red points with proper inherited points instead. No more SVs.

Now for the actual map

SPOILER

1. 00:46:715 - Why is it a hand? This one 00:45:115 - isn't. added note on the missing one.
2. 01:13:915 (73915|3,73915|1) - Only piano here. Shouldn't it be a single instead? The piano sound is along with the bass guitar sound.
3. 02:34:315 - Missed sound added
4. 02:41:415 (161415|2,161415|3,161615|3,161615|1,161615|0) - what no selected notes, if you are talking about the doubles and chords as applied in the styles kick for double, snare for triple.
5. 02:45:115 (165115|1,165315|2) - Both are also snare and kick. added
6. 02:45:715 - No triple? added
7. 03:01:715 - No triple? It's there in 03:04:915 - the selected time line has no 1/4th sound or if there is, it is inaudible compared to the 4 sec mark.

[ ]

I guess that's it. I'm a bit bummed it isn't in v2 but nevermind eh

Btw to meep: 04:08:310 - Does the purple here represents some kind of a symbol? because imo it looks kind of terrible and unnatural
Also give mania its own hitnormal pls. It'd be cancerous to have it the same volume as standard. https://puu.sh/zeeTw/5d33d74e15.wav This is the one I used in my ranked mania map

good luck