Update All ~ Thanks Surono :3Surono wrote:
kqowdwkqokwqokqwokwqo krkrkrkr caw :(
hi
* https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C75ZWlZVsAMuOyM.jpg:large change bg with BIG r e s o l u t i o n pls, use this. ...ok
* HP setting seems hmmm, try it? 6 | 6 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 7 | 7 from Bitter Oni until Kantan, cause more to lower diff more high the hp and with length. Change it.
* OD of kantan is 3? please 4 as 6-5-4 concept OD ok.
>Akemi's Futsuu
00:38:185 - make slider until 00:39:094 - here? since kantan used it and density with muzu seems yeah. Change it. add Silder
ok just it.
forum
Hello, Happy World! - Sugar Song and Bitter Step [Taiko]
posted
Total Posts
119
Topic Starter
BanG Dream gg memes tho kwkwk
Topic Starter
ty surono <3Surono wrote:
BanG Dream gg memes tho kwkwk
Osu! needs More BanG Dream!
Hello! Nice to see people working on BanG Dream! songs. Specially Kokoro <3 I only have issues with your artist. In the game they use ハロ、ハッピワールド！ as seen in the game's song carousel:
Also if you check the official site: https://bang-dream.bushimo.jp/music/
Translation:
Hello, Happy World! - Sugar song and Bitter step (Lyrics / composition: Tomoya Tabuchi) its safe to ignore the parenthesis
I'd recommend adding these tags too:
Also if you check the official site: https://bang-dream.bushimo.jp/music/
Translation:
Hello, Happy World! - Sugar song and Bitter step (Lyrics / composition: Tomoya Tabuchi) its safe to ignore the parenthesis
I'd recommend adding these tags too:
Hello, Happy World! Tsurumaki Kokoro 弦巻 こころ Okusawa Misaki 奥沢美咲 Michelle 奥沢 美咲 Seta Kaoru 瀬田 薫 Matsubara Kanon 松原 花音 Kitazawa Hagumi 北沢 はぐみ Miku Itou 美来 伊藤 Kurosawa Tomoyo 黒沢 ともよ Tadokoro Azusa 田所 あずさ Toyota Moe 豊田 萌絵 Yoshida Yuri 有里 吉田
Topic Starter
-Nitrous wrote:
Hello! Nice to see people working on BanG Dream! songs. Specially Kokoro <3 I only have issues with your artist. In the game they use ハロ、ハッピワールド！ as seen in the game's song carousel:
Also if you check the official site: https://bang-dream.bushimo.jp/music/
Translation:
Hello, Happy World! - Sugar song and Bitter step (Lyrics / composition: Tomoya Tabuchi) its safe to ignore the parenthesis
I'd recommend adding these tags too:Hello, Happy World! Tsurumaki Kokoro 弦巻 こころ Okusawa Misaki 奥沢美咲 Michelle 奥沢 美咲 Seta Kaoru 瀬田 薫 Matsubara Kanon 松原 花音 Kitazawa Hagumi 北沢 はぐみ Miku Itou 美来 伊藤 Kurosawa Tomoyo 黒沢 ともよ Tadokoro Azusa 田所 あずさ Toyota Moe 豊田 萌絵 Yoshida Yuri 有里 吉田
yea.
I will change it now
Disqualified as requested by map creator to fix metadata issue stated as above.
Topic Starter
Nardoxyribonucleic wrote:
Disqualified as requested by map creator to fix metadata issue stated as above.
Source : BanG Dream! ガールズバンドパーティー！ -> バンドリ！ガールズバンドパーティ！
Title. Sugar Song and Bitter Step
ty Nardo. Change & Update.
" Hello, Metadata World! "
わ か り ま ｓ た , ssssssss .
edit:
unselected then selected icon again.
わ か り ま ｓ た , ssssssss .
edit:
unselected then selected icon again.
Topic Starter
re update : add tag BanG Dream!Surono wrote:
" Hello, Metadata World! "
わ か り ま ｓ た , ssssssss .
gomen nasai ;__;
The anime title is BanG Dream! and the game's title screen also uses BanG Dream! even the official game site uses BanG Dream!
BanG Dream! ガールズバンドパーティ！ is more appropriate as Google Play isn't really a good source of metadata.
BanG Dream! ガールズバンドパーティ！ is more appropriate as Google Play isn't really a good source of metadata.
The current metadata is correct.-Nitrous wrote:
The anime title is BanG Dream! and the game's title screen also uses BanG Dream! even the official game site uses BanG Dream!
BanG Dream! ガールズバンドパーティ！ is more appropriate as Google Play isn't really a good source of metadata.
from Official Game Site
That was too subjective then. That works.
Topic Starter
:3
also, for the record kwan said this to me before
glgl with requa!
glgl with requa!
hi
how many times did this metadata change
Topic Starter
ty (๑´̥̥̥>ω<̥̥̥`๑)Kin wrote:
hi
(๑´̥̥̥>ω<̥̥̥`๑)Naotoshi wrote:
how many times did this metadata change
(´°̥̥̥ω°̥̥̥｀)
Oh..! Gratzu~ toara san!
おめでとうございます></ GD呼んでいただき感謝です
Topic Starter
404 AccNotFound wrote:
Thank you everyone :3
@Charlotte : いや～こちらこそ感謝感謝ッ！
hello, a n i k i WORLD!
@Charlotte Hello! Why didn't you use 1/6 at 01:45:685 https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9002654 ? Just curious
The map is great btw ~
[]
potential timing issues (time stamps used from top diff)
The timing of some parts in the beginning sound a bit off to me. For example 00:07:504 (38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46) - . To me they sound like they should be 1/12 for some objects https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9003331 . Same here 00:03:867 (17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25) -
The map is great btw ~
[]
potential timing issues (time stamps used from top diff)
The timing of some parts in the beginning sound a bit off to me. For example 00:07:504 (38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46) - . To me they sound like they should be 1/12 for some objects https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9003331 . Same here 00:03:867 (17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25) -
your point is actually true. However, I'd say simplifying the song by using 1/4 seems better ; and more consistent with the next part. The melody is just offbeatKisses wrote:
@Charlotte Hello! Why didn't you use 1/6 at 01:45:685 https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9002654 ? Just curious
I know how charlotte is, he doesn't like to use big note at the end of stream, and if the sound is strong enough, he prefer to map it as finisher instead of stream \o
The map is great btw ~
[]
potential timing issues (time stamps used from top diff)
The timing of some parts in the beginning sound a bit off to me. For example 00:07:504 (38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46) - . To me they sound like they should be 1/12 for some objects https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9003331 . Same here 00:03:867 (17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25) -
01:45:685 - i think thats intentional to emphasize the cymbal than to making 1/6 pattern
then so the off guitar would be like, 00:03:905 -
at 1/12 snapping its well accurate but the currents pattern are simpler as for consistency overall map I think
let the Mapper or QAT check this, imo its optional but good to be decided.
then so the off guitar would be like, 00:03:905 -
at 1/12 snapping its well accurate but the currents pattern are simpler as for consistency overall map I think
let the Mapper or QAT check this, imo its optional but good to be decided.
Well I looked into it after my friend was telling me that the felt off to him whilst playing it (he was using DTHD). He said that the high OD made it noticeable.
I guess it's a case of finding out which is better for the majority of the players
I guess it's a case of finding out which is better for the majority of the players
Topic Starter
Kin wrote:
your point is actually true. However, I'd say simplifying the song by using 1/4 seems better ; and more consistent with the next part. The melody is just offbeatKisses wrote:
@Charlotte Hello! Why didn't you use 1/6 at 01:45:685 https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9002654 ? Just curious
I know how charlotte is, he doesn't like to use big note at the end of stream, and if the sound is strong enough, he prefer to map it as finisher instead of stream \o
The map is great btw ~
[]
potential timing issues (time stamps used from top diff)
The timing of some parts in the beginning sound a bit off to me. For example 00:07:504 (38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46) - . To me they sound like they should be 1/12 for some objects https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9003331 . Same here 00:03:867 (17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25) -
Surono wrote:
01:45:685 - i think thats intentional to emphasize the cymbal than to making 1/6 pattern
then so the off guitar would be like, 00:03:905 -
at 1/12 snapping its well accurate but the currents pattern are simpler as for consistency overall map I think
let the Mapper or QAT check this, imo its optional but good to be decided.
I agree with Kin exactly the same.
A. @Charlotte Hello! Why didn't you use 1/6 at 01:45:685 https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9002654 ? -> I agree with Kin. I think Charlotte will not change this.
B. The timing of some parts in the beginning sound a bit off to me. For example 00:07:504 (38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46) - . To me they sound like they should be 1/12 for some objects https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9003331 . Same here 00:03:867 (17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25) - -> : I think your opinion is correct. But rather than using 1/12 to fit the sound, I think that it arranged like this in balance with other Notes.
I don't think that I should change the mapset. But since this is my personal opinion, If QAT or Charlotte judges it should be changed, it will follow it ~
The friend you are talking about does not put out 100 at the place. This isn't the cause.Kisses wrote:
Well I looked into it after my friend was telling me that the felt off to him whilst playing it (he was using DTHD). He said that the high OD made it noticeable.
I guess it's a case of finding out which is better for the majority of the players
Summoned by Kin, I am here to hand out my opinion regarding the raised issues.
2. The current pattern constellation looks fine here as well. In fact, it is not very necessary to map the off-beat guitar as overall consistency and intuitiveness of patterns outweigh the irregularity. Generally speaking, unpredictable notes weaken flow while keeping the structure at 00:04:322 - 00:07:958 - 00:11:594 and 00:13:413 - similar could avoid that situation to happen, so I guess this is what Charlotte pursued.
1. Whether placing finish or 1/6 notes is freely up to mapper's choice. In this case, it is fine for Charlotte to emphasize the last note using 1/2 d K because of the strong percussion over there.Kisses wrote:
@Charlotte Hello! Why didn't you use 1/6 at 01:45:685 https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9002654 ? Just curious - (1)
[]
potential timing issues (time stamps used from top diff)
The timing of some parts in the beginning sound a bit off to me. For example 00:07:504 (38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46) - . To me they sound like they should be 1/12 for some objects https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9003331 . Same here 00:03:867 (17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25) - (2)
2. The current pattern constellation looks fine here as well. In fact, it is not very necessary to map the off-beat guitar as overall consistency and intuitiveness of patterns outweigh the irregularity. Generally speaking, unpredictable notes weaken flow while keeping the structure at 00:04:322 - 00:07:958 - 00:11:594 and 00:13:413 - similar could avoid that situation to happen, so I guess this is what Charlotte pursued.
I love how the points above get neglected lol :>
lol blame the time, I think nardo's post is statement so it doesnt look like as something points to change for the map. XD inb4 unranked intensifies *triggerd L I S H*