Morroni wrote:

Hi, a little mod how I can
[Easy]

1. 00:12:521 (3) - maybe delete it? sounds better no
2. 00:37:833 (3) - I don't know if it is good idea, but you can try to replace this with one circle or something similar for more interesting souind desuyone

[Normal]

1. 00:11:771 (6,7) - replace with slider? keep for now
2. 00:30:146 (6) - sounds better without it emphasize key sound
3. 01:48:146 (6) - ^
4. 02:00:146 (6) - ^

[Hard]

1. 00:00:896 (1,2,3,4,1,2) - maybe you can make this through more interesting patterns for eyes? hm... remove stack?? xD
2. 00:03:896 (1,2,3,4,1,2) - ^
3. 00:06:896 (1,2,3,4,1,2) - ^
4. 00:46:833 (3,4,1) - a bit hard to aim for semi-newbies, I think... this little jump to slider is more suitable for kiai-time llittle changed
5. 00:51:896 (1) - you can start this from a circle and then from spinner... too hearable place no

I can't mod Light Insane and Insane because I can't find something wrong there. You can just make them more readable (DS, overlaps and so on) I'll check
Very nice work, good luck!

Lami wrote:

diff name

light insane => insane
insane => custom diff name or etc // insaneより expert難易度に近いですかも
LightInsaneを削除したので、Insaneはこのままでいきますー

normal

00:27:333 (6) - このnoteをここで00:27:146 - 運んでください

hard

00:13:271 (2,4,1) - 00:14:958 (3,5,1,2) - 、etc.... unsnap
00:38:771 (1,2) - hardでは ３/４は読むのが大変かも知りません 確かに。。　でも少し保留で。
01:00:802 (5) - 01:12:802 (5) - overmapped、特にbeatがないので、敢えてnoteを使うのはよくないと思います
01:06:896 (1,2) - このよに急なjumpは避けてください。hardのjumpは基本的には問題ないですが、全体的にjumpみたいのがないので
特別な音がないばしょうでのjumpは不自然です。
01:07:083 (2) - ・・ ここに 01:07:271 - vocalもあるし、beatもあるので、１/１sliderを１/２rhythmで返してください。
01:14:021 (5,1) - blanket
01:38:396 - 強いbeatをskipするのはなんか変な感じがします
02:07:271 (2,3,4) - DSがビジュアルてきに一致しません。ここと比べれば...（02:20:958 (3,4) - ）


light Insane

00:19:646 (3,4,5) - 、00:21:521 (5,6) - 、00:43:458 (4,5) - 、00:49:458 (4,5) - 、01:17:958 (3,4) - ... etc
rhythm自体が理解できないのではないですが、insane diffにある同じpartと比べれば、insaneより もっと きついrhythmを 使っています。
light insaneが 下位難易度という点で、rhythmを 上位難易度よりsimpleにするのも考え見るほうもいいと思います。

00:12:333 - Rhythmの Gapが 長すぎると 感じるので、１/４sliderもいいとおもいます。
00:38:208 (6) - ほかのdiffでは ただのnoteだったのに...(特にhard diffより rhythmがないです。）
01:21:896 (1,2) - make smaller ds、insaneを参考して...（２）はよわいbeat、（３）はつよいbeat、dsも beatの強さを表現すろほうが
いいと思います。

Insane

00:06:521 - hitsoundがmusicと似合わないですね
00:14:021 (5,6) - (6)にあまり強い音がないので、ここでのjumpは気まずい感じdesu
00:30:521 (8) - 、02:00:521 (1) - 一致しないnc rule。
00:39:052 (2,3) - ・00:38:771 (1,2) - dsが 小さいので、３／４は読みづらいです
このsnareみたいな 音よりは（00:52:927 (5) - ）、このdrumがある この部分が 00:53:302 - 重要と思います。
01:05:771 (3,4) - ええ、this jump is too big
01:28:646 (3) - ctrl+g
01:44:771 (3,4) - same ＾
01:20:396 - だいたい、音楽がdrumで成っているので、mappingするほうがいいとおもいます。
01:24:427 (5) - 01:30:427 (5) - overmapped

personally think, would be better if you recheck how to use your rhythm usage. gl

osuskrub wrote:

Hello there!

[General]

the "cv" should be capitalized so it's "CV" no

[Easy]

00:41:396 (3,4) - i honestly think you should curve these a little more or just leaving them straight

00:48:896 (1,4) - i feel like these two should be somewhat similar, they might not be expressing same sound, but it doesn't look that great aesthetically

02:02:958 (5,1) - the entry to 5-1 could be better and more linear imo

keep

[Normal]

00:27:333 (6,1) - this looks realllly ugly, i would ctrl + > and fix ds

00:34:458 (2) - i would make this a 1/2 slider because you are missing the important sound on the white tick

00:36:896 (1,2,3) - this still kinda looks ugly imo, maybe move 3 around x:469 y:37 to make it have like a diagonal flow downwards, it looks better

01:41:208 (3,4) - i would just make 4 go along with the flow of 3

[Hard]

lemme start off with some ds errors

01:07:083 (2,3) -

01:07:646 (3,4) -

02:20:958 (3,4) -

onto the actual map

00:12:896 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5) - all of this is very confusing. you start off with drums then do the vocals and then back to drums? 00:14:396 - is an important beat i think you should map and overall the rhythm should be more clear

00:23:677 (2,3) - i'd probably just stack these on the end of 1 cause that's very irregularly spaced for a hard

00:33:802 - there's a note here

00:51:427 - and here

01:07:083 (2) - you seem to be mapping vocals here? but i think a reverse slider would work better

01:18:521 (5,6,7) - reverse slider because hard players aren't very good at playing somewhat awkward rhythm

01:37:271 (3,4) - this overlap would look a lot better if you curved 4 some more

02:03:802 - a note here

i'm not very good with light insanes so i'll just skip it

[Insane]

00:12:521 (2,3,1) - the flow here is very weird, i understand you are trying to do a different type of flow, but introducing it like this isn't very intuitive

00:14:583 (1,2,3) - i would try and make these as equal as you can

00:57:521 (5) - i was expecting this slider to be ctrl+g

01:44:677 (2) - overmapped?

02:10:083 (2,3) - this distance is WAYYYYYYYYY too far and it's at a very awkward angle, i'd reduce the distance and make the flow more comfy


good luck

Time Capsule wrote:

@Alveryn Please don't make something that actually just a piece of dot on paper become a novel. If it does really annoy you I suggest you to just leave (will really appreciate it tho lol). Peoples have their own prespective about stuff and yes, its not wrong to critized or even point out their mistake. but please keep in mind this sentence because it was so doesn't mean it was so . Restricted a map to not get check by others is just "meh". In simple way, if bn does point out again about CV or cv usage, he will prolly fix it immidiently. if NOT just let what it be. Thanks and have a good day

ps. this is not discussion forum, its mod one

Alveryn wrote:

Your sources (Designed, Bold-text, Green bad font) are mistakes in production/design, not OFFICIAL notations. -> https://auctions.c.yimg.jp/images.aucti ... s28489.jpg

Alveryn wrote:

My sources (Raw, plain-text, correct format, not-designed) are corrected and done in the right way without design limitations. Saying your fail-design "cv" is correct is false af. ->
http://www.yuzu-soft.com/ja/post/5692/% ... 83%AB.html (This part: https://puu.sh/vORDD/76a3ce3e7e.jpg which YOU sent? Like can't you see it?)

Alveryn wrote:

Even google search of song title shows 99% of the answers to have "CV" and not "cv", it's like writing "adhd" instead of "ADHD" it's nothing but mistake and poor english. https://www.google.co.jp/search?q=Masak ... itani+Hana)+-+Daisuki+Nanda&oq=Masaki+Gaillard+(cv%3A+Kiritani+Hana)+-+Daisuki+Nanda&aqs=chrome..69i57.1807j0j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

Alveryn wrote:

You can't take a design image text and use that as "proof" of being "official", you need the Raw text. Many thing are written differently when designed (Logo's for example) yet are written in a different way when shown in plain text.

Alveryn wrote:

BN please dont bubble until you have fixed this mistake

ALBUM INFORMATION
Original name: 「天色＊アイルノーツ」キャラクターソングVol.4 大好きなんだ
Artists: Masaki Gaillard (CV: Kiritani Hana), Shirley Warwick (CV: Kitami Rikka), Amagiri Yune (CV: Toyota Sera), Shiraga Airi (CV: Natsuno Koori)
Lyricist: Nakayama♥Mami (Angel Note)
Composer: Famishin (Yuzusoft)
Arranger: Shinohara Mizuki (Angel Note)
Release date: May 31, 2013
Catalog number: YSCD-0030
Publisher: Yuzusoft

AUDIO INFORMATION
Format: MPEG-1 Layer 3
Channels: 2
Sample rate: 44100 Hz
Compression level: MP3 LAME V0

BACKSIDE

http://www.yuzu-soft.com/ja/post/5692/%E7%9C%9F%E5%92%B2+%E3%82%AB%E3%82%99%E3%82%A4%E3%83%A4+%E3%83%AB.html

Image 1 and Image 2 (Sources: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XvclwsR ... .be&t=1m7s and https://auctions.c.yimg.jp/images.aucti ... s28489.jpg)

Asuka_ wrote:

but I can not judge that should use whitch by myself because there are official sites, not official websites, sites that I do not know whether it is official or not.

IamKwan wrote:

You also mentioned design mistake, how can you prove it? I mean, there are also some other songs which use small letters instead of big ones in their artists, like this one or this one. There is basically no way to verify and what you said is thus pretty much worthless.

IamKwan wrote:

Amazon and all the other third party retail sites (also the mp3 file, I supposed you downloaded them online? Fields are not even in Japanese?) are not official, so they have zero value on justifying usage of CV in the Artist. Shitty or not shitty is not the matter to judge the accuracy of metadata, correctness is the officality in this game, not based on the usual / common practice. What the official says has the highest priority.

IamKwan wrote:

Amazon and all the other third party retail sites (also the mp3 file, I supposed you downloaded them online? Fields are not even in Japanese?) are not official

IamKwan wrote:

Let me repeat again, the cover is definitely the only credible and official reference showing the current artist, all your justifications and what you linked are unfortunately untenable because none of them falls into the category of official references.

Since IamKwan and Asuka_ don't seem to understand what metadata is neither the meaning of the word "OFFICIAL", please some other BN/QAT to check out proofs and decide. They consider their frontside of CD cover to be official song information metadata, while I give retail info, official backside of the CD and the official ASL CD download metadata info, they are still somehow in denial.

Their proofs of official title being "cv": Frontside of Cover. And YouTube video stylized font. Image 1 and Image 2

My proofs of official title being "CV":
Retails selling the CD with metadata GIVEN BY YUZUSOFT. http://www.suruga-ya.jp/product/detail/302064229001
http://music-book.jp/music/Artist/870080/Album/aaa63au0
https://www.amazon.co.jp/%E5%A4%A9%E8%8 ... B06VT4CCDH
https://pc.dwango.jp/portals/album/2642 ... o=official
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_b0d77c7a0101a3d0.html
Official Amazon product (Album) with info that must have come from Yuzusoft https://www.amazon.co.jp/s/ref=ntt_srch ... ch-type=ss
Barcode/QR-code to buy the official album (Which redirects to retails selling it as CV:). 4560100333805
Scans of the fcking CD (Inside, frontside, backside, everyfcking thing). http://puu.sh/vPZQR/ee1172c75d.rar
BACKSIDE OF THE CD COVER WHICH IS USUALLY CORRECTED FROM STYLIZED FRONT-SIDE. https://i.ppy.sh/5c682d54e78932a96ee870 ... 312e6a7067

I wrote:

I understand that "CV" should be given priority in cases where both "CV" and "cv" are present.
In this case, I think that "CV" is probably correct.

Let's finish the discussion.

Alveryn wrote:

But the most convincing and real proof is the fact that I got the backside (you can even Barcode-scan it) and as I suspected IT HAS CV! Which disproves all your false accusations of "being on the cover means it's the official way to write" as we can see it's corrected here in the BACKSIDE

BACKSIDE

.

Alveryn wrote:

If you think retail site such as Amazon is "not official" why not use my other 3490312471941 sources I linked? For example, the Backside and Barcode?? Why are you mentioning only Amazon as if it's my only reference?

You are trying very hard to make my post as invalid as possible by ignoring all the important parts. And the fact that you are awaiting IamKwan who's just as much in denial as you, he will obviously say no, you guys don't care about the facts you just want me to be wrong.

Ephemeral wrote:

"CV" is the correct metadata given from Alveryn's assertions and associated proof via the backside barcode image. Though the front side denotes "cv", acronym use is traditionally purely in uppercase (ie: CV) and the official frontside image is either incorrect or uses "cv" as a stylistic choice.

In respect to the common nomenclature and official metadata, "CV" is plainly the right choice for this particular case and needs no further discussion from either party, though I would encourage both of you to be more civil in your discussions in the future, even if such things can be rather frustrating at times.

IamKwan wrote:

None of the songs here is the exact same song as 大好きなんだ? They are some other songs.
I have pretty much repeated many times that we have to stick with the exact alias for this exact song. I am also not against you on this matter but judging everything based on facts and rules.

Vol 3

Original name: 「天色＊アイルノーツ」キャラクターソングVol.3 アオゾラキャンバス
Artists: Shiraga Airi (CV: Natsuno Koori), Shirley Warwick (CV: Kitami Rikka), Amagiri Yune (CV: Toyota Sera), Masaki Gaillard (CV: Kiritani Hana)
Lyricist: kala (Angel Note)
Composer: Famishin (Yuzusoft)
Arranger: Inohara Satoru (Angel Note)
Release date: May 17, 2013
Catalog number: YSCD-0029
Publisher: Yuzusoft

Vol 2.

Original name: 「天色＊アイルノーツ」キャラクターソングVol.2 私だけの空
Artists: Amagiri Yune (CV: Toyota Sera), Shirley Warwick (CV: Kitami Rikka), Shiraga Airi (CV: Natsuno Koori), Masaki Gaillard (CV: Kiritani Hana)
Lyricist: Riryka (Angel Note)
Composer: Famishin (Yuzusoft)
Arranger: Shiranui Tsubasa (Angel Note)
Release date: April 19, 2013
Catalog number: YSCD-0028
Publisher: Yuzusoft

Backside with highlight for dummies

IamKwan wrote:

You can't prove neither the official frontside image being incorrect nor using "cv" as a stylistic choice

IamKwan wrote:

Amazon and other retail stores are not treated as official reference for a while because they have already given us so many incorrect metadata examples in recent years. When there are direct materials released from the official, why do we bother to follow those unofficial third party information outside? If you need examples, I can grab some for you.

Kanau wrote:

一つだけ思うところがあったので書かせて頂きます、正直割とどうでもいいと思う人もいるので無視でも構いません
01:53:958 (5,1) - 同じような配置/音取りをしている00:23:958 (5,1) - に比べSVが高く設定されているにもかかわらず十分なdistanceが確保できておらず、
カーソルの流れの延長線上にあるのも加えて1/2に誤認される可能性があると思いました。
この状態からさらにdistanceを広げるのは厳しいなので、流れを折って1/1スペースであると認識させやすくするために右下に01:54:333 (1) - を移動させる、
例えばこのような感じにするのはいかがですか？

SPOILER

[]
good mapです! 桐谷華好きなんで頑張ってください

osuskrub wrote:

could i get a proper response to my mod please?

Delis wrote:

[General]
sourceのromanised versionとして、Amairo Islenautsをtagsに入れておきましょう。
offset +5程、してもいいかもしれません。
normal-hitclap.wavは使われてないみたいです
[Insane]
個人的に、一プレイヤーとしては00:12:333 (1,2,3) - や00:24:333 (1,2,3) - 等のキックはSVがもう少し早い方が叩きやすいです汗更に言えば、各スライダーの置き方をもう少し、曲に合わせて変えてみるとか一工夫あるとより面白くなると思います。https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8595891 例えばここでは、00:12:521 - の裏の音が強いのに対し00:12:708 - は控えめなので、 前のスライダーの近めに置き、かつ次のパートがサビと思わせておとなしめの、SVも以前のパートと同じように控えめのAIM動作から導入した方が合うと思ったので3の向きを次のスライダーに合わせてます。それと、ここからのパートの配置が実際のサビとそう変わらないレベルのジャンプ配置になっているので、もう少し控えめに配置するべきだと思います。例えば00:13:646 (3,4,5) - のジャンプ等やろうと思えばいくらでも小さく出来、かつ曲調と合います。 http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8595932

前半のキック部分のみ1.0に設定しましたー イントロのjumpも狭てみましたが、こんな感じでokでしょうか？

00:23:958 - 3/4,或いは1/2等のスライダーからキックスライダーに導入させた方が曲と合うように感じました。自分だけかもしれません。01:53:958 (5) - ここも。
00:37:083 (2) - 流石にこのサークルはいらないのでは・・・？完全に曲内の無音な箇所にサークルを置いていて、かつここは1/1のgapが合った方が絶対に合う箇所、だと思います。配置に関しては、このサークルを消すだけで自然に合うかと思いますが改めて確認してみてください。02:07:083 (2) - 同じくです。因みにスタックさせるのがダブルタイムでプレイする際に一番やりやすいです！
01:24:146 (3,4) - 恐らく順番に、clap - 何もなし、whistle - whistleが一番合うんじゃないかなあ、と。
01:17:208 (1) - ここでfinishを付ける選択をするのであれば、01:00:896 (1) - や01:12:896 (1) - にもあるべきかと。
01:41:958 (3,1) - 少し離れすぎな気がｗ完全にスタックさせるまでにしないにしろ、もう少し近くて良いと思います。
01:59:958 (4,5) - 4から5へ、そしてそこから下にスライダーが流れるのが個人的に好きじゃないpatternなので一つ提案を。https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8596025 このように流れを重視して配置させた方がこの場合は良いんじゃないかな、と。なぜかと言うとサークルパターンならともかく、スライダーの場合向きにより大分流れの印象が変わり、ここで特別変わった流れ、配置をする必要は無い様に思えたので。
02:09:708 (7) - 必要以上に前後の配置と離れていて、曲と合ってない印象を受けました。適当に近づけて、90℃ほど回転させてみると02:09:896 (1) - とより合うかも・・？ https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8596056
02:14:583 (2) - ここでスライダーを挟んで02:13:458 (4,5,6,7,8) - のジャンプに一区切りをつけるのではなく、02:14:396 (1,2) - をより近づけてジャンプの流れを一旦休憩させた方がより綺麗なマッピングに仕上がると思います。https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8596066 (配置は若干ランダムです)
02:20:404 - 緑線ずれてます
02:21:333 (1,2,3) - よく曲を聞いてみると、02:21:333 (1,2) - はほとんど同じ音なのに対して02:21:708 (3) - だけ違いますね、なので3つまとめて一緒に見えるような配置にするのではなく、02:21:520 (2,3) - を CTRL+Gする、等で少し区切ったように見せる配置に変えてみると、なお曲に合うように出来ると思います。やってみてください。
余談ですが、AR9,OD8の方がpp的にも譜面の配置的にも合うかも？
[Hard]
DSを使用されていて、基本的に一定のspacingなのでAR7で十分かと思います。 7だと窮屈な配置が露わになるので7.5にしたいです～！でも7だと3-5-7-9とめっちゃ綺麗なspreadになるので、spread優先にすべきなら7に変更します。。ｗ
00:12:896 - Insaneと同じようにSVx0.8の方が合うのでは・・？
00:17:958 (3) - overlapさせない方が綺麗だと思います https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8596103
00:23:864 - の方が目立つ音なのに対し、00:23:677 - の方で音を取った理由がよくわかりませんでした。1/1スライダー後に1/4snapで3連打の音を取るのは、比較的難しめの音取りで若干タイミングが合わせづらく、あまり良いデザインになっているとは思えませんでした。サークル削除、そして 00:23:864 - に追加、もしくは1/2のリズムでも良いと思います。
00:24:333 (1) - 不必要なNCかな？
00:51:708 (6) - もう1個リバースを入れてからスライダーに入ったほうがスライダー終点にてシンバル音をfinishで拾えるのでいい感じになるかも。
しいて言うなら、この難易度はx1.3 dsベースの難易度であるに関わらず、1/2のサークルスタック等が最初以外に一切無く単調、と言ったようなマッピングに見えます。たぶんスローパート (01:18:896 - や00:12:896 -)に何個か増やしてみるともう少し見栄えが良くなると思います。
[Normal]
00:30:146 (6,7) - 恐らく00:28:646 (3) - と同じように、スライダーを代わりに使った方がボーカルをうまくカバーしてる感が出るんじゃないでしょうか？
00:54:521 - 一応normalと言う事で、ルール上は00:54:146 - から配置できるんですが、00:54:521 - にサークル置いてからスピナー後の配置をスタートさせた方が合うかもしれません、特にここには少し特殊な強い音があるので。
01:47:771 (5,6) - ボーカルメインの音取りからいきなり裏の音に変わるのは少し分かりづらいリズムかもしれません。サークル、1/1スライダー、といった音取りでボーカルを丁寧にフォローした方が叩きやすいでしょう。https://delisha.s-ul.eu/yUwtCbzJ
02:00:146 (6,7) - 00:30:146 (6,7) -と同じ理由でスライダーの方が良いと思います。
02:09:333 (2,3) - リズムが変です、ギターをちゃんとスライダーでカバーできていないので、02:09:333 (2) - のリバースを減らす、02:09:708 - に02:09:896 (3) - を持ってくる、02:10:271 - にサークル。のような音取りがいいのでは！
[Easy]
00:15:896 (1) - 少し曲がっているより、直線の方がきれいです。
00:32:958 (4,1) - このoverlapは少し初心者には難しいかも・・・。
01:21:146 (3) - 内側より、外側に流れるように配置したほうが叩きやすくなるかと、こんな感じ: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8596397
02:02:583 (4,5) - このような、直線のスライダーの直前でoverlapさせると少しだけやりづらさが増すので、Easyではあまりお勧めできない配置です。

My Angel Settia wrote:

Insane diff

00:10:083 (2,3,4) - 4 is louder than 2 and 3 but has the same spacing ok[/color]
00:14:208 (1,2,3,4) - 3 broke flow when there's nothing special there it's fine imo
00:25:646 (3,1) - doesnt look like a proper blanket little changed?
00:37:083 (2) - no sound, and the spacing is just as big as 00:37:833 (1,2,3) - these sound here ~ i delate 00:37:088 -
00:44:583 (2,3) - these 2 feel like they stand out cause of that spacing its fine??
00:53:396 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - why is the spacing getting smaller as the combo progresses? song doesnt really lower intensity, kinda stays the same
01:05:677 (2) - i dont think i hear a sound supporting this circle over map? no overmap...?
01:10:833 (5,6) - this spacing feels kinda big when not much changes its fine imo
01:17:677 (2) - i dont hear anything hear as well, over map? its fine
01:24:896 (1,2,3,4,5) - this kinda feels abit much for the calm part of song i had changed spacing of them
01:26:208 (1,2,3,4,5) - ^ ^
02:04:833 (1,2) - over lap these overlap....?
02:07:083 (2) - no sound here sound here~

02:07:833 (1,2,3) - feel like this should be more spaced than 02:06:896 (1,2,3,4) - this i had changed spacing.
02:20:958 (3) - add a NC here? the gap in the time line changed and actually caught me off guard when playing xd no need nc i think.

there was one certain reddish brown combo colour that was kinda hard to see with a low BG dim fine

Delis wrote:

言い忘れてましたが、前のmodにて適用したInsaneのhitsoundは他の難易度にも同様につけてください。01:24:146 (3,4) - や 01:00:896 (1) - 01:12:896 (1) -等。
02:20:401 - 緑線2個になってます (Insane)
02:21:338 (1,2,3) - clap - clap - finishの順番で付けた方が曲と合うかも？

-Normal-
00:30:151 (6) - スライダーエンドにclap
00:54:526 (1) - finish
01:47:776 (5) - clap, 01:47:963 (6) - スライダーの始まりと終わりどちらにもwhistle
02:00:151 (6) - スライダーの終わりにclap
02:09:338 (2) - whistle - clap
02:09:713 (3) - finish + whistle - whistle
02:10:276 (4) - clap


p/6132932 のmodに返信してもらえれば、泡つけます！

1. 00:12:713 (3) - looks kinda random and doesn't plays that nice, try https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8927470
2. 00:51:994 (1) - add some hs, whistle maybe? apply for every diff
3. 01:50:776 (2,4) - the overlap looks really bad, try a blanket maybe
4. 02:09:338 (4,5,6,7,1,2,3) - this rhythm is super questionable, specially because the triplet, try this: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8927538

1. 00:09:526 (4,1) - spacing is off because of the stack leniency
2. 00:25:838 (4,1) - it doesn't looks nice
3. 00:58:088 (2,3) - blanket is off
4. 01:08:026 (5,1) - same
5. 01:31:651 (3,4) -

1. OD and HP 4

1. hp 2 od 2

Natsu wrote:

Insane

1. 00:12:713 (3) - looks kinda random and doesn't plays that nice, try https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8927470
2. 00:51:994 (1) - add some hs, whistle maybe? apply for every diff
3. 01:50:776 (2,4) - the overlap looks really bad, try a blanket maybe
4. 02:09:338 (4,5,6,7,1,2,3) - this rhythm is super questionable, specially because the triplet, try this: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8927538
   changed kick slider part. but i want to keep 02:09:901 (1,2,3) - because i want to follow guiter sound such 02:13:182 (2,3) - and 02:15:338 (5,6,7) -

hard

1. 00:09:526 (4,1) - spacing is off because of the stack leniency
2. 00:25:838 (4,1) - it doesn't looks nice changed (but i leaved little overlap)
3. 00:58:088 (2,3) - blanket is off
4. 01:08:026 (5,1) - same
5. 01:31:651 (3,4) -

normal

1. OD and HP 4

easy

1. hp 2 od 2

send me a forum or in game pm when done