_DT3
_DT3 wrote:
Using this as a placeholder
Hope it's fine if I mod tmr because something came up suddenly
Ok here I am
My map is: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/508665
[ Decay]Since you said Insane is wip I'd skip that for now but you can let me mod that whenever it's done
Does that ^ look pretty? owo- 00:02:209 (4,1) - I can see that this was meant intentionally but it kinda annoys me that the piano on 00:02:409 (1) - sticks out from the other circles in the pattern (00:00:809 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - ) but it doesn't seem or feel like something is done to emphasize the note sticking out. I'd change the direction of the 1/2 circles (00:02:409 (1,2,3,4) - ) like you did here 00:03:009 (4,1) - but since it was probably intentional, I'd like to hear your reasoning for the way you mapped this rn. current patterning puts more emphasis visually (and a bit movement wise) on 1s already, which I think fits the piano well
- 01:15:209 (2) - ; 01:29:209 (1,1) - ; 01:24:409 (1) - 01:25:609 (1) - ; 02:42:409 (2) - 02:43:809 (2) - 02:44:409 (2) - Won't really affect anything (and sorry for being nazi) but in the editor these stacks looked kinda odd, so it would be nice if you could adjust those to look a bit neater tried to fix, but editor will probably break them agin
- 01:32:409 (1,2,3) - vs. 02:51:609 (1,2,3) - When I played this, the second one didn't feel just as impactful as the first one imo, while playing and visually as well since you can tell that the angle is much larger between objects in the first one but not with the second one. Maybe ctrl+g-ing the second one and moving it closer to 02:51:809 (2) - could work but it's up to you what you want to do here.I think both work fine and still emphasize/follow the same things, don't really see an issue
- 01:51:609 (3,1) - vs. 00:10:809 (3,1) - The second one is notably more spaced out and it seems to be intentional judging by how large the margin is. You might have had intentions with this but both of the timestamps have similar if not identical strength for the notes imo and sound similar (if not, the same). I~d reduce distance by at least a little bit if you want to keep the second timestamp spaced larger than the first one.
yeah 1:51 was a bit too much lol. reduced- 03:22:609 (1,2) - I'm not sure but by your usual patterning you would have the NC after the triple and not in the triple itself, 03:22:809 (2) - feels more 'worthy' of the NC as well so it could be switched imo would work, but strings start on 03:22:609 - so I nc there
I really like how you implemented the concepts and executed them ^^
Also, really sorry I couldn't find much in the map, it looked amazing, the map was really clean
GL!
thanks!
also renamed difficulties cause I think new names fit better
edit: expert is also done now