Thank you for modding!
xfraczynho wrote:hi~ my mod (as request), hope it can help a little, remember they're suggestions so feel free to deny everything you want to
00:00:790 (1,2) - I've listened like 10 times this part and I think you should ctrl+g them because first pitch is higher than second I feel that using K at the first will make a strange flow because the first sound is strong. -> 00:01:617 (2) - changed to D
00:02:858 (4) - what about don? makes a good emphasis on next note and new section changed
00:29:755 (15) - try a don here and 00:31:823 (17) - kat here, sounds great for section change I have applied former
and keep latter because sound is diffrent from 00:32:237 - .
00:57:065 (6) - maybe you could delete this and give a little break for that part. I think it's already good but I don't feel any hard sound for a kat here 00:55:410 - deleted
not any other comment, really good
same first two comments than Kantan. changed like same
00:02:858 (5) - this one sounds better at D because it makes a great 'low' sound through this part changed
00:07:824 (13) - try kat here, sounds similar as 00:08:238 (14) - changed
00:28:927 (27) - I think this deserves a D since it's almost the same pitch as 00:30:583 (31,32) - I think not necessary since sound is not strong.
01:21:064 - I think here using d d k d k sounds better than triple kat considering it's increasing changed
Really good too!
well the same comment; here is strange, you're using both dons... maybe use 00:00:790 (1) - K here? It's same reason as Kantan.
00:03:479 - why that break on the following vocal? It for difficulty spread.
not any other comment, flows really well for me
same xD same
00:30:583 (66,67) - on every diffs you're using K K here... why D D on this? I think K K sounds better Just before of this notes is k, so I think putting here D can emphasize sound.
01:13:513 (129,130) - try ctrl+g here, sounds better I think this note matched back sound.
It's really fine for me hope to see it ranked soon and star ~
404 AccNotFound wrote:hi~
thanks for accepting m4m xD
noob at modding, and include personal feeling, so roughly refer my opinion.
If my modding affect your style, feel free to ignore
[ Kantan ]
00:09:065 (10,11,12,13,14) - little awkward to me, tabun boku ga kantan diff no tsukurikata wo yoku wakaranaikara to omoundesu. tabun daijoubu
00:50:858 (9,10,11) - dkd? not enough flat sound that use ddd imo. changed
01:10:720 (25,26,27,28,29,30) - same 00:09:065. same
[ Futsuu ]
00:19:203 (19) - k. ddkdk seems little difficult in futsuu, even 1/2. I think it's no problem since bpm is not high.
00:41:756 (24,26) - finish? 1/3 no kawari ni. I keep to emphasize 00:44:238 (1) -
01:13:203 (52) - delete? even muzukashii don't have circle in here. I want to make simpler rhythm than Muzukashii like Kantan.
01:22:719 (21,23) - same 00:41:756. same
[ Muzukashii ]
00:39:066 (21) - k, so same with 00:39:273 (22,23,24,25) , focusing balanced staccato. It is focusing on diversity.
01:08:858 (72) - delete? so pursue more new start kanji that started from 01:09:065 (73). deleted and added d at 01:08:444 - .
[ Oni ]
00:00:790 (1) - K. because you used D at 00:01:617 (6). here is more high pitch and summative sound is same against 00:01:617 (6) imo. I'd like to focus on sound intensity than pitch.
00:14:237 (8,9,10,11) - dk kk? fit vocal pitch. I keep it in order to make pattern that easy to play.
00:15:893 (19,20) - kk? melody is going down from 'sol' to 'fa#', and 00:15:893 (19) here no strong sound like drum bass. keep(same reason as ^)
00:16:928 (27) -
um....k? even never don't fit in sound.I feel it is similar to 00:13:203 - .
00:17:962 (34,35,36,37) - same 00:14:237. same
01:00:996 - add circle to catch beat little more easily. I don't think that's necessary because it's an upsurge of the song.
01:02:444 (56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64) - for more fit with vocal imo, https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8160024. I keep it in order to fit drum.
01:25:202 (66,1) - fusion? no new started sound at 01:25:408. same all diff. I want to emphasize starting point of vocal.
so when rank :thinking:
00:21:272 (5,12) - I'd suggest putting these notes on the following blue tick, and deleting 00:22:100 (8) - . It will fit better with the vocals and not be too hard. (If you do this maybe put this one as a kat 00:22:307 (8) - ) I want to suppress 3/4 in order to not to be difficult in here.
00:39:894 (25) - This note feels a bit ff in the muzu, deleting it will be better, also considering that you didnt put one at 00:41:549 - . deleted
00:49:824 (25) - Delete this one ? There is no note at 00:48:996 - so it feels weird to hear. deleted
In the kiai : Avoid using 2 triplets in the same pattern like 00:57:065 (14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22) - , or 01:01:410 (35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45) - if you want to keep the pattern, kill one of the triplets. deleted some notes
00:41:032 - Maybe add a kat here to emphasize a bit the measure I didn't think need to emphasize it
00:41:549 (43) - Putting this as a kat could help reading a bit and flow better changed
01:03:272 (61,62,63,64,65,66,67) - What about ? It will flow and emphasize better. It's matching drums as well as vocals
01:19:512 (29) - I think you can remove this note for a little break, there is a lot of 1/4 in this part and this note isn't really necessary deleted
call me back ~
00:10:100 - You could add a d here since there is also a vocal and it would stay consistent with the other doublets. I think it's monotonous because doublets will too continuous.
01:04:100 - 01:05:755 - Mmm... how about making these 2 triplets different from each other since the vocals sound different too changed the latter triplet to dkd, and 01:06:479 (83,84) - changed to dk in order to make different color scheme from 01:05:755 (78,79,80) -
00:21:272 - I would try moving this to 00:21:376 - to emphasize the vocal better I want to avoid using 3/4 in this part.
00:21:686 - k instead to emphasize the pitch change on 00:21:893 - ? changed
00:22:928 - Same as earlier, move to 00:23:031 - to emphasize the vocal better? I keep it because of same reason.
01:02:238 - Maybe make this a ddd triplet since there is a vocal on 01:02:341 - which isn't there for the other patterns added
01:10:617 - Idk... I don't really see any reason for the doublets to be here since there is no strong sound on the blue tick, maybe move these notes to 01:10:410 - etc. to emphasize the vocals? moved
00:52:513 (23,24,25,26) - I would change this to D D K K to be consistent with 00:02:445 (4,5,6,7) - changed
00:10:307 - You could add a d to emphasize the rise in intensity in the vocals added
00:21:065 - Idk... I would just delete this note for a small break and a better transition into the next part tbh deleted
00:26:444 - ^Same deleted
01:04:100 - The vocals here get more intense but the map gets calmer... maybe shift the triplets a bit to emphasize the vocals in this part a bit more? I keep it to show the changing of flow and in order to unify 01:04:100 (17,18) - and 01:05:755 (19,20) - as well.
You can poke me for heart~
Thanks a lot!
XYousoro wrote:Took long enough for me to try modding again
00:02:445 (6,7,8,9,10,11) - Something like this will do to emphasize "a e i u e o ao!"
putted same pattern as oni
00:09:893 (29,30,31,32,33,34,35) - The dk patterns in 00:10:721 (33,34,35,36) may be hard to read, maybe just leave out the dons
changed dk to kk and 00:10:514 - changed to d
00:52:513 (36,37,38,39,40,41) - That pattern may be a bit hard to read so I'm suggesting the same pattern shown in the top image
I keep it to show the percussion difference from top image part
00:57:272 (15) - Remove this if possible deleted
01:04:100 (47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54) - Swap 01:04:513 (50) into a kat, 01:04:720 (51,52,53) into triplet dons, and insert another don in 01:05:134
I didn't swap it in order to show the difference of vocal from 01:05:755 (56,57,58,59,60,61,62) - . Also,I want to make many 1/1s since 1/4s are many a little.
01:05:341 (54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65) - Something like this might do the trick
I keep it because of same reason.
I'm looking forward to seeing the entire mapset become ranked