Gekidan Hitotose - a e i u e o ao!! [Taiko]

posted
Total Posts
48
show more
404 AccNotFound
☆ミ
Topic Starter
_yu68
blue=change
red

xfraczynho wrote:

hi~ my mod (as request), hope it can help a little, remember they're suggestions so feel free to deny everything you want to :P

[Kantan]
00:00:790 (1,2) - I've listened like 10 times this part and I think you should ctrl+g them because first pitch is higher than second :arrow:I feel that using K at the first will make a strange flow because the first sound is strong. -> 00:01:617 (2) - changed to D
00:02:858 (4) - what about don? makes a good emphasis on next note and new section :P:arrow:changed
00:29:755 (15) - try a don here and 00:31:823 (17) - kat here, sounds great for section change :arrow:I have applied former
and keep latter because sound is diffrent from 00:32:237 - .
00:57:065 (6) - maybe you could delete this and give a little break for that part. I think it's already good but I don't feel any hard sound for a kat here :arrow: 00:55:410 - deleted
not any other comment, really good :D

[Futsuu]
same first two comments than Kantan. :arrow:changed like same
00:02:858 (5) - this one sounds better at D because it makes a great 'low' sound through this part :arrow:changed
00:07:824 (13) - try kat here, sounds similar as 00:08:238 (14) - :arrow:changed
00:28:927 (27) - I think this deserves a D since it's almost the same pitch as 00:30:583 (31,32) - :arrow:I think not necessary since sound is not strong.
01:21:064 - I think here using d d k d k sounds better than triple kat considering it's increasing :arrow:changed
Really good too!

[Muzukashii]
well the same comment; here is strange, you're using both dons... maybe use 00:00:790 (1) - K here? :arrow:It's same reason as Kantan.
00:03:479 - why that break on the following vocal? :arrow:It for difficulty spread.
not any other comment, flows really well for me :D

[Oni]
same xD :arrow:same
00:30:583 (66,67) - on every diffs you're using K K here... why D D on this? I think K K sounds better :arrow:Just before of this notes is k, so I think putting here D can emphasize sound.
01:13:513 (129,130) - try ctrl+g here, sounds better :P:arrow:I think this note matched back sound.
nothing more


It's really fine for me :D hope to see it ranked soon and star ~
Thank you for modding!
Topic Starter
_yu68

404 AccNotFound wrote:

☆ミ
Thanks <3
404 AccNotFound
hi~
thanks for accepting m4m xD
noob at modding, and include personal feeling, so roughly refer my opinion.
If my modding affect your style, feel free to ignore :)


[ Kantan ]

00:09:065 (10,11,12,13,14) - little awkward to me, tabun boku ga kantan diff no tsukurikata wo yoku wakaranaikara to omoundesu.

00:50:858 (9,10,11) - dkd? not enough flat sound that use ddd imo.

01:10:720 (25,26,27,28,29,30) - same 00:09:065.


[ Futsuu ]

00:19:203 (19) - k. ddkdk seems little difficult in futsuu, even 1/2.

00:41:756 (24,26) - finish? 1/3 no kawari ni.

01:13:203 (52) - delete? even muzukashii don't have circle in here.

01:22:719 (21,23) - same 00:41:756.


[ Muzukashii ]

00:39:066 (21) - k, so same with 00:39:273 (22,23,24,25) , focusing balanced staccato.

01:08:858 (72) - delete? so pursue more new start kanji that started from 01:09:065 (73).


[ Oni ]

00:00:790 (1) - K. because you used D at 00:01:617 (6). here is more high pitch and summative sound is same against 00:01:617 (6) imo.

00:14:237 (8,9,10,11) - dk kk? fit vocal pitch.

00:15:893 (19,20) - kk? melody is going down from 'sol' to 'fa#', and 00:15:893 (19) here no strong sound like drum bass.

00:16:928 (27) - um....k? even never don't fit in sound.

00:17:962 (34,35,36,37) - same 00:14:237.

01:00:996 - add circle to catch beat little more easily.

01:02:444 (56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64) - for more fit with vocal imo, https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8160024.

01:25:202 (66,1) - fusion? no new started sound at 01:25:408. same all diff.



so when rank :thinking:
Topic Starter
_yu68
blue=change
red=keep

404 AccNotFound wrote:

hi~
thanks for accepting m4m xD
noob at modding, and include personal feeling, so roughly refer my opinion.
If my modding affect your style, feel free to ignore :)


[ Kantan ]

00:09:065 (10,11,12,13,14) - little awkward to me, tabun boku ga kantan diff no tsukurikata wo yoku wakaranaikara to omoundesu. :arrow:tabun daijoubu

00:50:858 (9,10,11) - dkd? not enough flat sound that use ddd imo. :arrow:changed

01:10:720 (25,26,27,28,29,30) - same 00:09:065. :arrow:same


[ Futsuu ]

00:19:203 (19) - k. ddkdk seems little difficult in futsuu, even 1/2. :arrow:I think it's no problem since bpm is not high.

00:41:756 (24,26) - finish? 1/3 no kawari ni. :arrow:I keep to emphasize 00:44:238 (1) -

01:13:203 (52) - delete? even muzukashii don't have circle in here. :arrow:I want to make simpler rhythm than Muzukashii like Kantan.

01:22:719 (21,23) - same 00:41:756. :arrow:same


[ Muzukashii ]

00:39:066 (21) - k, so same with 00:39:273 (22,23,24,25) , focusing balanced staccato. :arrow:It is focusing on diversity.

01:08:858 (72) - delete? so pursue more new start kanji that started from 01:09:065 (73). :arrow:deleted and added d at 01:08:444 - .


[ Oni ]

00:00:790 (1) - K. because you used D at 00:01:617 (6). here is more high pitch and summative sound is same against 00:01:617 (6) imo. :arrow:I'd like to focus on sound intensity than pitch.

00:14:237 (8,9,10,11) - dk kk? fit vocal pitch. :arrow:I keep it in order to make pattern that easy to play.

00:15:893 (19,20) - kk? melody is going down from 'sol' to 'fa#', and 00:15:893 (19) here no strong sound like drum bass. :arrow:keep(same reason as ^)

00:16:928 (27) - um....k? even never don't fit in sound. :arrow:I feel it is similar to 00:13:203 - .

00:17:962 (34,35,36,37) - same 00:14:237. :arrow:same

01:00:996 - add circle to catch beat little more easily. :arrow:I don't think that's necessary because it's an upsurge of the song.

01:02:444 (56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64) - for more fit with vocal imo, https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8160024. :arrow:I keep it in order to fit drum.

01:25:202 (66,1) - fusion? no new started sound at 01:25:408. same all diff. :arrow:I want to emphasize starting point of vocal.



so when rank :thinking:
Thanks~!
Arrival
:)

[Muzukashii]

00:21:272 (5,12) - I'd suggest putting these notes on the following blue tick, and deleting 00:22:100 (8) - . It will fit better with the vocals and not be too hard. (If you do this maybe put this one as a kat 00:22:307 (8) - )

00:39:894 (25) - This note feels a bit ff in the muzu, deleting it will be better, also considering that you didnt put one at 00:41:549 - .

00:49:824 (25) - Delete this one ? There is no note at 00:48:996 - so it feels weird to hear.

In the kiai : Avoid using 2 triplets in the same pattern like 00:57:065 (14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22) - , or 01:01:410 (35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45) - if you want to keep the pattern, kill one of the triplets.

[Oni]

00:41:032 - Maybe add a kat here to emphasize a bit the measure

00:41:549 (43) - Putting this as a kat could help reading a bit and flow better

01:03:272 (61,62,63,64,65,66,67) - What about ? It will flow and emphasize better.

01:19:512 (29) - I think you can remove this note for a little break, there is a lot of 1/4 in this part and this note isn't really necessary

call me back ~
Topic Starter
_yu68
blue=change
red=keep

Arrival wrote:

:)

[Muzukashii]

00:21:272 (5,12) - I'd suggest putting these notes on the following blue tick, and deleting 00:22:100 (8) - . It will fit better with the vocals and not be too hard. (If you do this maybe put this one as a kat 00:22:307 (8) - ) :arrow:I want to suppress 3/4 in order to not to be difficult in here.


00:39:894 (25) - This note feels a bit ff in the muzu, deleting it will be better, also considering that you didnt put one at 00:41:549 - . :arrow:deleted

00:49:824 (25) - Delete this one ? There is no note at 00:48:996 - so it feels weird to hear. :arrow:deleted

In the kiai : Avoid using 2 triplets in the same pattern like 00:57:065 (14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22) - , or 01:01:410 (35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45) - if you want to keep the pattern, kill one of the triplets. :arrow:deleted some notes

[Oni]

00:41:032 - Maybe add a kat here to emphasize a bit the measure :arrow:I didn't think need to emphasize it

00:41:549 (43) - Putting this as a kat could help reading a bit and flow better :arrow:changed

01:03:272 (61,62,63,64,65,66,67) - What about ? It will flow and emphasize better. :arrow:It's matching drums as well as vocals

01:19:512 (29) - I think you can remove this note for a little break, there is a lot of 1/4 in this part and this note isn't really necessary :arrow:deleted

call me back ~
Thank you! :)
Arrival
aeiueoao !
Topic Starter
_yu68

Arrival wrote:

aeiueoao !
Thanks!
Monstrata
Oni

00:10:100 - You could add a d here since there is also a vocal and it would stay consistent with the other doublets.
01:04:100 - 01:05:755 - Mmm... how about making these 2 triplets different from each other since the vocals sound different too

Muzukashii

00:21:272 - I would try moving this to 00:21:376 - to emphasize the vocal better
00:21:686 - k instead to emphasize the pitch change on 00:21:893 - ?
00:22:928 - Same as earlier, move to 00:23:031 - to emphasize the vocal better?
01:02:238 - Maybe make this a ddd triplet since there is a vocal on 01:02:341 - which isn't there for the other patterns
01:10:617 - Idk... I don't really see any reason for the doublets to be here since there is no strong sound on the blue tick, maybe move these notes to 01:10:410 - etc. to emphasize the vocals?

Futsuu

00:52:513 (23,24,25,26) - I would change this to D D K K to be consistent with 00:02:445 (4,5,6,7) -

Kantan

00:10:307 - You could add a d to emphasize the rise in intensity in the vocals
00:21:065 - Idk... I would just delete this note for a small break and a better transition into the next part tbh
00:26:444 - ^Same
01:04:100 - The vocals here get more intense but the map gets calmer... maybe shift the triplets a bit to emphasize the vocals in this part a bit more?

[]

You can poke me for heart~
XYousoro
Took long enough for me to try modding again


Muzukashii

00:02:445 (6,7,8,9,10,11) - Something like this will do to emphasize "a e i u e o ao!"

00:09:893 (29,30,31,32,33,34,35) - The dk patterns in 00:10:721 (33,34,35,36) may be hard to read, maybe just leave out the dons

00:52:513 (36,37,38,39,40,41) - That pattern may be a bit hard to read so I'm suggesting the same pattern shown in the top image

00:57:272 (15) - Remove this if possible

01:04:100 (47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54) - Swap 01:04:513 (50) into a kat, 01:04:720 (51,52,53) into triplet dons, and insert another don in 01:05:134

01:05:341 (54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65) - Something like this might do the trick

I'm looking forward to seeing the entire mapset become ranked
Topic Starter
_yu68
blue=change
red=keep

Monstrata wrote:

Oni

00:10:100 - You could add a d here since there is also a vocal and it would stay consistent with the other doublets. :arrow:I think it's monotonous because doublets will too continuous.
01:04:100 - 01:05:755 - Mmm... how about making these 2 triplets different from each other since the vocals sound different too :arrow:changed the latter triplet to dkd, and 01:06:479 (83,84) - changed to dk in order to make different color scheme from 01:05:755 (78,79,80) -

Muzukashii

00:21:272 - I would try moving this to 00:21:376 - to emphasize the vocal better :arrow:I want to avoid using 3/4 in this part.
00:21:686 - k instead to emphasize the pitch change on 00:21:893 - ? :arrow:changed
00:22:928 - Same as earlier, move to 00:23:031 - to emphasize the vocal better? :arrow:I keep it because of same reason.
01:02:238 - Maybe make this a ddd triplet since there is a vocal on 01:02:341 - which isn't there for the other patterns :arrow:added
01:10:617 - Idk... I don't really see any reason for the doublets to be here since there is no strong sound on the blue tick, maybe move these notes to 01:10:410 - etc. to emphasize the vocals? :arrow:moved

Futsuu

00:52:513 (23,24,25,26) - I would change this to D D K K to be consistent with 00:02:445 (4,5,6,7) - :arrow:changed

Kantan

00:10:307 - You could add a d to emphasize the rise in intensity in the vocals :arrow:added
00:21:065 - Idk... I would just delete this note for a small break and a better transition into the next part tbh :arrow:deleted
00:26:444 - ^Same :arrow:deleted
01:04:100 - The vocals here get more intense but the map gets calmer... maybe shift the triplets a bit to emphasize the vocals in this part a bit more? :arrow:I keep it to show the changing of flow and in order to unify 01:04:100 (17,18) - and 01:05:755 (19,20) - as well.

[]

You can poke me for heart~

XYousoro wrote:

Took long enough for me to try modding again


Muzukashii

00:02:445 (6,7,8,9,10,11) - Something like this will do to emphasize "a e i u e o ao!"
:arrow:putted same pattern as oni

00:09:893 (29,30,31,32,33,34,35) - The dk patterns in 00:10:721 (33,34,35,36) may be hard to read, maybe just leave out the dons
:arrow:changed dk to kk and 00:10:514 - changed to d

00:52:513 (36,37,38,39,40,41) - That pattern may be a bit hard to read so I'm suggesting the same pattern shown in the top image
:arrow:I keep it to show the percussion difference from top image part

00:57:272 (15) - Remove this if possible :arrow:deleted

01:04:100 (47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54) - Swap 01:04:513 (50) into a kat, 01:04:720 (51,52,53) into triplet dons, and insert another don in 01:05:134
:arrow:I didn't swap it in order to show the difference of vocal from 01:05:755 (56,57,58,59,60,61,62) - . Also,I want to make many 1/1s since 1/4s are many a little.

01:05:341 (54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65) - Something like this might do the trick
:arrow:I keep it because of same reason.

I'm looking forward to seeing the entire mapset become ranked
Thanks a lot!
Monstrata
Doublechecked metadata. Looks good. Qualified ^^
Surono
gratz yumuya
Stefan
mfw I wanted to check the mapset today. but whatever, congrats!
Topic Starter
_yu68
Thanks for all <3
yuzu__rinrin
まゆきのーと
gratz :3
zigizigiefe
Congratz yumuya :3
toara_fict
gz~
Topic Starter
_yu68
Thank you ありがとうございます :3 !
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply